A man who shook his partner’s toddler to death after staying up late playing video games has been jailed for life with a minimum of 25 years.
Paula Roberts left her son Charlie, aged one year and 10 months, in the care of her partner Christopher Stockton at her Darlington home while she went for an eye test, Teesside Crown Court heard.
Within minutes of her leaving, Stockton called 999 to report the toddler had gone “floppy”.
Stockton, 38, who is not Charlie’s father, was convicted of the boy’s murder and child cruelty in December.
Image: Christopher Stockton has been sentenced for the killing. Pic: Durham Constabulary/PA
Sentencing Stockton, Mr Justice Goss said Charlie, who was born two months prematurely and had difficulty communicating, was particularly vulnerable.
The judge said only Stockton knew why he inflicted the fatal blow which caused brain injuries similar to those seen in a car crash, a crushing incident or a fall of several storeys.
“You have robbed his family of the joy of bringing up a child and of sharing life events with him. No court can undo the harm you have caused,” he said.
Roberts was sentenced to four years in prison on Friday.
Image: Paula Roberts had concerns about Stockton, but did nothing. Pic: Durham Police
Having initially denied a child cruelty charge, she eventually admitted neglecting her son by failing to get Charlie medical treatment for bruising caused by Stockton over several weeks.
During the police investigation into Charlie’s death, detectives uncovered a series of photographs on Roberts’ phone which showed him with bruises and injuries to different parts of his body.
Several messages on her phone stated she would seek medical help for her boy – but she never did.
“You now recognise that you contributed to his neglect, in effect turning a blind eye to what you must have known was the reality of the situation,” the judge told Roberts.
“You remain a risk to any children in your care.”
Richard Herrmann, defending Roberts, said she had struggled with mental health issues.
She wept as Mr Herrmann said: “She has to live with the knowledge that had she acted differently it would not have happened.”
Image: Pic: Family Handout/PA
The court heard Roberts was suspicious enough about Stockton that she set up a spy camera above her son’s cot.
But the 41-year-old stayed in a relationship with him, even after she voiced her concerns about Stockton to her brother.
Stockton, who had moved in with Roberts and Charlie just seven days earlier, was in sole charge of the boy on 12 January 2024.
He was off work ill and had stayed up into the early hours playing Xbox games, and must have snapped that morning, the court was told.
Stockton inflicted a severe head injury on Charlie which caused widespread bleeding on the brain. The toddler died in hospital the next day.
Image: Charlie Roberts
Pic: Durham Police
Nicholas Lumley KC, prosecuting, told jurors Stockton “shook or threw him with such violence, deliberately and forcefully harming little Charlie”.
Stockton rang 999 and could be heard on a recording repeatedly saying “come on mate” and “wakey wakey” to Charlie, who was not breathing.
He was to tell paramedics, doctors and the police that Charlie had choked on a biscuit and that he patted the child on the back and stuck his fingers down the toddler’s throat.
Jamie Hill KC, defending Stockton, told the court he had no previous convictions, the murder was not premeditated and there was no intention to kill.
Following Stockton’s conviction, Charlie’s father Barry Greenwell said: “Charlie was a much-loved son and grandson who has been taken away needlessly, and has left the whole family with a void that will never be filled.
“As a family we are processing the recent events and are trying to come to terms with the verdict and information given that has been deeply disturbing to ourselves.”
Detective Superintendent Chris Barker, who led the investigation, said: “To install a spy camera, as Paula Roberts did, means there must have been concerns about him.
“If you have concerns about those caring for your children, you must act, speak out or ask for help.
“Charlie had everything to live for, but his life was cruelly cut short.”
Among families struggling to make ends meet, there’s an uneasy sense that the people who can least afford it are being forced to bear the brunt of the nation’s financial woes.
As the impact statement of the government’s welfare cuts was released – revealing tens of thousands of children will be tipped into poverty – at a community centre in Wolverhampton, families shared their frustration that sick and disabled people will be those who lose out.
Image: Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ announced a ‘spring statement’ on Wednesday. Pic: PA
“It’s for people that need extra help because they’re ill, so why would they target that? I’m confused,” said Melissa.
A former carer, she’s currently pregnant, and says she’d love to go back to work and hasn’t been able to since her older children were born – due to the cost of childcare.
Melissa believes the government’s aim of encouraging more people into work is “a good thing, it’s what they need”. But she questions where the jobs are for people who’ve been out of work and may struggle due to illness.
Image: Melissa says she is ‘confused’ by the welfare cuts
“It’s okay saying they’re making cuts, but how are they going to help get people back in work by making them cuts?” she asks.
Philippa agrees. “It’s always a certain section of the community that gets targeted and it’s always those are on low incomes,” she says.
Now a grandmother, but still a few years away from retirement, Philippa recently applied for the disability benefit PIP – personal independence payment – due to diabetes and related health problems.
Image: Phillipa says those on low income are always ‘targeted’.
She was rejected but intends to appeal – and says she feels targeted by the government’s cuts.
“My son’s got disability living allowance, which means I can become his carer and that’s the opt out of getting a job”, she says, adding “I’ve never had to look into ways of avoidance”.
The cuts to welfare target the rapidly growing cost to the public purse of sickness and disability benefits.
Image: Up to 50,000 children may be pushed into poverty due to the chancellor’s latest welfare cuts
The bill currently stands at £65bn a year and has ballooned since the pandemic, fuelled by a large increase in claims from young people with mental illness.
The measures are designed to remove some of the disincentives to work within the system.
Currently, people signed off sick can get double the amount job seekers receive in benefits.
However, they risk losing the extra money if they do get a job.
Image: Stephanie Leo
Stephanie Leo is a senior community support worker in Wolverhampton and believes some people are put off looking for work because they worry about losing their benefits.
“If you could still work on certain benefits that would be more impressive,” she says.
Winston Lindsay, 57, struggles to walk due to a range of conditions, including spondylosis that affects his spine.
He used to be a social worker but now runs a voluntary organisation in Wolverhampton supporting people with disabilities.
He uses his PIP payments to cover the basics, but says he already struggles to get by, and worries that if his benefits are reduced, it will have a “major impact” that will force him to restrict how much food he buys, and how often he puts the heating on at home.
“We’re going have to wrap up and wear more clothes”, he says. “I’m just glad it’s summer at the moment – with the winter that’s going to be the worst period.”
The government’s aim is that more people currently in receipt of benefits go out and seek work.
Ben Harrison, director of the Work Foundation, told Sky News that it may happen.
“These measures will mean that they will face an increasing need to engage with employment support services.
“The problem here is whether they’ll be able to be connected to the appropriate kinds of work”, he says.
He believes the risk is that people “get pushed into inappropriate kinds of employment”.
“That in the end, makes their condition worse, and it makes their long-term employment prospects worse as well”, he adds.
As Rachel Reeves made her spring statement, opposition to the spending cuts was being spelt out on the ground in her constituency, literally.
The voters of Leeds West and Pudsey sent the chancellor to Westminster with a majority of 12,000 last summer, support she perhaps can no longer take for granted after rewriting spending plans to meet self-imposed rules she can never have intended to break.
In appropriately seasonal sunshine, disability campaigners gathered in the shadow of gold and silver cladding of the city’s John Lewis.
The chancellor’s cuts are a little more short term than that, a means of balancing the books that may have satisfied the OBR but left campaigners furious.
The cuts to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) are particularly unpopular. The government’s narrative is that cutting these benefits will help push people back to work.
Campaigners like Flick Williams, a wheelchair user, point out PIP is unrelated to employment.
She thinks she will lose at least £100 a week under new assessment rules, with devastating implications.
“I don’t know how we will survive, I absolutely have no idea because I don’t have any luxuries as it is,” she says.
“The whole point of personal independence payment is to fund the additional costs you have for being a disabled person,” adds Ms Williams.
“So, for example, disability equipment like my power chair, it’s extremely expensive. I have a bigger electricity bill because I have to charge my wheelchairs. I have a bath lift which also needs charging, and this equipment wears out.
“The government’s got a funny idea about what incentivises people because, honestly, nobody was ever motivated to go to work or increase their productivity by being pushed into penury.”
‘Everyone hit by cost-of-living crisis’
Welfare recipients are at the sharp end of the spending cuts, but they are not the only ones squeezed by the cost of living.
At the Pudsey Community Project, they see the impact of in-work financial stress, too.
Based in a community hall serving 20,000 households across two wards, they have been operating for five years and have seldom been busier.
The project offers a food bank and food pantry, a contributory scheme where people pay for subsidised goods, along with youth activities, lunch clubs for the elderly and lonely, and a busy clothes exchange.
Children insist on growing, even if the economy does not.
Image: Mr Dimery says the community project is supporting many people who are in work
Director Richard Dimery says demand is steadily growing and senses that need has become entrenched, with the impact of the pandemic compounded by the cost of living.
“I don’t know anybody who’s not been affected by the cost of living crisis,” he says.
“We’ve all become a lot more used to things not necessarily getting a lot better. There haven’t been any quantum leaps of significant improvement, just ongoing costs, a lot of them above inflation.
“One of the reasons our pantry, our food bank, our children’s clothes are all six days a week are because we know a lot of the people we’re supporting are in work, either part-time or full-time.”
Economic growth would solve a lot of the chancellor’s problems, never mind the country’s.
For that, companies like WDS Components need to thrive.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:51
What Reeves said in under two minutes
Employing 50 people with an annual turnover of around £10m a year, it manufactures myriad parts used in production lines and finished goods.
They stock more than 40,000 lines, from handles and hinges to hydraulics, casters and clamps, in what marketing director Mark Moody calls “an engineers’ candy store”.
Like every other employer, it faces rising costs from higher employment taxes that kick in next week.
It’s the latest in a long line of challenges that has made growth and expansion a tougher proposition.
“Considering we’ve had a pandemic, we’ve had Brexit, global supply chain issues, the Suez Canal and a few wars, we’re doing okay. We’re holding our own with good, modest organic growth, and we’re trying to stay positive,” he says.
“As we try to manage our business, if we’re constantly mitigating increases in costs and the pressures around us, then we’re not as focused on driving the business in really exciting, innovative ways.”
Mr Renowden said: “I know she will likely be feeling very frightened and going through an extremely difficult time.
“If you are the baby’s mother and you see this today, I want to appeal directly to you to come forward and receive help, my priority is to help you, to make sure that you can receive medical assistance.”
He added she can get assistance anytime by attending any hospital, police station or by calling emergency services.
He also appealed to anyone who may have information to come forward.
They can call 101 or make an online report quoting reference 1879 and today’s (26/3) date.