A woman who died this month after being set on fire inside a New York subway train has been identified by police as a 57-year-old woman from New Jersey.
The woman, Debrina Kawam, was registered to an address in Toms River, New Jersey, according to New York Police Department (NYPD).
Officials had previously said they were using forensics and video surveillance to try to piece together the identity of the victim.
A 33-year-old man, Sebastian Zapeta, was taken into custody hours after police sent out images of a suspect who had been spotted by high school students.
Federal immigration authorities say the suspect is from Guatemala and entered the US illegally.
More from World
New York City mayor Eric Adams said today the victim had had a “brief stint in our homeless shelter system” at some point, and that authorities had contacted her next of kin.
“Hearts go out to the family, a horrific incident to have to live through,” Mr Adams said during a news briefing on another matter.
“It impacts on how New Yorkers feel. But it really reinforces what I’ve been saying: People should not be living on our subway system, they should be in a place of care. No matter where she lived, that should not have happened.”
Image: Sebastian Zapeta appeared in court on Christmas Eve. Pic: AP
Prosecutors allege Zapeta set Kawam on fire on a stopped F train at Brooklyn’s Coney Island station, fanned the flames with a shirt, and then sat on a platform bench and watched as she burned.
She was pronounced dead at the scene.
“This was a malicious deed. A sleeping, vulnerable woman on our subway system,” Brooklyn district attorney Eric Gonzalez said after the charge was announced.
Zapeta has yet to enter a plea in the case.
He was arrested hours after the Kawam’s death following the police receiving a tip off from a group of high school students who recognised images of the suspect circulated by police.
Vladimir Putin has agreed to an immediate 30-day pause in strikes on energy infrastructure in Ukraine during a lengthy phone call with Donald Trump.
The Russian and US presidents spoke for around an hour and a half as the Trump administration aims to bring about an end to the conflict which started after Moscow’s forces carried out a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Mr Putin agreed to the limited ceasefire but stopped short of backing a broader 30-day pause in fighting that the White House is pushing for.
Image: Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. File pics: AP
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said after the call that he supports the US proposal to stop Kyiv’s strikes on Russian energy infrastructure.
Mr Zelenskyy added that the hopes to speak to Mr Trump to find out “what the Russians offered the Americans or what the Americans offered the Russians” during his conversation with Mr Putin.
He also said that future talks about Ukraine without Kyiv at the table will not bring results.
During talks led by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Saudi Arabia last week, Ukrainian officials agreed to the US proposal for a 30-day pause in fighting.
However, Mr Putin said during his call with Mr Trump on Tuesday that any long-term deal would require a complete halt to intelligence sharing and military aid to Ukraine from its allies.
Mr Zelenskky said in an online briefing after the call that Ukraine’s partners would never agree to such a move and that he hopes supplies will continue.
He added that Moscow’s demand was simply an example of Mr Putin attempting to weaken Ukraine.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:24
What did Trump and Putin talk about?
Trump has moved dial closer to peace but Putin can continue ground war
The outcome of this call will allow both side to claim a win.
For President Trump, he can and will claim that he has secured a phased ceasefire – an air and sea ceasefire.
He will claim, correctly, that he has moved the dial closer to peace (at least in the short term) in this long conflict.
For President Putin, he has accepted a partial ceasefire (energy and infrastructure facilities will not be targeted) but he can still continue his war along the frontline.
He wants to do this because he believes he has the upper hand and can continue the battlefield conflict to push the frontline as far west as he can.
This is a war all about territory. Russia wants to have control of as much land as possible before it signs any full ceasefire plan.
US hopes call marks first step towards peace
The White House has said Mr Trump and Mr Putin agreed to a “movement to peace” it hopes will eventually include a maritime ceasefire in the Black Sea and a full and lasting end to the fighting.
“These negotiations will begin immediately in the Middle East,” the White House added.
Mr Putin welcomed Mr Trump’s calls for the maritime ceasefire and “agreed to begin negotiations to further work out specific details of such an agreement”, according to the Kremlin.
Ukrainian officials had earlier proposed a ceasefire covering the Black Sea and long-range missile strikes and the release of prisoners at their meeting with the US delegation in Saudi Arabia earlier this month.
The Kremlin also said after the call that Russia and Ukraine will exchange 175 prisoners of war each on Wednesday.
Moscow added that it will also hand over 23 badly wounded soldiers to Ukraine.
Mr Zelenskyy responded by saying Russia could show it was serious about peace talks by freeing all prisoners.
Meanwhile, Moscow said in its recap of the call that Mr Trump supported an idea from Mr Putin to organise ice hockey matches in the US between professional players from America and Russia.
The White House’s account of the conversation did not mention hockey.
Shortly after the call, Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: “We agreed to an immediate Ceasefire on all Energy and Infrastructure, with an understanding that we will be working quickly to have a Complete Ceasefire and, ultimately, an END to this very horrible War between Russia and Ukraine.”
Mr Zelenskyy remains sceptical that Mr Putin is ready for peace as Russian forces continue to pound Ukraine.
Mr Putin last week said he agreed in principle with the US proposal for a 30-day ceasefire, but emphasised that Russia would seek guarantees that Ukraine would not use a break in hostilities to rearm and continue mobilisation.
He has also demanded that Ukraine renounce joining the NATO military alliance, sharply cut its army, and protect Russian language and culture to keep the country in Moscow’s orbit.
Fears Washington favours Moscow
The call between Mr Trump and Mr Putin is just the latest turn in a dramatically shifting relationship between the two superpowers.
