Connect with us

Published

on

Children with special educational needs are being “segregated” and left to struggle in the wrong schools because councils are trying to “save on costs”, parents have told Sky News. 

Maire Leigh Wilson, whose four-year-old son has Down syndrome, says she “shudders to think” where he would be now had she not been in a “constant battle” with her council.

“I think he would probably just be at the back of a classroom, running around with no support and no ability to sign or communicate,” she said.

Mrs Leigh Wilson wanted her son Aidan to go to a mainstream school with additional specialist support, but her council, who decide what is known as a child’s Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP), wanted him to attend a special school.

The number of EHCPs being appealed by parents has risen “massively”, according to education barrister Alice De Coverley.

She said councils are struggling to meet the volume of demand with “stretched budgets”, and parents are also more aware of their ability to appeal.

Mrs De Coverley said more than 90% of tribunals are won by parents, in part because councils do not have the resources to fight their cases.

More on Education

She said, in her experience, parents of children with special educational needs will put “anything on the line, their homes, their jobs”.

On whether she thinks the system is rigged against parents, Mrs De Coverley said: “I’m not sure it’s meant to be. But I think that parents are certainly finding it very tough.”

She added the number of “unlawful decisions” being made by local authorities means parents who can afford it are being “utterly burnt out” by legal challenges.

Read more:
Three in four parents of SEND children forced to give up work or cut hours

Maire Leigh Wilson with her son, Aiden, four
Image:
Maire Leigh Wilson with her son, Aidan, four

Mrs Leigh Wilson’s case was resolved before making it to court.

Her council, Hounslow in southwest London, said they complete more than four in five new EHCPs within the statutory 20-week timescale, twice the national average.

Hounslow Council said they “put families at the heart of decision-making” and young people in the area with special educational needs and disabilities achieve, on average, above their peers nationally.

They admitted there are areas of their offer “that need to be further improved” and they are “working closely with families as a partnership”.

“We have a clear and credible plan to achieve this, and we can see over the last 18 months where we have focused our improvement work, the real benefits of an improved experience for children, young people, and their families,” a Hounslow Council spokesman said.

He added the council had seen the number of EHCPs double in the last decade and they “share parents’ frustrations amid rising levels of national demand, and what’s widely acknowledged as a broken SEND system”.

Emma Dunville wanted her son, Albie, to go to a special school but the council took too long to assess him
Image:
Emma Dunville wanted her son, Albie, to go to a special school but the council took too long to assess him

Emma Dunville, a friend of Mrs Leigh Wilson whose son also has Down’s syndrome, describes her experience trying to get the right education provision for her child as “exhausting mentally and physically”.

She said: “For the rest of his life we’ll be battling, battling, battling, everything is stacked up against you.”

Unlike Mrs Leigh Wilson, Mrs Dunville wanted her son Albie to go to a special school, but she had to wait more than a year for an assessment with an education psychologist to contribute to the council’s decision, which meant she missed the deadline for an EHCP.

“The people making these decisions just don’t see that all children with Down’s syndrome are totally different and can’t be seen as the same.”

The guidelines are that if there are not enough local authority-employed education psychologists they should seek a private assessment, but her local authority did not do that.

Mrs Dunville said her son has been “segregated” in a mainstream school, where they are “trying their best” but “it’s just not the right setting”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Memecoins, markets and Trump: Cointelegraph’s Q1 crypto editorial roundtable

Published

on

By

Memecoins, markets and Trump: Cointelegraph’s Q1 crypto editorial roundtable

Memecoins, markets and Trump: Cointelegraph’s Q1 crypto editorial roundtable

The year 2025 kicked off with a bang and a meme. Just weeks into the New Year, a frenzy of politically fueled memecoins sent Crypto Twitter into overdrive, while lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic turned up the heat on stablecoins, securities laws and tokenized assets, usually with different approaches.

It was a whirlwind first quarter, shaped by Bitcoin’s dominance in the crypto market and a US political climate that put digital assets back in the spotlight. Q1 delivered no shortage of storylines.

Who better to break it all down than the journalists tracking it in real time? In the latest episode of Decentralize with Cointelegraph, editorial team members sit down for an unfiltered newsroom roundtable.

Savannah Fortis, head of podcasts and EU reporter, is joined by Gareth Jenkinson, chief of multimedia; Zoltan Vardai, breaking news reporter on the EU news team; and Vince Quill, US news reporter, to reflect on Q1’s biggest stories and what they signal for the months ahead.

Memecoins, power and perception

As memecoins surged in early 2025, questions regarding their legitimacy and political entanglement intensified. For Cointelegraph’s editorial team, the frenzy wasn’t just a market quirk, it revealed deep tensions among innovation, opportunism and influence.

Jenkinson was first to comment on what the impact of US President Donald Trump and greater political memecoin frenzies may mean for the industry in the long term, saying, “I struggle to still trust what the Trump administration and his group of advisers are doing, when they are launching things like memecoins…”

“Yes, we’ve seen a much more favorable approach to the wider crypto industry, and that’s been really great. But a lot of the lobbying, from Ripple, Circle and others, was about making sure their cryptocurrencies were included in this bundle of assets the US wants to hold.”

Related: Bitcoin may hit a wall at $84K if bullish conditions don’t pick up: CryptoQuant

The team acknowledged that while regulatory clarity and institutional support have created a more stable environment for crypto companies in general since the new administration took office, that progress risks being overshadowed by spectacle.

More memes…

Trump’s big moves seem to domino into other political figures, namely Argentina’s President Javier Milei, to become entangled in a high-profile memecoin controversy that rippled far beyond national politics.

For an industry seeking legitimacy, this kind of involvement by world leaders sends a mixed message. “It’s terrible for the industry,” Jenkinson added. “Milei was supposed to be a savior for Argentina after years of hyperinflation. And now he’s launching a memecoin with a known rug puller.”

Still, the roundtable remained hopeful. “I’m an eternal optimist,” he continued. “At least we got the affirmation for Bitcoin. People now understand what it is, governments are starting to hold it. That’s how good the fundamentals are.”

Stablecoins and the altcoin fallout

While much attention has centered on Bitcoin’s institutional glow-up and the memecoin spectacle, several members of the Cointelegraph team voiced deeper concerns around emerging stablecoin legislation and the quiet moves behind it.

“One thing that I think kind of flew under the radar is that the Trump-linked World Liberty Forum actually launched a US dollar-backed stablecoin in March,” Vardai pointed out. 

“These stablecoins would fall completely in line with both requirements in the Genius Act and Stable Act… but it could really be interpreted as Trump trying to pass stablecoin legislation while having a vested interest. His World Liberty Financial is launching a lot of crypto-related products.”

The fallout from politically aligned memecoins has also weighed heavily on the broader crypto markets, particularly altcoins. “Altcoins aren’t really winning at all this quarter,” Vardai also noted.

“Memecoins have had this premature rally, and they’ve been rallying independently from other cryptocurrencies. A lot of people are concerned whether Bitcoin’s rise is going to come before Ether’s, and before any altcoin rise.”

So what defined Q1 of 2025? Tune in to the full episode to hear all of the insights! 

Memecoins, markets and Trump: Cointelegraph’s Q1 crypto editorial roundtable

Listen to the full episode of Decentralize with Cointelegraph on Cointelegraph’s podcast page, Spotify, Apple Podcasts or your podcast platform of choice. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows!

Magazine: Memecoin degeneracy is funding groundbreaking anti-aging research

Continue Reading

Politics

MPs summoned to debate emergency legislation to ‘protect’ British Steel

Published

on

By

MPs summoned to debate emergency legislation to 'protect' British Steel

Parliament is being recalled so MPs can debate draft legislation to “protect” the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe, Number 10 has said.

MPs are being summoned back from Easter recess to Westminster, and will sit from 11am on Saturday, the House of Commons confirmed.

The news comes as the government has been actively considering nationalising British Steel after Jingye, its owner in Scunthorpe, cancelled future orders for the iron ore, coal and other raw materials needed to keep the furnaces running.

Union officials have told Sky News that British Steel’s blast furnaces at Scunthorpe, the last blast furnaces left operating in Britain, will run out of raw material soon unless more can be sourced.

This has led to fears the Scunthorpe plant could be forced to close as early as next month.

Politics latest: Gove awarded peerage in Rishi Sunak’s resignation honours list

More than half of British Steel’s 3,500-strong workforce is being put at risk amid the impasse over a government funding package for the UK’s second-biggest steel producer.

More from Politics

The accountancy firm EY is being lined up by the government to play a role in the emergency nationalisation of British Steel, Sky News understands.

A Number 10 spokesperson said: “The prime minister has been clear, his government will always act in the national interest. All actions we take are in the name of British industry, British jobs and for British workers.

“Tomorrow parliament will be recalled to debate the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill.

“The Bill provides the government with the power to direct steel companies in England, which we will use to protect the Scunthorpe site.

“It enables the UK government to preserve capability and ensure public safety. It also ensures all options remain viable for the future of the plant and the livelihoods it supports.”

The spokesperson added: “We have always been clear there is a bright future for steel in the UK. All options remain on the table.”

Politicians had left Westminster for their Easter break on Tuesday and were not due to return until Tuesday 22 April.

The last time parliament was recalled was on 18 August 2021 to debate the situation in Afghanistan.

This will be the 35th recall during a recess since 1948.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Katerina Vittozzi explains.

The House of Commons said Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has granted a request from the government for parliament to be recalled at 11am on Saturday 12 April “to take forward legislative proposals to ensure the continued operation of British Steel blast furnaces is safeguarded”.

In a letter to MPs, Sir Lindsay said he was satisfied the “public interest” requires the recall.

It is understood the House of Lords will also be recalled.

The British Steel plant in Scunthorpe has the UK’s last operating blast furnaces.

Read more:
‘All options’ on table for British Steel, chancellor says
British Steel rejects government’s £500m aid offer

The government has been in negotiations with both British Steel and Jingye throughout the week with talks continuing on Friday.

This morning, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said that “all options remain on the table” in terms of saving British Steel.

Sir Keir Starmer had used the same line the day before, adding that demand for steel was “likely to go up, not down, which is why it’s very important to do everything we can”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

At the Liaison Committee, the prime minister does not rule out nationalising British Steel.

There have been calls from Reform for the company to be nationalised – though the Conservatives have said a “commercial solution” should be found instead.

Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and officials met with the chief executives of Jingye and British Steel on Wednesday for discussions on steelmaking in Scunthorpe.

A statement released after the meeting said: “Both sides welcomed continued cooperation in talks to find a way forward.

“The UK government thanked Jingye for their respect for the workforce during this process, and work continues at pace to find a resolution.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Some good news for the British economy – but the celebration might not last long

Published

on

By

Some good news for the British economy - but the celebration might not last long

We’ve been waiting for a while for the Office for National Statistics to deliver us some good news on the British economy – and today it came.

Output grew by 0.5% in February, up from zero growth in January and higher than the 0.1% forecast by economists.

Some usual caveats apply. Monthly data can be volatile and prone to revision – but it can go up as well as down.

While publishing the latest figures, the ONS also revised up its January figure from -0.1% to zero.

It’s clear that, across the economy, sectors performed robustly.

The big surprise was manufacturing.

Business surveys told us that UK factories were on their knees, anxious about Trump’s tariffs and impending tax rises that came into effect in April.

More on Uk Economy

Yet the production sector grew by 1.5% – led by pharmaceuticals, metals and transport equipment. Businesses have been resilient.

The chancellor will be pleased, but the celebrations are likely to be fleeting.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Analysis: Trump blinks as bonds falter

The world has already moved on, with Donald Trump unleashing policy chaos on the global economy.

Britain is now facing a 10% tariff on exports to the US and there will be pockets of acute stress, particularly for our car manufacturers, who have been hit with a 25% tariff.

They export more to the US than any other country in the world. Indeed, some of the growth in manufacturing may have been driven by businesses rushing to do deals before tariffs came into force.

The tariffs alone on the UK will be painful – but the most significant damage is likely to come from a slowdown in the global economy.

The US and China are engaged in a tit-for-tat trade war and that will have negative spillovers, especially for an open economy like ours. We won’t escape the fallout.

Businesses here in the UK might curtail hiring and investment in response, their hesitancy compounded by uncertainty over what Donald Trump might do next.

Consumers may also retreat, especially if the pound weakens and imports become more expensive, causing inflationary consequences.

So, while we’ve finally been given something to cheer, darker days beckon. We should enjoy it while it lasts.

Continue Reading

Trending