Connect with us

Published

on

The US Supreme Court today rejected a bid by Ohio and other states to stop California from implementing its own clean air rules, a legal right that California has had since the 60s which Donald Trump has repeatedly tried and failed to remove.

Ever since the 1960s, California has been able to set its own clean air rules, as long as they are at least as strict as federal clean air rules. California was granted this waiver in the Clean Air Act as recognition of its unique air quality challenges.

When the link between gasoline-burning vehicles and smog was discovered, California was building its own clean air rules at the same time as the federal government was.

At the time (and still), Los Angeles was choked with smog. The city is built around car transportation (after public transit in the city was destroyed by literal cartoon villians), has unique geography which traps smog above most of its population, and is also currently home to the largest container ports in America, through which ~40% of the country’s containerized traffic now comes.

The central valley of California is also home to a lot of smog – with the most agriculturally productive land in the country producing half of the nation’s fruits, nuts and vegetables. But it’s surrounded by mountains, and smog has nowhere to go.

Since the federal government didn’t want to pre-empt efforts that were already underway in California (under then-Governor Ronald Reagan), and acknowledging that California’s challenges were unique, it allowed the EPA to review California’s rules and grant it a waiver to run under its own clean air regulations as long as they are at least as good as the EPA’s.

Other states are allowed to follow these rules, but only if they copy them exactly. These are known as “section 177 states,” named after the section of the Clean Air Act that grants this waiver, or “CARB” states, named for the California Air Resources Board which creates the state’s regulations.

So for the last 60 years, California has mostly run under its own clean air rules. There was a brief period during the Obama administration where California and federal rules were harmonized – but industry lobbying and the meddling of an ignorant reality TV host resulted in a shattering of that harmony, giving companies a more difficult regulatory environment.

These clean air rules have been a success, resulting in a >98% reduction in vehicle-based pollutants in the LA area, even as total vehicle miles traveled have gone up (and that news was from 2012 – it’s gotten even better since then due to EVs).

However, there’s still more work to be done, as LA and the nearby Inland Empire still have quite dirty air.

And so, California released a new set of clean air rules in 2022, which the EPA is expected to approve this week.

But other states immediately challenged those rules, despite that the rules do not affect them.

The challenge was brought by Ohio and 16 other republican-led states who sought to end the California’s long-supported state’s right to protect its residents from dirty air.

The states argued that the Constitution doesn’t allow the government to treat states unequally (despite that all of the states bringing the lawsuit have more Congressional representation per capita than California does), so letting California set clean air rules is unfair. The states seem to think that Californians should be required to breathe just as much poison as their republican leadership is forcing onto their citizens.

The case has already made its way through the court system, with courts reasonably ruling that the law, which has been effective for 60 years at reducing pollution and health costs for Californians and other CARB states, should stand. In April, the DC court of appeals affirmed California’s right.

But that wasn’t enough for Ohio and the 16 republican states, who brought their desire to poison Californians all the way so the Supreme Court of the United States.

That Court today denied the states’ petition, thus affirming the DC Court’s decision will stand. 8 of the 9 individuals sitting on the Court agreed not to review the case and to let the lower court’s decision stand, though Clarence Thomas stated that he would have taken the case.

In addition, last Friday, while the Court did agree to hear a case involving an oil industry challenge to California’s clean air rules, that case is narrowly limited to the issue of standing, or deciding what entities are allowed to bring cases to court. When it accepted that petition, the Court said it will not consider review of California’s right to set its own emissions standards.

Electrek’s Take

Well, I’ll take this as my opportunity to eat a little bit of crow. Even as late as last week, I thought there was a good chance the Court would torture itself into some sort of extra-legal reasoning to try to stop California’s rules, as it has before on CO2 emissions and Chevron deference.

But on Friday and today, the Court denied review of not one but two separate cases in that respect, so it seems like it either doesn’t want to hear cases about California’s well-established legal authority – or perhaps that it’s just waiting until the time is right to strike. We’ll have to see which one it is – I still don’t trust them given their explicit corruption, but we can take a breath for now.

All of this happens just over a month before convicted felon Donald Trump, who finally received more votes than his opponent on his third attempt (despite committing treason in 2021, for which there is a clear legal remedy), will once again find himself squatting in the White House. Mr. Trump has stated repeatedly that he wants to reverse clean air policies, thus saddling Americans with dirtier airhigher costs and poorer health, and to destroy the US EV market and send US manufacturing jobs to China.

And one of his common targets has been California, the state that has done the most in favor of advancing clean air – which is obviously anathema to a dirty air advocate like himself. He has signaled that he wants to “rip up” California’s waiver, an effort which he tried and failed to do before. So expect a fight to come in the coming years, with California once again on the side of clean air, and Mr. Trump once again on the side of poisoning Americans.


If you’d like your electric vehicle to be even cleaner, charge it at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Mazda’s new electric SUV hits dealerships with over 20,000 pre-orders in China

Published

on

By

Mazda's new electric SUV hits dealerships with over 20,000 pre-orders in China

Mazda calls it a “dream car.” The EZ-60 is about the size of a Tesla Model Y, and it will be sold globally. After racking up over 20,000 pre-orders in just over two weeks, Mazda’s new electric SUV is now arriving at dealerships across China.

Mazda’s EZ-60 electric SUV reaches dealerships in China

The EZ-60 is Mazda’s first electric SUV from its joint venture with Changan Auto. Following the EZ-6, it’s the second dedicated Mazda EV to land in China.

After its debut on April 23, Changan Mazda announced that the EZ-60 had secured over 10,000 pre-orders in 24 hours, a new record for joint-venture electric SUVs. With the current tally at over 20,000, Mazda’s new electric SUV is now arriving at dealerships across China.

The EZ-60 is based on Changan’s hybrid platform and uses a CATL LFP battery for a CLTC range of up to 600 km (372 miles). It’s also available with a 1.5L gasoline engine, providing a combined range of over 1,300 km.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

To keep pace in China’s competitive EV market, Mazda’s electric SUV is specifically designed for Chinese buyers.

Mazda-EZ-60-electric-SUV-interior
Mazda EZ-60 electric SUV interior (Source: Changan Mazda)

It includes “a number of world-first technologies,” including a 100″ naked-eye 3D head-up display (HUD), voice recognition, and advanced safety systems.

Mazda’s new EZ-60 electric SUV is about the same size as a Tesla Model Y, measuring 4,850 mm in length, 1,935 mm in width, and 1,620 mm in height.

Mazda's-new-electric-SUV-dealerships
Mazda EZ-60 electric SUV (Source: Changan Mazda)

To lure potential buyers, Mazda launched a deposit program this week. With an initial 10 yuan deposit, buyers can grow their account by 10 yuan every day with an “expansion code.”

Test drives are expected to be available in July, with the first customer deliveries set to follow in August. Like the EZ-6 sedan, Mazda’s electric SUV will be sold in several global markets, including Europe, starting next year. It will launch under the name CX-6e.

Mazda-first-EV-overseas
Mazda 6e electric sedan for overseas markets like Europe (Source: Changan Mazda)

In Europe, the electric sedan is called the Mazda 6e. It will be available in two battery packs: 68.8 kWh or 80 kWh, offering a WLTP driving range of 479 km (300 miles) and 552 km (343 miles), respectively.

More info, including final specs and prices for the global version, will be revealed closer to launch. Check back soon for the latest.

Source: CarNewsChina, Changan Mazda

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Trump will hold a rally at U.S. Steel as investors seek clarity on Nippon deal. Here’s what we know

Published

on

By

Trump will hold a rally at U.S. Steel as investors seek clarity on Nippon deal. Here’s what we know

Sen. Dave McCormick on Nippon-U.S. Steel deal: A win-win situation for both sides

President Donald Trump will hold a rally Friday at a U.S. Steel plant near Pittsburgh, a week after signaling that he had cleared a controversial merger with Japan’s Nippon Steel.

Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks at 5 p.m. ET at U.S. Steel’s Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, according to the White House. Investors and union members will listen for answers from the president on what shape the deal he announced between U.S. Steel and Nippon will take.

Trump described the deal as a “partnership” in a May 23 post on his social media platform Truth Social. The president said U.S. Steel’s headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh and Nippon would invest $14 billion over 14 months in the more than 120-year-old American industrial icon.

Trump told reporters on Sunday that the deal is an “investment, it’s a partial ownership, but it will be controlled by the USA.” But the White House and the companies have provided little detail to the public on how the deal is structured since Trump’s announcement.

U.S. Steel has described the deal as a “merger” in which it will become a “wholly owned subsidiary” of Nippon Steel North America but continue to operate as separate company, according to an April 8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Sources familiar with the matter told CNBC’s David Faber that Nippon is expected to close its acquisition of U.S. Steel at $55 per share, the original offer the Japanese steelmaker made before President Joe Biden rejected the deal in January. Biden blocked Nippon’s proposed acquisition on national security grounds, arguing that it would jeopardize critical supply chains.

U.S. Trade Rep. Jamieson Greer: Very concerned with Chinese non-compliance on trade agreement

But Trump ordered a new review of the deal in April, softening his previous opposition to Nippon buying U.S. Steel. The president announced the “partnership” one day after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States was supposed to conclude its review and make a recommendation on whether the companies had found ways to “mitigate any national security risks.”

‘National security agreement’

Pennsylvania Sen. Dave McCormick told CNBC on Tuesday that the U.S. government will have a “golden share” that will allow it to decide on a number of board seats. U.S. Steel will have an American CEO and a majority of the board will come from the U.S. McCormick said.

“It’s a national security agreement that will be signed with the U.S. government,” McCormick told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “There’ll be a golden share that will essentially require U.S. government approval of a number of the board members and that will allow the United States to ensure production levels aren’t cut.”

Nippon will “have certainly members of the board and this will be part of their overall corporate structure,” McCormick told CNBC. White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro told reporters Thursday that “Nippon Steel is going to have some involvement, but no control of the company.”

