Connect with us

Published

on

It was a small signifier – one which could be over-interpreted – but nevertheless provoked angst among some in government at a time when there isn’t universally huge confidence that UK-US political relations are as robust as they should be.

On Sunday, the British Embassy in Washington had a bash for members of the incoming Trump administration: a chance to boost goodwill amongst supporters of the 47th president as they prepared to descend on the nation’s capital.

Organisers hoped to get a very high-value guest indeed: someone who isn’t a household name, or a member of the incoming Trump cabinet, but who was set to become the most powerful attendee of the lot within hours – Susie Wiles, Donald Trump’s chief of staff and long-time political consultant.

Credited with injecting a level of professionalism in Trump 2.0 absent in 2016 and 2017, Wiles is so close to Trump that he invited her to take the microphone as part of his victory speech on election day in November. As she almost always does, she declined the limelight.

Follow live: Trump returns to power

There are many good and understandable reasons why Wiles would have been absent from a British embassy party hours before her man swore the oath of office and returned to the White House.

But her failure to attend was nevertheless a disappointment felt on both sides of the Atlantic. Just the latest source of insecurity, it seems, as the special relationship is put to the test. Insecurity at a very difficult moment.

As Donald 2.0 returns to the world stage, the rhetoric from Keir Starmer and David Lammy could not, superficially, appear more confident in US-UK links.

In remarks released on Sunday night, the PM talked about a shared history fighting common enemies and deepening the special relationship. But, behind the scenes, there is far less certainty that all is well – and we will soon see if this is true.

Nowhere will this be put to a faster, more brutal test than over the attitude of the White House, Trump allies and the president himself to Lord Peter Mandelson – the man Downing Street hopes will be the incoming British ambassador to Washington.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could Trump stop the new UK ambassador?

At some point in February, Lord Mandelson – known as the Prince of Darkness from his days as a New Labour spin doctor – will fly to Washington to present his credentials to the new president, a precondition of starting work in the job.

But, in truth, nobody really knows what will happen at that point: whether they will be accepted, and whether Lord Mandelson will be able to get on the job to which he has been tasked by Starmer.

In London on Sunday, government sources got to work claiming the suggestion his application to be the next inhabitant of 3100 Massachusetts Avenue could be rejected was just “bar room gossip”.

But it is not.

In parts of government it is being considered a clear and present danger. A full-scale diplomatic effort over the coming weeks will be put into securing Lord Mandelson’s position. The stakes are high, because of the way Number 10 has gone about this selection.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump adviser hints at possible first actions

The fundamentals of our link to the US – the shared history, the Five Eyes security alliance, military and diplomatic cooperation – means a special relationship will almost certainly endure whatever the path of Trump’s second presidency.

But the political ties between the Labour Party and Trump-leaning Republicans are deeply frayed and recently got worse, according to multiple sources I’ve spoken to – and much of this could play itself out in how Trumpland chooses to treat Lord Mandelson in the next few weeks.

Some of those around Trump have made it clear that the incoming president is still minded to reject Mandelson’s credentials on two grounds: previous criticism of the president himself, and also over his support for China and business dealings with a country out of favour with the US.

All this against a backdrop of the first political diplomatic appointment to Washington in decades.

This means Lord Mandelson is also weighed down by all the baggage of months of rows over Labour’s efforts to campaign for rival Kamal Harris and the role of Starmer’s pollster Deborah Mattinson in the US during the election.

However, the manner of Downing Street’s appointment of Lord Mandelson was just as big a problem as the name itself, I’m told.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Long before the election, Labour signalled a preference for a political appointee to succeed Karen Pierce, the respected incumbent.

But the months rolled on and Number 10 put back the decision, creating a vacuum which Ms Pierce filled by – what some saw as – a campaign to continue in post.

In Trumpland, she ensured she was regarded as the best woman for the job, and was – according to sources – even succeeding on being on the radar of President Trump himself.

The rest of Washington acknowledged her success getting close to the now president as well.

It took until December, and a visit by Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, before a decision was made that Lord Mandelson should get the job, and made clear he was starting in a matter of weeks.

It was an abrupt end to Ms Pierce’s time. Allies of the incoming president, who had an affection for Ms Pierce, were aghast. “Trumpland was horrified,” a source told me. “They were saying we want you to stay.”

Tales of their horror have ricocheted around Whitehall, with one source in the Foreign Office claiming they think Lord Mandelson is “dead on arrival” as it stands, and a huge effort is needed to reverse this.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lord Mandelson ‘best choice’, Lord Darroch says

Inside government, there’s an acknowledgement they did not initially fathom how grumpy Trump allies had become, and just how serious the consequences might be for a prime minister who has unexpectedly made foreign policy such a key part of the job.

There is now irritation in all direction. Whitehall sources said today Number 10 is cross with Ms Pierce, who they blame for making life more difficult for Lord Mandelson.

“They are briefing Karen is “vindictive” and better watch out or she won’t get an honour. Ridiculous. What 25 years of service and this is how it ends. This is disgusting – no respect,” they said.

Number 10 deny any rift, on the day Ms Pierce is the only representative of the UK government at the inauguration. The Foreign Office insist Ms Pierce has only ever been doing the job she was tasked to do.

Whatever happens, a big fight is on to ensure Lord Mandelson gets the post he’s been given.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK prime minister Sir Keir Starmer sent a message to Trump on his inauguration day.

Yet all this for a Labour figure that some claim is not as close to Sir Keir as some assume.

He is well-liked by the chief of staff, Mr McSweeney, but I’m told that Sir Keir has had flashes of irritation about Lord Mandelson both in the run-up to the general election and during the autumn – even as the selection process for ambassador was underway.

Ominously, there is precedent for Trumpland casting out a UK ambassador: Sir Kim Darroch was effectively excommunicated by Trump during the first presidency after disobliging cables written by Sir Kim were leaked while in office.

Lord Mandelson will make no such mistake – he wrote an ingratiating piece last Friday on the Fox News website praising Trump’s “straight-taking and deal-making”. He knows what he has to do.

The question now is how much Trumpland bears a grudge. The 47th president is at the peak of his power in the coming months, is signalling he is unwilling to back down, but it is unclear how many fights he wants to pick at once.

Sir Keir and David Lammy will both make trips to the US in the coming weeks, when ensuring the smooth transition of our man in the US is a priority.

But it is clear nothing is obvious. The failure of Susie Wiles to attend Sunday’s event prompted some to speculate maybe she was behind some of the briefings which ended up in the Sunday papers. With the fate of Lord Mandelson, as with everything else: nothing is certain in Trumpland – yet.

Continue Reading

UK

Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell tells Nigel Farage ‘kneejerk’ migrant deportation plan won’t solve problem

Published

on

By

Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell tells Nigel Farage 'kneejerk' migrant deportation plan won't solve problem

The Archbishop of York has told Sky News the UK should resist Reform’s “kneejerk” plan for the mass deportation of migrants, telling Nigel Farage he is not offering any “long-term solution”.

Stephen Cottrell said in an interview with Trevor Phillips he has “every sympathy” with people who are concerned about asylum seekers coming to the country illegally.

But he criticised the plan announced by Reform on Tuesday to deport 600,000 people, which would be enabled by striking deals with the Taliban and Iran, saying it will not “solve the problem”.

Mr Cottrell is currently acting head of the Church of England while a new Archbishop of Canterbury is chosen.

Pic: Jacob King/PA Wire
Image:
Pic: Jacob King/PA Wire

The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell in 2020.
File pic: PA
Image:
The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell in 2020.
File pic: PA

Phillips asked him: “What’s your response to the people who are saying the policy should be ‘you land here, unlawfully, you get locked up and you get deported straight away. No ifs, no buts’?”

Mr Cottrell said he would tell them “you haven’t solved the problem”, adding: “You’ve just put it somewhere else and you’ve done nothing to address the issue of what brings people to this country.

More on Migrant Crisis

“And so if you think that’s the answer, you will discover in due course that all you have done is made the problem worse.

“Don’t misunderstand me, I have every sympathy with those who find this difficult, every sympathy – as I do with those living in poverty.

“But… we should actively resist the kind of isolationist, short term kneejerk ‘send them home’.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What do public make of Reform’s plans?

Nigel Farage at the launch of Reform UK's plan to deport asylum seekers. Pic: PA
Image:
Nigel Farage at the launch of Reform UK’s plan to deport asylum seekers. Pic: PA

Asked if that was his message to the Reform leader, he said: “Well, it is. I mean, Mr Farage is saying the things he’s saying, but he is not offering any long-term solution to the big issues which are convulsing our world, which lead to this. And, I see no other way.”

You can watch the full interview on Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News from 8.30am

Mr Farage, the MP for Clacton, was asked at a news conference this week what he would say if Christian leaders opposed his plan.

“Whoever the Christian leaders are at any given point in time, I think over the last decades, quite a few of them have been rather out of touch, perhaps with their own flock,” he said.

“We believe that what we’re offering is right and proper, and we believe for a political party that was founded around the slogan of family, community, country that we are doing right by all of those things, with these plans we put forward today.”

Sky News has approached Mr Farage for comment.

Farage won’t be greeting this as good news of the gospel – nor will govt ministers

When Tony Blair’s spin doctor Alastair Campbell told journalists that “We don’t do God”, many took it as a statement of ideology.

In fact it was the caution of a canny operator who knows that the most dangerous opponent in politics is a religious leader licensed to challenge your very morality.

Stephen Cottrell, the Archbishop of York, currently the effective head of the worldwide Anglican communion, could not have been clearer in his denunciation of what he calls the Reform party’s “isolationist, short term, kneejerk ‘send them home'” approach to asylum and immigration.

I sense that having ruled himself out of the race for next Archbishop of Canterbury, Reverend Cottrell feels free to preach a liberal doctrine.

Unusually, in our interview he pinpoints a political leader as, in effect, failing to demonstrate Christian charity.

Nigel Farage, who describes himself as a practising Christian, won’t be greeting this as the good news of the gospel.

But government ministers will also be feeling nervous.

Battered for allowing record numbers of cross- Channel migrants, and facing legal battles on asylum hotels that may go all the way to the Supreme Court, Labour has tried to head off the Reform challenge with tougher language on border control.

The last thing the prime minister needs right now is to make an enemy of the Almighty – or at least of his representatives on Earth.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Our daughter was unlawfully killed – but loophole means she won’t get justice’

Published

on

By

'Our daughter was unlawfully killed - but loophole means she won't get justice'

In the hospital which was supposed to help her, the last moments of 14-year-old Ruth Szymankiewicz’s life were recorded on CCTV.

The teenager, who should have been under constant supervision on the children’s psychiatric ward, was left alone by her support worker at Taplow Manor Hospital in Berkshire. Fifteen minutes later, she had fatally self-harmed.

The worker assigned to her had only one-and-a-half days’ training and had faked his identity using false documents.

CCTV footage showed Ruth Szymankiewicz left alone
Image:
CCTV footage showed Ruth Szymankiewicz left alone

Earlier this month, a jury at the inquest into Ruth’s death concluded she was unlawfully killed. Despite this, there have been no criminal prosecutions.

Speaking to Sky News and The Independent in their first TV interview, Ruth’s father, Mark, said: “She went somewhere that was supposed to be helping her, and it made her worse. The isolation and lack of access to her family had a massively negative impact.”

Ruth Szymankiewicz's parents spoke to Sky News about her death
Image:
Ruth Szymankiewicz’s parents spoke to Sky News about her death

Her mother, Kate, added: “The children get lost. Ruth got lost. She was lost in the middle of all this chaos.”

Ruth’s parents have said the hospital’s strict visiting regime meant they were unable to see their daughter as often as they had wanted. Her father never saw her room.

“Her access to us was denied,” Mark said. “We were willing and able to give that support. It completely derailed her.”

The family believe that if Ruth had been allowed regular contact with them, she would still be alive.

Ruth's parents Kate and Mark
Image:
Ruth’s parents Kate and Mark

History of failings

The failures at Taplow Manor were well-documented. Investigations by Sky News and The Independent uncovered disturbing evidence about the treatment of young people.

There were numerous critical reports, including three from the Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulator in the year leading up to Ruth’s death, each one highlighting unsafe practices.

Despite this, the NHS continued to send vulnerable children there.

Ruth Szymankiewicz died in February 2022. Pic: Family handout via PA
Image:
Ruth Szymankiewicz died in February 2022. Pic: Family handout via PA

At Ruth’s inquest, an NHS clinician in charge of commissioning her care admitted they knew about the issues at the hospital.

The inquest heard there were no other psychiatric intensive care units close enough to send her to.

Steph Smith was a former patient at Taplow Manor – then known as The Huntercombe Hospital Maidenhead – in 2017, who later went on to work at the unit as a healthcare assistant between September 2021 and February 2022.

She described the ward as “chaotic, scary and intense”.

Steph Smith was a former patient at Taplow Manor
Image:
Steph Smith was a former patient at Taplow Manor

“There was a huge culture of covering things up,” she said.

“Observations weren’t done. People just signed the paperwork at the end of the shift. On paper, it looked fine, but in reality, children were left at risk.

“It was only a matter of time. It breaks my heart that it took a 14-year-old girl dying for the hospital to close. It should have been shut years ago.”

Staff warned managers

Nurse Ellesha Branaghan worked as a clinical team leader on Ruth’s ward. She and colleagues warned managers about shortages on the rota.

“We would often tell them the staffing levels weren’t safe but we just kept getting told these are the numbers,” she said.

She said a lack of staffing often meant patients could not go on leave, or even visit the hospital gardens.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Teenager’s death in psychiatric care ruled unlawful killing

There were occasions, she said, when patient observation levels were decreased because there were not enough staff on shift.

“Sometimes we would have four or five incidents at the same time,” she added. “We didn’t have the staff to respond, so that becomes unsafe.”

The staffing levels became “so severe” that even patients wrote to senior managers to express concerns.

An NHS England spokesperson said: “All providers must operate to the highest standards and the NHS worked with young people and families to move patients from Taplow Manor to other clinically appropriate services.”

The ‘loophole’

Taplow Manor was finally closed in 2023. The CQC had visited the hospital just 11 days before Ruth’s death.

High-level feedback was given following this, highlighting concerns with the environment, care plans not being followed and staffing levels.

After further inspections in March 2022, the watchdog issued a warning notice about failings in patient observations.

But once a warning notice is issued, that particular issue cannot be the subject of a criminal prosecution – something Ruth’s parents describe as a “loophole”.

Pic: Family handout
Image:
Pic: Family handout

Mark said the CQC opened an investigation into his daughter’s death and looked at a “number of different routes to potentially prosecute the Active Care Group”.

Active Care Group acquired the Huntercombe Group, which ran Taplow Manor, in December 2021.

Mark said the regulator was not “allowed or able to prosecute, even though the same failing happened with catastrophic consequences”.

‘No justice for Ruth’

The CQC said it did carry out a full criminal investigation but the evidence “did not meet the threshold”.

It added that there was no suggestion the outcome would have been different if there had been no warning notice.

For Ruth’s parents, this is unacceptable.

“Why did our daughter have to die before anyone paid attention?” Kate asked. “They knew all this before she died.”

The inquest ruling of unlawful killing has brought no comfort to Ruth’s family.

“There can be no justice for Ruth,” her father said. “She’s dead, she’s gone. We’re left with the fallout.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Gaping hole in our family will never be filled’

A CQC spokesperson said the regulator began a criminal investigation in November 2022 but “found that there was not sufficient evidence to charge”.

“We know that this was disappointing for Ruth’s family, and we met with them to explain how we came to this decision,” the spokesperson added.

“We have a range of enforcement powers available to us and criminal action is only an option when the evidence demonstrates without any doubt that there have been organisational failings that can be proven to the required legal threshold.”

Following Ruth’s death, the CQC continued to visit the unit. A report published just six months later raised more concerns over observations, saying “there had been 22 incidents involving poor practice with observing young people”.

It went on: “The incidents ranged from staff falling asleep, not following young people when they left the room and completing other tasks whilst they were meant to be observing someone.”

It was rated inadequate in December 2022, before its closure.

Ex-patients voice concerns

Ruth’s case echoes concerns raised by other former patients.

Amber Rehman, who was admitted to Huntercombe Hospital in 2019, said: “Ruth’s story – I’ve heard so many similar stories. It could happen to anyone. It could still be happening out there.”

Amber’s mother, Nikki, said: “It was absolutely preventable. No one made changes.”

Amber Rehman
Image:
Amber Rehman

Amber’s family made a formal complaint about the care she received.

An independent review was commissioned by the hospital, which found issues with observations – including missing observation records – and an over-reliance on physical intervention and medication.

The review – which was published exactly a year before Ruth harmed herself – recommended an audit of the observation records, and said the way the hospital communicated and engaged with families should be looked at.

Pic: Family handout
Image:
Pic: Family handout

Sky News has seen two other independent reports commissioned by the hospital before Ruth died, raising similar concerns – including engagement and communication with the patient’s family.

Fifty former patients came forward to our investigation in 2022 to share their experience of this hospital and a number of other units run by the same provider.

Many have told us how they still struggle with trauma from what they faced while under its care – some have formal diagnosis of PTSD due to it.

Sky News understands that 58 former patients are now taking legal action against around 30 psychiatrists who worked at various Huntercombe hospitals over two decades.

Sky News investigations into Huntercombe Group units:
‘Blood on the walls’: Shocking truth of life on mental health unit
Thirty ex-patients reached out to Sky News after initial probe

‘Inadequate staffing’ at hospital ‘put young people at risk’

A statement from Active Care Group said: “We extend our heartfelt condolences to Ruth’s family, friends, and all those affected by her passing. We deeply regret the tragic event that occurred, and we are truly sorry for the distress this has caused

“We directed significant investment in staff training, recruitment, and the hospital estate, spending more than £3m on the physical environment alone over an 18-month period.

“Despite these efforts, by early 2023, it became clear that achieving the high standards of care that reflect our core values would not be possible within an acceptable timescale.

“In recent years, we have made significant improvements to the quality and safety in all of our services.

“We are regrettably unable to comment on historical allegations relating to care provided under previous ownership or management.”

Elli Investments Group, owners of The Huntercombe Group until 2021, previously told us: “We regret that these hospitals and specialist care services, which were owned and independently managed by The Huntercombe Group, failed to meet the expected standards for high-quality care.”

Pictures of Ruth at the family home
Image:
Pictures of Ruth at the family home

‘Our lives are darker without her’

Ruth’s parents, who are both doctors working in the NHS, are calling on the government to close what they see as the “legal loophole” in the powers the CQC has to prosecute.

They also want to strengthen safeguards for children in mental health units by ensuring parents have visitation rights to their children.

“Ruth died under the care of the state,” her mother, Kate, said.

“We very much hope that secretaries of state for health and for mental health are listening to Ruth’s story, and that they can use this opportunity, particularly to make sure that children have unrestricted access to their families.”

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “Our deepest sympathies are with Ruth’s family and friends. This is a shocking case and it is clear care at Huntercombe Hospital fell far below the standards we expect.

“Where appropriate the CQC can bring prosecutions where a provider has failed to comply with a warning notice, and we are clear that those that harm patients through negligence or mismanagement should face the consequences.

“We are investing £75m this year to reduce inappropriate out of area placements, increasing family involvement in patient care through the Mental Health Bill, and driving up standards through the 10 Year Plan so everyone receives the level of care they deserve.”

Ruth’s parents are both struggling with the lack of accountability over their daughter’s death, especially the decision by the CQC not to prosecute.

“We don’t have faith the system will make sure changes happen,” Mark said.

“Governance has been completely ineffectual. Until there is real accountability, nothing will stop this happening again.”

Kate added: “Our lives are darker without her. Ruth was unique and wonderful. She kept us wholehearted in everything we did. Now she’s gone.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.

Continue Reading

UK

Political leanings of two judges involved in Epping migrant hotel case – and who they sided with

Published

on

By

Political leanings of two judges involved in Epping migrant hotel case - and who they sided with

The Appeal Court judge who ruled in favour of Home Secretary Yvette Cooper in the Epping migrant hotel case is a long-standing Labour supporter.

Lord Justice David Bean, 71, is a former treasurer of the Society of Labour Lawyers and chaired the left-leaning Fabian Society, which is affiliated to the Labour Party, in 1989 and 1990.

Politics latest: Home Office says Epping asylum hotel appeal win in court ‘avoids chaos’

He was also – with Sir Tony Blair’s barrister wife Cherie – a founder member in 2000 of the left-wing Matrix Chambers, whose members include the current attorney general, Lord Hermer.

The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, is at the centre of a legal battle. Pic: PA
Image:
The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, is at the centre of a legal battle. Pic: PA

On its website, the Society of Labour Lawyers describes itself as “a thinktank and affiliated socialist society which provides legal and policy advice to the Labour Party”.

Founded in 1948 by a future Labour lord chancellor Gerald Gardiner, it declares: “Our objectives are to contribute legal expertise to the Labour Party and uphold the principles of justice, liberty, equality, and the rule of law in the UK and around the world.

“We advise Labour MPs and the House of Lords; develop and scrutinise policy and legislation; contribute to debate within the Labour movement by hosting events and discussions; and mentor future members of the legal profession.

More from Politics

“We are open to Labour Party members who are also practising or retired lawyers, law students or graduates, academics, and members of the judiciary.”

The Fabian Society describes itself as “a democratically governed socialist society, a Labour affiliate and one of the party’s original founders”.

But Lord Justice Bean isn’t the only judge at the centre of the legal battle over The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, who has a political background and affiliation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Inside the asylum hotel protests

Sir Stephen Eyre, the High Court judge who ruled in favour of Epping Forest Council earlier this month, was a Conservative parliamentary candidate four times.

His most high-profile bid to become an MP came in the 2004 Birmingham Hodge Hill by-election, won by current Labour MP and former minister Liam Byrne.

Sir Stephen Eyre. Pic: Judicial Appointments Commission/Ministry of Justice
Image:
Sir Stephen Eyre. Pic: Judicial Appointments Commission/Ministry of Justice

Appointed a High Court judge by then Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab in 2021, Sir Stephen was a Tory candidate while working as a barrister.

His first attempt came in 1987, when he stood in Hodge Hill in that year’s general election, coming second behind Labour’s Terry Davis.

Then in 1992, the year of Sir John Major’s 21-seat election victory, he stood for the Northern Ireland Conservatives in the unionist stronghold of Strangford.

Read more:
Protesters on why they oppose asylum hotels
Government struggling to reduce migrant hotel use

Mr Eyre, as he then was, came fourth behind the official Unionists’ John Taylor, with current Democratic Unionist MP for Antrim East Sammy Wilson in second place.

In 2001, he stood in Stourbridge, where he again came second, this time to Labour’s Debra Shipley, when he cut her majority from nearly 6,000 to under 4,000.

And in the 2004 by-election, he came a distant third as Mr Byrne scraped in by just 460 votes ahead of the Liberal Democrats, who benefited from an Iraq war backlash.

Continue Reading

Trending