Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has a ruthless streak when it comes to suspending MPs who’ve brought the party into disrepute or failed to toe the line.

It’s no surprise that Andrew Gwynne was sacked before the story of his outrageous comments on WhatsApp had even been published, given that Sir Keir has built his leadership of the party on the promise to root out antisemitism.

Labour ministers sent out to bat for the party have highlighted that decisiveness as evidence of the PM’s determination to hold its representatives to the highest possible standards.

Once it emerged that there was a second Labour MP in that toxic WhatsApp group, Oliver Ryan, it was surely only a matter of time before he faced his own retribution.

Politics latest: Diane Abbott condemns WhatsApp chat

We’ve only seen a handful of the messages sent by the 29-year-old Burnley MP, as published in today’s Daily Mail.

He was a 23-year-old councillor when the group was set up – and while clearly highly inappropriate, his comments are not in the same league as those of his former boss, Andrew Gwynne. But it also seems clear he failed to challenge, let alone report, what was going on.

In his statement last night Mr Ryan said he fully condemns the “unacceptable” comments made in the group, that he regrets not speaking out at the time, recognises that failing to do so was wrong, and apologised for his own comments.

It was a much more heartfelt, detailed mea culpa than Mr Gwynne’s apology for “any offensive I’ve caused” and description of “badly misjudged comments”.

But the party leadership wants to make it abundantly clear that the offensive comments in the group, and the offensive attitudes fuelling them, are utterly condemned.

Read more politics news:
MPs set for above inflation pay rise to nearly £94,000
Immigration arrests rise – with one raid caught on camera

It’s hard to see how they could have avoided suspending Mr Ryan. It’s understood the decision had been taken as a result of the party’s internal investigation and before his meeting with the Chief Whip this afternoon – at which he was informed of the outcome.

The danger for Number 10 is if there is anything more to emerge both from the cache of messages, and whether substantial previous concerns had been raised about the individuals involved.

Sir Keir will be hoping his rapid response will have taken the heat out of the scandal, and limited the damage to the party’s reputation. But there’s no doubt the damage has been done.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Published

on

By

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

The CARF regulation, which brings crypto under global tax reporting standards akin to traditional finance, marks a crucial turning point.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Published

on

By

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

The nascent real-world tokenized assets track prices but do not provide investors the same legal rights as holding the underlying instruments.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government’s controversial welfare bill.

Sir Keir Starmer’s Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion.

MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.

Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole – close to breaching Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules set out last year.

Read more:
Yet another fiscal ‘black hole’? Here’s why this one matters

Success or failure: One year of Keir in nine charts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were “costs” to watering down the welfare bill.

“I’m not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that,” Ms Reeves told the outlet.

More on Rachel Reeves

“We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement.

“So we’ll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.”

Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised.

The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more.

It comes after Ms Reeves said she was “totally” up to continuing as chancellor after appearing tearful at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was the chancellor crying at PMQs?

Criticising Sir Keir for the U-turns on benefit reform during PMQs, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the chancellor looked “absolutely miserable”, and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election.

Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a “tough day” before adding: “People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday.

“Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

Sir Keir also told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby on Thursday that he “didn’t appreciate” that Ms Reeves was crying in the Commons.

“In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,” he said. “That’s what it was yesterday.

“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”

Continue Reading

Trending