“U.S. Steel owns the company,” Navarro said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC on Friday that the details of the Nippon Steel deal “remain confidential, relatively.”

“The underlying principle is that the United States should have control over key critical sectors, whether it’s basic manufacturing or high tech,” Greer told “Squawk Box.” “In the event that foreign countries or foreign individuals or firms want to acquire these companies or have large investments, the U.S. has to maintain control of things that matter.”

The United Steelworkers, which originally opposed the deal, has said the union “cannot speculate about the impact” of Trump’s announcement “without more information.”

“Our concern remains that Nippon, a foreign corporation with a long and proven track record of violating our trade laws, will further erode domestic steelmaking capacity and jeopardize thousands of good, union jobs,” USW President David McCall said in a statement.

Continue Reading

Environment

Hyundai’s first three-row electric SUV is here as IONIQ 9 deliveries kick off across the US

Published

on

By

Hyundai's first three-row electric SUV is here as IONIQ 9 deliveries kick off across the US

Hyundai handed over one of the first IONIQ 9 models to customers in the US on Friday, marking the start of deliveries for its new three-row electric SUV.

Hyundai IONIQ 9 deliveries are now underway in the US

Just over two months after the first models rolled off the assembly line at Hyundai’s new EV plant in Georgia in March, deliveries are now underway.

Hyundai delivered one of the first IONIQ 9 models to customers in Georgia. The owners, Jennifer and Dwayne Maynard, traded in their IONIQ 5 for the larger electric SUV.

“We loved our IONIQ 5, but the IONIQ 9 offers everything we need and more for our family and our adventures,” Jennifer Maynard explained.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

With up to 2,472 liters (87 cubic feet), Hyundai’s three-row SUV boasts more interior cargo space than a Ford Explorer (2,492 liters).

To showcase the spaciousness of the IONIQ 9, Hyundai launched a new marketing campaign, “Space to Connect,” earlier this month, offering a glimpse inside the seven-seat family hauler.

Hyundai-IONIQ-9-deliveries
Hyundai IONIQ 9 (Source: Hyundai)

Not only does the SUV have “class-leading” interior space, but it’s also loaded with Hyundai’s latest tech and software.

The interior features a panoramic curved display with over 24″ of screen space, including dual 12.3″ driver display and infotainment screens.

Hyundai-vehicle-prices
2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 interior (Source: Hyundai)

Hyundai announced that 2026 IONIQ 9 prices start at just over $60,500, including a $1,600 destination fee. That’s for the base RWD model, which has a range of up to 335 miles. The AWD trim, with 303 horsepower and 320 miles range, starts at under $65,000.

Hyundai-IONIQ-9-interior-space
Hyundai IONIQ 9 interior (Source: Hyundai)

Like the upgraded 2025 IONIQ 5, Hyundai’s three-row electric SUV features a built-in NACS port, allowing you to access Tesla’s Supercharger network. Using a 350 kW DC fast charger, the IONIQ 9 can recharge from 10% to 80% in about 24 minutes.

While it’s still available, the IONIQ 9 qualifies for the $7,500 federal tax credit, which could lower prices to as low as $53,055.

2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 Model EV Powertrain Drivetrain Driving
Range
(miles)
Starting Price
(including destination fee)
IONIQ 9 RWD S 160-kW (215-HP)
Electric Motor
Rear-
Wheel
Drive
335 $60,555
IONIQ 9 AWD SE 226.1 kW (303-HP)
Dual Electric Motors
All-Wheel
Drive
320 $64,365
IONIQ 9 AWD SEL 226.1-kW (303-HP)
Dual Electric Motors
All-Wheel
Drive
320 $67,920
IONIQ 9 AWD 
PERFORMANCE LIMITED
314.6-kW (422-HP)
Dual Electric Motors
All-Wheel
Drive
311 $72,850
IONIQ 9 AWD
PERFORMANCE
CALLIGRAPHY
314.6-kW (422-HP)
Dual Electric Motors
All-Wheel
Drive
311 $76,590
IONIQ 9 AWD
PERFORMANCE
CALLIGRAPHY DESIGN
314.6-kW (422-HP)
Dual Electric Motors
All-Wheel
Drive
311 $78,090
2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 prices and driving range by trim (*including a $1,600 destination fee)

With deliveries now underway, there are a few deals that are worth checking out. Hyundai is offering a $5,000 cash bonus on all IONIQ 9 trims. With the $7,500 credit, you can snag up to $12,500 in upfront savings

Leases start as low as $419 for 36 months, which is even more affordable than a Toyota Highlander XLE Hybrid right now. If you’re looking for something smaller, the 2025 IONIQ 5 is available with leases starting at $209 per month.

Until June 2, Hyundai will give you a free ChargePoint Level 2 charger with the purchase or lease of a 2026 IONIQ 9 or 2025 IONIQ 5. Earlier today, we learned that Hyundai could raise vehicle prices as soon as next week.

Ready to check out Hyundai’s electric SUVs for yourself? We’re here to help. You can use our links below to find deals on the Hyundai IONIQ 9 and IONIQ 5 in your area.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending