Elon Musk is ‘not good for America or the world,’ according to himself
Elon Musk is participating in the “dumbest experiment in history” and is “not good for America or the world” – and both of those quotes come from Elon Musk, himself.
(Note: every use of quotation marks in this article is a direct quote from Elon Musk, in the context of climate change and the Paris Agreement)
In Donald Trump’s first day in the Oval Office (after committing treason in 2021, for which there is a clear legal remedy), he once again announced that he wants to pull the US out of the Paris Agreement.
This action would result in a hotter climate, which means more environmental destruction, more displacement of people, more death and higher costs for Americans and everyone else on the planet, likely causing “more displacement and destruction than all the wars in history combined.” (Unless, of course, it is mitigated by Trump’s impotence as so many of his previous attempts at environmental destruction have been)
And, like last time, pulling out will weaken the position of America on the world stage. The move allies the US with such luminary states as Iran, Libya and Yemen, the only three other countries in the world not to ratify the Paris Agreement.
This order was not unexpected, as Mr. Trump did the same “dumb” thing in 2017, which President Biden reversed right away in 2021. Mr. Trump also campaigned in 2024 on a platform of causing environmental destruction, committing to pump the brakes on the environmental and economic progress of President Biden’s policies and forfeiting the boom in American manufacturing they brought.
Mr. Trump justified this withdrawal by using the same “propaganda from the carbon industry” as he has in the past, showing his lack of understanding of the Agreement, of science, and of the economy, as we covered before. And just like last time, the public overwhelmingly opposes withdrawing from the agreement, by about a 2.5x margin.
But what has changed this time is the response from technology company CEOs, who previously correctly stated that pulling out of the Paris Agreement is not good for the world, and now are actively participating in the very destruction they decried in the past.
In 2017, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg both decried pulling out of Paris, saying that it harms our planet and our future, and Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos vowed that Amazon would continue to follow Paris goals (which it hasn’t followed through on).
But this time, all three of those spineless husks not only stayed quiet, but also personally donated a million dollars each to the very environmental destruction that they previously claimed to oppose.
Despite the silence of these cowardly billionaires who have fallen in line with destroying the planet’s future (again, their words), international leaders have at least correctly called out Mr. Trump’s actions for their stupidity and feebleness. The UN’s climate secretary, Simon Stiell, said that the door remains open for the US to rejoin just as last time, and pointed out that the world’s energy transition is unstoppable. And the US Climate Alliance, a coalition of states and cities that was formed in 2017 to protect their residents from Trump’s destructive actions, also vowed to continue to work to solve the problem that Trump wants to worsen.
Most likely, the most significant thing the US’ withdrawal from this global effort to solve a global problem will do is to ensure that America is unable to lead that inevitable transition, and will hand that lead to China. Congratulations Mr. Xi, you’re welcome for the global leadership position we’ve granted to you. Signed, the republican party.
And as another business leader pointed out in the past, “the only thing we gain by slowing down the transition is just slowing it down. It doesn’t make it not occur. It just slows it down,” but that “the faster we can bring that date forward, the better.”
That business leader is Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who runs a company whose mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.
Musk has previously called climate change the “dumbest experiment in history.” He acknowledges that it will cause “more displacement and destruction than all the wars in history combined.” He said that carbon is the “turd in the punch bowl” of our atmosphere and “if countries don’t take action, they all will share in a bad future.”
You can read a transcript of his landmark 2015 speech on climate change at the Sorbonne here, or watch the video above.
And, in 2017, when Mr. Trump said he would drop the US out of the Paris Agreement, Musk responded wisely at the time by departing from a council of business leaders that Mr. Trump had assembled. Musk said he did so because “Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.”
However, deep in the throes of his current social media addiction that resulted in him losing ~$35 billion of his and other people’s money, Musk now seems to have lost any portion of himself that pretended to care about the planet.
Not only has he recently displayed that he doesn’t know even the basics of how climate change works, but he is now actively a part of a decision that he previously said was “not good for America or the world.”
As a thank you for his massive bribes to Mr. Trump’s campaign, Musk has been appointed to the Department of Government Efficiency. This is not an actual department, but an advisory panel with no official authority.
It was created to be helmed by Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, two of the supposedly most intelligent and capable republican operatives, who nevertheless have both been tasked to do a job that would normally accomplished by one person (Ramaswamy has since quit or been forced out, before the job even started). The panel has a redundant mission to the already-existing Government Accountability Office – making it a redundant office to reduce redundancy (no, this is not a Monty Python sketch, this is apparently real life).
So, despite being put in a position that is very clearly busywork to make him feel important – and in which he already admitted failure at the goals he set out for himself, weeks before even starting the job – this nevertheless means that Musk is a member of the team that has now signaled yet another withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. (And notably, nobody is talking about how he’s doing at his job running Tesla, which he’s doing badly, and is even lobbying to harm his own company as Tesla’s sales drop in a growing market)
But unlike last time, when he swiftly departed from Mr. Trump’s unofficial business council for doing something that he correctly pointed out as being bad for the world (and bad for his business selling renewable energy), Musk has instead spent the last couple days defending his use of an unambiguous Nazi salute in front of a live TV audience (which Nazis were very happy to see).
The salute was not out of character for Musk, given his history of white supremacist statements and his current support for German neo-Nazis. Musk’s support has been noted by Germans, both among the public and by one German auto CEO who sees it as a sales opportunity, as a Tesla boycott gains momentum in Germany due to Musk’s neo-Nazi advocacy.
He has yet to make a public statement leaving the administration that made this “destructive” decision, instead choosing to remain on and continue advancing the “dumbest experiment in human history” – and being “not good for America or the world,” according to himself.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Ford is jumping into the battery energy storage business, betting that booming demand from data centers and the electric grid can absorb the EV battery capacity it says it’s not using.
To achieve this, Ford plans to repurpose its existing EV battery manufacturing capacity in Glendale, Kentucky, into a dedicated hub for manufacturing battery energy storage systems.
Ford pivots from EVs to battery storage for data centers
Ford says it will invest about $2 billion over the next two years to scale the new business. The Kentucky site will be converted to build advanced battery energy storage systems larger than 5 megawatt-hours, including LFP prismatic cells, BESS modules, and 20-foot DC container systems — the kind of hardware increasingly used by data centers, utilities, and large-scale industrial companies.
The company plans to bring initial production online within 18 months, leaning on its manufacturing experience and licensed battery technology. By late 2027, Ford expects the business to deploy at least 20 gigawatt-hours of energy storage annually.
The move follows a joint venture disposition agreement reached last week between Ford, SK On, SK Battery America, and BlueOval SK. Under the agreement, a Ford subsidiary will independently own and operate the Kentucky battery plants, while SK On will fully own and operate the Tennessee battery plant.
Ford is also planning a separate energy storage play in Michigan. At BlueOval Battery Park Michigan in Marshall, the company will produce smaller amp-hour LFP prismatic cells for residential energy storage systems. That plant is on track to begin manufacturing in 2026, and it will also supply batteries for Ford’s upcoming midsize electric truck — the first model built on the company’s new Universal EV Platform.
Electrek’s Take
Overall, the shift reflects Ford’s broader push toward what it calls “higher-return opportunities.” Alongside taking a step backward to add more gas-powered trucks and vans to its US manufacturing footprint, Ford says it will no longer produce some larger EVs, such as the Lightning F-150, where softer demand and higher costs are resulting from the lack of support for EVs by the Trump administration. (Batteries produced at the Glendale plant were for the all-electric Ford F-150 Lightning. The best-selling electric truck in the US in Q3, before the federal tax credit expired, was the Ford F-150 Lightning, with 10,005 EVs sold, a 39.7% year-over-year increase.)
With tax credits eliminated and regulatory uncertainty, Ford is pivoting to adjacent markets, including grid-scale and residential energy storage, to keep its battery plants running and justify billions in sunk investment.
If you’re looking to replace your old HVAC equipment, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable HVAC installer near you that offers competitive pricing on heat pumps, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to get a heat pump. They have pre-vetted heat pump installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions. Plus, it’s free to use!
Your personalized heat pump quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – *ad
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Stellantis may have backed away from planned EVs like the all-electric Ram REV and range-topping Dodge Charger Daytona R/T EV, but the company isn’t standing still. A newly awarded patent outlines an innovative, foam-based thermal runaway suppression system that’s built into an EV’s battery pack.
The indisputable fact of the matter is that electric vehicles catch fire far less often — and far less frequently — than their combustion-powered brethren. Still, a number of highly-publicized early Tesla fires and poorly managed recall on the first-gen Chevy Bolt have linked “electric car” and “fire” in the minds of many Americans, and the ones who have been waiting to test the EV waters until a better safety solution came along are going to absolutely love this latest setup from Chrysler parent company Stellantis.
MoparInsiders is reporting on a new Stellantis patent awarded on a proactive battery safety system that’s designed to stop thermal runaway (read: fire) before it can cascade through an entire EV battery pack.
Rather than relying solely on passive barriers or post-event containment, Stellantis’ freshly patented system uses strategically placed foam channels and deployment mechanisms that can flood the affected cells with high insulation foam when abnormal heat is detected in a cell, isolating the problem area and dramatically slowing (if not outright stopping) the chain reaction that leads to catastrophic battery failure.
The patent describes an electric car battery that, on the outside, will look familiar to EV enthusiasts, but there are some key differences “layered in” around the familiar bits. These include:
- A bladder filled with a fire-retardant chemical; located close to the battery cells, typically between the cells and the top of the pack. It’s made from a flexible polymer, so it can be punctured when needed
- Two sets of blades; the first aimed at the bladder, ready to pierce it and release the fire-retardant chemical while the second targets specific points on the coolant inlet line, outlet line, or heat sinks to rupture them and release cooling foam directly where it’s needed
- Special coolant line sections; designed with small sealed apertures that closed off with a soft plug material that’s easy for the blades to pierce but strong enough to maintain pressure during normal operation
- Actuation devices tied to a controller; that push the blades into the bladder and coolant components when a thermal event is detected
Special coolant lines
The system relies on a suite of existing temperature sensors throughout the battery pack, and seems like a viable enough solution to a problem that, while rare, certainly exists — and which looms large over America’s Early Majority tech adopters.
As for me, I think Stellantis should focus on bringing more compelling products to market and stop looking for ways to blame the customer, market, and government for its inability to sell Jeep products that, apparently, have enough markup to cover nearly $30,000 in discounts to help dealers move their metal. I look forward to hearing about your take in the comments.
SOURCE | IMAGES: US Patent Office, via MoparInsiders.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
It’s official. The all-electric pickup is dead, but Ford is promising the F-150 Lightning EREV will be “every bit as revolutionary” as it shakes up EV plans once again.
Ford reveals next-gen F-150 Lightning EREV
Ford confirmed production of the current F-150 Lightning has ended as part of its updated Ford+ plan, which the company revealed on Monday.
The changes come as part of a broader shift from larger EVs, like the Lightning, to smaller, more affordable models.
While Ford still plans to launch lower-cost EVs based on its Universal EV Platform, the company is expanding its hybrid and extended range electric vehicle (EREV) lineup. By 2030, Ford expects 50% of its global volume to be hybrids, EREVs, and EVs, up from 17% in 2025.
As part of its new plans, Ford said the next-generation F-150 Lightning will switch to an EREV powertrain. It will be assembled at the Rouge EV Center in Dearborn, Michigan, replacing the current all-electric pickup.
With production of the current-generation Lightning now concluded, Ford is sending workers from the Rouge EV Center to its Dearborn Truck Plant as it doubles down on gas and hybrids.
During its Q3 earnings call last month, Ford said the electric pickup would remain paused following a fire at Novelis’ plant in New York that disrupted aluminum supply.
The F-150 Lightning is a “groundbreaking” vehicle, according to Doug Field, Ford’s chief EV, digital, and design officer, that showed an electric pickup can be a great F-Series.
Field claims the “next-generation Lightning EREV is every bit as revolutionary.” It will still offer 100% electric power delivery, sub-5-second acceleration, an estimated combined range of 700+ miles, and it “tows like a locomotive.”
Ford also plans to replace its electric commercial van for North America with affordable gas- and hybrid-powered versions. It will be assembled at Ford’s Ohio Assembly Plant.
The move comes as part of Ford’s plans to launch five new affordable vehicles by the end of the decade, four of which will be assembled in the US. Ford also plans to offer gas, hybrid, and EREV options across nearly every vehicle in its lineup by then.
The first vehicle based on Ford’s new Universal EV Platform will be a midsize electric pickup, starting at around $30,000. It’s expected to be about the size of the Ranger or Maverick.
The news comes after SK On announced last week that it planned to end its joint venture with Ford to build EV batteries at three US gigafactories.
Ford is now planning to use the wholly owned EV battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to launch a new battery energy storage business. The company plans to begin shipping BESS systems in 2027, with an annual capacity of 20 GWh.
“The operating reality has changed, and we are redeploying capital into higher-return growth opportunities: Ford Pro, our market-leading trucks and vans, hybrids, and high-margin opportunities like our new battery energy storage business,” CEO Jim Farley said on Monday.
The changes are designed to improve profitability and returns. Ford’s EV business, Model e, is now expected to reach profitability by 2029 with improvements in 2026.
Model e lost another $1.4 billion in Q3, bringing the total to $3.6 billion through September. Around $3 billion was due to its current EVs, while the other $600 million was spent on its next-gen models.
Although sales of the F-150 Lightning dropped 60.8% last month following the expiration of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit, Ford’s electric pickup remained the best-selling pickup in the US through September.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment3 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024