Connect with us

Published

on

A very strange disjuncture has opened up in Washington between the serene mood and the alarming developments that are under way. The surface is calm because the Republican presidential candidate won the election, and Democrats, the only one of the two major parties committed on principle to upholding the legitimacy of election results, conceded defeat and are cooperating in the peaceful transition of power. Whatever energy the chastened Democrats can muster at the moment is aimed inward, at factional struggles over their future direction.

Meanwhile, what is actually happening in the capital is, by any rational standard, disturbing. Donald Trump is filling his administration with loyalists, a prerogative that his opponents have grudgingly accepted as his due. Yet he is defining loyalist in maximal terms, including the belief that Trump legitimately won the 2020 election and was justified in his attempt to seize power. The winners are rewriting the history of the insurrection, and their version of history is about to acquire the force of law.

Consider three developments just from the past weekend.

On Saturday, The New York Times reported that the Trump transition team is asking applicants for high-level positions in the Defense Department and intelligence agencies three questions: which candidate they supported in the past three elections, what they thought about January 6, and whether they believed the 2020 election was stolen. Among the wrong answers, applicants say, are conceding that Trump lost the election or that his supporters should not have tried to overturn the result.

Franklin Foer: How the Trump resistance gave up

The purpose of these issue screens is not merely to ensure that Trump benefits from advisers who are committed to his success and wished for it all along. After all, plenty of Republicans voted for Trump multiple times without endorsing his attempted autogolpe. The purpose, rather, is to weed out anybody who dissents from Trumps conviction that he is entitled to rule regardless of what the Constitution says. Trump believes, not without reason, that his first term was undermined by the insufficient devotion of his underlings, most famously Mike Pence (of Hang Mike Pence! fame).

Then, yesterday, in an interview with NBC, Trump reiterated his promise to free the January 6 insurrectionists. He justified this promise on the supposed grounds that the J6 criminals are being confined in a hellhole (better known as the D.C. jail) and that their guilty pleas were coerced with the threat of even longer prison sentences had they gone to trial. (These are, of course, routine features of a criminal-justice system Trump normally depicts as too soft.) He denied the well-documented fact that some rioters assaulted police officers, even claiming that the cops invited the rioters into the Capitol before unfairly arresting them. And he proceeded to say that members of the congressional committee investigating January 6 were themselves criminals who should be in prison, alleging without any basis that the committee deleted and destroyed evidence that Nancy Pelosi was responsible for the insurrection.

It remains exceedingly unlikely that this rhetoric will lead to any members of the January 6 committee facing prison time. What Trumps comments signify is the complete political turnabout that he has wrought since January 2021. In the aftermath of the insurrection, Trump was disgraced, the insurrectionists faced legal accountability for their attempt to seize power, andthis is a measure of how distant that period of post-J6 recriminations now feelsAmerican corporations were withholding financial contributions from any Republicans who had endorsed it.

By next month, the insurrectionists may be free, and the opponents of the insurrection will be the hunted ones. Whether their punishment amounts to facing bogus criminal charges or mere political banishment (a price most that pro-democracy Republicans have already paid) remains to be seen.

David A. Graham: The Trump believability gap

Finally, last night, Trump announced that he will appoint Michael Anton as director of policy planning at the State Department. This announcement attracted little attention, and given that Anton already served during the first Trump term (in a communications role), it hardly moves the needle. But Antons appointment does highlight the banal ubiquity of authoritarian thinking in the Trumpified Republican Party.

Anton is best known for an essay published eight years ago called The Flight 93 Election. In it, he argued that conservatives should support Trump, despite their serious reservations about his character, because another Democratic term in office would amount to the death of the republic. (Hillary Clinton, like the 9/11 hijackers, would steer the country toward the equivalent of a fiery demise.) At the time, Antons argument stood out for its existential tone and hysterical life-and-death metaphor. Now his logicthat permitting Democrats to win a single national election is tantamount to national suicide, the prevention of which justifies any measures, legal or otherwiseis a required belief for service in the power ministries. Once an oddball, Anton is just another Trump bureaucrat who subscribes to the partys rule-or-perish ideology.

Exactly how this belief system will play out over the next four years is a wide-open question, one that those of us who dont subscribe to it would prefer not to contemplate. In the meantime, we are in the midst of an uneasy transfer of legitimate democratic power to a party whose leader, at least for the moment, does not need to seize it by force.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Lawyer for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs claims there was ‘mutual violence’ between him and ex-girlfriend

Published

on

By

Lawyer for Sean 'Diddy' Combs claims there was 'mutual violence' between him and ex-girlfriend

A lawyer representing Sean “Diddy” Combs has told a court there was “mutual” domestic violence between him and his ex-girlfriend Casandra ‘Cassie’ Ventura.

Marc Agnifilo made the claim as he outlined some of the music star’s defence case ahead of the full opening of his trial next week.

Combs has pleaded not guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of
transportation for prostitution. If convicted, he faces up to life in prison.

Ms Ventura is expected to testify as a star witness for the prosecution during the trial in New York. The final stage of jury selection is due to be held on Monday morning.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why is Sean Combs on trial?

Mr Agnifilo told the court on Friday that the defence would “take the position that there was mutual violence” during the pair’s relationship and called on the judge to allow evidence related to this.

The lawyer said Combs‘s legal team intended to argue that “there was hitting on both sides, behaviour on both sides” that constituted violence.

