Toyota the largest auto industry funder of climate deniers in US – report
Toyota has been revealed as the largest auto industry funder of climate deniers in US Congress, according to a report released today by Public Citizen.
Toyota is the largest automaker in the world, having occasionally competed for that title with Volkswagen. It sells more gas-powered, polluting vehicles than any other company on Earth, and thus, it has a vested interest in continuing to sell those polluting vehicles.
But the problem is that gas-powered, polluting vehicles are not good for the health of humans or other living beings on this planet.
The pollution created by gas-powered vehicles damages every organ in the body, kills millions of people per year, and is a primary driver of climate change which is already causing an uptick in natural disasters (as we see currently, with climate change-driven fires destroying 12,000 structures in the last week in the US’ second-largest metro area) and threatens to displace over a billion people.
But that truth is inconvenient to Toyota, whose global revenue from selling polluting vehicles exceeds $300 billion/year. That means that, as one of the richest companies in the world and thus one of the most well-positioned to fund a transition to cleaner vehicles, it has a choice: it can either better itself, or it can do nothing to improve and instead pay people to lie about the problems that its vehicles are causing.
As you might expect, it has chosen the latter.
Toyota ranked as a top pollution advocate, once again
Toyota has repeatedly ranked as one of the strongest funders of pro-pollution, anti-EV, and climate denying propaganda in the world, and a new report out today reveals its growing interest in seeding anti-science attitudes in US Congress, through political donations to climate deniers.
Public Citizen’s report, “Driving Denial: How Toyota’s Unholy Alliance with Climate Deniers Threatens Climate Progress,” analyzes political donations from US auto industry PACs over the last three election cycles, and shows that not only is Toyota the largest funder of climate denial, but that Toyota’s funding of climate denial is increasing, while others are decreasing.
(Edit: Notably, the report only covered company-linked automaker PACs, specifically Toyota, Ford and GM, and donations to Congressional candiates. Tesla CEO Elon Musk did set up his own PAC, and his donations to anti-EV and climate denying candidates vastly outpaced all of the aforementioned PACs combined).
Public Citizen analyzed public records of political donations and past statements by US Congressmembers. It expanded its definition of “climate denier” from previous reports, this time including members who “used other rhetorical tactics like climate doomism (saying there is nothing that can be done), portraying climate activism as alarmism, and who downplayed the need to act to address climate change.”
It found 169 candidates – unsurprisingly, all republican – who had worked to deny scientific truths about climate change over the course of the last three election cycles. Out of those 169 candidates, Toyota donated some amount of money to 143 of them, totaling $810k.
In just the most recent cycle, it found that Toyota gave $271,000 combined to 62 candidates, nine times as much as Ford and more than twice as much as GM gave. Both Ford and GM’s climate denial donations reduced over the last three cycles, while Toyota’s dipped in 2022 and rose in 2024.
These are relatively small dollar numbers compared to Toyota’s >$300 billion in global annual revenue, and it’s money that has gotten results.
How this lobbying affects your lungs and pocketbook
In March of 2024, President Biden’s EPA finalized a new exhaust rule that will save thousands of lives and save Americans over $100 billion in fuel and health costs per year, and reduce climate pollution by 7 billion tons – but lobbying from the auto industry, including Toyota, got those rules softened before they were implemented.
The rest of the auto industry also asked for that softening of the rules, but there is now an opportunity for them to go further. Unfortunately for America, the next occupant of the White House is convicted felon Donald Trump, who finally received more votes than his opponent on his third attempt (despite committing treason in 2021, for which there is a clear legal remedy).
Mr. Trump has stated quite forcefully that he wants to reverse President Biden’s money-saving clean air policies, thus saddling Americans with dirtier air, higher costs and poorer health. This turnaround would also send American jobs to China and attempt to quash the new boom in American manufacturing driven by Biden’s EV rules.
In the past, the auto industry has taken advantage of changes in government, trying to get money-saving clean air rules torpedoed even after implementation.
This time, though, the auto industry is begging that the rules remain in place (after realizing they screwed everything up last time) in order to provide regulatory certainty to an industry with long planning timelines.