Mr Trump made bringing about a quick end to the conflict a top priority when he took office in January – straining ties with allies who want Mr Putin to pay a price for the invasion.
Mr Trump, who has long shown admiration for Mr Putin, has blamed Ukraine for Russia’s unprovoked invasion.
European countries have continued to show support for Ukraine as Mr Trump has appeared to favour Moscow as he aims to secure an end to the war.
Mr Zelenskyy said he spoke to German leader Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron following Tuesday’s call between the US and Russian presidents.
Meanwhile, a Downing Street spokeswoman said: “We welcome the progress President Trump has made towards a ceasefire and in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine.
“This process must lead to a just and lasting peace for Ukraine. We will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes to ensure Russia can never launch an illegal invasion again.”
Shortly after the call, air raid alerts sounded in Kyiv which were followed by explosions in the city.
It comes after the AES Group private oil refinery was badly damaged after a shock Russian attack in the Kharkiv region on Monday.
The AES Group confirmed the destruction of the facility in Merefa after about 20 drones were launched at it.
I think Vladimir Putin will be very satisfied with the outcome of this call because even if he hasn’t gained a whole lot, he crucially hasn’t lost anything.
By agreeing to a ceasefire on energy infrastructure, he has given Donald Trump enough to ensure the wider US-Russia rapprochement remains intact.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
There’s been talk in the last month of a reset of relations, of the lifting of sanctions – and Putin certainly doesn’t want to jeopardise that.
At the same time, though, Putin didn’t want to dilute any of his red lines. And by the sounds of it, they’re as indelible as ever.
The Kremlin’s readout of the call talks of a need to “eliminate the root causes of the crisis”, which is Kremlin code for “Russia’s security concerns regarding NATO expansion need to be met”.
One thing this call has given him though is the time to press home Russia’s military advantage.
This is particularly important to Putin in Russia’s Kursk region, where his forces are seemingly on the verge of eradicating Ukraine’s foothold, which would be of huge symbolic importance to the Kremlin.
They’re calling it “ceasefire-lite”. In Kyiv, they’ll choke on it.
The respective readouts of the Trump-Putin phone call don’t read well for Ukrainians relying on a US ally to do their bidding.
They had already agreed to a 30-day ceasefire with the Americans who said they were “on the 10th yard line of peace”.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Moscow, clearly, has different ideas. To extend the American football metaphor, Vladimir Putin still has hands on the ball.
The Russians know Donald Trump. Prisoner exchanges present a trophy achievement.
There was, of all things, talk of US vs Russia ice hockey matches. In Moscow, they know Trump’s comfortable talking sport and that many Americans think hockey before they think Ukraine.
It was dressing around a deal that is deeply flawed from Kyiv’s perspective.
Russian talk of eliminating “root causes of the crisis” speaks to Moscow’s desire to demilitarise Ukraine and lay claim to its territory.
Then there was Putin’s insistence on a “cessation of foreign military aid and the provision of intelligence information to Kyiv”.
To cut the supply of weapons and intelligence would weaken Ukraine while Russia strengthens. For Kyiv, it’s a line so red, it’s purple.
What Trump does next is pivotal. What he’s done so far boxes Ukraine into a corner, European allies too.
A common thread in the readouts was the positive talk of US-Russian relations to come – “an improved bilateral relationship… has huge upside” was Washington’s take.
It’s clear Trump and Putin share the vision of a geopolitical shift, built on shared priorities. The fate of Ukraine isn’t necessarily top of the list.
One of Tesla’s earliest investors has told Sky News that Elon Musk should step aside as the carmaker’s chief executive unless he gives up his new government job.
Ross Gerber said in an interview with Sky’s Business Live that the tycoon and adviser to Donald Trump had lost his focus given his widening interests and was now too “divisive”.
He cited Musk’s post-election role at the helm of the Trump administration’s new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
It has attracted public anger, and protests, over planned swingeing cuts to federal government staff.
Mr Gerber said: “I think Tesla needs a new CEO and I decided today I was going to start saying it and so this is the first show that I’m saying it on.
“It’s time for somebody to run Tesla. The business has been neglected for too long. There are too many important things Tesla is doing, so either Elon should come back to Tesla and be the CEO of Tesla and give up his other jobs or he should focus on the government and keep doing what he is doing but find a suitable CEO of Tesla.”
Mr Gerber told presenter Darren McCaffrey that the business was “absolutely” in crisis and the appointment was among several reasons he had sold off a substantial number of shares in recent months.
A slump began shortly before Mr Trump took office, as the first salvoes of the president’s trade war were being threatened.
Tesla’s market value has plunged by more than $800bn since December and it was a further 4% down in US trading on Tuesday.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:26
Climate protesters vandalise Musk’s Tesla robot
The business has been struggling on several fronts.
Electric car demand appears to have peaked across key Western markets despite steep discounting to boost appeal at a time of continued strain on consumer budgets.
Also in the mix is cheap Chinese competition nibbling away at Tesla’s market share.
Add the potential for heightened costs due to Mr Trump’s trade war, it is of little surprise that investors are concerned.
Mr Gerber said that while Tesla’s products were undoubtedly the best around, Musk only had 24 hours in the day and he had split his time too thinly since his purchase of Twitter – now called X – in 2022.
He added that his social media posts and work with the president since had brought too much negative publicity to Tesla.
“The company’s reputation has just been destroyed by Elon Musk,” he said.
“Sales are plummeting so, yeah, it’s a crisis. You literally can’t sell the best product in the market place because the CEO is so divisive”.