Connect with us

Published

on

The logo of OpenAI is shown on a mobile phone in front of a computer screen displaying the photographs of Sam Altman, left, and Elon Musk, March 14, 2024.

Muhammed Selim Korkutata | Anadolu | Getty Images

OpenAI on Friday clapped back against Elon Musk, one of its co-founders, after the billionaire’s request last month for a federal court to stop the ChatGPT-maker from converting to a fully for-profit business.

In a blog post titled “Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit,” the startup alleged that in 2017, Musk “not only wanted, but actually created, a for-profit” to serve as the company’s proposed new structure.

“When he didn’t get majority equity and full control, he walked away and told us we would fail,” OpenAI wrote in the blog post. “Now that OpenAI is the leading AI research lab and Elon runs a competing AI company, he’s asking the court to stop us from effectively pursuing our mission.”

Musk and xAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Since Musk announced the debut of xAI, his OpenAI competitor, in July 2023, the startup has released its Grok chatbot and is raising up to $6 billion at a $50 billion valuation, in part to buy 100,000 Nvidia chips, CNBC reported last month.

Musk was questioning OpenAI’s nonprofit model from day one, a member of OpenAI’s legal team told CNBC.

OpenAI’s “structure doesn’t seem optimal,” Musk wrote in a November 2015 email to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, according to screenshots shared in the blog post. He added that receiving a “salary from the nonprofit muddies the alignment of incentives,” and that it’s “probably better to have a standard C corp with a parallel nonprofit.”

In a text conversation with former board member Shivon Zilis, OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman wrote that a conversation he had with Musk “turned into talking about structure” and that Musk “said non-profit was def the right one early on, may not be the right one now,” according to blog screenshots.

Musk forwarded an article about China’s strategy for AI research facilities to Brockman and fellow OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever. Musk wrote that China “will do whatever it takes to obtain what we develop. Maybe another reason to change course,” per the blog post.

Brockman agreed, and he wrote that starting in 2018, OpenAI’s path would need to be a “Al research + hardware for-profit,” according to the blog post. Musk wrote back, “Let’s talk Sat or Sun. I have a tentative game plan that l’d like to run by you.”

Altman, Brockman, Musk and others negotiated terms for the planned OpenAI for-profit in the fall of 2017, but the talks fell apart due to disagreements about equity, control and who would be CEO, according to the blog. Musk initially proposed that he should “unequivocally have initial control of the company” but said “this will change quickly” when the board has 12 to 16 members, per screenshots.

Musk created a public benefit corporation called “Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc” in September 2017, according to screenshots included in OpenAI’s blog post. A few days later, OpenAI rejected Musk’s proposed terms for the for-profit and offered to keep the conversation going, but Musk responded that his offer was “no longer on the table” and that “discussions are over,” per screenshots.

In January 2018, Musk proposed that OpenAI spin into Tesla, his electric vehicle company, according to the blog.

“The only paths I can think of are a major expansion of OpenAl and a major expansion of Tesla Al. Perhaps both simultaneously. The former would require a major increase in funds donated and highly credible people joining our board. The current board situation is very weak,” Musk wrote, according to the blog. He added that “OpenAI is on a path of certain failure relative to Google.”

Brockman responded with a lengthy plan, including the idea that the company should “try our best to remain a non-profit,” according to screenshots. In February 2018, Musk resigned as co-chair of OpenAI.

OpenAI’s complex history

OpenAI originally debuted in 2015 as a nonprofit and then in 2019 converted into a “capped-profit” model, in which the OpenAI nonprofit was the governing entity for its for-profit subsidiary. Altman claimed onstage last week at the DealBook Summit that the company decided to go to a capped-profit structure in part because Musk stopped funding them.

Thanks largely to the viral spread of ChatGPT, which debuted in November 2022, OpenAI has become one of the hottest, and at times one of the most controversial, startups on the planet. The company’s valuation has climbed to $157 billion since it launched ChatGPT. OpenAI has raised about $13 billion from Microsoft, and it closed its latest $6.6 billion round in October, led by Thrive Capital and including participation from chipmaker Nvidia, SoftBank and others.

The company also received a $4 billion revolving line of credit, bringing its total liquidity to more than $10 billion. OpenAI expects about $5 billion in losses on $3.7 billion in revenue this year, CNBC confirmed in September with a person familiar with the situation.

OpenAI is now in the midst of a potentially two-year process of converting into a fully for-profit public benefit corporation, which could make it more attractive to investors. The restructuring plan would also allow OpenAI to retain its non-profit status as a separate entity, CNBC previously reported.

OpenAI has faced increasing competition from startups such as Musk’s xAI and Anthropic, as well as tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Meta. The generative AI market is predicted to top $1 trillion in revenue within a decade, and business spending on generative AI surged 500% this year, according to recent data from Menlo Ventures.

A thorny legal battle

Attorneys representing Musk, his AI startup xAI and Zilis filed for a preliminary injunction against OpenAI on Nov. 29.

In their motion for preliminary injunction, attorneys for Musk argued that OpenAI should be prohibited from “benefitting from wrongfully obtained competitively sensitive information or coordination via the Microsoft-OpenAI board interlocks.”

The latest court filings represent an escalation in the legal feud between Musk, OpenAI and Altman, as well as other long-involved parties and backers including tech investor Reid Hoffman and Microsoft.

Musk in March 2024 sued OpenAI — and co-founders Altman and Brockman — in a San Francisco state court, alleging breach of contract and fiduciary duty. In the suit, Musk claimed that the early OpenAI team had set out to develop artificial general intelligence “for the benefit of humanity,” but that the project had been transformed into a for-profit entity that’s largely controlled by principal shareholder Microsoft.

In June, Musk withdrew that complaint and later refiled in federal court. Attorneys for Musk in the federal suit, led by Marc Toberoff in Los Angeles, argued in their complaint that OpenAI had violated federal racketeering, or RICO, laws.

In November, they expanded their complaint to include allegations that Microsoft and OpenAI had violated antitrust laws when the ChatGPT maker allegedly asked investors to agree to not invest in rival companies, including Musk’s xAI.

“Microsoft and OpenAI now seek to cement this dominance by cutting off competitors’ access to investment capital (a group boycott), while continuing to benefit from years’ worth of shared competitively sensitive information during generative AI’s formative years,” the lawyers wrote in the November filing. They added that the terms OpenAI asked investors to agree to amounted to a “group boycott” that “blocks xAI’s access to essential investment capital.”

Altman denied that OpenAI investors can’t invest in competitors during an onstage interview last week at The New York Times’ DealBook Summit. Altman said that investors are welcome to do so but that the company will stop their “information rights,” such as sharing its research road map and other materials.

Microsoft has invested nearly $14 billion in OpenAI but revealed in October that it would record a $1.5 billion loss in the current period largely due to an expected loss from the AI startup. Microsoft gave up its observer seat on OpenAI’s board in July, although CNBC reported that the Federal Trade Commission would continue to monitor the influence of the two companies over the AI industry.

— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed reporting.

WATCH: OpenAI releases AI video generation tool Sora

OpenAI releases AI video generation tool Sora

Continue Reading

Technology

The Street’s bad call on Palo Alto – plus, two portfolio stocks reach new highs

Published

on

By

The Street's bad call on Palo Alto – plus, two portfolio stocks reach new highs

Continue Reading

Technology

Govini founder Eric Gillespie released on $1 million bond with Pentagon probe ‘ongoing’

Published

on

By

Govini founder Eric Gillespie released on  million bond with Pentagon probe 'ongoing'

Mug shot of Eric Gillespie, Govini Founder and Chairman.

Courtesy: Pennsylvania Attorney General

Govini founder Eric Gillespie, who is charged with four felonies, including multiple counts of unlawful contact with a minor, was released on bail.

Gillespie, who lives in Pittsburgh, posted a $1 million bond after his court appearance Thursday. He is not allowed to travel, and his passport has been revoked.

He was initially denied bail following his arrest on Nov. 7, with the judge citing flight risk and public safety concerns.

David Shrager of Shrager Defense Attorneys, who represents Gillespie, insisted that his client did not break any laws.

“Mr. Gillespie has never contacted a minor, either online or in person, and the facts clearly prove that,” Shrager said after the hearing on Thursday.