But Toyota has broken with the rest of the industry, instead asking the new Congress – that it bought – to give tax credits to its polluting gas-powered vehicles, which harm your health and exacerbate natural disasters.
Toyota’s “green image” is long overdue for a change
Toyota has long rested on the laurels of its previous success with hybrid vehicles, hoping that customers would be fooled into thinking that it is an environmentally responsible company because it sold some vehicles that make slightly less pollution than others for a while.
But conventional hybrid vehicles like the Prius (non-plug-in version) are still gas-powered, and still get 100% of their energy from gasoline. The vehicle’s hybrid drive only works to recover kinetic energy that’s already in the system and redeploy it, increasing efficiency, but still relying entirely on a resource that absolutely, without question, must stay in the ground.
And while Toyota has sold a significant amount of hybrids, the brand still ranks below average in efficiency, according to the EPA automotive trends report. It ranked below all other Asian brands, and below BMW, a brand famous for its large-engine and high-performing sportscars (though ahead of the US Big Three, which sell a lot of disgustingly huge vehicles and need to do better).
This is incongruous with Toyota’s perception among the public, which still consider the company as a green leader despite its long-time advocacy, as covered above, against EVs, against clean air regulations, and in favor of climate denial.
Toyota also portrays itself as a green leader through numerous greenwashing campaigns and anti-science disinformation. Public Citizen recently filed an FTC complaint over Toyota’s false electrification claims.
But is all of this effort to be hostile to life on Earth helping Toyota? Probably not – and it might even know it.
Toyota’s EV intransigence is harming it – and all of Japan
While Toyota’s advocacy could be interpreted as an attempt to protect its profits, this is a short-sighted view.
All industries change, and companies that do not change along with their industry are doomed to failure.
Toyota, itself, was the harbinger of this change in the 1970s, when the auto industry went through a big shakeup due to disruption in the oil and steel industries. Consumers needed smaller and more efficient vehicles that were not being provided by US automakers, and Toyota and other Japanese automakers – which also had superior manufacturing techniques and access to better and cheaper steel – swooped in to provide them.
Despite US attempts at protectionism (which didn’t work then and won’t work now), this catapulted Japan to becoming the world’s top auto exporter, and Toyota remains a global powerhouse.
However, now Toyota and Japan are on the opposite side of this lesson. Worldwide, consumers are demanding electric vehicles at increasing rates, and Toyota not only refuses to provide them, but tries to channel customers to its polluting vehicles instead.
The situation got so bad that the company’s longtime CEO, Akio Toyoda, stepped down in 2023 due to his failure on EVs, but the new CEO Koji Sato didn’t change much.
But someone else is providing the EVs consumers want – namely, China. As a result, China overtook Japan as the world’s largest auto exporter in the last year or so. And Toyota’s business is cratering in the world’s largest auto market because Chinese consumers just don’t want their crappy gas cars.
So the roles are reversed now – China is the new Japan, and Japan, led by Toyota (the largest company in the country, with high political and cultural influence) is responding in just the way that will ensure the same outcome as the last time this happened.
As EV sales grow globally, any company that does not keep pace will find its position diminished. Toyota has shown no interest in keeping pace, and instead is trying to lobby to stop a transition that will happen whether it likes it or not.
And it won’t just harm Toyota, but the entire country of Japan, for which automotive products make up around a fifth of its exports. Japan is reliant on the auto industry, and its intransigence could lead to a huge drop in GDP if it doesn’t shape up.
But instead of looking at all this blatant evidence that its intransigence will harm it, Toyota is doubling down on climate denial instead of trying to catch up with an industry that has clearly left it in the dust.
While Toyota’s short-term lobbying victories may feel good in the moment, they will help neither the company, the health of the humans who work for it who have to deal with the increased pollution its leadership lobbies for, nor the health of the planet it exists on which will be harmed by the science denial it lobbies for.
If you’re an electric vehicle owner, charge your car at home with rooftop solar panels. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing on solar, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Bojangles, the North Carolina-based chain known for its fried chicken and biscuits, is joining the growing list of fast food chains installing EV chargers in their parking lots.
The restaurant chain is working with Smart Big Box, Alyath EV, and Energy and Environmental Design Services to install turnkey EV charging stations at a “wide range” of its 800 restaurants, which are concentrated heavily in the southeast US. The rollout starts in late 2025, with most chargers expected to be available by sometime in 2026.
Each Bojangles location getting EV chargers will offer at least four ports. The stations will vary between Level 2 and DC fast chargers.
Bojangles CIO Richard Del Valle said, “Working with Alyath and Smart Big Box allows us to introduce a new convenience that aligns with evolving customer needs.”
It’s a smart move. The charging stations will let people plug in and power up, and they’re more likely to dine at Bojangles while they’re doing so. Plus, Bojangles will get a reputation for having charging stations, so EV drivers will be more inclined to head toward the restaurants as a reliable power source.
Cristiane Rosul, CEO of Alyath, said the partnership “not only benefits EV drivers but also positions Bojangles as a leader in the future of quick-service dining.”
Smart Big Box has contracted with Energy and Environmental Design Services as the exclusive installer and maintenance partner for all EV chargers.
Read more: Waffle House is getting DC fast chargers – and it’s a genius move
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Toyota’s electric SUV is now its cheapest vehicle to lease. After slashing lease prices again, the Toyota bZ4X is listed for lease at just $199 per month in some states. That’s even cheaper than a Corolla right now, even though it’s nearly double the price.
Toyota bZ4X is now cheaper to lease than a Corolla
The 2025 Toyota bZ4X already starts at $6,000 cheaper than the previous model year, but with a new promotion this month, it’s even more affordable.
Toyota is at it again, having cut lease prices once more this month following the Fourth of July holiday. The 2025 Toyota bZ4X XLE is now listed at just $199 per month for 36 months. With $3,999 due at signing, you’ll end up paying an effective cost of $310 per month.
The offer is $42 less than before the new promo, or about a 12% price cut. It’s hard enough to find any lease nowadays around $300, but for an electric SUV, it’s a pretty good deal.
According to online auto research firm CarsDirect, it’s even cheaper to lease a bZ4X now in some states than a Toyota Corolla. The 2025 Corolla LE Sedan is available for $229 for 36 months. With $2,999 due at signing, the effective monthly rate is $312, or $2 more than the bZ4X.
Although $2 might not seem like much in the grand scheme of things, it’s pretty significant, given that the bZ4X is $16,000 more expensive.
The 2025 Toyota bZ4X XLE has an MSRP of $38,465, compared to the Corolla LE Sedan, which starts at $22,325. That’s a $16,140 cost difference alone.
Toyota’s electric SUV is slightly longer than a RAV4 at 184.6″ in length, but it has a longer wheelbase, which opens up more interior space.
Toyota is also throwing in a free year of unlimited charging (at EV-go-operated public charging stations) for those who buy or lease a new 2025 bZ4X. You can also add a ChargePoint home charger to the cost.
Although the bZ4X is available for just $199 per month, the 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 is listed at $179 nationwide this month. With more range, style, and an NACS port for charging at Tesla Superchargers, the 2025 IONIQ 5 offer is hard to pass up right now.
| 2025 Toyota bZ4X trim | Starting Price (excluding $1,395 DPH fee) |
Price reduction (vs 2024MY) |
Range (mi) |
| XLE FWD | $37,070 | -$6,000 | 252 |
| XLE AWD | $39,150 | -$6,000 | 228 |
| Limited FWD | $41,800 | -$5,380 | 236 |
| Limited AWD | $43,880 | -$5,380 | 222 |
| Nightshade | $40,420 | N/A | 222 |
Like many carmakers, Toyota is currently offering significant incentives on electric vehicles, with the federal tax credit set to expire at the end of September. Accordingly, Toyota’s promotion ends on September 30. Although the bZ4X doesn’t qualify for the credit through purchase, Toyota is passing it on through leasing.
In some areas, like LA, Toyota is currently offering $12,000 off bZ4X leases. With the loss of the tax credit, the savings would drop to just $4,500, which would add over $100 a month to the lease price.
