Connect with us

Published

on

An inquiry into the Southport stabbings has been announced by the government.

It comes after Axel Rudakubana, 18, admitted murdering Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, in the attack in Southport, Merseyside, in July last year.

In a statement, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said that now there has been a guilty plea, “the families and the people of Southport need answers about what happened leading up to this attack”.

Politics latest: PM says ‘grave questions to answer’ over Southport

It has now emerged that Rudakubana was referred to the government anti-extremism scheme – known as Prevent – three times before the murders due to a fixation with violence.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Southport murderer – what you need to know

In her statement, Ms Cooper said these three referrals happened in the 17 months between December 2019 and April 2021, when Rudakubana was 13 and 14 years old.

He was also in contact with the police, the courts, the youth justice system, social services and mental health services.

“Yet between them, those agencies failed to identify the terrible risk and danger to others that he posed,” Ms Cooper said.

“We also need more independent answers on both Prevent and all the other agencies that came into contact with this extremely violent teenager as well as answers on how he came to be so dangerous.”

Axel Rudakubana. Pic: Merseyside police
Image:
Axel Rudakubana. Pic: Merseyside police

Rudakubana is set to be sentenced on Thursday – with the judge saying a life sentence is “inevitable”.

Sir Keir Starmer said earlier today: “The news that the vile and sick Southport killer will be convicted is welcome.

“It is also a moment of trauma for the nation and there are grave questions to answer as to how the state failed in its ultimate duty to protect these young girls.

“Britain will rightly demand answers. And we will leave no stone unturned in that pursuit.”

After the attacks in July 2024, there were calls for more information about what was known by authorities to be released and violent riots took place across the country.

Read more:
Mugshot of Axel Rudakubana released
People of Southport are trying to make sense of horror

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Southport attacker pleads guilty

Ms Cooper said the government was not able to release more information sooner about Rudakubana because the Crown Prosecution Service wanted to “avoid jeopardising the legal proceedings” – including any potential trials – “in line with the normal rules of the British justice systems”.

However, the government launched an “urgent” review into Rudakubana’s contact with Prevent last summer – and details will be published this week.

Ms Cooper said this “terrible case” comes against a “backdrop” of increasing numbers of teenagers being referred to Prevent, investigated by anti-terror police being referred to other agencies “amid concerns around serious violence and extremism”.

“We need to face up to why this has been happening and what needs to change,” she said.

Speaking earlier today, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said: “As we learn more details of Axel Rudakubana’s horrific crimes, my thoughts are first and foremost with the victims’ families.

“We will need a complete account of who in government knew what and when. The public deserves the truth.

“This case is still in court and there are, properly, limits on what can be said at this stage.

“But once it concludes on Thursday with sentencing, there are many important questions the authorities will need to answer about the handling of this case and the flow of information.”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage accused the government of a “cover-up”, and said the “vacuum of information” led to the riots.

He called on Ms Cooper to make an apology in the Commons.

Continue Reading

Politics

Farmers warn mansion tax could be double whammy

Published

on

By

Farmers warn mansion tax could be double whammy

Farmers have warned the government it would be unfair to include farms in the mansion tax as they are working businesses, “not luxury homes”.

Rachel Reeves revealed homes worth £2m or more will be subject to an annual charge on top of council tax from 2028.

Politics latest: Starmer challenged over ‘misleading the public’ with budget tax rises

Her spokesman refused to rule out farms having to pay the mansion tax, which could prove a double hit for farmers after last year’s budget removed inheritance tax relief for farms worth more than £1m.

The Conservatives accused Labour of “waging a war on farmers”, while the Lib Dems said the government has “no understanding of farmers or farms”.

Farmers have been protesting since Ms Reeves’s inheritance tax announcement last year.

She gave them a small concession on Wednesday as she announced farmers and small business owners will be able to transfer up to £1m of any unused inheritance tax allowance to their spouse or civil partner if they die – bringing them in line with homeowners.

More from Politics

Farmers have said this is welcome but does not address the issue completely, as they said many farms will still have to sell land off, or sell up entirely, due to inheritance tax costs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farmers defy ban in budget-day protest

Ms Reeves’s spokesman said there will be “a consultation that will look at different cases” for the mansion tax.

Asked if he could rule out farms having to pay the tax, he said: “There’s a consultation on cases to be accounted for.”

