Connect with us

Published

on

The logo of OpenAI is shown on a mobile phone in front of a computer screen displaying the photographs of Sam Altman, left, and Elon Musk, March 14, 2024.

Muhammed Selim Korkutata | Anadolu | Getty Images

OpenAI on Friday clapped back against Elon Musk, one of its co-founders, after the billionaire’s request last month for a federal court to stop the ChatGPT-maker from converting to a fully for-profit business.

In a blog post titled “Elon Musk wanted an OpenAI for-profit,” the startup alleged that in 2017, Musk “not only wanted, but actually created, a for-profit” to serve as the company’s proposed new structure.

“When he didn’t get majority equity and full control, he walked away and told us we would fail,” OpenAI wrote in the blog post. “Now that OpenAI is the leading AI research lab and Elon runs a competing AI company, he’s asking the court to stop us from effectively pursuing our mission.”

Musk and xAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Since Musk announced the debut of xAI, his OpenAI competitor, in July 2023, the startup has released its Grok chatbot and is raising up to $6 billion at a $50 billion valuation, in part to buy 100,000 Nvidia chips, CNBC reported last month.

Musk was questioning OpenAI’s nonprofit model from day one, a member of OpenAI’s legal team told CNBC.

OpenAI’s “structure doesn’t seem optimal,” Musk wrote in a November 2015 email to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, according to screenshots shared in the blog post. He added that receiving a “salary from the nonprofit muddies the alignment of incentives,” and that it’s “probably better to have a standard C corp with a parallel nonprofit.”

In a text conversation with former board member Shivon Zilis, OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman wrote that a conversation he had with Musk “turned into talking about structure” and that Musk “said non-profit was def the right one early on, may not be the right one now,” according to blog screenshots.

Musk forwarded an article about China’s strategy for AI research facilities to Brockman and fellow OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever. Musk wrote that China “will do whatever it takes to obtain what we develop. Maybe another reason to change course,” per the blog post.

Brockman agreed, and he wrote that starting in 2018, OpenAI’s path would need to be a “Al research + hardware for-profit,” according to the blog post. Musk wrote back, “Let’s talk Sat or Sun. I have a tentative game plan that l’d like to run by you.”

Altman, Brockman, Musk and others negotiated terms for the planned OpenAI for-profit in the fall of 2017, but the talks fell apart due to disagreements about equity, control and who would be CEO, according to the blog. Musk initially proposed that he should “unequivocally have initial control of the company” but said “this will change quickly” when the board has 12 to 16 members, per screenshots.

Musk created a public benefit corporation called “Open Artificial Intelligence Technologies, Inc” in September 2017, according to screenshots included in OpenAI’s blog post. A few days later, OpenAI rejected Musk’s proposed terms for the for-profit and offered to keep the conversation going, but Musk responded that his offer was “no longer on the table” and that “discussions are over,” per screenshots.

In January 2018, Musk proposed that OpenAI spin into Tesla, his electric vehicle company, according to the blog.

“The only paths I can think of are a major expansion of OpenAl and a major expansion of Tesla Al. Perhaps both simultaneously. The former would require a major increase in funds donated and highly credible people joining our board. The current board situation is very weak,” Musk wrote, according to the blog. He added that “OpenAI is on a path of certain failure relative to Google.”

Brockman responded with a lengthy plan, including the idea that the company should “try our best to remain a non-profit,” according to screenshots. In February 2018, Musk resigned as co-chair of OpenAI.

OpenAI’s complex history

OpenAI originally debuted in 2015 as a nonprofit and then in 2019 converted into a “capped-profit” model, in which the OpenAI nonprofit was the governing entity for its for-profit subsidiary. Altman claimed onstage last week at the DealBook Summit that the company decided to go to a capped-profit structure in part because Musk stopped funding them.

Thanks largely to the viral spread of ChatGPT, which debuted in November 2022, OpenAI has become one of the hottest, and at times one of the most controversial, startups on the planet. The company’s valuation has climbed to $157 billion since it launched ChatGPT. OpenAI has raised about $13 billion from Microsoft, and it closed its latest $6.6 billion round in October, led by Thrive Capital and including participation from chipmaker Nvidia, SoftBank and others.

The company also received a $4 billion revolving line of credit, bringing its total liquidity to more than $10 billion. OpenAI expects about $5 billion in losses on $3.7 billion in revenue this year, CNBC confirmed in September with a person familiar with the situation.

OpenAI is now in the midst of a potentially two-year process of converting into a fully for-profit public benefit corporation, which could make it more attractive to investors. The restructuring plan would also allow OpenAI to retain its non-profit status as a separate entity, CNBC previously reported.

OpenAI has faced increasing competition from startups such as Musk’s xAI and Anthropic, as well as tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Meta. The generative AI market is predicted to top $1 trillion in revenue within a decade, and business spending on generative AI surged 500% this year, according to recent data from Menlo Ventures.

A thorny legal battle

Attorneys representing Musk, his AI startup xAI and Zilis filed for a preliminary injunction against OpenAI on Nov. 29.

In their motion for preliminary injunction, attorneys for Musk argued that OpenAI should be prohibited from “benefitting from wrongfully obtained competitively sensitive information or coordination via the Microsoft-OpenAI board interlocks.”

The latest court filings represent an escalation in the legal feud between Musk, OpenAI and Altman, as well as other long-involved parties and backers including tech investor Reid Hoffman and Microsoft.

Musk in March 2024 sued OpenAI — and co-founders Altman and Brockman — in a San Francisco state court, alleging breach of contract and fiduciary duty. In the suit, Musk claimed that the early OpenAI team had set out to develop artificial general intelligence “for the benefit of humanity,” but that the project had been transformed into a for-profit entity that’s largely controlled by principal shareholder Microsoft.

In June, Musk withdrew that complaint and later refiled in federal court. Attorneys for Musk in the federal suit, led by Marc Toberoff in Los Angeles, argued in their complaint that OpenAI had violated federal racketeering, or RICO, laws.

In November, they expanded their complaint to include allegations that Microsoft and OpenAI had violated antitrust laws when the ChatGPT maker allegedly asked investors to agree to not invest in rival companies, including Musk’s xAI.

“Microsoft and OpenAI now seek to cement this dominance by cutting off competitors’ access to investment capital (a group boycott), while continuing to benefit from years’ worth of shared competitively sensitive information during generative AI’s formative years,” the lawyers wrote in the November filing. They added that the terms OpenAI asked investors to agree to amounted to a “group boycott” that “blocks xAI’s access to essential investment capital.”

Altman denied that OpenAI investors can’t invest in competitors during an onstage interview last week at The New York Times’ DealBook Summit. Altman said that investors are welcome to do so but that the company will stop their “information rights,” such as sharing its research road map and other materials.

Microsoft has invested nearly $14 billion in OpenAI but revealed in October that it would record a $1.5 billion loss in the current period largely due to an expected loss from the AI startup. Microsoft gave up its observer seat on OpenAI’s board in July, although CNBC reported that the Federal Trade Commission would continue to monitor the influence of the two companies over the AI industry.

— CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed reporting.

WATCH: OpenAI releases AI video generation tool Sora

OpenAI releases AI video generation tool Sora

Continue Reading

Technology

Amazon faces FAA probe after delivery drone snaps internet cable in Texas

Published

on

By

Amazon faces FAA probe after delivery drone snaps internet cable in Texas

Amazon’s new MK30 Prime Air drone is displayed during Amazon’s “Delivering the Future” event at the company’s BFI1 Fulfillment Center, Robotics Research and Development Hub in Sumner, Washington on Oct. 18, 2023.

Jason Redmond | AFP | Getty Images

Amazon is facing a federal probe after one of its delivery drones downed an internet cable in central Texas last week.

The probe comes as Amazon vies to expand drone deliveries to more pockets of the U.S., more than a decade after it first conceived the aerial distribution program, and faces stiffer competition from Walmart, which has also begun drone deliveries.

The incident occurred on Nov. 18 around 12:45 p.m. Central in Waco, Texas. After dropping off a package, one of Amazon’s MK30 drones was ascending out of a customer’s yard when one of its six propellers got tangled in a nearby internet cable, according to a video of the incident viewed and verified by CNBC.

The video shows the Amazon drone shearing the wire line. The drone’s motor then appeared to shut off and the aircraft landed itself, with its propellers windmilling slightly on the way down, the video shows. The drone appeared to remain in tact beyond some damage to one of its propellers.

The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating the incident, a spokesperson confirmed. The National Transportation Safety Board said the agency is aware of the incident but has not opened a probe into the matter.

Amazon confirmed the incident to CNBC, saying that after clipping the internet cable, the drone performed a “safe contingent landing,” referring to the process that allows its drones to land safely in unexpected conditions.

“There were no injuries or widespread internet service outages. We’ve paid for the cable line’s repair for the customer and have apologized for the inconvenience this caused them,” an Amazon spokesperson told CNBC, noting that the drone had completed its package delivery.

Amazon delivery drone snaps internet cable in Texas

The incident comes after federal investigators last month opened a separate probe into a crash involving two of Amazon’s Prime Air drones in Arizona. The two aircrafts collided with a construction crane in Tolleson, a city west of Phoenix, prompting Amazon to temporarily halt drone deliveries in the area.

For over a decade, Amazon has been working to realize founder Jeff Bezos’ vision of drones whizzing toothpaste, books and other goods to customers’ doorsteps in 30 minutes or less. The company began drone deliveries in 2022 in College Station, Texas, and Lockeford, California.

But progress has been slowed by a mix of regulatory hurdles, missed deadlines and layoffs in 2023 that coincided with broader cost-cutting efforts by Amazon CEO Andy Jassy.

The company has previously said its goal is to deliver 500 million packages by drone per year by the end of the decade.

The hexacopter-shaped MK30, the latest generation of Amazon’s Prime Air drone, is meant to be quieter, smaller and lighter than previous versions.

Amazon says the drones are equipped with a sense-and-avoid system that enables them to “detect and stay away from obstacles in the air and on the ground.” The company recommends that customers maintain “about 10 feet of open space” on their property so drones can complete deliveries

The company began drone deliveries in Waco earlier this month for customers within a certain radius of its same-day delivery site who order eligible items weighing 5 pounds or less. The drone deliveries are supposed to drop packages off in under an hour.

Amazon has brought other locations online in recent months, including Kansas City, Missouri, Pontiac, Michigan, San Antonio, Texas, and Ruskin, Florida. Amazon has also announced plans to expand drone deliveries to Richardson, Texas.

Walmart began offering drone deliveries in 2021, and currently partners with Alphabet’s Wing and venture-backed startup Zipline to make drone deliveries in a number of states, including in Texas.

WATCH: Amazon unveils satellite terminal for enterprise customers — but Starlink still dominates

Amazon unveils satellite terminal for enterprise customers — but Starlink still dominates

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC Daily Open: Nvidia’s crown looks increasingly uneasy on its head

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: Nvidia's crown looks increasingly uneasy on its head

Jensen Huang, chief executive officer of Nvidia Corp., during the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) sports day event in Hsinchu, Taiwan, on Saturday, Nov. 8, 2025.

Lam Yik Fei | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown.

Shares of artificial intelligence czar Nvidia fell 2.6% on Tuesday as signs of unrest continued rippling through its kingdom.

Over the month, Nvidia has been contending with concerns over lofty valuations and an argument from the “The Big Short” investor Michael Burry that companies may be overestimating the lifespan of Nvidia’s chips. That accounting choice inflates profits, he alleged.

The pressure intensified last week in the form of a potential challenger to the crown. Google on Nov. 18 announced the release of its new AI model Gemini 3 — so far so good, given that Nvidia isn’t in the business of designing large language models  — powered by its in-house AI chips — uhoh.

And on Monday stateside, Meta, a potential kingmaker, appeared to signal that it is considering not just leasing Google’s custom AI chips, but also using them for its own data centers. It seemed like Nvidia felt the need to address some of those rumblings.

The chipmaker said on the social media platform X that its technology is more powerful and versatile than other types of AI chips, including the so-called ASIC chips, such as Google’s TPUs. Separately, Nvidia issued a private memo to Wall Street that disputed Burry’s allegations.

Power, whether in politics or semiconductors, requires a delicate balance.

Remaining silent may shroud those in power in a cloak of untouchability, projecting confidence in their authority — but also aloofness. Deigning to address unrest can soothe uncertainty, but also, paradoxically, signal insecurity.

For now, the crown is Nvidia’s to wear — and the weight of it is, too.

What you need to know today

And finally…

Lights on in skyscrapers and commercial buildings on the skyline of the City of London, UK, on Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2025. U.K. business chiefs urged Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to ease energy costs and avoid raising the tax burden on corporate Britain as she prepares this year’s budget.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The UK’s Autumn Budget is coming

The run-up to this year’s U.K. Autumn Budget has been different from the norm because so many different tax proposals have been floated, flagged, leaked and retracted in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday’s statement.

It has also made it harder to gauge what we’re actually going to get when Finance Minister Rachel Reeves finally unveils her spending and taxation plans for the year ahead.

— Holly Ellyatt

Continue Reading

Technology

Workday stock slips on light quarterly margin guidance

Published

on

By

Workday stock slips on light quarterly margin guidance

Workday CEO Carl Eschenbach, right, walks to the morning session during the Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, on July 11, 2025.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Workday shares slid more than 5% in extended trading Tuesday after the finance and human resources software maker issued quarterly margin guidance that came in below Wall Street projections.

Here’s how the company did in comparison with LSEG consensus:

  • Earnings per share: $2.32 adjusted vs. $2.18 expected
  • Revenue: $2.43 billion vs. $2.42 billion expected

The company forecast a fourth-quarter adjusted operating margin of at least 28.5% and $2.355 billion in subscription revenue, according to a statement. The StreetAccount consensus was a 28.7% margin and $2.35 billion in subscription revenue.

Workday’s revenue grew about 13% year over year in the quarter, which ended on Oct. 31. Net income of $252 million, or 94 cents per share, was up from $193 million, or 72 cents per share, in the same quarter a year ago.

Subscription revenue in the third quarter totaled $2.24 billion, with an adjusted operating margin of 28.5%. Analysts polled by StreetAccount had anticipated $2.24 billion in subscription revenue and a 28.1% margin.

During the fiscal third quarter, Workday announced artificial intelligence agents for analyzing employee performance testing financial health, and the company revealed plans to buy AI and learning software startup Sana for $1.1 billion. Also, activist investor Elliott Management said it had built a Workday stake worth over $2 billion.

Workday has seen its stock decline this year as pundits discuss the risk of generative AI tools threatening the growth prospects for cloud software incumbents. Company shares have fallen 9% so far in 2025, while the Nasdaq Composite index has gained 19%.

WATCH: Workday CEO Carl Eschenbach: There’s a narrative that AI is eating into software, that is false

Workday CEO Carl Eschenbach: There's a narrative that AI is eating into software, that is false

Continue Reading

Trending