Connect with us

Published

on

California’s new building codes will require EV chargers in most new overnight parking spots starting in 2026, going a big way towards solving the only actual problem with EVs.

One of the main benefits of an electric vehicle is in the convenience of owning and charging the car. Instead of having to go out of your way to fuel it, you just park it at home, in the same place it spends at least 8 hours a day, and you leave the house every day with a full charge.

But this benefit only applies to those with a consistent parking space which they can easily install charging at – like a garage or a driveway, or perhaps a charger at work. When talking about owners who live in apartment buildings, it can sometimes get more complicated.

While certain states have passed “right to charge” laws to give apartment-dwellers a solution for home charging, apartment charging is nevertheless a bit of a patchwork solution so far.

But in California a fix is about to come, in the form of new building codes with sweeping EV charging requirements, ensuring that a huge percentage of new parking spots in California will have to be ready for EV charging.

New building codes mean huge increase in charging points

California building codes already required a lesser percentage of units to be “EV ready,” depending on the size of the development. But now, the new rules require at least one charger per unit, in most cases.

For any new unit with a parking space in a multi-family development (apartments/condos), at least one of the parking spots must be “EV Ready.” An EV Ready space is defined as having at least a 240V/20A outlet or charger for EV charging, either with a standardized outlet (NEMA 6-20, 14-30 or 14-50) or a J1772 or J3400 (NACS) charger.

However, EV ready spaces are allowed to share power between them, as we saw in one recent condo project we highlighted, as long as the system can provide a minimum of 3.3kW simultaneously to each unit. That project happened with a final cost of $405/space, though that was after a $2k/space incentive from the utility – still, quite cheap to wire up an entire apartment complex.

If the parking space is the unit’s own space, the new rules say it should be on a separate circuit wired to that unit’s electrical panel “when feasible” (a phrase that will likely do some heavy lifting in power-sharing situations). If the space is shared, then at least one EV ready space needs to exist per unit. If there are more parking spaces than there are units, at least 25% of the excess need to be EV ready (and there are options for individual cities to increase this requirement).

But the rules go on from there – beyond multi-family developments, they also apply to hotels. A new hotel or motel must have 65% EV-ready parking spaces, with an option for cities to increase that requirement to 100%.

Even non-residential parking lots have new EV requirements. 20% of spaces in any commercial, office or retail lot must be EV ready, with an option for cities to increase the requirement to 30% or 45%. In these cases though, property owners can install DC fast charging to get “extra credit” and reduce the number of lower-powered spaces required.

Presumably, this will incentivize an increase in the number of public DC charging spaces, which should make DC charging on the road just that much easier (even though it’s already pretty easy in California).

Finally, the rules don’t just apply to entirely new developments, but to any added parking on an existing development. Any time a parking space is added or altered in a way that requires a building permit, that space must be EV ready.

This last point is important – not only do new developments get covered by the codes, but we’ll gradually see older developments having to add EV charging as time goes on and they make renovations or improvements. This includes new solar canopy parking projects, which are required to add chargers, but doesn’t include retrofits of existing parking lots that add level 1 charging – they’re exempted from the minimum 240v/20a/3.3kW service requirements.

A positive reaction from advocacy groups

We spoke to a number of organizations about these changes, and everyone seems quite happy. Peninsula Clean Energy, a utility in the SF Bay Area, said the new rules are a “HUGE win,” highlighting how the success of local building codes (like Bay Area Reach Codes) helped push the state to ramp up from its previous incremental approach in setting regulations.

PCE highlighted that the “advocacy community” pushed hard for these regulations – namely, the EV Charging for All Coalition, who were the first to bring this news to our attention. EVCAC consists of EV advocates and environmental organizations who realized that building codes were a relatively underfocused area where a lot of progress could be made, and started pushing the state to accelerate improvement of its codes.

We talked to Sven Thesen, one of EVCAC’s co-founders, who highlighted that a “small group of dedicated individuals” were able to stand up against the glacial pace of change and resistance from the building industry “to get something much faster out there that needed to be out there. And it’s a win-win for everybody.”

Thesen highlighted that while this is a strong goal, it’s not excessive – the focus was on right-sizing installations, allowing for lower-power Level 2, power-sharing, and Level 1 retrofits to ensure that everyone has a charging option, but that systems aren’t oversized.

The new rules were finalized in a unanimous vote Tuesday, and will go into effect at the start of 2026 – just over a year away. And all of this can’t come soon enough – given that California also wants to ensure that all new cars have a plug as early as 2035, building codes like these need to be in place ahead of time so there’s time for them to percolate through the housing stock and make sure those EVs will have a place to charge.

Electrek’s Take

I’ve long said that charging for people who don’t own their own parking space is the only real problem with EVs. The last time I said it was in the story of a condo complex that covered all of its parking spots with charging.

In that story, I said “and, frankly, we also need legislation/building codes to hop in and require this sort of thing.” And here we are, two weeks later, and I got exactly what I asked for. Well ain’t that just a Merry freakin’ Christmas!

One note on cost: while I’m rarely sympathetic to the desires of big residential developers, who seem pathologically opposed to any sort of minimum guidelines for construction and always looking to cut corners (often putting them at odds with the state of California), it is true that California is an expensive place to build, and that’s not a problem we want to contribute more to.

But what’s great about these codes is that while they do require minimum standards, they seem open to allowing some flexibility on feasibility. A strict requirement of a certain amount of power per unit, each set up on a separate circuit, would likely still be a drop in the bucket for new developments in already-expensive California – but making lower-power installations possible, especially for existing developments without triggering new-build requirements, is a great middle ground.

So I’m in agreement with Thesen from the EVCAC that these codes strike the right balance of ensuring minimum standards for EV charging while also keeping costs reasonable and not unduly burdening multi-family developments – which are something that California desperately needs. There’s a lot of low-density, car-dependent areas in California, and we don’t want to make it too hard to build higher density neighborhoods, so we can hopefully start working towards more walkability and less car dependence.

But the codes also include some measures to help in that respect – by adjusting requirements for bicycle parking. Instead of basing bike rack requirements on motor vehicle traffic, the rules now base them on square footage, which helps to decouple these rules from their current car-centric mentality. It also eliminates an exception which allowed developments to get out of offering bike parking.

Between these two moves, it should go a long way towards solving the one real problem with EVs.


But if you *do* have your own garage and roof, consider charging your electric vehicle at home using rooftop solar panels. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Newly unveiled electric bike motor is ‘world’s lightest, most efficient’

Published

on

By

Newly unveiled electric bike motor is 'world's lightest, most efficient'

TQ, the German force behind some of the lightest and quietest e-bike motors on the market, just took a leap forward – again. Barely weeks after debuting the lightweight HPR60 e-bike drive system, the company has introduced the HPR40, now claiming the title of the lightest and most efficient mid-drive motor in the world.

Tailored for road and gravel e-bikes, the HPR40 clocks in at just 1.17 kg (2.6 lb). That means it has slashed nearly half the weight of the previous HPR60, which weighed 1.92 kg (4.2 lb).

Despite being smaller, it still delivers a respectable 40 Nm of torque and up to 200W of peak power, making it ideal for riders seeking subtle assist rather than brute force. This isn’t about raw horsepower; it’s about efficiency and seamless integration.

Don’t expect to see it on the next 750W Lectric or Aventon, but look for it on higher-end gravel and road e-bikes where riders are looking for a modest boost instead of a powerful burst.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Unlike motors that have been rebadged from their original use on mountain bikes or commuters, TQ designed the HPR40 from scratch for lighter frames, aiming to remain nearly invisible on a bike’s bottom bracket and with controls hidden inside the handlebar. The result is a drive system that blends into the bike like a whisper, offering performance without the bulk.

At the heart of the HPR motor is TQ’s Harmonic Pin-Ring Transmission, which is a refined drivetrain rearranged to live fully inside a bike in place of the bottom bracket. This clever design eliminates noisy gears, reduces friction, and lets the motor engage instantly with zero lag. While that might sound like many mid-drives we regularly see from manufacturers like Bosch, TQ’s is so small and so deeply integrated that it’s barely visible to a casual observer.

