Renewable energy is now over 30% of total US utility-scale electrical generating capacity and on track to reach 37% by the end of 2027, according to data in two new end-of-the-year reports just released by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) and reviewed by the SUN DAY Campaign.
In addition, renewables – i.e., solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydropower – provided almost 25% of the US’s electrical generation during the first 10 months of 2024.
Further, October was the 14th month in a row in which solar was the largest source of new capacity, putting it on track to become the US’s second-largest source of capacity, behind natural gas, in three years or sooner.
Renewables were over 90% of new generating capacity through October 2024
In its latest monthly “Energy Infrastructure Update” (with data through October 31, 2024), FERC says 41 “units” of solar totaling 1,970 megawatts (MW) were placed into service in October along with three units of wind (174 MW). Combined, they accounted for 99.9% of all new generating capacity added during the month. Natural gas provided the balance – a mere 3 MW.
During the first 10 months of 2024, solar and wind added 21,425 MW and 2,799 MW, respectively. Combined with 213 MW of hydropower and 6 MW of biomass, renewables were almost 90.5% of capacity added. The balance consisted of the 1,100 Vogtle-4 nuclear reactor in Georgia plus 1,456 MW of gas, 11 MW of oil, and 8 MW of “other.”
Solar was 92% of new capacity in October and 79% during the first 10 months of 2024
Solar accounted for 79.3% of all new utility-scale generation placed into service in the first 10 months of 2024. In October alone, solar comprised 91.8% of all new capacity added.
New wind capacity YTD accounted for most of the balance – 10.4% through October.
Solar capacity additions through the end of October were 80.5% higher than during the same period in 2023. Meanwhile, new natural gas capacity was less than one-sixth (15.3%) of that added last year.
Solar has now been the largest source of new generating capacity for 14 months straight, from September 2023 to October 2024. For a majority of those months, wind took second place.
Solar + wind are now over 21% of US generating capacity
The combined capacities of just solar and wind now constitute 21.2% of the US’s total available installed utility-scale generating capacity.
However, roughly one-third of US solar capacity is in the form of small-scale (e.g., rooftop) systems that is not reflected in FERC’s data. Including that additional solar capacity would bring the share provided by solar + wind closer to a quarter of the country’s total.
Solar’s share of US generating capacity advances it to fourth place
The latest capacity additions have brought solar’s share of total available installed utility-scale generating capacity up to 9.5%, further expanding its lead over hydropower (7.7%). Wind is currently at 11.8%. With the inclusion of biomass (1.1%) and geothermal (0.3%), renewables now stand at 30.37% of total US utility-scale generating capacity.
Installed utility-scale solar has now moved into fourth place – behind natural gas (43.3%), coal (15.5%) and wind – for its share of generating capacity after previously surpassing that of nuclear power (7.9%).
Solar will soon become the second-largest source of US generating capacity
FERC reports that net “high probability” additions of solar between October 2024 and September 2027 have risen to 93,803 MW – an amount more than four times the forecast net “high probability” additions for wind (23,261 MW), the second fastest-growing resource.
FERC also foresees growth for hydropower (1,316 MW), biomass (164 MW), and geothermal (90 MW). On the other hand, there is no new nuclear capacity in FERC’s three-year forecast, while coal, oil, and natural gas are projected to shrink by 19,863 MW, 2,244 MW, and 90 MW, respectively.
If FERC’s current “high probability” additions materialize, by October 1, 2027, solar will account for almost one-sixth (15.5%) of the nation’s installed utility-scale generating capacity. That would be greater than either coal (13.0%) or wind (12.6%) and substantially more than either nuclear power (7.4%) or hydropower (7.3%). The installed capacity of utility-scale solar would thus rise to second place – behind only natural gas (40.3%).
Meanwhile, the mix of all renewables would account for 36.7% of total available installed utility-scale generating capacity – rapidly approaching that of natural gas – with solar and wind constituting more than three-quarters (76.5%) of the installed utility-scale renewable energy capacity.
The combined capacities of all renewables, including small-scale solar, seem likely to exceed natural gas within three years
As noted, FERC’s data do not account for the capacity of small-scale solar systems. If that is factored in, within three years, total US solar capacity (i.e., small-scale plus utility-scale) is likely to approach – and very possibly surpass – 300 GW. In turn, the mix of all renewables would then exceed 40% of total installed capacity while the share of natural gas would drop to about 37%.
Moreover, FERC reports that there may actually be as much as 213,902 MW of net new solar additions in the current three-year pipeline in addition to 66,094 MW of new wind, 7,123 MW of new hydropower, 235 MW of new biomass, and 199 MW of new geothermal. In addition, new solar capacity has regularly exceeded FERC’s forecasts. Thus, renewables’ share could be even greater by early autumn 2027.
Solar is still the fastest-growing source of US electrical generation
In its latest monthly “Electric Power Monthly” report (with data through October 31, 2024), EIA says the combination of utility-scale and “estimated” small-scale (e.g., rooftop) solar increased by 26.3% in the first 10 months of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023.
Utility-scale solar thermal and photovoltaic expanded by 30.8% during the 10-month period (and by 37.8% in October alone), while small-scale solar PV increased by 15.8%, thereby making solar once again the fastest growing source of US electrical generation.
For perspective, between January and October inclusive, natural gas grew by 4.1% and nuclear power by just 0.7% while coal contracted by 4.0%.
Small-scale solar (i.e., systems <1 MW) accounted for 27.9% of all solar generation and provided 2% of US electricity supply in the first 10 months of this year.
Together, utility-scale and small-scale solar were 7.2% of total US electrical generation for the 10-month period and 7.7% in October alone.
Renewables provided 24% of US electrical generation in first 10 months of 2024
Wind and solar provided 17.2% of US electrical generation during the first 10 months of 2024.
Between January and October inclusive, electrical generation by the mix of all renewables (solar, wind, hydropower, biomass, and geothermal) grew by 9.0% year-over-year and provided 24.2% of total production. That share rose to 25.5% in October alone. By comparison, renewables accounted for 22.9% of electrical output in the first 10 months of 2023 and 23.1% in October last year.
The SUN DAY Campaign’s executive director Ken Bossong said:
Calendar year 2024 has proven to be a period of remarkable growth by renewables, especially solar.
The question now is whether they will continue that growth in 2025 or will the incoming Trump Administration adversely affect it.
If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Polestar announced it has officially opened up sales of its long-promised 4 crossover SUV as a 2026 model, available to US customers starting today. Below, we’ve included performance specs and pricing separated by each model variant.
The Polestar 4 is the, you guessed it, fourth model from the Geely-owned, Swedish-designed automaker. The 4 was unveiled in 2023 before it kicked off production in China later that year.
Those EVs were followed by deliveries to Europe and Australia in 2024, although US customers have had to continue to wait. In April 2024, Polestar said it was officially opening orders for the 4 in the US, starting at $54,900 and available in eight (yes, eight) different variants, built in North America.
Deliveries were expected to follow in Q2 2025, but Polestar faced several hurdles, including the appointment of a new CEO and the looming threat of tariffs from the Trump Administration. As such, Polestar has regrouped and returned with updated timelines for its latest model.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
As of this morning, the Polestar 4 is on sale in the US as a 2026 model that will initially be assembled in Korea. It starts at $56,400. You can learn more below.
Source: Polestar
The 2026 Polestar 4 is FINALLY on sale in North America
Per the automaker, the 2026 Polestar 4 is officially on sale in the United States and can now be configured at Polestar.com. When it was still a 2025 model, Polestar said the 4 would be built alongside its 3 sibling in North America, but things have changed, at least as US sales begin.
2026 Polestar 4 EVs destined for North America will instead be built in Busan, South Korea. Per the head of Polestar North America, Rick Bryant:
Following the successful launch of Polestar 4 in other markets around the world, we are thrilled to open the order books for the 2026 Polestar 4 in North America, which will all be built in Busan, South Korea. Polestar 4 confidently enters the premium performance class within the D-SUV segment. Our SUV coupe’s innovative design offers generous interior space and a stunning appearance. Coupled with the assembled-in-the-U.S. Polestar 3, we now offer two dynamic SUV options for North American customers
As a 2026 model, Polestar appears to have slightly trimmed down its 4 variants, now offering five options for North American customers. Here’s how they break down:
2026 Polestar 4 Variant
Drivetrain
Battery Capacity
Max Charge Rate (DC)
EPA Range(Est.)
Power
Torque
Acceleration(0-60 mph)
Starting MSRP*
Long Range Single Motor (w/ standard Pilot Pack)
RWD
100 kWh
200 kW
300 miles
272 hp
253 lb-ft
6.9 seconds
$56,400
Long Range Single Motor (w/ Pilot and Plus Pack)
RWD
100 kWh
200 kW
300 miles
272 hp
253 lb-ft
6.9 seconds
$61,900
Long Range Dual Motor (w/ standard Pilot Pack)
AWD
100 kWh
200 kW
270 miles
544 hp
506 lb-ft
3.7 seconds
$62,900
Long Range Dual Motor (w/ Pilot and Plus Pack)
AWD
100 kWh
200 kW
270 miles
544 hp
506 lb-ft
3.7 seconds
$68,400
Long Range Dual Motor (w/ Pilot, Plus and Performance Pack)
AWD
100 kWh
200 kW
270 miles
544 hp
506 lb-ft
3.7 seconds
$72,900
* – Prices do not include destination fees of $1,400.
You can see how the promised initial variants compare here. It looks like Polestar nixed any variant that initially had a “Pro Pack.” The automaker has also removed the Long Range Single Motor trim, which was supposed to start at an MSRP of $54,900. That’s why the current MSRPs seem higher, albeit only slightly if at all.
