Connect with us

Published

on

BOISE STATE’S PEERS across the Group of 5 took notice in the fall.

The Broncos’ run to No. 3 seed in the inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff was remarkable in its own right. But equally noteworthy to coaches was that of Boise State‘s 26 starters across offense, defense and specialists, 22 had signed with the program out of high school, including running back and Heisman Trophy runner-up Ashton Jeanty, six other All-Mountain West selections and quarterback Maddux Madsen.

The Broncos laid the blueprint for the other half of major college football in 2024. Two weeks after the season ended, Boise State coach Spencer Danielson was back on the road in eastern Idaho recruiting another crop of high school prospects with his mind fixed on another critical task.

“A big push for me this offseason is fundraising,” he told ESPN. “It’s going to take everybody’s help to keep our staff and players here. But we’re no longer selling something that could happen. We’ve already done it here. A year like this year has the potential to change everything. It can catapult you to unknown waters.”

Boise State is now the standard in the Group of 5, the 65 programs across the AAC, C-USA, MAC, Mountain West and Sun Belt conferences. And Danielson’s offseason objectives are a lens into the modern recruiting realities facing major college football’s smallest programs, where the gap to the Power 4 of the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and SEC is wider than ever and the sport’s increasingly disadvantaged underdogs are adapting to survive.

Under the crush of NIL deals, free transfers, conference realignment, a compressed recruiting calendar and ever-evolving NCAA governance, the degree of difficulty behind managing a roster has never been higher for the thin-resourced programs across the Group of 5. Amid the chaos, high school recruiting has not been spared on campuses where all-conference players are poached annually, budgets stay tight and coaching staffs engage in a constant battle to build competitive rosters and sign classes of high school prospects in a time of seismic change.

“We’re not recruiting the way we used to,” North Texas coach Eric Morris said. “I think now, every year you’re building a new team, and it’s almost a race to who can have the best roster in that particular season. There’s a new premium in college football.”

The pending settlement of House v. NCAA — the $2.8 billion lawsuit expected to reshape college athletics and introduce an era of revenue sharing with athletes — poses the latest challenge, a potentially existential threat to the Group of 5 and its smallest revenue generators.

Yet others across the level sense opportunity, and they’re exploring new avenues in recruiting in 2025, selling on-field success, scooping up talented prospects skipped over by bigger programs and pitching themselves in new ways, while pockets of talented high school recruits are progressively identifying fresh pathways through the Group of 5. Equipped with favorable geography, motivated donor bases and a path to the 12-team playoff, many of those same programs across the Group of 5 believe they’re poised to leverage the revenue sharing era and climb on the recruiting trail, which is still one the last remaining (relatively) level playing fields.

“The money has gotten so big from the portal; it’s not a sustainable model from the G5 standpoint,” Western Kentucky coach Tyson Helton said. “I think you have to redirect now and go back into high school recruiting. In this next phase, everybody will have the opportunity to position themselves to be competitive. And you don’t have excuses. Nobody has an excuse.”


THE SUGGESTION THAT Power 4 programs are recruiting high schools less is anecdotal. In fact, while Group of 5 recruiting classes shrunk by 11.5% from the 2019 to the 2024 recruiting cycles, per data collected by ESPN, the size of the average Power 4 high school class has dipped only slightly in recent years, falling 1.9% across the same cycles.

Miami (Ohio) coach Chuck Martin begs to differ with the math, at least for his program.

A two-time MAC champion in 11 seasons leading the RedHawks, Martin watched another string of starters and contributors land Power 4 transfers last month. Former Miami standouts including wide receivers Javon Tracy (Minnesota) and Reggie Virgil (Texas Tech) and defensive back Raion Strader (Auburn) are now some of the most compelling figures in Martin’s recruiting pitch. Each time one of his players moves on to a bigger school, Martin believes there’s an opportunity in the high school ranks.

“If Minnesota takes Javon Tracy from us, then Minnesota’s taking one less high school receiver,” Martin added. “So, I better go get the guy that Minnesota used to get out of high school and at least have him for a couple of years. Maybe he balls out and I lose him again.”

The modern landscape is inspiring creativity in coaches throughout the Group of 5, where leaders count a growing financial gap to the Power 4, the meddlesome dynamics of the transfer portal and steadily shifting NCAA regulation on transfers, eligibility and compensation among the factors driving down high school recruiting in 2025.

The condensed recruiting calendar is another spot Group of 5 coaching staffs are feeling the squeeze. In a different era of college football, Texas State coach GJ Kinne likely would have deployed his staff onto the recruiting trail in early January. But not this offseason.

“We don’t have the capability of sending everyone out on the road right now,” Kinne said. “Not because of money or anything. But we’re signing all these midyear transfers, and we have two low-level entry-level positions in the recruiting office. Past them, it’s all coaches.”

