Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said most Waspi women knew the state pension age was changing so it was not “the best use of taxpayers’ money to pay an expensive compensation bill”.
The government revealed on Tuesday it would not be compensating millions of women born in the 1950s – called Waspi women – who say they were not given sufficient warning of the state pension age for women being lifted from 60 to 65.
It was due to be phased in over 10 years from 2010, but in 2011 was sped up to be reached by 2018, then rose to the age of 66 in 2020.
Several leading Labour politicians, including Sir Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, said they would get compensation for Waspi women (Women Against State Pension Inequality) before they were in government.
However, they have all now said compensation, which would have cost up to £10.5bn, will not be provided.
Image: Liz Kendall announced on Tuesday Waspi women would not be compensated, despite previously supporting it. Pic: PA
Ms Reeves became the latest, as she said: “I understand that women affected by the changes to the state pension age will be disappointed by the decision but we looked in full at the ombudsman recommendations and they said 90% of women did know these changes were coming.
“As chancellor, I have to account for every penny of taxpayers’ money spent.
“Given the vast majority of people knew these changes were coming, I didn’t judge that it was the best use of taxpayers’ money to pay an expensive compensation bill for something most people knew was happening.”
Image: Rachel Reeves posed with Waspi women in support of their campaign for compensation in 2020. Pic: Waspi/Facebook
Earlier this year, an investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) found thousands of women may have been adversely impacted by failures to adequately inform people of the change.
The watchdog suggested women should receive compensation of between £1,000 and £2,950 – but the findings were not legally binding.
Following the government’s decision to not compensate the women, the ombudsman criticised the government.
Rebecca Hilsenrath, PHSO chief executive, told Times Radio: “It’s great that the government are saying that our intervention will lead to service improvements and it’s fair to say also that people who come to us, overwhelmingly, are motivated by wanting things to improve for other people.
“But what we don’t expect is for an acknowledgement to be made by a public body that it’s got it wrong but then refuse to make it right for those affected.”
Image: Waspi women said not providing compensation was a ‘bizarre’ move. Pic: PA
Angela Madden, chairwoman of the Waspi campaign group, said refusing to compensate those impacted was a “bizarre and totally unjustified move”.
She added: “An overwhelming majority of MPs back Waspi’s calls for fair compensation and all options remain on the table.
“Parliament must now seek an alternative mechanism to force this issue onto the order paper so justice can be done.”
Conservative Andrew Griffith, shadow business secretary, told Sky News it was “a big issue of betrayal” by the Labour government.
“I’m not sitting here saying we would necessarily have done something about it. That’s fair,” he said.
“But the point is this government has given everybody the impression that they would, and then they’ve come in, and now they’re saying they wouldn’t. That’s a big issue.
“I can understand people, particularly the Waspi women, feeling enormously let down by that.”
The bill has seen contention online, but Satoshi Action Fund’s Eric Peterson says it updates the state’s unclaimed property laws so crypto doesn’t get liquidated.
Nigel Farage could be the next prime minister – but Labour could beat him by connecting with voters more, Greater Manchester’s Labour mayor has told Sky News.
Andy Burnham, talking to Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, said the Reform UK leader winning the next election “is in the realms of possibility”.
“But we’ve got to make sure that it doesn’t become a reality,” he said.
“I don’t ever demonstrate complacency as a politician, I will always say it like it is.
“He’s connected with people, maybe not everybody, but he’s connected.”
Asked if he thinks Labour are not connecting with voters at the moment, he said he does not think his party is speaking enough about “working class ambition”.
Mr Burnham said there are “hundreds of thousands” of people in Greater Manchester who are being “held back by their housing situation”.
More on Andy Burnham
Related Topics:
He said previous generations would have had council housing to “propel them to do amazing things” and if the government can follow up with its promise to build 1.5 million homes “they will really connect with people”.
The mayor said his party has not “spoken properly for quite some time now” to young people and their parents who want alternatives to the university route.
He said Labour has only seemed to care “in some people’s minds” about the university route, which “leaves a disconnect”.
To really come up strong against Mr Farage, Mr Burnham said Labour have “got to really speak to that working class ambition”.
He added: “I think Starmer has got to respond to the changing world that we’re in.”