He said the Valuation Office Agency (VOA), which provides property taxation advice to the government, will be carrying out the consultation.

The VOA is also responsible for valuing properties for council tax and business rates.

Read more:
How much is the mansion tax and who will have to pay it?
The main budget announcements

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘This is not the budget you wanted to deliver’

Farmer Gavin Lane, president of the Country Land and Business Association, which represents rural property, land and business owners, told Sky News: “A farm is not a luxury home. It is a working business.

“If a tax built for high-value homes were ever stretched to cover barns, grain stores, or the land a farmer needs to run their business, it would hit people the policy was never written for.

“There are already clear rules for valuing residential property. This is about council tax on homes, and this system has always been built around residential use, not the land and buildings a farmer relies on to run a business.”

Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride. Pic: PA
Image:
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride. Pic: PA

Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride told Sky News: “Labour are waging a war on farmers.

“Having been whacked by the family farm tax last year, farmers now face a double hit with Rachel Reeves’s family home tax.

“Reeves’s farm tax has already placed heavy pressure on many family farms.

“At a time when certainty is essential, this budget has left people feeling that nothing is safe – not their home, their job, their savings, their pension or their farm.

“This was the benefits budget. Rachel Reeves has chosen to put taxes up on hardworking people to pay for more and more welfare.”

Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey told Sky News: “The government has once again shown it has no understanding of farmers or their farms.

“For many farmers, their home is their place of work. Some farmers who could be hit by this tax earn less than the minimum wage for doing work that is absolutely crucial to our country.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: Budget 2025

Under the mansion tax, officially called the “high-value council tax surcharge”, there will be four bands.

The lowest band, for properties worth between £2m and £2.5m, will pay £2,500.

The highest band, for homes worth £5m or more, will pay £7,500.

Ms Reeves and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) did not reveal the two middle bands and charges.

But she said the surcharge would be uprated annually by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation.

Continue Reading

Politics

Uzbekistan greenlights stablecoins for payments under new sandbox regime

Published

on

By

Uzbekistan greenlights stablecoins for payments under new sandbox regime

Uzbekistan is moving to bring stablecoins into its formal payment system, starting with a tightly controlled development sandbox, according to local media.

According to a Friday report by local news outlet Kun, Uzbekistan’s new stablecoin regulatory framework will come into force on Jan. 1, 2026. The new law, signed on Nov. 27, establishes a regulatory sandbox under the purview of the National Agency for Perspective Projects, together with the central bank.

Pilot projects are expected to be implemented to develop a stablecoin-based payment system operating on distributed ledger technology. Starting next year, Uzbekistan-based entities will reportedly be allowed to issue tokenized shares and bonds, and a separate trading platform will be created on licensed stock exchanges for those new assets.

The news follows Uzbekistan’s central bank Chairman Timur Ishmetov announcing in September that studies on digital currencies are underway. At the time, he said crypto activities “should be done under strict control, as it will have a serious impact on monetary policy.”

Related: Crypto on horseback: Journey into Kyrgyzstan’s gold-pegged digital future

CBDCs also on the table

Ishmetov also mentioned central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), but not in their retail form. He explained that “such a currency would not be used in people’s daily lives, but mainly to speed up settlements between commercial or central banks.

Kashkadarya Regional branch of the Central Bank of Uzbekistan. Source: Wikimedia

Uzbekistan’s National Agency for Prospective Projects issued a directive in late March 2024 to increase monthly fees for crypto market participants in the country. Under the new system, crypto exchanges face a monthly fee equivalent to $20,015 — about double the previous fee.

Related: Kyrgyzstan introduces state crypto reserve concept in new bill

Central Asia not left being left behind

As much of the world develops crypto regulatory frameworks, Central Asia has also progressed. In late October, Kyrgyzstan rolled out a new stablecoin pegged 1:1 to the Kyrgyzstani som, while confirming plans to issue a central bank digital currency and explore a digital asset reserve.

Still, Kazakhstan clearly leads the pack. According to October reports, Kazakhstan’s Financial Monitoring Agency took down 130 crypto platforms involved in money laundering schemes this year. Earlier that month, the country also continued implementing its dual-track approach to digital assets, piloting a CBDC while also backing a state-linked stablecoin.

This followed the launch of the Kazakhstan central bank’s stablecoin pilot project in late September. Also in September, the country established a state-backed crypto reserve in partnership with Binance, holding BNB (BNB).

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express