For thinly staffed programs such as Texas State, the weight of the winter portal window has turned the weeks immediately after the regular season into a feverish time devoted almost exclusively to player retention and transfer portal speed dating. A necessity for the sake of the Bobcats’ 2025 season, that portal emphasis also means less time for Kinne and his staff to evaluate high school film, fewer days for in-person visits and tighter windows for building the relationships that are integral to bolstering future recruiting classes.

Meanwhile, the prominence of the December early signing period has gained since its introduction in 2017 along with other updates to the recruiting calendar have the back end of the cycle creeping in too. With recruits scheduling visits and committing earlier than ever before in 2025, it’s an additional burden on smaller programs that rely heavily on senior year evaluations.

“Five years ago, guys would be committing more during the fall season of their senior year,” Danielson said. “It’s all sped up now. January used to be a situation where you’d go see some of your top guys. Now, that’s turned into crunch time because you have to know everybody by the time you get to April and May.”

High school recruiting still remains the most economical path to program building across all levels of the sport. Yet each December, the annual winter transfer portal arrives as a progressively more precarious double-edged roster management sword for the Group of 5.

ESPN’s Max Olson reported on Jan. 7 that the total count of Group of 5-to-Power 4 transfers over the first 29 days of this year’s portal window rose to 260, up 40% from the same span a year ago. By the time Ohio State won the national title on Jan. 20, the number had climbed to 320.

Unable to match six-figure NIL offers in the portal, Group of 5 programs are resigned to the certainty of losing top talent to the Power 4 each year. But the inherent unpredictability the portal places on roster numbers and the lane it provides programs to quickly fill depth chart needs have taken a toll on high school recruiting too.

“How many high school kids you sign changes every year,” Kinne said. “Fifteen? Eighteen? Twelve? I don’t exactly know. You sign as many good ones as possible because you’re always going to have guys leave that you don’t count on leaving.”

The strain of that uncertainty is significant, and the numbers bear out its impact on the Group of 5.

In the 2019 class — one of the last recruiting cycles before COVID-19 eligibility waivers and post-pandemic free transfer rules — the size of the average high school class among the current Group of 5 was 19.4, per data gathered by ESPN. In 2024, that average fell to 17.2, an especially stark drop when compared to the Power 4, which saw its average class size fall just from 20.7 (2019) to 20.3 (2024) over the same span.

“We’ve still taken over 20 high school kids the last two years,” Martin said. “But we’re like the dinosaurs: Nobody’s doing that anymore.”

The recruiting decline comes amid a period of sweeping change in the Group of 5, where patience has seemingly never been shorter. Staring down a series of hurdles, new coaches and those on the hot seat are straying from high school recruiting in favor of proven transfer talent more and more, exchanging long-term gains for short-term Band-Aids.

“I don’t think there’s a college coach in America who doesn’t want to recruit high school and sign the majority of players from high school or junior college,” Helton said. “But there’s pressure over job security and to win right away. You have to ask yourself if you can play the long game or if you want a quick fix.”


MEMPHIS QUARTERBACK SIGNEE Antwann Hill was an eighth grader when he landed an offer from Georgia. Scholarships from a collection of other Power 4 programs including Alabama, Florida and Tennessee came next, and Hill even spent a month committed to Colorado in the fall of his junior season. Upon the release of ESPN’s final 2025 recruiting rankings this week, he was the nation’s 94th-ranked recruit and No. 7 pocket passer in the cycle.

But Hill instead enrolled at Memphis earlier this month as the top-ranked Group of 5 signee in the class, lured by the potential of early playing time and his fit in the Tigers’ pass-heavy offense.

“You don’t have to go to the SEC to get the opportunity at the next level anymore,” Hill’s father, also Antwann, told ESPN. “The ultimate goal is for him to play on Sundays, so that’s how we treated it. If you can’t get on the field at a certain school, there’s really no point in being there.”

The overwhelming majority of the nation’s elite high school recruits are still funneling into the Power 4. Between the six classes from 2020 to 2025, all but 14 of the 1,800 prospects ranked inside the ESPN 300 signed somewhere within the ACC, Big 12, Big Ten and SEC. And as Power 4 schools splash NIL dollars on top high school recruits, the scales appear to be tipping further. After securing six ESPN 300 prospects in the 2022 class, Group of 5 schools have landed just five top 300 recruits over the three cycles since.

Yet among a select group of prospects on the Power 4-Group of 5 border, a different view of what non-power conference football has to offer is beginning to take hold. In a moment where portal churn has Group of 5 programs replacing experienced production annually, chances to compete for early playing time have seldom been more available across the level, where the potential of a lucrative jump to the Power 4 exists only one transfer portal cycle away.

“I realized I could go play anywhere,” Liberty running back signee Jaylon Coleman said. “But if I was at a bigger school, I was going to have to be a fourth string and wait, and they still might tell me to transfer out a year later.”

Like Hill, Coleman’s recruitment began before high school with an offer from Florida Atlantic. Over the next few years, offers rolled in from Power 4 programs Oregon, Texas A&M and Florida State before Coleman committed to the Flames last summer with system fit and a chance to see the field early as major components in his decision.

Coleman is intent on building a legacy at Liberty as soon as he joins the Flames. But he also isn’t naive to the pathways a couple of strong seasons could open for him.

No different from coaches across the level, high school recruits are noticing the trend of Group 5-to-Power 4 transfers. Minutes after four-star running back D’Shaun Ford committed to Louisiana-Monroe of the Sun Belt earlier this month, Ford told On3 he wanted to be “the next Ahmad Hardy,” the Warhawks running back who ran for 1,351 yards and 13 touchdowns in his freshman season last fall before transferring to Missouri.

“The sky’s the limit,” Coleman said. “I saw coaches switch jobs all throughout my recruitment. Hopefully, everything goes well for me at Liberty. But it’s a business at the end of the day, and everybody makes that known. Nothing is guaranteed.”

Early playing time was a factor for Akron offensive line signee Kenneth McManus IV, as well. In his eyes, revenue sharing could become another leveler in the recruiting game for schools in the Group of 5.

McManus, the lone Group of 5 signee at the 2025 Under Armour All-America Game, said he never centered his recruitment on NIL, focused instead on development and the chance to compete right away. While he understands the allure of big money and life in the Power 4, McManus also believes the opportunity for players to be paid directly by their schools could have recruits like himself, right on the edge of Power 4 football, thinking twice about turning away from the Group of 5.

“It’s going to change things for those guys that go Power 4 just to be on the team,” McManus said. “That might make them actually consider going G5 if they can go play and still make some money for themselves.”


WHY NOT US? It’s a question Group of 5 programs across the country are asking themselves.

Vast structural and financial hurdles remain, but the automatic playoff bid reserved for the Group of 5’s highest-ranked conference champion under the current format has made the dream of reaching the 12-team field more attainable than ever. The next Boise State could emerge from any one of those 65 campuses next fall.

Coaches across the level, however, believe the true challenge facing any of the Group of 5 programs that intend to compete perennially in college football’s next phase won’t be reaching the playoff just once but managing a sustained run of success.

“You can build a team for one year; that’s what we’re all chasing,” Northern Illinois coach Thomas Hammock said. “But we beat Notre Dame and everyone started scouting our roster. That’s why you lose seven guys to P4 programs. It’s not just if you can win. It’s do you have the money to hold onto guys after you win?”

Revenue sharing won’t be a one-size-fits-all solution for the Group of 5. And it won’t close the gap to the Power 4, where administrators have suggested that as much as 75% of the $20.5 million that each school will be permitted to share in direct payments to its athletes via NIL deals could go to football, well ahead of any of the scattered projections that have been made related to Group of 5 budgets.

Even among Group of 5 schools with the best resources, competing dollar for dollar with the nation’s biggest programs remains a pipe dream. For coaches at the G5 level, for whom every cent counts, there’s some creative financial brainstorming going on to try to stretch their funds to stay competitive.

Texas State’s Kinne, for instance, chose not to send his full staff to the American Football Coaches Association’s convention earlier this month. At Western Kentucky, Helton is weighing the possibility of having his team sleep at home on the night before home games and pushing the cost of the roughly $75,000 hotel bill straight to the program’s revenue sharing bucket. Other coaches believe scheduling extra “money games” against Power 4 programs and scrapping unnecessary travel could help foot the bill.

As Group of 5 leaders commit increasing time and resources to make sure they’re not among those left behind, fundraising remains central to the recruiting conversation.

Toledo was the first MAC program to establish an NIL collective, and since NIL was introduced in 2021, athletic director Bryan Blair has made the Rockets a fundraising leader within the Group of 5. Absent major TV and mammoth conference distributions, schools such as Toledo are preparing to live on a more grassroots approach to revenue sharing dollars, leaning on ticket sales, institutional and conference-level support and, most crucially, donations.

Under the proposed House settlement, schools across the country will soon be paying their athletes directly from athletic department funds, shifting control from the booster-run collectives that have sprouted in the NIL era in-house. On a Group of 5 campus equipped with deep-pocketed donor bases, fundraising can be a new driver in a post-House revenue sharing era, capable of transforming roster retention, easing the rigors of roster management and bringing trickle-down stability to high school recruiting.

“We’re not out trying to match everybody in the universe financially,” Blair said. “But you certainly have to be a player in the ballpark, and we can do that by fundraising from the center and using those dollars on football.”

Schools and conferences are scrounging for dollars, navigating new regulations and searching for ways to win on the margins. But in 2025, the time-honored selling points of winning and proven success still remain paramount on the recruiting trail.

Hammock said Northern Illinois’ upset of Notre Dame in September gave the Huskies “instant credibility” when he returned to the recruiting trail. Toledo coach Jason Candle has made the development of All-MAC cornerback-turned-NFL first-round draft pick Quinyon Mitchell a central piece of his recruiting pitch. At Boise State, Danielson said he might not fully understand the full scope of the Broncos’ 2024 season until a few years down the line.

For any of the 65 schools across the Group of 5, the potential multiyear impact of a playoff appearance in a storybook season such as Boise State’s presents a mouthwatering proposition.

“It’s millions and millions of dollars in exposure and revenue that you get a chance to leverage for more success,” Blair said. “That’s the sweet spot: When you’re doing it right and having success, you can leverage the moment.”

The world of high school recruiting has become increasingly complicated for a Group of 5 whose mechanics in recruiting — for the time being — still resemble a bygone time in college football. But from the AAC to the C-USA, MAC, MWC and Sun Belt, schools are modernizing, coaches are seeking out ways to adapt and programs are preparing, some eagerly, for the opportunity to pay their players.

Yet as Danielson pondered the future earlier this month, his mind returned to the collection of former signees who powered the playoff team at Boise State, affirming a core belief of where success for the Broncos, and the rest of Group of 5, still lies.

“No matter how these things change in the sport, we are going to recruit high school kids first and foremost. That is our life blood,” he said. “We need to hit home runs on high school kids. I believe when we do that, regardless of where college football goes, we’ll always be on the cutting edge as one of the best teams in the country.”

Continue Reading

Sports

How the Rantanen blockbuster happened, what’s next for Avs, Canes, other contenders

Published

on

By

How the Rantanen blockbuster happened, what's next for Avs, Canes, other contenders

Mikko Rantanen has been a member of the Carolina Hurricanes for nearly a week, but it’s going to take a bit longer than that for the shock to subside.

Carolina stunned the NHL last Friday night by acquiring Rantanen from the Colorado Avalanche in a three-way deal that also sent Chicago Blackhawks winger Taylor Hall to the Hurricanes. Entering Wednesday night, Rantanen was tied for sixth in the NHL in scoring (65 points). Since the 2021-22 season, the 28-year-old winger was fifth with 365 points in 286 games, including back-to-back 100-point seasons.

The NHL simply does not see this level of offensive superstar traded within the regular season; nor does it see teams with designs on the Stanley Cup move on from foundational core players like Colorado did with Rantanen. But his contract demands, as a pending unrestricted free agent, created a significant impasse with the Avalanche, with whom he had played for 10 seasons.

Rantanen told ESPN on Tuesday that he still hasn’t reached out to all the Avalanche teammates he wants to connect with. Both teams were right back in action in the aftermath of the trade, and Rantanen has been in a personal hurricane of reorienting his new life in Raleigh.

He knows players like Nathan MacKinnon have expressed their disappointment in seeing him traded. The feeling is mutual.

“I thought it was going to be an extension for sure. I can’t lie about that,” Rantanen said. “It was surprising because there was still some time to the deadline. I totally understand they didn’t want to lose me for free. But it surprised me for sure. I didn’t expect it at all.”

Nor did the rest of the NHL, which is still processing one of the biggest blockbusters of the last decade. We spoke with several NHL executives, agents and players to get a sense of the trade’s magnitude and the fallout that could impact more than just the teams involved.


Is this the right gamble for Carolina?

The Hurricanes were in New York when the Rantanen trade went down, with a game against the Islanders on the following evening. The players were at dinner when the news broke about Hall and then Rantanen. The tone and tenor of the meal quickly changed.

“We didn’t know who was going the other way. We all tried to figure out who it was,” center Jesperi Kotkaniemi said.

Kotkaniemi started getting texts from Finnish friends. “They’re really pumped in Finland. They’re able to watch the two best players now on the same team. So what could be better for them?” he said of Rantanen and center Sebastian Aho.

But then something else happened on social media: It was erroneously reported that Kotkaniemi himself would be sent to the Avalanche in the Rantanen trade.

On the surface, it made sense: He’s a 24-year-old forward signed through 2029-30 at a reasonable cap hit ($4.82 million annually), but he was never part of the package for Rantanen. Still, his name was out there long enough for another wave of text messages to roll in about his own future, which made the situation a bit more intense for him.

“It was a very hectic 15 minutes there,” he said.

It’s been a hectic few weeks for Eric Tulsky, in his first season as Hurricanes general manager. The league was buzzing about Carolina being active in the trade market. Sources told ESPN that the Hurricanes and Vancouver Canucks had engaged in negotiations about forwards Elias Pettersson and J.T. Miller. The players’ longstanding feud had finally reached a boiling point, and Vancouver was seeking to ship one or both of them out before the March 7 trade deadline.

Kotkaniemi and forward Jack Roslovic were discussed in the framework of a Miller trade. Martin Necas wasn’t on the table for Miller, but might have been part of a deal for Pettersson.

Meanwhile, Carolina was also engaged in talks with the Avalanche for Rantanen, ones that tracked back to last summer.

Tulsky said last week that there was a desire for all parties to “get their best offers on the table” so the Hurricanes could decide which player to pursue. “Everybody had multiple offers. It was sort of time for everyone to figure out what they wanted to do, and this deal got done,” he said. “It was a complicated dance.”

When the music stopped, Rantanen and Hall were members of the Hurricanes.

The Avalanche picked up Carolina forwards Necas and Jack Drury, as well as a second-round pick in this year’s draft and a fourth-rounder in 2026. Chicago acquired its 2025 third-rounder from Carolina for Hall, the rights to Swedish forward Nils Juntorp and 50% retention of Rantanen’s $9.25 million salary cap hit. The Hurricanes ended up with Hall, a former Hart Trophy winner as league MVP, and Rantanen.

“Obviously, Carolina has been coveting a superstar and this is the way to get one,” one agent said.

NHL executives were impressed with the boldness of the swing from Carolina.

“Good for them. Risk and reward,” a general manager said. “They’re giving up controllable assets for someone that you’re not sure you can control. But they have the cap space to sign him. He’s a great player who makes them a better team.”

The executives we spoke with downplayed the notion that the Hurricanes might have started an “arms race” in the Eastern Conference among contenders. One general manager said that most teams have their own plans in mind for the NHL trade deadline for specific needs that won’t be torn up because a rival made a blockbuster trade.

There were virtues to all three players the Hurricanes were considering. Miller and Pettersson were both signed with lengthy term. Miller seemed cut from a Rod Brind’Amour mold as a great, two-way player who’s difficult to play against. (Depending on who you believe, he’s also a bit difficult to play with as a teammate.) Pettersson has been underwhelming this season, but has incredible upside as a star offensive. In 2022-23, he had 103 points in 80 games for Vancouver.

But Rantanen’s combination of size, skill and offensive consistency was too much for the Hurricanes to pass up. Especially when one considers his Stanley Cup Playoff success: Since 2019-20, Rantanen is fifth in postseason scoring, with 83 points in 63 games, including 28 goals.

Carolina has made the playoffs for six straight seasons, each time not producing enough offense to advance out of the conference. In that span, the Hurricanes have a .486 winning percentage in one-goal games.

The downside to acquiring Rantanen, potentially: They currently don’t know if he’ll be one-and-done in Raleigh, a superstar rental for a team that’s yet to play for the Stanley Cup with Brind’Amour as their coach.

“Carolina will look stupid if they lose in the first round and he walks away to another team,” an agent said. “But I think they’re going to sign him. I think he’ll like it there.”


Did Colorado make the right call?

Nathan MacKinnon was already in a mood after the Avalanche lost to the Boston Bruins last Saturday.

“I wish I could have talked about this not right now,” he said.

But this was the first opportunity for the media to ask Colorado’s star center about losing his linemate and close friend Mikko Rantanen.

“Just sad, obviously. Losing Mikko … really great friend for 10 years. Won a Cup together. I don’t really know what happened,” he said. “It’s just unfortunate losing a great friend and a great teammate.”

Rantanen was seeking a contract in the neighborhood of the eight-year extension Leon Draisaitl signed with the Edmonton Oilers in September. That deal carries an average annual value of $14 million. Both Rantanen and Draisaitl are represented by agent Andy Scott.

The winger has said he was willing to take less than market value to remain in Colorado, but it’s unclear what that number actually looked like with regard to market value.

MacKinnon tried to stay out of Rantanen’s business on a new contract. The ticking clock didn’t bother him. He assumed it would play out much like Gabriel Landeskog‘s negotiations with the team did back in 2021, when the latter signed an eight-year, $56 million extension hours before free agency. But MacKinnon was wrong.

“I never thought in a million years he’d leave. It just sucks,” he said.

But Rantanen’s departure was something the Avalanche and GM Chris MacFarland believed was a possibility. The Avalanche and Hurricanes had been discussing Rantanen since last summer. Tulsky said the teams tabled “serious offers” for the winger during the past six to eight weeks. The Hurricanes were pushing hard to complete the trade in the past two weeks.

Others around the league knew it was a possibility too.

“I wasn’t surprised. For me, it wasn’t a secret,” a GM said. “The potential was there because of their situation — that he can’t go over MacKinnon [in AAV] or whatever. And I know that Carolina wasn’t the only team they were speaking with about Rantanen.”

MacKinnon makes $12.6 million against the salary cap on a deal that runs through 2030-31. Before signing that deal in Sept. 2022, he talked about taking less than market value — on a contract that made him the highest paid player in the league at the time — in order to “win with the group.” It’s the same mindset exhibited by his friend and mentor Sidney Crosby with the Pittsburgh Penguins over Crosby’s career.

But the contract that really influenced the Rantanen deal was one that hasn’t been signed yet: Cale Makar‘s next deal, which will begin in 2027-28. Considered by some to be the best offensive defenseman since Bobby Orr, Makar could earn the largest NHL contract for a defenseman ever.

“I think they made a decision that you can have two players but not three players making more than $12 million per season,” an agent said. “They knew, ballpark, the number for Cale Makar. So their decision was, ‘We can have two, but not three. Who do we keep?'”

So MacFarland had a choice to make: Top-load his roster with three star players gobbling up a large percentage of the salary cap or break up their holy hockey trinity. MacFarland made it clear that in doing the latter, he was acknowledging the team didn’t have championship depth and needed the flexibility to get it back.

“It’s clear we are not deep enough. I think that you’ve got to be deep to go four rounds, and hopefully this is going to help that,” MacFarland said. “Obviously Mikko is a superstar. You can’t replace that. But he’s a superstar that earned the right to be a free agent.”

One agent was skeptical of the negotiation: “I don’t feel they ever really were interested in signing him.”

Another agent felt the Avalanche did what they had to do. “It was the right trade for Colorado, because they couldn’t afford to pay Rantanen what he wanted within the context of their salary structure. He didn’t have full trade protection, so good move by them to trade him,” they said.

play

0:47

Mikko Rantanen nets goal for Avalanche

Mikko Rantanen nets goal for Avalanche

MacFarland called it “a tough business decision” for the team. “It hurts, right. He’s a homegrown talent. He’s a superstar person. He’s a superstar human being,” he said.

Of course, there are other “business decisions” to think about in Denver or any NHL market.

“There’s an argument to be made that keeping Rantanen makes sense because you’re selling tickets. It doesn’t really matter ultimately if you win the Cup, but you have to be good every year. That guy is going to allow you to make the playoffs every year,” another general manager said. “But I could also make the argument that winning the Cup trumps everything else, and that winning it buys you a few seasons of a steady revenue stream no matter what your success is in those seasons.”

MacFarland has made it clear that teams usually have to draft and develop players like Rantanen. “We’re going to have to try and replace him in the aggregate; 50-goal scorers don’t grow on trees,” he said.

But what if he could be replaced?

“You could make the argument that Rantanen is a unicorn, and that you’re not finding another player like that,” a general manager said. “That said, what’s your opportunity cost? Could you find another 100-point winger like that? What could you trade to find that?”

One agent believes the Avalanche could find that player because of MacKinnon.

“Something no one seems to be discussing: I think the Avalanche believe that MacKinnon was a big part of Rantanen’s success, and that they would be able to put another guy with MacKinnon, pay him less and have comparable success,” they said.

Right now that player is Necas, who was immediately placed with MacKinnon after the trade. The speedy winger led the Hurricanes in scoring this season and has another year on his contract at $6.5 million AAV.

MacFarland said it was important to have Necas and Drury, an “emerging player” down the lineup, under contract and “cost-controlled” beyond this season. He said the trade would allow the Avalanche to potentially make more moves before the March 7 deadline. Many sources are wondering if the Avalanche would target a center to play behind MacKinnon, with players like the Islanders’ Brock Nelson in the conversation.

“I think we’re always sort of looking to get better. Certainly, over the next few weeks that won’t change. I think obviously there are a little more bullets in the draft-pick cupboard and some cap space,” MacFarland said.

But no Mikko Rantanen any longer.


‘What is Chicago doing?’

The Blackhawks’ role in the Rantanen trade had observers around the NHL baffled.

“What the f— is Chicago doing?” one NHL executive asked.

The Blackhawks retained half of Rantanen’s salary and cap hit, while also trading Hall to the Hurricanes. For that, they received their own 2025 third-round draft pick that Carolina had acquired from Chicago at the 2024 draft.

In recent trades, a third-party team retaining 25% of a player’s salary to facilitate a transaction has typically received a fourth-round pick. Chicago retaining that much cap space ($4.625 million) for 50% of a player’s salary and including a veteran forward with Hall’s abilities in a deal for only one third-round pick in return left many criticizing the return for the Blackhawks. But NHL insiders acknowledge there may have been some method to Chicago’s perceived madness.

One aspect of the trade that hasn’t gotten a lot of attention is the actual salaries for Rantanen and Hall this season. Rantanen’s contract has a declining real-dollar value to where he was making only $6 million this season after having a base salary of $12 million in the first two years of the deal. Hall made $5.25 million this season. As one general manager noted, from a base salary perspective, the Blackhawks are paying slightly more for the rest of Rantanen’s contract than they would have if Hall finished the season with them.

“Essentially, Chicago was asked to sell a little cap space with the money being the same. They get a third for Hall — which to me is a little low — but effectively that’s what they’re doing,” one general manager said.

Davidson said that trading Hall was the logical move now because things frankly weren’t going to get better for him in Chicago leading up to the trade deadline. “You run the risk of things like injury, the role was diminishing almost by the game, and it just wasn’t heading towards a way that was going to maximize or enhance value,” he said.

As one NHL agent put it: “I know Kyle Davidson’s taking a lot of heat, but I don’t think he probably was going to get much better for Taylor Hall than what he got.”

There’s no question it hasn’t been the happiest season for Hall in Chicago. Former head coach Luke Richardson surprised him by making him a healthy scratch earlier this season. He had nine goals in 46 games. One NHL executive suggested that moving Hall out now could benefit the vibes inside Chicago’s dressing room.

But moving him out now also means not having to use Chicago’s last salary retention spot to move him later, which Davidson would undoubtedly have to do to make a trade work at the deadline. Now that slot is available for another deadline trade involving a player like forward Ryan Donato ($2 million AAV) or defenseman Alec Martinez ($4 million AAV), both of whom are unrestricted free agents after the season; or a more coveted player in forward Jason Dickinson, who has two years left at $4.25 million AAV.


Will Carolina sign Rantanen?

The Hurricanes now have the chance to do something no other team can do for Rantanen this offseason: Give him an eight-year contract. Per the NHL Collective Bargaining Agreement, everyone else can only go as high as seven years.

“Where is he going to go for seven years instead of the eight that Carolina can give him? If they’re willing to go eight years and $13 million annually, where else would he want to go that’s good that can afford him?” one agent pondered.

Rantanen told me that the Hurricanes’ ability to give him an eighth year will be a factor in his eventual free-agent decision. But those negotiations are a ways off. He’s got other things to think about now.

“To be honest, I haven’t had any chance to think about an extension, just trying to get into the group and try to play well,” he said. “So I think we’ll have to think about those situations in a couple weeks or so.”

What’s been interesting in chatting with sources about Rantanen and the Hurricanes is that the money doesn’t seem to be a concern. Owner Tom Dundon is infamous for his tough negotiations on contracts for everyone from players to his own coaches. But the assumption is that the Hurricanes had a ballpark idea of what Rantanen is looking for on his next contract and were comfortable going there in negotiations.

Obviously, the Hurricanes faced a similar situation when they traded for Pittsburgh Penguins winger Jake Guentzel at the deadline last season and attempted to sign him to an extension, only to see the Tampa Bay Lightning ink him instead.

But Tulsky said the conditions are more favorable to keep Rantanen than they were for retaining Guentzel. Last season, the Hurricanes didn’t have the cap flexibility to sign Guentzel and the other players they wanted. This offseason, Tulsky estimates the team could have between $35 million to $40 million in cap space.

“Our team situation is totally different right now,” he said. “We don’t feel nearly as constrained.”

So if it’s not the money and it’s not the percentage of the salary cap, what is the make-or-break thing for Rantanen staying with the Hurricanes?

“I think they will ultimately sign him, unless he absolutely hates it there,” one agent concluded.

Tulsky admitted that the Hurricanes’ current approach to Rantanen is “more of a recruiting pitch than a negotiation in my mind.” They have to sell him on the franchise, the system, the players on the roster and on the way and, most of all, spending the next eight years of his life in Raleigh.

Sebastian Aho has not affixed “Ambassador” to his name, but it might as well be there. He’s been a friend and Finnish national team teammate for Rantanen throughout their lives. Aho has starred with Carolina since 2016-17. No one on the Hurricanes is better equipped to sell Rantanen on Raleigh and the franchise.

“I guess it’s just about making him feel comfortable, making him feel welcome. I think that goes a long way,” Aho said. “But obviously if he wants to go play a round of golf, I’m not saying no to that.”


What if Rantanen goes to market?

There isn’t yet certainty on the NHL’s salary cap in the near term. Some projections have it jumping from $88 million to upwards of $97 million next season. From there, the sky’s the limit.

One agent said that as the salary cap rises, some teams will claim they have an internal cap that only allows them to offer so much money to players. But after one or two huge contracts are handed out that elevate teams to the new ceiling, that dogma will go out the window.

“Competitiveness is going to kick in. GMs and owners are going to decide that they need to spend more to stay competitive,” the agent said.

The opportunity has never been greater for a player like Rantanen to maximize his earning potential on the open market. Leon Draisaitl’s contract with the Oilers was $112 million over eight years, or $14 million AAV.

“I think he’ll get Draisaitl-like money as a UFA,” one agent predicted.

“There are probably some good teams that might be willing to go seven years at $14 million annually to get him,” another said.

Draisaitl’s contract is one factor, but there’s another winger potentially going to market this summer seeking a big contract: Mitch Marner of the Toronto Maple Leafs, who is in the last year of a six-year contract with a $10.903 million AAV.

As far as possible suitors, two of the NHL’s richest franchises come to mind:

  • The New York Rangers continue to aggressively try to reshape their roster. They nearly completed a trade for Miller with the Canucks in recent weeks, with center Filip Chytil as the centerpiece. But salary retention and draft pick conditions were reported sticking points. If they’re able to create the necessary space — moving out a veteran like Chris Kreider or Mika Zibanejad — Rantanen is the kind of shiny new toy the franchise finds hard to resist. Consider also that winger Artemi Panarin will be in the last year of his contract in 2025-26 at an $11,642,857 AAV.

  • The other team is already paying part of Rantanen’s salary: The Chicago Blackhawks. They’re expected to be in on every player they can this offseason in an attempt to quickly build a contender around young star Connor Bedard. The 19-year-old phenom has shown some discontent at dwelling in the Central Division cellar in the first two seasons of his NHL career. Putting a top five scorer like Rantanen on his wing would certainly put a smile on his face. Needless to say, Chicago has the money and the cap space to attempt it — if not the competitive team that Rantanen might be compelled to join.

Then there’s a wild card played recently by insider Andy Strickland, who is the rinkside reporter for the St. Louis Blues on FanDuel Sports Network. On his “Cam & Stick” podcast, Strickland said Rantanen will sign with the Edmonton Oilers this summer.

“They’re going to be able to pay him and I think there would be some interest from him,” he said, noting that Draisaitl and Rantanen share an agent. Strickland said the acquisition of Rantanen would also be an enticement for star Connor McDavid to re-sign, as he becomes an unrestricted free agent in summer 2026.

The magnitude of this trade, and the star quality of the player, lend themselves to this kind of speculation. The Hurricanes have some advantages in seeking to keep Rantanen. But they won’t be alone if he tests the market.

“Assuming he doesn’t hate the system and the environment there, I think he signs with Carolina,” one agent said. “If he doesn’t care where he plays, all bets are off.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: IF Kim, Rays agree to 2-year, $29M deal

Published

on

By

Sources: IF Kim, Rays agree to 2-year, M deal

Infielder Ha-Seong Kim and the Tampa Bay Rays are in agreement on a two-year, $29 million contract that includes an opt-out after the first season, sources told ESPN, adding a Gold Glove winner to a Rays team that places significant emphasis on defense.

Kim, 29, who is expected to return from shoulder surgery in May, likely will start at shortstop but also has played second and third base, with his Gold Glove coming in a utility role.

The deal, which will pay Kim $13 million this season, is the most Tampa Bay has guaranteed in free agency for a position player since signing outfielder Greg Vaughn for four years and $34 million in 1999.

Before the partial tear of his right labrum required surgery, Kim was expected to land a free agent deal in the nine-figure range. With his opt-out, he can join a free agent class next year that’s thin on infielders, with shortstop Bo Bichette and second baseman Luis Arraez the only players of Kim’s caliber.

He arrived from Korea in 2021, signing with the San Diego Padres as a bat-first middle infielder. While the power Kim displayed in Korea didn’t show up as frequently as it did with the Kiwoom Heroes, his glove was a revelation, and in four seasons with the Padres, he posted double-digit wins above replacement despite never slugging above .400.

Tampa Bay enters the 2025 season with playoff aspirations but had been relatively quiet over the winter, signing catcher Danny Jansen and trading left-hander Jeffrey Springs to Oakland. The Rays used Jose Caballero and Taylor Walls at shortstop last season and are expected to do the same this year before the return of Kim.

Their infield already was a strength, with first baseman Yandy Diaz, second baseman Brandon Lowe and star-in-the-making Junior Caminero at third, with Christopher Morel, Curtis Mead, Jonathan Aranda and Richie Palacios also capable to playing on the dirt.

Shortstop Wander Franco, who was expected to be the Rays’ long-term solution at the position after signing an 11-year deal, remains on the restricted list while facing charges in the Dominican Republic of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation against a minor and human trafficking.

Continue Reading

Sports

Fantasy baseball rankings, projections, strategy and cheat sheets

Published

on

By

Fantasy baseball rankings, projections, strategy and cheat sheets

All of your fantasy baseball draft preparation needs collected in one place! Here you’ll find rankings, projections, cheat sheets, analysis and strategy. Check back every day for new content through Opening Day of the 2025 season. If this is your first time playing fantasy baseball, might we recommend starting with the basics: The Playbook: How to play fantasy baseball.

Don’t have a team yet? Create or join a league and then dive into the latest draft-prep material tailored for whatever format you prefer.


The Playbook: Become an expert in 9 innings

Inning 1: How to play fantasy baseball

Inning 2: League Formats: Which is right for you?

Inning 3: Everything you need to know about salary-cap drafts

Inning 4: How to create the ultimate cheat sheet

Inning 5: Roster optimization

Inning 6: Nine must-follow tips

Inning 7: Staying ahead of league trends

Inning 8: Using advanced stats to get ahead

Inning 9: Mastering the 2025 player pool


Rankings and cheat sheets

Cockcroft: Points-league rankings

Karabell: Head-to-head categories/rotisserie rankings


Advice from our experts

Karabell: The top 10 fantasy baseball prospects for 2025 (1/29)

Karabell: News or Noise (1/24)

Zola: What to expect from Roki Sasaki and other Asian newcomers (1/15)

Cockcroft: Reaction to Juan Soto signing with the New York Mets (12/9)


Roster-building essentials

2025 Player Projections and Outlooks

“Hot stove” free agent and player movement tracker

Live Draft Results

Closer depth chart

MLB depth charts


For Dynasty Leaguers

Dynasty Top 300 (2025 edition coming soon!)

Continue Reading

Trending