Connect with us

Published

on

“What Sean Combs is being accused of is not rare. He’s not an anomaly.”

For a year in the early noughties, Elisabeth Ovesen was a hip-hop video star dancing alongside some of the biggest names in the business. It was an era of big-budget music videos filled with, in rap especially, money, cars, and women.

She kept diaries. In 2005, she published Confessions Of A Video Vixen, recounting her difficult upbringing and relationships before finding a seemingly glamorous lifeline to financial security.

Under the name Karrine Steffans, she detailed her experiences on video sets as a 22-year-old woman, her relationships and sexual encounters with rappers, other music stars and executives. Most of her own experiences involving famous stars were consensual, she says; the book is a cautionary tale about a feted industry, her stories highlighting misogyny and power imbalances in terms of age and status, how women were used and discarded, rather than criminal behaviour.

But Ovesen says she was also aware of a much darker side to the music industry, and Hollywood in general.

In the wake of the #MeToo movement – and most recently the charges filed in the US against rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs, which he has strenuously denied – she says she wants people to know there are others “getting away” with similar behaviour and crimes.

Her words echo those of lawyer Tony Buzbee, who has filed several lawsuits against Combs. He has also claimed A-listers are paying off victims to avoid being publicly named.

Sunset casts a pink glow over the Los Angeles skyline as seen from behind the famous Hollywood sign Wednesday evening, March 8, 2023. The 95th annual Academy Awards will be held Sunday at the Dolby Theatre in the Hollywood section of Los Angeles. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)
Image:
Pic: AP

‘Everything that’s coming out wasn’t a secret’

Speaking to Sky News on Zoom, Ovesen recounts the night she first met Combs, saying she was “kind of ordered” to his house. Despite this, in hindsight, being a “weird” experience, she says he treated her well and with respect. “We’re at a club, I was with people he knew, our cars were leaving at the same time,” she says. Combs leaned out of a window to talk to the men in her car, “talking about me like I’m property”.

The men decided she would go to his house, she says. “It was kind of like, ‘send her’. In retrospect now I realise how weird that is.”

She says this was shortly after Combs’ break-up with Jennifer Lopez in 2001. “He was very sweet and very docile with me and very respectful. The next morning we had brunch at his house… again, [he was] pleasant, warm.” She says she went to other parties with Combs and he was always the same.

But he knew she kept diaries, she claims. “So my experiences with him are a lot different than hundreds of other people’s… I have seen him flare up. I have seen things that did not involve me.”

These are not her stories to tell, she says. “I don’t want to overshadow actual victims. I’m nobody’s victim.”

However, Ovesen says she became aware of the hip-hop star’s alleged behaviour, his abuse of former girlfriend Cassie, which he publicly apologised for, and the claims of “freak-off” parties detailed in the charges against him.

“I knew what kind of person he was to other people. Everything that’s coming out now about Sean wasn’t a secret… him and Cassie, that was an open secret in LA, in the industry. Everyone knew. The issue with something like that is that if someone says, ‘yeah, I was there, I’ve seen it. I know for sure’. Then the question becomes, well, what were you doing there?”

Elisabeth Ovesen, formerly known as Karrine Steffans. Pic: JSSImages/BEImages
Image:
Elisabeth Ovesen, formerly known as Karrine Steffans, pictured after the release of the book, in 2006. Pic: JSSImages/BEImages

Misogyny and abuse in the hip-hop industry, and in the wider music industry – Hollywood in general – is rife, Ovesen says.

“If we’re looking at this one person and the industry this person is in, now let’s look at all the men who are not saying anything at all,” she says. “I want to be very clear that what Sean is being accused of is not rare. He’s not an anomaly… the behaviour is learned and perpetuated.”

Ovesen says some men she knew from the industry at the time had a family home – “and then there’s a party house”. Drugs were rife, she says, and she witnessed heroin, cocaine and crack being taken “by prominent celebrity men”.

Women are treated as objects and often suffer sexual abuse, she says. Some men too, and under-age boys and girls, she claims.

Artists “have the same agents, the same managers, the same handlers, the same accountants… they have the same friends. They share jets. They use each other’s houses. They share women. They share secrets. It’s not [just] a Sean Combs problem, it is a worldwide issue. It’s about men with money, men with power.”

When Ovesen arrived in LA, she was looking for dancing work. Being “discovered” for music videos, with payment of thousands of dollars for a day or two on set, would set her up. But she says she was never naïve about the industry and also acknowledges that a lot of her experiences were “fun”.