Looking to take advantage of the savings while they are still here? You can use our link to find deals on the 2025 Toyota bZ4X in your area today.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Transport Canada has finished its investigation into Tesla’s questionable filing of $43 million worth of EV incentives in a single day, finding that the claims did indeed represent cars sold before the deadline to file for incentives – still raising questions about disorganization within Tesla.
To recap, Canada suddenly sunsetted its electric vehicle incentives back in January, as the program ran out of money. It caught a lot of EV dealers by surprise, and there was a sudden rush to sell cars and to file for incentives, given that the end of the program was announced with just three days notice.
One of these dealerships that showed a rush was a single Tesla dealership in Quebec, which recorded 4,000 rebate requests in a single weekend, an impossible number at the relatively small location. Other Tesla locations also filed for suspiciously high numbers of incentive claims on the same weekend.
This raised alarm bells, and other Canadian auto dealers pointed it out to Transport Canada, with Huw WIlliams, head of the Canadian Auto Dealers Association (CADA) claiming that Tesla “gamed the system” to hog an illegitimate number of incentive claims out of the limited money left. The total amount was $43 million, which was more than half of the amount left in the Canadian government’s coffers.
Even accounting for Tesla delivery pushes, and for increased sales as the credit rapidly sunset, these numbers did not seem possible.
This – perhaps combined with Tesla’s unpopular position in Canada at the time given CEO Elon Musk’s participation in a US government which was attacking Canada’s sovereignty at the time – led to Transport Canada announcing an investigation into Tesla’s incentive claims (Canadian Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland even said at the time that future Canadian ZEV incentives should exclude Tesla until the US’ “illegitimate and illegal” tariffs were lifted).
Tesla responded to the investigation in a typically standoffish manner, claiming in a letter that it was “shocked” to hear about the investigation, threatening legal action if payments weren’t resumed, and blaming Transport Canada for causing Tesla’s negative public perception and exposing Tesla’s Canadian employees to harassment (the letter did not, however, mention anything about CEO Musk’s government activities, or his recent actions attempting to spread white supremacy around the globe, and how those are much more responsible for negative public perception of the company).
Well now, the result of that investigation is back, and Freeland said on Friday that Tesla’s claims “were determined to legitimately represent cars sold before January 12.”
Transport Canada also pledged to CADA that all cars delivered before January 12 will have their incentive claims fulfilled, regardless of the program’s budget. CADA estimates it’s owed around $11 million in past-due claims, and Williams still wonders how Tesla knew to file those claims so suddenly.
Electrek’s Take
Questions still remain about this incentive. As pointed out by the Canadian Press, it’s still not clear whether Tesla’s incentive claims were for cars sold on that weekend, or for cars sold prior to that weekend and delivered all in a lump.
Given the physical limitations of the locations involved, it’s likely the latter. Which raises a different kind of alarm bell: that of disorganization within Tesla, as I pointed out as my main concern over this situation in a previous article.
I just don’t see how Tesla Canada can justify leaving tens of millions of dollars on the table for potentially several months, when all it took was the filing of some pieces of paper for them to get it. That’s capital that Tesla could have used to do business, and letting it sit in someone else’s bank account doesn’t benefit Tesla at all.
Now, disorganization is nothing new for Tesla, but businesses usually don’t like leaving money laying around for no reason. And Tesla, with its focus on quarterly results and end-of-quarter pushes, surely would have enjoyed having that extra cash in December, the end of a fiscal quarter/year, rather than the beginning of January when they filed for these incentives.
So regardless of the now proven legitimacy of these claims, this aspect should be cause for some amount of concern. It’s a reflection of a longtime problem in Tesla, where things tend to fall through the cracks until there’s some sort of emergency, and then it’s all-hands-on-deck from whoever happens to be closest to the problem at the time. But this has been an issue within Tesla for so long that it’s hard to see it being fixed at this point – and certainly not under its longtime CEO who seems far more interested in using Tesla to bail out his private companies or turning Twitter into “MechaHitler” than on making actual good decisions for Tesla.
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike