For days, the attacks had been raining down from Elon Musk and his supporters on Keir Starmer, safeguarding minister Jess Phillips and the wider government, over handling of the historical sex abuse cases.
The consensus in Number 10, as voiced by another leader subject to Mr Musk’s ire – German Chancellor Olaf Scholz – was do “not feed the troll”.
And so, as Mr Musk posted dozens of times about sex grooming gangs in the north of England, and accused Ms Phillips of being a “rape genocide apologist” and a “wicked witch”, the government kept out of the fray.
But that all changed on Monday when the PM came out swinging, with the most impassioned remarks I can remember him making, when I asked him to comment on Mr Musk’s abuse of Ms Phillips on social media.
He said the debate on child sex exploitation was based on lies, with politicians “jumping on the bandwagon simply to get attention”, as he hit back at not just at Mr Musk but the leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch too.
“We have seen this playbook many times – whipping up of intimidation and of threats of violence, hoping that the media will amplify it,” he told me on a visit to Epsom Hospital.
“When the poison of the far right leads to serious threats to Jess Phillips and others, then in my book a line has been crossed.
More on Elon Musk
Related Topics:
“I enjoy the cut and thrust of politics, the robust debate that we must have. But that’s got to be based on facts and truth, not on lies. Not on those who are so desperate for attention that they’re prepared to debase themselves and their country.”
From a lawyerly prime minister that chooses his words carefully, and is often ponderous in his approach to questions, this was quite a handbrake turn.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The tech billionaire is in Donald Trump’s inner circle and about to have an official role in his administration.
He perhaps worries that taking on Mr Musk will anger President Trump and make an already delicate relationship even harder to navigate on critical issues such as tariffs and support for Ukraine. So why, on Monday, did he bite back?
Firstly, I’m told the PM is angered that the abuse and disinformation online has led to threats to Ms Phillips, with one man being charged with malicious communication to the MP over the weekend.
“It crosses the line into MPs’ safety,” said one Number 10 insider.
“There will be people who say ‘don’t feed the troll’ and I think Keir Starmer is of that view and wanted to avoid getting into that side of things,” they said.
But there are times when the responsibility of a PM “is to try to shape these issues”, they added.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:31
PM: People ‘spreading lies’ are ‘not interested in victims’
“His view was this is a moment where he has a responsibility to say he’s happy to have a debate and stand by his record, but there are some things we can’t accept as a country – and that is misinformation and disinformation around individuals.”
Starmer is frustrated about the disinformation that Mr Musk is spreading online and believes it is “dangerous” not just to individual MPs but to UK democracy.
On Monday, he criticised those who had been defending far-right agitator Tommy Robinson, who the PM said “went to prison for nearly collapsing a grooming case”.
“These are people who are trying to get some kind of vicarious thrill from street violence that people like Tommy Robinson promote.”
Starmer defended his record as chief prosecutor, as Mr Musk accused the prime minister of being “deeply complicit in the mass rapes in exchange for votes”.
Some of the online allegations levelled at Starmer seem to refer to his time at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the failures more than a decade earlier to bring grooming gangs to justice: In 2009 a decision was taken not to prosecute alleged perpetrators in the town of Rochdale after lawyers believed the victim would not come across as credible.
“For many, many years, too many victims have been completely let down; let down by perverse ideas about community relations or by the idea that institutions must be protected above all else. And they’ve not been listened to, and they’ve not been heard,” said Starmer on Monday.
Image: Elon Musk. File pic: Reuters
“And when I was a chief prosecutor for five years, I tackled that head-on, because I could see what was happening, and that’s why I reopened cases that have been closed and supposedly finished. I brought the first major prosecution of an Asian grooming gang – in the particular case it was in Rochdale, but it was the first of its kind.”
He said his record was “not secret” and that he has called for “mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse” when he was at the CPS, which “the Tories did nothing about.”
Third, it is about standards in public life, with the prime minister clearly irritated with Ms Badenoch’s and others’ handling of the affair as he called out politicians for not disavowing the attacks on Ms Phillips.
“He thinks truth matters in politics and while politics is a place of skullduggery, it also needs to be a place based on fact and truth and not smears,” said one aide.
For their part, the Conservatives on Wednesday will attempt to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to require a full national inquiry into grooming gangs, with Ms Badenoch saying on X that her party’s action will “do right by the victims and end the culture of cover-ups”.
There are still questions about whether there should be a wider inquiry into historical sex abuse and the “endemic” abuse Professor Alexis Jay referred to in her 2022 inquiry.
Image: Kemi Badenoch
Calling for it on the back of the Musk interventions in recent days has been the first big intervention by Ms Badenoch two months into her leadership.
The PM on Monday defended his decision not to have another review, saying that the Jay Report published in 2022 was a “comprehensive review” of child exploitation which “doesn’t need more consultation or research. It just needs action”.
The home secretary took such action today by announcing in the Commons that she would strengthen the laws around child sexual exploitation through the implementation of Professor Jay’s recommendations.
But the actions are unlikely to end this row, with Ms Badenoch demanding a national inquiry over this issue as she seizes on grooming gangs and historical abuse as a dividing line with Labour on which she believes she can take on Starmer and go toe to toe with Reform.
It was not the start to the new year that the prime minister intended.
But it is true, too, that Number 10 decided that, after ducking the Musk attacks for months, this was a ground he would not cede, with the PM making a deliberate choice to kick off the new year facing down these attacks.
And it was perhaps the most authentic I have seen him for months as he answered criticisms of his past record as a prosecutor and denounced the vicious treatment of his own MP.
An embattled prime minister since entering Number 10, he’s come out in 2025 fighting.
Earlier this week, the prime minister confirmed his party was looking to make changes to its controversial slashing of winter fuel payments to pensioners at an upcoming “fiscal event”.
Little clarity was provided on when this would be – the budget in the autumn thought the most likely.
Image: Angela Rayner says she wants the changes announced soon. Pic: PA
Ms Rayner has now suggested the 11 June spending review in just over a fortnight is her preferred date.
She told Sky News: “I think that we’ve got the upcoming spending review, and I’m sure that the chancellor will set it out when we’ve got the opportunity – at the first opportunity Trevor she will set out what we’ll be able to do.”
Asked if changes might be announced at the review, Ms Rayner said: “I hope so, but I don’t know. But I hope so.
“I mean, the prime minister’s announced it, so logically to me that indicates that the prime minister wants to do something in this area.
“And if the prime minister wants to do that, I’m sure the chancellor is going to look at how we can achieve that.”
Some might suggest Ms Rayner’s stance was a bid to push Downing Street into an announcement faster than it previously wanted.
It would add to rumours the deputy prime minister is unhappy with the way Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves are running the government.
However, when asked by Trevor Phillips if she wanted to lead her party, Ms Rayner was unequivocal.
“No. I’m very happy and honoured to be deputy prime minister of this country,” she said.
“And I’ve got a lot in my in-tray to prove that I can do the job that I’m doing and deliver on the milestones for the people in this country.”
She continued: “I have no desire to go for the leadership of the Labour Party.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Asked to say the word “never”, Ms Rayner repeated “never”.
Ms Rayner also confirmed a leak inquiry was under way after her proposals on tax and spend sent to the chancellor ended up published in The Daily Telegraph.
This weekend, it has become clear there is a price to pay for Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to row back on winter fuel payment cuts.
One MP said in a text message: “We all want to see more”, while former prime minister Gordon Brown told Sky News this week the two-child benefit cap was “pretty discriminatory” and could be scrapped.
Image: Nigel Farage is expected to call for the two-child benefit cap to be scrapped
The cap, which prevents parents from claiming child tax credit or universal credit for more than two children, is a symbolic sore for Labour that saw seven MPs suspended from the party last year.
Now it’s back to cause more trouble.
A Downing Street source suggests little has changed in the last week, and looking at the cap has always been part of the (now delayed) Child Poverty Strategy.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
‘You’ve got to be fair to pensioners’
But, beyond the whispers behind the scenes, one thing has overtly changed this weekend – growing pressure from Nigel Farage.
Mr Farage is parking his tanks on Labour’s lawn, trying to tap into working-class votes on uncomfortable territory for Mr Starmer.
How would they pay for it? A combination of closing asylum hotels, cutting aid, and scrapping net-zero targets, the party says.
Image: Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch
Headline-grabbing move
The beauty of not being in power is not having to make all the sums add up right now, and it is a headline-grabbing announcement that will, at the very least, reignite the conversation about the two-child cap.
It’s also a reminder that Reform UK, who were beaten by Labour in 89 out of the 98 constituencies they came second in last year, have set their sights beyond the Conservatives.
As for the Tories, who introduced the measure in 2017, leader Kemi Badenoch is clear, saying: “If you can’t afford to have lots of children, then you shouldn’t do so”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:26
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is hoping for an update on the winter fuel allowance
Blue water between Tories and Reform UK
So, there is blue water between the Conservatives and Reform, but it’s the prime minister and his party that Nigel Farage is targeting now, and Labour is unclear on where it stands.
With the spending review fast approaching, Sir Keir and Chancellor Rachel Reeves will be working out the actual cost, beyond the political one, of rowing back on winter fuel payment cuts.
But will the anger that the policy ignited among some Labour MPs end there? Or will it move to another uncomfortable subject?
As one MP puts it: “If there’s money for pensioners, why not children?”
Pakistan has allocated 2,000 megawatts of surplus electricity exclusively for Bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence centers.
The move is part of a broader digital transformation plan spearheaded by the Pakistan Crypto Council and backed by the Ministry of Finance, according to a May 25 report by local news outlet 24NewsHD TV Channel.
In the first phase, the government plans to channel excess power into AI infrastructure and crypto mining operations. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the decision is expected to attract billions in foreign investment while generating high-tech employment across the country.
The initiative’s second phase will introduce access to renewable energy for mining operations, aiming to balance growth with environmental responsibility.
Pakistan unveils tax incentives to attract investors
Per the report, interest from international Bitcoin (BTC) miners and AI firms has already picked up. Officials confirmed that multiple foreign delegations have visited Pakistan in recent months to explore potential partnerships.
To further incentivize investment, the Ministry of Finance announced a package of tax incentives for AI centers and duty exemptions for Bitcoin miners.
Bilal Bin Saqib, CEO of Pakistan’s Crypto Council, reportedly welcomed the development, calling it a “turning point” for the country’s digital economy.
Saqib claimed that with clear regulations and a transparent framework, Pakistan could emerge as a significant player in the global crypto and AI sectors.
The meeting included lawmakers, the Bank of Pakistan’s governor, the chairman of Pakistan’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SECP), and the federal information technology secretary.
The Pakistan Digital Assets Authority (PDAA) will serve as a regulatory body to oversee licensing and regulating exchanges, custodians, wallets, tokenized platforms, stablecoins, and decentralized finance applications.
Pakistan ranked highly in Chainalysis’ 2024 crypto adoption index, coming in ninth, mainly due to strong retail adoption and transactions at centralized services.
Pakistan ranked highly in Chainalysis’ 2024 crypto adoption index, coming in 9th. Source: Chainalysis
Data from Statista also shows Pakistan’s crypto market is “experiencing rapid growth,” estimating the number of crypto users to amount to over 27 million by 2025, out of a population of 247 million.