He added: “It is relevant in terms of the coercive aspects, we are admitting domestic violence.”

U.S. Marshalls sit behind Sean "Diddy" Combs as he sits at the defense table alongside lawyer Marc Agnifilo in the courtroom during his sex trafficking trial in New York City, New York, U.S., May 9, 2025 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg
Image:
A court sketch showing Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs (right) as he listens to his lawyer Marc Agnifilo addressing the court. Pic: Reuters

Ms Ventura’s lawyers declined to comment on the allegations.

US District Judge Arun Subramanian said he would rule on whether to allow the evidence on Monday.

Combs, 55, was present in the court on Friday.

He has been held in custody in Brooklyn since his arrest last September.

Prosecutors allege that Combs used his business empire for two decades to lure women with promises of romantic relationships or financial support, then violently coerced them to take part in days-long, drug-fuelled sexual performances known as “Freak Offs”.

Read more:
Diddy on trial: Everything you need to know
Sean Combs: A timeline of allegations

Combs’s lawyers say prosecutors are improperly seeking to criminalise his “swinger lifestyle”. They have suggested they will attack the credibility of alleged victims in the case by claiming their allegations are financially motivated.

The trial is expected to last around eight weeks.

Continue Reading

UK

Police investigating alleged attack on prison officer by Southport triple murderer Axel Rudakubana

Published

on

By

Police investigating alleged attack on prison officer by Southport triple murderer Axel Rudakubana

Police are investigating an alleged attack on a prison officer by Southport triple killer Axel Rudakubana on Thursday, Sky News understands.

A Prison Service spokesperson said: “Police are investigating an attack on a prison officer at HMP Belmarsh yesterday.

“Violence in prison will not be tolerated and we will always push for the strongest possible punishment for attacks on our hardworking staff.”

Rudakubana is serving life in jail for murdering Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class last year.

According to The Sun, Rudakubana poured boiling water over the prison officer, who was taken to hospital as a precaution but only suffered minor injuries.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

Environment

Kia EV4 test drive reveals the good, the bad, and the ugly

Published

on

By

Kia EV4 test drive reveals the good, the bad, and the ugly

Can Kia’s first electric sedan live up to the hype? After launching the EV4 in Korea, we are finally seeing it in action. A new test drive of the EV4 gives us a closer look at what to expect as Kia prepares to take it global. Here’s how it went down.

Kia EV4 test drive: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Kia claims the EV4 will “set a new standard in electric vehicles” with long-range capabilities, fast charging, and a sleek new design.

The electric sedan features a unique, almost sports-car-like profile with a long-tail silhouette and added roof spoiler.

Kia claims it is “the new look of a sedan fit for the era of electrification.” Despite its four-door design, the company is calling it a new type of sedan.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The design is not only eye-catching, but it’s also super efficient. With a drag coefficient of just 0.23, the EV4 is Kia’s most aerodynamic vehicle so far, enabling maximum driving range and efficiency.

Kia opened EV4 orders in South Korea in March, starting at about $29,000 (41.92 million won). It’s available with two battery options: 58.2 kWh and 81.4 kWh. The entry-level “Standard Air” model, powered by the 58.2 kWh battery, is rated with up to 237 miles of driving range.

Kia-EV4-test-drive
Kia EV4 sedan Korea-spec (Source: Hyundai Motor)

The “Long-Range Air” variant starts at 46.29 million won ($31,800) and has a driving range of up to 331 miles (533 km) in Korea.

With charging speeds of up to 350 kW, the EV4 can charge from 10% to 80% in around 29 minutes. The long-range battery will take about 31 minutes.

Kia-EV4-test-drive
Kia EV4 sedan interior (Source: Hyundai Motor)

The interior boasts Kia’s latest ccNC infotainment system with a 30″ Ultra-wide Panoramic Display. The setup includes dual 12.3″ driver displays, navigation screens, and a 5″ air conditioning panel.

With deliveries kicking off, we are seeing some of the first test drives come out. A review from HealerTV gives us a better idea of what it’s like to drive the EV4 in person.

Kia EV4 test drive (Source: HealerTV)

Sitting next to Kia’s first pickup, the Tasman, the reviewer mentions the EV4 feels “particularly newer.” The test drive starts around the city with a ride quality similar to that of the K5, if not even better.

As you can see from the camera shaking, the ride feels “a bit uncomfortable” on rough roads. However, on normal surfaces and speed bumps, Kia’s electric sedan “feels neither too soft nor too hard,” just normal. The reviewer calls the EV4’s overall ride quality “quite ordinary” with “nothing particularly special about it.”

When accelerating, the electric car was smooth in the beginning but felt “a little lacking in later stages.” Overall, it should be enough for everyday use.

One of the biggest issues was that the rear window appeared too low. The rear brake lights also stick out, making it hard to see clearly through the rearview.

Keep in mind that the test drive was the Korean-spec EV4. Kia will launch the EV4 in Europe later this year and in the US in early 2026.

In the US, the EV4 will include a built-in NACS port for charging at Tesla Superchargers and a driving range of up to 330 (EPA-est) miles. Prices will be revealed closer to launch, but the EV4 is expected to start at around $35,000 to $40,000.

Would you buy Kia’s electric sedan for around $35,000? Or would you rather have the Tesla Model 3, which starts at $42,490 in the US and has up to 363 miles of range? Let us know in the comments.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending