Making Britain better off will be “at the forefront of the chancellor’s mind” during her visit to China, the Treasury has said amid controversy over the trip.
Rachel Reeves flew out on Friday after ignoring calls from opposition parties to cancel the long-planned venture because of market turmoil at home.
The past week has seen a drop in the pound and an increase in government borrowing costs, which has fuelled speculation of more spending cuts or tax rises.
The Tories have accused the chancellor of having “fled to China” rather than explain how she will fix the UK’s flatlining economy, while the Liberal Democrats say she should stay in Britain and announce a “plan B” to address market volatility.
However, Ms Reeves has rejected calls to cancel the visit, writing in The Times on Friday night that choosing not to engage with China is “no choice at all”.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Image: Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing. Pic: AP
On Friday, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy defended the trip, telling Sky News that the climbing cost of government borrowing was a “global trend” that had affected many countries, “most notably the United States”.
“We are still on track to be the fastest growing economy, according to the OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] in Europe,” she told Anna Jones on Sky News Breakfast.
“China is the second-largest economy, and what China does has the biggest impact on people from Stockton to Sunderland, right across the UK, and it’s absolutely essential that we have a relationship with them.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:32
Nandy defends Reeves’ trip to China
However, former prime minister Boris Johnson said Ms Reeves had “been rumbled” and said she should “make her way to HR and collect her P45 – or stay in China”.
While in the country’s capital, Ms Reeves will also visit British bike brand Brompton’s flagship store, which relies heavily on exports to China, before heading to Shanghai for talks with representatives across British and Chinese businesses.
It is the first UK-China Economic and Financial Dialogue (EFD) since 2019, building on the Labour government’s plan for a “pragmatic” policy with the world’s second-largest economy.
Sir Keir Starmer was the first British prime minister to meet with China’s President Xi Jinping in six years at the G20 summit in Brazil last autumn.
Relations between the UK and China have become strained over the last decade as the Conservative government spoke out against human rights abuses and concerns grew over national security risks.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:45
How much do we trade with China?
Navigating this has proved tricky given China is the UK’s fourth largest single trading partner, with a trade relationship worth almost £113bn and exports to China supporting over 455,000 jobs in the UK in 2020, according to the government.
During the Tories’ 14 years in office, the approach varied dramatically from the “golden era” under David Cameron to hawkish aggression under Liz Truss, while Rishi Sunak vowed to be “robust” but resisted pressure from his own party to brand China a threat.
The Treasury said a stable relationship with China would support economic growth and that “making working people across Britain secure and better off is at the forefront of the chancellor’s mind”.
Ahead of her visit, Ms Reeves said: “By finding common ground on trade and investment, while being candid about our differences and upholding national security as the first duty of this government, we can build a long-term economic relationship with China that works in the national interest.”
The private equity backer of Motor Fuel Group (MFG), one of Britain’s biggest petrol forecourt empires, is exploring the sale of a stake in a deal that could value it at about £7bn.
Sky News has learnt that Clayton Dubilier & Rice (CDR), which has built MFG from a mid-sized industry player over the course of more than a decade, is working with advisers to examine options for selling a large minority shareholding.
City sources said this weekend that CD&R was expected to run a process during the coming months, with a deal anticipated later this year.
A stake of roughly 25-30% is expected to change hands, although the final shape of any deal has yet to be determined.
A so-called continuation vehicle common in private equity transactions is understood to have been ruled out by CD&R.
MFG is now the largest independent forecourt operator in the UK, having grown from 360 sites at the point of CD&R’s acquisition of the company.
It trades under a number of brands, including Esso and Shell.
More from Money
Lazard, the investment bank, has been working with CD&R on the preparatory work for a minority sale.
CD&R, which also owns Morrisons, united MFG’s petrol forecourt businesses with that of the supermarket chain in a £2.5bn transaction which completed last year.
MFG now comprises roughly 1,200 sites across Britain, with pro forma earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of about £700m expected in this financial year.
A previous attempt by CD&R to sell the company in 2022 was derailed in part by Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and a deteriorating macroeconomic environment.
It is now focused on its role in the energy transition, with hundreds of electric vehicle charging points installed across its network, and growing its high-margin foodservice offering.
MFG has outlined plans to invest £400m in EV charging, and is now the second-largest Ultra Rapid player in the UK – which delivers 100 miles of range in 10 minutes – with close to 1,000 chargers.
It aims to grow that figure to 3,000 by 2030.
Insiders said that CD&R would retain a controlling stake in MFG after any stake sale, while Morrisons also holds a 20% interest in the company.
Bankers believe that a minority sale this year would be followed a couple of years later with an initial public offering on the London stock market.
CD&R invested in MFG in 2015, making its investment a long-term one by the standards of most private equity holding periods.
The sale of a 25% stake at a £7bn enterprise valuation would deliver a meaningful amount of liquidity to the US-based buyout firm.
