Connect with us

Published

on

A woman and her boyfriend have been given community orders after prosecutors accepted she did not illegally abort her baby.

Warning: This article contains distressing content.

Sophie Harvey, 25, was due to stand trial with Elliot Benham in February on charges she took abortion pills online a month after the 24-week cut-off when she was 19.

The couple had accepted they bought the medication, but Harvey insisted she did not take them and gave birth to a stillborn baby in her bathroom in September 2018.

Harvey had previously described to Gloucester Crown Court how she was confused after going into labour and wrapped the baby in a towel before placing it into a bin.

At a further hearing on Wednesday, they both admitted to a new charge of conspiracy to procure a poison with intent to procure a miscarriage.

Harvey, of St Mary’s Road, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, and Benham, of Wingfield, Swindon, Wiltshire, had already accepted a charge of concealing the birth of a child.

But on Wednesday, the Crown Prosecution Service said it decided not to pursue other charges following “careful reflection”.

These included procuring a poison, procuring a miscarriage by poison and perverting the course of justice – which they denied and were ordered to lie on file.

“We recognise the profoundly painful circumstances surrounding this case, which our prosecutors have approached with sensitivity and care,” a spokesperson said.

“The defendants have pleaded guilty to two offences, and after careful reflection we have concluded that it is not in the public interest to pursue further charges.”

‘Absence of compassion’

The couple had stood trial at the court in May this year, but the jury was discharged after an application by their lawyers citing inaccurate reports of the proceedings by the BBC.

Prosecutors had sought a new trial and a date had been fixed for February next year.

Read more:
Criminology student guilty of murder
Not guilty pleas for Southport stabbings

Passing sentence, Judge Ian Lawrie KC, the Recorder of Gloucester, handed the pair a 18-month community order.

Harvey was also given a mental health treatment requirement, while Benham was told to complete 150 hours of unpaid work and both must pay a £114 surcharge.

“The loss of that life was a tragedy, and that small child was treated by being wrapped in a towel and placed in a bin,” the judge said, describing an “absence of compassion and humanity”.

“The impact upon your lives has been traumatic and I am sure this will continue for some time. If you can, and I doubt it, put it all behind you and get on with your lives.”

Continue Reading

UK

PM backs Reeves despite allegations of expenses scandal at bank job

Published

on

By

PM backs Reeves despite allegations of expenses scandal at bank job

Sir Keir Starmer says he has full confidence in Rachel Reeves after questions were raised about inaccuracies in her CV and her use of expenses in a previous job.

The chancellor has been accused by former employees of being involved in an “expenses scandal” while working at Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) from 2006 to 2009, according to the BBC.

She has also been accused of saying she worked for the Bank of England for longer than she did.

Politics latest: PM ditches visit after tractors bypass gates

The prime minister said the chancellor can be trusted and has no concerns about her conduct, Number 10 said.

Ms Reeves’ spokesperson said she was “not aware of an investigation, nor was she interviewed”. Her lawyer has denied the allegations.

One ex-colleague said she nearly got sacked after an investigation into three senior managers accused of “signing off each other’s expenses”.

This included spending hundreds of pounds on handbags, perfume, earrings and wine for colleagues, including one gift for her boss.

A whistleblower said there was also concern about her spending on taxis and on a Christmas party.

In a Facebook group of former HBOS employees seen by the BBC, several people referred to Ms Reeves being investigated over her expenses spending.

Rachel Reeves gestures, as she speaks about her plans for Britain's economy in Eynsham.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Sir Keir’s official spokesman said it was “correct” the prime minister has “no concerns whatsoever” about the chancellor’s conduct and has confidence in her.

He also said: “I can’t speak to her time prior to government.

“The PM works hand in hand and has full faith in the chancellor.”

Sir Keir later said she has “dealt with any issues that arise” from questions about her career before becoming an MP.

Reeves lawyers deny wrongdoing

A spokesperson for Ms Reeves said: “Rachel is proud of the work she did at HBOS and the teams that she led, it is 16 years since she left the bank and the first time she was made aware of these claims was when approached by journalists.

“She was not aware of an investigation nor was she interviewed, and she did not face any disciplinary action on this or any other matters. All expenses were submitted and signed off in the proper way.

“Several former colleagues from her time at the bank, including HBOS’ former HR business partner, have corroborated this account.

“Rachel left HBOS in 2009 on good terms.”

Ms Reeves’s lawyer while she was leaving HBOS denied she had done anything wrong, saying she left HBOS with a “standard-style agreement” after a “mutually agreed exit was made during the bank’s restructure”.

David Sorensen, a managing partner at Morrish Solicitors, added: “My clear understanding at the time was that my client, who was in a senior role, left on good terms when HBOS plc was acquired in 2009, as evidenced by the payments made to her, the retention of her company car and other benefits for a six-month period, and a favourable reference.

“Absolutely no allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct were mentioned by the HBOS HR team during this process.”

Read more:
Judge ‘wrong’ to let Gaza family settle in UK under Ukraine scheme, PM says

Treasury launches inquiry into leak of growth forecasts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I am not satisfied with the level of growth’

LinkedIn dates questioned

Questions have also been raised about Ms Reeves’ online CV, as her LinkedIn profile said she stayed at the Bank of England nine months longer than she actually did, the BBC has reported.

She has publicly said she spent a decade there, but her LinkedIn profile claimed she worked at the bank from September 2000 to December 2006.

However, she is understood to have left by March 2006, when she started working at HBOS.

That means she spent five and a half years at the bank, including nearly a year studying.

Ms Reeves’ spokesman, in a comment given to the BBC, said the dates on her LinkedIn were inaccurate and blamed an administrative error by her team.

They said the chancellor had not seen it before it was published.

The chancellor’s LinkedIn profile has now been updated to reflect she left the bank in March 2006.

Ms Reeves has repeatedly said she spent 10 years at the Bank of England, citing her time as an economist there as why she can be trusted with the UK’s finances.

Continue Reading

UK

Two British citizens detained in Iran

Published

on

By

Two British citizens detained in Iran

Two British citizens have been detained in Iran, the government has said.

Both are being supported by the UK Foreign Office, according to a spokesperson.

It comes following reports of the detention from Iranian state media yesterday.

A spokesperson said: “We are providing consular assistance to two British Nationals detained in Iran and are in contact with the local authorities.”

Iranian state media said on Wednesday that a man and woman were in custody in Iran’s southeastern city of Kerman on security-related charges.

The Foreign Office advises against travel to Iran for those who are at significant risk of detention.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Brothers deny assaulting police officers at Manchester Airport

Published

on

By

Brothers deny assaulting police officers at Manchester Airport

Two brothers have pleaded not guilty to assaulting police officers in a disturbance at Manchester Airport.

Footage of the incident at the airport’s Terminal Two building on 23 July was widely shared online.

Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, is alleged to have assaulted PC Zachary Marsden and PC Lydia Ward, causing them actual bodily harm.

He is also accused of assaulting PC Ellie Cook at the terminal’s car park pay station, as well as the assault of Abdulkareem Ismaeil, a member of the public, said to have taken place earlier at a nearby Starbucks cafe.

Read more from Sky News:
Economy shows surprise growth at end of 2024
Why Downing Street’s relief over economy may be temporary

Muhammad Amaad, 25, from Rochdale, is also alleged to have assaulted PC Marsden, causing actual bodily harm.

On Thursday, both men appeared at Liverpool Crown Court where they entered not guilty pleas.

A trial, scheduled to last three weeks, has been fixed for 30 June at the same court.

The defendants’ unconditional bail has been extended.

Continue Reading

Trending