Polestar pointed out that its Long Range Dual Motor variant of the 2026 4 is its fastest production model to date, accelerating from 0 to 60 mph in 3.7 seconds. I’d take that all day.
Production for North American customers of the 2026 Polestar 4 is expected to begin in South Korea this summer, followed by initial customer deliveries this fall. What do you guys think? Will the Polestar 4 be worth the wait?
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Now, the latest data confirms that similar declines are continuing for Tesla in Europe in Belgium, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, and other markets:
The only two markets that haven’t seen declines in May are Norway and Austria.
While Tesla isn’t commenting on any of the markets where its sales are crashing, the automaker quickly promoted its surprising performance in Norway:
However, it is worth nothing that the 213% increase in deliveries is compared to a particularly bad May 2024 for Tesla.
For comparison, here are Tesla’s deliveries in the second month of each quarter over the prior two years:
It’s clear that the anomaly was more with May 2024 than incredible performance in May 2025 – even though there’s no doubt that Tesla’s sales have recovered in Norway last month.
That’s partly due to Tesla offering record discounts, including zero-interest financing on the new Model Y.
The automaker has been offering similar incentives throughout Europe, but it isn’t having as much success with it.
With most of the data from the month of May coming in, Tesla’s Q2 deliveries in Europe are currently tracking below the already disastrous Q1 performance, which Tesla blamed on the Model Y changeover.
Electrek’s Take
Tesla can try to frame this however it wants, but the data is clear: Tesla’s sales are dropping like a rock in Europe despite the availability of the new Model Y and record incentives like zero-interest financing.
2,500 Norwegians buying Tesla vehicles in May isn’t compensating for the declines in other markets and I doubt that the surge in May in Norway is going to be sustainable in the second half, especially if Tesla ends the zero-interest financing when it claims it will at the end of the quarter.
At this point, what Tesla needs in Europe is to be completely dissociated from its CEO and a more updated EV lineup that includes smaller and more affordable vehicles, like the Kia EV3, Volve EX30, etc.
Unfortunately, its CEO is too focused on false promises regarding autonomy to bring those vehicles to market.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
A cyclist rides past the Meta sign outside the headquarters of Facebook parent company Meta Platforms in Mountain View, California, on Nov. 9, 2022.
Peter Dasilva | Reuters
Meta has signed a 20-year agreement to buy nuclear power from Constellation Energy, continuing the wave of tech giants teaming up with the industry in order to meet the growing power needs of data centers.
Beginning in June 2027, Meta will buy roughly 1.1 gigawatts of energy from Constellation’s Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois, which is the entire output from the site’s one nuclear reactor. The companies said the long-term agreement will support the continuing operation of the plant, as well as its relicensing. Without the commitment from Meta, the plant was in danger of closing when its zero-emission credit, which it’s relied on since 2017, expired.
“We are proud to partner with Meta. … They figured out that supporting the relicensing and expansion of existing plants is just as impactful as finding new sources of energy,” said Joe Dominguez, Constellation’s president and CEO. “Sometimes the most important part of our journey forward is to stop taking steps backwards.”
Terms of the deal, which will also expand Clinton’s output by 30 megawatts, were not disclosed. The plant will not power Meta’s data centers directly – instead it will continue to provide power to the regional grid, while contributing to the tech giant’s goal of 100% clean electricity.
Constellation shares rallied more than 15% on the agreement.
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon
CEG rallies
Tuesday’s announcement is the latest in a slew of deals between big tech and the nuclear industry. In September, Constellation said it would restart Three Mile Island – the site of the worst nuclear meltdown in U.S. history – and sell the power to Microsoft under a 20-year agreement.
Still, the deal with Constellation marks Meta’s first official foray into nuclear. In December, the company put out a request for proposals to find nuclear energy developers to partner with, saying they wanted to add between one and four gigawatts of new nuclear generation in the U.S. That proposal, which is focused on advanced nuclear, remains in progress, and stands apart from the company’s backing of the Clinton facility.
“Securing clean, reliable energy is necessary to continue advancing our AI ambitions,” said Urvi Parekh, head of global energy at Meta. “We are proud to help keep the Clinton plant operating for years to come and demonstrate that this plant is an important piece to strengthening American leadership in energy.”
President Donald Trump recently signed four executive orders aimed at speeding nuclear deployment, setting a target of quadrupling U.S. nuclear energy by 2050. The executive orders call for, among other things, an overhaul of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as well as building out a domestic supply chain for nuclear fuel.
The White House has also called for faster regulatory approval for reactors – including small modular reactors. In the past, nuclear projects have been plagued by high upfront costs and long construction timelines. The industry is hoping that SMRs can be a more cost-effective way to scale up nuclear power. At present, there are no operational SMRs in the U.S.
Constellation said Tuesday that it is considering seeking a new permit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to possibly build a small modular reactor at the Clinton site.