“I always knew what it was. I always knew why I was there. Women were being used as props and to make the men look good, and we were disposable and not treated with respect, for the most part. But coming from my particular background – having been an exotic dancer – that didn’t deter me or bother me at the time.”

Confessions Of A Video Vixen, published by Harper Collins
Image:
Ovesen’s book, Confessions Of A Video Vixen, published by Harper Collins

CCTV cameras and NDAs

This is no longer Ovesen’s world, she points out. She has published several books since her first, and has also given lectures about her experiences. However, she says she has friends in the industry who say things haven’t changed.

She claims she went to house parties and woke to “screaming in the middle of the night – women being beaten, slapped, pushed around”, as well as men being abused, and closeted artists who feel “shame”, which turns to anger, “around sexual proclivities”.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are signed and people are often paid off, she says. “It’s not rare or weird, it’s just the way it always has been, where the men do awful things and then they pay people off.” NDAs were often presented at the doors to celebrity homes before parties. Ovesen says she signed one herself on one occasion in 2000, but refused after this.

“They have cameras everywhere,” she says, as would be typical for security of an expensive property. “Not only is that NDA going to tell you, whatever you see here stays in this house, it’s also going to explain if anything happens to you, you can’t sue. And there’s also a clause about any videotaping.”

Non-disclosure agreement (NDA). Pic: iStock
Image:
Pic: iStock

Ovesen claims there are prominent actors, artists, producers and executives all involved in similar behaviour. She never witnessed an alleged “freak-off” party – because, she says again, Combs was aware she kept a diary. “But did I know about them? Yes. Did I hear about them? Yes.”

There are others who have “their own version”, she says. “I’m thinking of one actor in particular – an Oscar-winning actor”.

She says she was called a “whore” and a liar when she published her book, and in the years afterwards. People were “angry I discussed men they revered in a way that didn’t uphold that reverence”, she says. But nothing was sugarcoated, even “my willing participation. I didn’t try to make myself look good, I just told the truth”.

Ovesen wanted people to know what the industry was like. “Women are shamed about our consensual sex, we’re shamed about our non-consensual sex. Women are shamed no matter what they do.”

Since the rise of the #MeToo movement, she has noticed a change in the reaction, from younger women discovering her for the first time. She is frustrated there had to be a change at all, but pleased for younger women, she says. Next year, she will release an updated version of her book, marking 20 years since it was published.

“I want this new generation to understand how important it is to believe women, to support each other.”

Sky News has contacted representatives for Combs for comment.

What is Combs accused of?

Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs poses for a portrait during an interview in an office above New York's Times Square Wednesday, Dec. 20, 2000. Pic: AP Photo/Suzanne Plunkett
Image:
Pic: AP Photo/Suzanne Plunkett 2000


Combs was arrested on suspicion of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking in September and has remained in prison ahead of a trial currently set for May, having been denied bail.

The hip-hop mogul has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years with the aid of a network of associates and employees, while silencing victims through blackmail and violence – including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings.

He is also facing several civil lawsuits, with one lawyer saying he is representing dozens of accusers. Combs says his sexual relationships were consensual, and denies all wrongdoing.

Earlier this week, it emerged that rapper Jay-Z has been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl after the MTV Video Music Awards in 2000, allegedly alongside Combs. A federal lawsuit – which originally only named Combs – was refiled to add Jay-Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter.

Jay-Z has strenuously denied those allegations and called for the identity of the accuser to be revealed, or for the case to be dismissed. He responded to the allegations in a lengthy statement sent to NBC News, Sky News’ US partner.

“These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a criminal complaint, not a civil one!!” he said. “Whomever would commit such a crime against a minor should be locked away, would you not agree?

“These alleged victims would deserve real justice if that were the case.”

The rapper, who has three children with his wife Beyonce, continued: “My only heartbreak is for my family. My wife and I will have to sit our children down, one of whom is at the age where her friends will surely see the press and ask questions about the nature of these claims, and explain the cruelty and greed of people. I mourn yet another loss of innocence.

“Only your network of conspiracy theorists, fake physics, will believe the idiotic claims you have levied against me that, if not for the seriousness surrounding harm to kids, would be laughable.”

Continue Reading

US

US defence secretary’s Iran strikes briefing turned into a full throttle assault on the press

Published

on

By

US defence secretary's Iran strikes briefing turned into a full throttle assault on the press

Two things can be true at the same time.

It’s possible that the American airstrikes did “obliterate” the Iranian nuclear sites hit on Saturday night.

It’s also possible that Iran retains stockpiles of enriched uranium and nuclear production equipment elsewhere – undisclosed.

We know from the International Atomic Energy Agency that Iran has been obstructive, and we know too that the regime has attempted to build new facilities.

This pattern of behaviour makes it possible, even probable, that they have existing hidden programmes.

Preliminary intelligence reports shared with European governments indicated that Iran’s highly-enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact and that much of it was not concentrated in the Fordow site.

Pc: Maxar
Image:
A satellite overview shows the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility, along with damage from June 23 airstrikes. Pic: Maxar

Given all this, the storm around the level of destruction caused by Saturday’s American airstrikes could be a distraction. Nevertheless, the early morning Pentagon news conference revealed plenty.

There were two strands to the briefing. From the politician, we got a political attack, and from the general, we got the military detail.

The attack on the media

Defence secretary Pete Hegseth went full throttle on his assault against the ‘fake news’.

He didn’t just shoot the messenger; he sprayed his blunt criticism all over the defence department press room with characteristic disdain. The Fox News anchor-turned-politician has left his past well behind him.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Hegseth scolds media over strikes reports

“In hunting for scandals all the time, in trying to find wedges and spin stories, this press corps and the press corps miss historic moments,” he said.

“You, and I mean specifically you, the press, specifically you, the press corps, because you cheer against Trump so hard.

“It’s like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful, so bad. You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.”

This was a news conference to counter the leaks to numerous US news outlets, which suggested that the weekend strikes on the Iranian nuclear site might not have been very successful.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands June 25, 2025. REUTERS/Piroschka V
Image:
The Trump administration has been left angered by leaks. Pic: Reuters

The leaks, which Team Trump believes may have come from Congress, where certain lawmakers were shown the initial intelligence assessments, were from a preliminary report which was marked as containing ‘low confidence’ information.

Mr Hegseth said: “How about we talk about how special America is, that only we have these capabilities.

“I think it’s too much to ask, unfortunately, for the fake news, so we’re used to that, but we also have an opportunity to stand at the podium and read the truth of what’s really happened…

“And the reality is, you want to call it destroyed. You want to call it defeated. You want to call it obliterated. Choose your word. This was a historically successful attack.”

The US attacked the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites in Iran
Image:
The nuclear sites in Iran attacked by the US

The spy and the specially-designed bomb

The second strand of the news conference, from America’s top general Dan Caine, provided us with new details about the air strikes last Saturday night.

General Caine would not be drawn on the definitive success of the bombings. “We do not mark our own homework,” he said.

Instead, he sought to illustrate how the mission the military was tasked with, and the performance of the weapons used, all played out perfectly.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘All six weapons hit Fordow exactly where we wanted’

He revealed the Fordow nuclear site had been under surveillance for 15 years. One intelligence officer, he said, had the job of monitoring the site.

“For more than 15 years, this officer and his teammate lived and breathed this single target,” General Caine said.

“He studied the geology. He watched the Iranians dig it out. He watched the construction, the weather, the discard material, the geology, the construction materials, where the materials came from.

“He looked at the vent shaft, the exhaust shaft, the electrical systems, the environmental control systems, every nook, every crater, every piece of equipment going in and every piece of equipment going out, they literally dreamed about this target at night, when they slept.”

He also revealed the bunker-busting bombs were developed precisely for this mission.

He showed newly-declassified videos of the Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP) bombs exploding in test scenarios.

Together, the information was designed to show the high probability of massive damage to the nuclear sites.

Read more:
Trump dodges commitment to NATO principle
Why did the US attack on Iran avoid some nuclear sites?

A congressional leak?

In a related development, a Trump administration official has confirmed that the White House plans to limit intelligence sharing with lawmakers following the leak of the initial damage assessment.

According to NBC News, the administration plans to post less information on CAPNET, which is the name of a system utilised to share classified material with Congress.

It is not clear whether the assessment was leaked by someone in Congress or by a defence department official, but the speaker of the house – Trump ally Mike Johnson – said he suspects it came from Congress.

“There was a leak, and we’re trying to get down to the bottom of that. It’s dangerous and ridiculous that happened. We’re going to solve that problem, and we’ll keep the coordination,” Mr Johnson told NBC News.

Democratic Party Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticised the development.

