Tough new European Union regulations requiring banks to bolster their cybersecurity systems officially come into effect Friday — but many of the bloc’s financial services firms aren’t yet in full compliance with the rules.
The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act, or DORA, requires both financial services firms and their technology suppliers to strengthen their IT systems to ensure the industry is resilient in the event of a cyberattack or any other forms of disruption. It entered into effect on Jan. 17.
The penalties for breaches of the new legislation can be substantial. Financial services firms that fall foul of the new rules can face fines of up to 2% of annual global revenue. Individual managers could also be held liable for breaches and face sanctions of as much as 1 million euros ($1 million).
So far, the rate of compliance among financial services firms with the new rules has been mixed, according to Harvey Jang, chief privacy officer and deputy general counsel at IT giant Cisco.
“I think we’ve seen a mixed bag,” Jang told CNBC in an interview. “Of course, the more mature-stage companies are further along looking at this for at least a year — if not longer.”
“We’re really trying to build this compliance program, but it’s so complex. I think that’s the challenge. We saw this too with GDPR and other broad legislation that is subject to interpretation — what does it actually mean to comply? It means different things to different people,” he said.
This lack of a common understanding of what qualifies as robust compliance with DORA has in turn led many institutions to ramp up security standards to the level that they’re actually surpassing the “baseline” of what’s expected of most firms, Jang added.
Are financial institutions ready?
Under DORA, financial firms will be required to undertake rigorous IT risk and incident management, classification and reporting, operational resilience testing, intelligence sharing on cyber threats and vulnerabilities, and measures to manage third-party risks.
Firms will be also be required to conduct assessments of “concentration risk” related to the outsourcing of critical or important operational functions to external companies.
That’s a concern because, even though the U.K. falls outside the European Union now, DORA applies to all financial entities operating within EU jurisdictions — even if they’re based outside the bloc.
“Whilst it is clear that DORA has no legal reach in the U.K., entities based here and operating or providing services to entities in the EU will be subject to the regulation,” Richard Lindsay, principal advisory consultant at Orange Cyberdefense, told CNBC.
He added that the main challenge for many financial institutions when it comes to achieving DORA compliance has been managing their critical third-party IT providers.
“Financial institutions operate within a multi-layered and hugely complex digital ecosystem,” Lindsay said. “Tracking and ensuring that all parts of this system evidentially comply with the relevant elements of DORA will require a new mindset, solutions and resources.”
Banks are also adding higher levels of scrutiny in their contract negotiations with tech suppliers due to DORA’s strict requirements, Jang said.
The Cisco chief privacy officer told CNBC that he thinks there is alignment when it comes to the principles and the spirit of the law. However, he added, “any legislation is a product of compromise and so, as they get more prescriptive, then it becomes challenging.”
“The principles we agree with, but any legislation is a product of compromise, and so as as they get more prescriptive, then it becomes challenging.”
Still, despite the challenges, the broad expectation among experts is that it won’t be long until banks and other financial institutions achieve compliance.
“Banks in Europe already comply with significant regulations which cover the majority of the areas that fall under DORA,” Fabio Colombo, EMEA financial services security lead at Accenture, told CNBC.
“As a result, financial services institutions already have mature governance and compliance capabilities in place, with existing incident reporting processes and solid ICT risk frameworks.”
Risks for IT suppliers
IT providers can also be fined under DORA. The rules threaten levies of as much as 1% of average daily worldwide revenue for up to six months.
“These sanctions are necessary,” Brian Fox, chief technology officer of software supply chain management firm Sonatype, told CNBC. “They are a powerful motivator, pushing leaders to take compliance and operational resilience more seriously than ever.”
Orange Cyberdefense’s Lindsay said there’s a risk longer term that financial services firms end up moving their critical security functions and services in-house.
“Advances in technology may allow financial institutions to move services back in-house, simplifying this aspect and reducing the risk of non-compliance,” he said.
“Either way, existing contracts will need to be updated to ensure compliance is contractually mandated and monitored between entity and provider,” Lindsay added.
“As with any new regulation, there will certainly be a transitionary period as organisations adjust to new requirements and standards,” Sonatype’s Fox told CNBC. “This is the start of a long journey toward improving software security and resilience.”
Shares of grocery delivery service Instacart dropped about 7% in extended trading on Wednesday, following a report that said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has begun an investigation into the company’s pricing practices.
The FTC sent a civil investigative demand to Instacart, Reuters reported, citing unnamed people.
A study released last week showed that prices for the same products in the same supermarkets that work with Instacart can vary by around 7%, which can result in over $1,000 in extra annual costs for customers. Instacart responded by saying that retailers determine prices listed in the app.
In 2022, Instacart spent $59 million to acquire Eversight, a company specializing in artificial intelligence-driven pricing and promotions for retailers and consumer packaged goods. Instacart sought to “create compelling savings opportunities for customers in real-time” with Eversight, according to a regulatory filing.
The FTC and Instacart did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Jim Cramer implores Amazon not to engage in “sham-like” circular AI deals that remind him of the kind of speculation that fueled the 1990s dotcom bubble that burst more than two decades ago. According to multiple reports on Wednesday, Amazon is in talks about a potential $10 billion investment in OpenAI in exchange for the ChatGPT creator agreeing to use the cloud giant’s custom AI chips. “They really need Trainium chips sold so badly that they give somebody $10 billion to buy them,” Jim said during the Club’s Morning Meeting on Wednesday . “I would love to see them not play this game.” “I really respect Amazon, and this shocks me that they’re willing to put up with this,” Jim said on “Squawk on the Street” earlier Wednesday. “You can’t do these deals. These deals are not real.” Over the past several years, many investors have been sounding the alarm over the growing levels of AI-related spending from megacap hyperscalers to compete in the so-called AI arms race. The push for AI requires the buildout of data centers and high-performance chips to run the systems. Jim said the current spate of interconnected investment activity is similar to deals in the lead-up to the year 2000. “The market is not going to let this happen,” Jim predicted, calling the stock market a “cruel task master,” in a stark warning about excess that drove the tech-heavy Nasdaq to a then-record high in March 2000 and the 78% crash over 2½ years that followed. OpenAI has been on a deal spree in 2025, securing massive amounts of computing power from firms including Nvidia , Advanced Micro Devices , Oracle , and Amazon’s cloud unit. That has amounted to the AI startup making $1.4 trillion in infrastructure commitments in recent months. Jim recently referred to OpenAI’s deal activity as “2000 in a nutshell,” as it continues to make aggressive, leveraged bets, raising concerns about an AI bubble. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long AMZN, NVDA. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Rohit Prasad, Senior VP & Head Scientist for Alexa, Amazon, on Centre Stage during day one of Web Summit 2022 at the Altice Arena in Lisbon, Portugal.
Ben McShane | Sportsfile | Getty Images
Rohit Prasad, a top Amazon executive overseeing its artificial general intelligence unit, is leaving the company at the end of this year, the company confirmed Wednesday.
As part of the move, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said the company is reorganizing the AGI unit under a more expansive division that will also include its silicon development and quantum computing teams. The new division will be led by Peter DeSantis, a 27-year veteran of Amazon who currently serves as a senior vice president in its cloud unit.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.