CD&R and its investors have already been paid hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from MFG, having seen its earnings grow 14-fold since the original purchase.
Morrisons’ rival, Asda, has undertaken a similar transaction, with EG Group acquiring the Leeds-based grocer’s forecourt network.
EG Group, which along with Asda is controlled by private equity firm TDR Capital, is now being prepared for a listing in the US.
Regulators have proposed sweeping changes for the baby formula industry, saying high prices and branding are leading to “poor outcomes” for parents.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) found many brands cost more than the weekly value of people’s benefits, leading some parents to forgo food to buy formula.
The report was released nearly two years after Sky News revealed how a black market for baby formula had evolved as desperate families struggled to feed their children.
Parents openly described having no choice but to steal products, no longer able to afford formula as prices soared above inflation.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
9:27
From May 2023: Parents stealing formula
In its final report on surging prices in recent years, the CMA said parents could be saving £300 annually by switching to lower-priced brands that offered the same nutritional benefits.
The CMA said the NHS could have its own non-brand baby formula, in a bid to help drive prices down.
But the watchdog stopped short of recommending a price cap, which it had said it was looking into last year.
This is a moment of vindication for every parent who has struggled to afford baby formula.
It’s the same for every charity that has picked up the pieces of a family in crisis because they can’t safely feed their baby. Their long-held suspicions that parents were getting a poor deal from the baby formula market were right.
The CMA has scrutinised the industry and recommended the biggest shake-up in decades. The changes they propose are far-reaching and could help end the stigma and shame that many families feel because of the difficulties of feeding their babies.
Better information, clearer labelling and greater efforts to empower parents are all long overdue.
Nobody should have to feel like their only option is to steal baby milk but that is exactly what Sky News found when our investigation started two years ago. It was described to us then as a “national scandal” that was putting the health and development of babies at risk.
Baby banks still report a never-ending demand from families needing help even though prices have started to come down and new budget formula milk brands are entering the market.
The measures recommended to ministers today represent a huge opportunity for change – it is down to governments and the industry itself to make it happen.
The CMA has previously reported a 25% increase in prices over the past two years, with just three companies – Nestle, Kendamil and Danone – controlling 90% of the market.
The watchdog had determined that the lack of manufacturers meant there was no incentive to compete on prices, which meant additional factory costs had been passed on “quickly” and in full to shoppers.
The CMA, which has no powers to bolster competition by increasing the number of formula producers, said its four main recommendations were aimed at delivering better outcomes for parents on both choice and price.
It said formula provided in hospitals should come in plain packaging to reduce brand influence while parents are in a “vulnerable” setting.
Formula sold in shops should display nutritional information and not carry any claims that cannot easily be checked by parents, it said.
It also recommended extending the ban on advertising to include follow-on formula, and allowing parents to use vouchers and loyalty points to buy infant formula.
Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said many parents “pick a brand at a vulnerable moment, based on incomplete information, often believing that higher prices must mean better quality”.
“This is despite NHS advice stating that all brands will meet your baby’s nutritional needs, regardless of brand or price.”
Public health minister Ashley Dalton responded: “I welcome this report and would like to thank the Competition and Markets Authority for their thorough investigation.
“There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those families that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital that they can access formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies because of outdated regulation.
“As part of our Plan for Change, we’re determined to ensure every child has the best start to life. We will carefully consider these recommendations and respond fully in due course.”
The number of first-time buyers rose by almost a fifth last year, according to data from Halifax.
The bank said 2024 saw 341,068 people buy their first properties, up by 19% from 2023.
While the figures are a rebound from 2023’s 22% drop, they are not as high as they were in 2022.
That year saw 367,870 first-time buyers recorded.
Amanda Bryden, head of mortgages at the bank, said the rise “likely reflects an improvement in mortgage affordability as interest rates eased and stabilised, providing more certainty for those stepping on to the ladder”.
Earlier this month, the Bank of England cut interest rates to 4.5% – a drop of another quarter percentage point for the third period in a row.
Halifax said that on average, first-time buyers are 33 years old – two years older than they were a decade ago – and that the average deposit paid was £61,090 for a home typically valued at £311,034.
More on Housing
Related Topics:
The bank also said that people stepping on to the property ladder accounted for more than half of all home purchases made with a mortgage last year, at 54%.
Ms Bryden added that “many are still teaming up to make the numbers work, with most buying homes jointly”, which “makes sense” given the average deposit and house price.
She said these prices “can be a stretch for those with a single income”, and that: “It’s not surprising the average first-time buyer is now 33 years old, the oldest in the last two decades.”
However, while Halifax expects “modest house price growth” this year, Ms Bryden said: “Upcoming stamp duty threshold reductions won’t make things any easier in the short term for first-time buyers.”
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her budget last year that the “nil rate” stamp duty band for first-time buyers will reduce from £425,000 to £300,000 from 1 April.
Halifax’s research was based on data from its own housing statistics database, as well as figures from trade association UK Finance and official earnings data.