The HPR40 pairs with a 290Wh battery that weighs just 1.46 kg (3.2 lb) and is hidden inside the downtube. There’s also a water bottle-sized 160 Wh range extender available, keeping total system weight under 2.7 kg (6 lbs). That’s one of the lightest fully integrated e-bike systems out there.

Control comes via a hidden handlebar remote hidden under the handlebar tape, and a sleek end-cap LED display keeps essentials in view without disrupting aesthetics. This stripped-down interface reinforces TQ’s philosophy: get out of the rider’s way. Or as New Atlas humorously described it, “it’s almost as if the company is daring riders to start a fresh round of mechanical doping scandals.”

TQ’s HPR40 isn’t just a fancy new drive system in a display booth, it’s already built into the new Canyon Endurace:ONFly, a sub‑10 kg (22 lb) e-road bike that tips the scales at just 9.9 kg. The Endurace:ONFly marries TQ’s whisper-soft assist with Canyon’s aerodynamic finesse, offering riders a bike that feels analog but rides electric.

The HPR40’s high torque density means riders can double their pedaling output with a modest 200 W boost. That translates to better climbs, longer rides, and a natural ride feel, all without the compromises of heavier systems. Considering that many riders can put out around 200W of constant power by themselves, the effect is like having a tandem rider along helping out, except that he only weighs 6 pounds.

The move shows that not every drive maker is merely chasing horsepower and torque figures. Instead, by merging elegant design, noticeable yet natural power, and light weight, TQ is proving that electric assistance doesn’t have to scream. It can whisper.

Electrek’s Take

Here’s the real story: the HPR40 isn’t just a technical footnote, it’s a signal. It shows that electric bike engineering is transitioning from brute force toward a future that also includes invisible, intuitive power systems. For riders chasing the delicate line between analog feel and electric assist, this is a breakthrough.

And considering that many riders are reaching an age where their mind wants to do the kind of rides that their body might no longer be capable of, systems like these can keep those riders in the saddle for longer. That’s many more years of keeping the good times rolling (and keeping the body young by continuing regular exercise).

Now the question is whether other brands will follow suit. Will we see this ultra-light motor trickle down into commuter e‑bikes or adventure-ready gravel rigs? If so, the day when an e‑bike feels exactly like a bike, but gives you a little assist when you need it most, just got much closer.

TQ is playing a long game: subtle, smart, and purpose-built. The HPR40 is merely the first move, and if this is any indicator, the next wave of e-bikes may feel less electric and more… old school?

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Elon Musk claims Tesla delivered its first car fully autonomously from factory to customer

Published

on

By

Elon Musk claims Tesla delivered its first car fully autonomously from factory to customer

Elon Musk claims Tesla has delivered its first car fully autonomously from the factory to a customer’s home “across town.”

If true, I’d argue that this is actually a bigger deal than its “Robotaxi” with supervisors, but there are still questions about the value of such a system.

The Tesla CEO announced on X:

The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule!!

Musk has been known to stretch the meaning of the words “fully autonomous” over the years, but he did give a few more details:

Advertisement – scroll for more content

There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous! To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway.

This would be somewhat of an improvement from its recently launched Robotaxi service, which involves a Tesla employee in the passenger seat at all times, ready to hit a kill switch.

However, Musk’s last comment is not valid. Several companies have tested fully autonomous driving with no one in the driver’s seat or in the car, and Waymo has even started offering rides to paying passengers on freeways.

Highway driving is part of Waymo’s operations in Phoenix, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, although it is currently only available to employees through Waymo’s internal app in the latter two markets.

Musk says that a video of the milestone is coming soon.

The milestone comes after Tesla has been moving its vehicles autonomously from the end of the line to its delivery lots at factories in the US for the last few months.

Electrek’s Take

With in-car supervisors at all times and numerous issues arising in just the first few days of operations, Tesla’s Robotaxi launch fell short of expectations. For anyone who had previously experienced Tesla’s Supervised Full Self-Driving or a more comprehensive product like Waymo, it didn’t feel special.

An autonomous drive with no one in the car, including highway driving from the factory to a customer’s home, can be more impressive, albeit with some potential caveats.

“No people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point.” In some sense, Tesla’s FSD and Robotaxi programs would be able to do that too, it’s just that Tesla is not confident that they can do it reliably enough over long periods of time to remove the supervision.