“Completely false statements, including the use of artificial intelligence between adults made in the context of an online fantasy chat, are not illegal,” he added.

Gillespie’s next court date is Dec. 18.

The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office said Gillespie sent lewd photos to an agent posing as a father offering his daughter to be abused, and made graphic comments about sexual acts with children.

Gillespie, 57, commented on the security of the encrypted platforms being used in the chats between him and the undercover agent, according to a criminal complaint obtained by CNBC.

Gillespie is the founder of defense contractor Govini.

He was listed on the company’s website on the leadership page as a board member as recently as Aug. 17, according to an archived version of the page available on the Wayback Machine.

The company terminated Gillespie on Nov. 12.

Earlier this year, Govini landed a nearly $1 billion contract with the Department of Defense. The company’s suite of artificial intelligence-enabled applications is used by every department of the U.S. military and other federal agencies.

Following his arrest, Pentagon officials said they were looking into Gillespie and possible security issues.

CNBC has repeatedly asked the Department of Defense about updates on the status of the probe and potential security concerns with Govini or Gillespie.

“We don’t comment on ongoing investigations,” a Pentagon spokesperson said Thursday.

Continue Reading

Technology

Tech stocks set for big losing week as AI names get rocked after Nvidia earnings

Published

on

By

Tech stocks set for big losing week as AI names get rocked after Nvidia earnings

Jensen Huang, NVIDIA founder and CEO, has a Q&A session at a press conference during the APEC CEO summit on October 31, 2025 in Gyeongju, South Korea.

Woohae Cho | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Even Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang couldn’t save the tech and artificial intelligence trade this week.

The chip giant’s talismanic leader trumpeted “off the charts” chip sales and dismissed talk of an “AI bubble,” and for a while, the tide lifted all boats.

“There’s been a lot of talk about an AI bubble,” Huang said during an earnings call this week. “From our vantage point, we see something very different.”

The buzz from the blowout report quickly reversed, sending the AI winners deeply into the red — and few beneficiaries were left unscathed.

Every member of the Magnificent 7, except for Alphabet, was tracking for a losing week, with Nvidia, Amazon and Microsoft staring down the biggest losses.

Amazon and Microsoft have led the group’s drop lower, falling about 6% this week. Meanwhile, Alphabet has gained nearly 8%. The search giant is also the only megacap of the group on pace for November gains thanks to a boost from the launch of Gemini 3.

Oracle, which is another major Nvidia customer, slumped about 10%. The chipmaker also supplies major model developers such as OpenAI and Anthropic.

Read more CNBC tech news

Chip stocks have also declined amid the broader tech market turmoil. Advanced Micro Devices and Micron were on pace for 17% losses. Marvell Technology has slumped about 10%. Quantum computing stocks Rigetti, IonQ and D-Wave have dropped at least 10%

CoreWeave, which buys and rents out Nvidia’s chips in data centers, initially soared on the chipmaker’s earnings report, but swiftly reversed course. The company’s stock is looking at an 8% blow this week.

AI fever was cooling in the runup to Nvidia’s earnings report on Wednesday, and investors looked to the print to alleviate fears that the AI bubble was on shaky ground. Since the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, the stock has helped power the market to new all-time highs.

But concerns have mounted in recent weeks as tech stocks hit stretched valuations.

Major investors, including Bridgewater’s Ray Dalio told CNBC Thursday that the market is definitely in a bubble.

Much of the worries have stemmed from a boom in capital expenditures spending to support AI, with few signs of a payoff in view for many of the players.

Investor Michael Burry recently accused some of the biggest cloud and infrastructure providers of understating depreciation expenses and estimating a longer life cycle for their chips, calling it “one of the more common frauds of the modern era.”

Earlier this month, Burry revealed bets against Nvidia and Palantir.

Shares of the software analytics company, which supplies AI tools to the government and businesses, are down 11% this week. The stock has shed nearly a quarter of its value this month.

WATCH: Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio: We are definitely in a bubble, but that doesn’t mean you should sell

Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio: We are definitely in a bubble, but that doesn't mean you should sell

Continue Reading

Trending