“They seem not to want to see the facts get out. Just Trump’s version of the facts, which we know is often false,” Schumer said.

Continue Reading

US

Pete Hegseth’s news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering

Published

on

By

Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering

Pete Hegseth’s angry news conference, where the US defence secretary roundly abused those media outlets and individuals who didn’t agree with him, certainly told us one thing.

That when reliable information eventually emerges from the battle damage assessment of the US attack on Iran’s Fordow nuclear plant, it won’t be accepted by everyone.

The whole issue has suddenly become politically toxic in Washington DC and will doubtless be fed into the spin dryer of vitriolic commentary and assertion that has been the most stand-out feature of this second Trump administration.

But what we did find out from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Dan Caine, was that the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs had been designed in some secrecy with exactly this sort of target in mind.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘All six weapons hit Fordow exactly where we wanted’

Trump-Iran live: US president reacts to Hegseth news conference

We also learned they all worked as per the test simulations, and that 12 were fired at six separate targets at Fordow and another two at a single target at the Natanz nuclear facility.

But the fierce argument over how to characterise the damage done in these attacks is really just a semantic spat. The two key questions are rather different.

More on Donald Trump

Firstly, will the Iranians decide to give up their quest for a nuclear weapon as a result of this attack, as the Syrians did in 2007 when the Israelis destroyed their Al Kibar nuclear reactor?

Or else will they go hell for leather for a nuclear weapon, as Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did after the Israelis destroyed his nuclear reactor in 1981?

Read more:
Truth about success of US strikes lies deep underground
NATO chief refers to Trump as ‘daddy’

Satellite imagery of Fordow after the US bombing. Credit: Maxar
Image:
Satellite imagery of Fordow after the US bombing. Credit: Maxar

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

And secondly, if the Iranians decide to go again for a nuclear weapon, how long will it be before they are back at the nuclear threshold, where they were less than a month ago?

Will it be within a year? Or five years? Or longer?

When we have an answer to those two questions, then we can put some real perspective on whether the US bombing has really been a success.

Continue Reading

US

The truth about the success of US airstrikes on Iran lies buried deep underground

Published

on

By

The truth about the success of US airstrikes on Iran lies buried deep underground

The B-2 bombers have returned to their US base, but questions about the success of their airstrikes last weekend hang in the air.

President Donald Trump is pushing back hard against a leaked preliminary intelligence report, suggesting the audacious bombing raid only set Iran’s nuclear ambition back “by months”.

“It’s destroyed… Iran will not have nuclear. We blew it up. It’s blown to kingdom come,” Mr Trump told a news conference.

A satellite image shows damage to the tunnel entrances of the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Research Center, following U.S. airstrikes amid the
Image:
A satellite image shows damage to the tunnel entrances of the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Research Centre in Iran. Pic: Reuters

Read more: Iran and NATO summit latest updates

A statement from CIA director John Ratcliffe backed that up. He said: “[The] CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran’s nuclear programme has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes.

“This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

US strike on Iran ‘ended the war’

But Democrats say the president was claiming Iran‘s underground facilities had been “obliterated” long before any intelligence had been received.

Arizona senator Mark Kelly, who flew 39 combat missions in the first Gulf War, said: “He’s just saying that because he wants that to be the narrative.

“He said it the night of the strike, without any information, not even satellite imagery, and certainly without any information about what happened underneath 200 feet of rock and granite and dirt.”

“The likelihood of something underground like that being obliterated is incredibly low,” he added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Senator rejects Iran nuclear sites ‘obliterated’

Senator Kelly blamed Mr Trump for Iran’s enrichment growing from “less than 4% to, public reporting, 60%”, accusing him of “chucking the Obama deal out the window”.

The leaking of the classified report from the Pentagon and subsequent debate has enraged US defence secretary Pete Hegseth.

Read more:
How much damage has been done to Iran’s nuclear facilities?
Why did the US attack on Iran avoid some nuclear sites?

“If you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordow [nuclear site], you better get a big shovel and go really deep because Iran’s nuclear programme is obliterated,” Mr Hegseth said.

“Those that dropped the bombs precisely in the right place know exactly what happened when they exploded, and you know who else knows? Iran.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why were some Iranian nuclear sites spared?

The White House is railing against what it calls the “fake news media” for reporting the content of the leaked report.

But the success of a military operation has become a battle of political narratives in Congress.

That will last longer than a 12-day war because the truth lies buried, quite literally, deep underground.

Continue Reading

Trending