Which raises the question: what’s different with this?

No one in the car, so Tesla doesn’t take the safety concerns as seriously? That would be weird, as the safety of people outside of the vehicle, aka other road users, also needs to be considered.

It’s possible that Tesla tested the particular route for this drive several times and then remotely, even potentially with a trailing car, as it was spotted several times in recent months, monitored it with someone ready to stop it at all times.

It wouldn’t be that far from what Tesla already operates, and not something scalable until we see data that shows Tesla can consistently do this safely over hundreds of thousands of miles.

Ultimately, that remains the main issue. Tesla is big on making videos and making showy statements when it comes to self-driving, but it has never released any relevant data. Ever. Let’s see it.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

The GMC Sierra EV pickup just got way more affordable

Published

on

By

The GMC Sierra EV pickup just got way more affordable

The 2026 GMC Sierra EV is already over $27,500 cheaper than the outgoing model. With new deals dropping this month, the electric pickup is even more affordable.

The 2026 GMC Sierra gets more affordable and capable

After introducing the new Elevation and AT4 variants for the 2026 model year, GMC said the Sierra EV is now “right in the heart of the premium truck market.” It looks like GMC wasn’t just talking.

The 2026 GMC Sierra EV Elevation starts at $64,495. That’s $27,795 less than the 2025 Denali edition, which has a base price of $92,290 (which we had the opportunity to try out).

After launching new lease deals and other discounts this month, the 2026 GMC Sierra EV is surprisingly affordable. The base Sierra EV 4WD Elevation is listed for lease at just $559 per month. In comparison, monthly leases for the 2025 model year start at $949.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The offer is for a 36-month lease with $5,599 due at signing and based on an MSRP of $64,495. However, the deal is only good until June 30, 2025.

GMC-Sierra-EV-affordable
2026 GMC Sierra EV AT4 (left) and Elevation (right) trims (Source: GMC)

Since the Elevation and Denali trims start under the $80,000 threshold, they qualify for the $7,500 federal tax credit (as long as it’s still available).

GM is offering more ways to save on the 20,25 model year, including 2.9% APR for 72 months and a $3,000 Purchase Allowance.

2026-GMC-Sierra-EV affordable
2026 GMC Sierra EV AT4 (Source: GM)

The 2026 GMC Sierra EV is available with three battery pack options: Standard, Extended, and Max Range, boasting a range of up to 478 miles.

With an all-electric powertrain, the Sierra is more capable than ever. The base Elevation trim offers a best-in-class rating of up to 605 horsepower and can tow up to 12,300 lbs.

GMC-Sierra-EV-affordable
2026 GMC Sierra EV AT4 with MultiPro Tailgate (Source: GM)

It also comes with a few added perks, including GMC’s MultiPro Tailgate, a flexible tailgate system with six different configurations that make hauling even easier.

Inside, the electric pickup features a 16.8″ infotainment system with Google built-in. GM’s Super Cruise hands-free driver assistance system comes standard on AT4 and Denali trims.

The new AT4 model features an added 2″ of ground clearance, a lifted coil suspension, perimeter grille illumination, and 35″ all-terrain tires. It also has an exclusive Terrain Mode, which maximizes torque, control, and more using GM’s new software.

2026 GMC Sierra EV trim Starting Price
(MSRP including $2,05 DFC)
Max Driving Range
Elevation (Standard Range) $64,495 283 miles
Elevation (Extended Range) $72,695 410 miles
AT4 (Standard Range) $81,395 390 miles
AT4 (Extended Range) $91,695 478 miles
Denali (Standard Range) $71,795 283 miles
Denali (Extended Range) $79,995 410 miles
Denali (Max Range) $100,695 478 miles
2026 GMC Sierra EV prices, battery, and trim options (Source: GMC)

With DC fast charging speeds of up to 350 kW, the 2026 Sierra EV can gain about 100 miles of range in roughly 10 minutes.

After cutting lease prices last month, Chevy’s electric pickup, the Silverado EV, may also be worth considering right now.

Want to see what the electric pickup is all about? You can use our link to find 2025 and 2026 GMC Sierra EV models available at a dealer near you (trusted affiliate link).

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending