Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has a ruthless streak when it comes to suspending MPs who’ve brought the party into disrepute or failed to toe the line.
Labour ministers sent out to bat for the party have highlighted that decisiveness as evidence of the PM’s determination to hold its representatives to the highest possible standards.
Once it emerged that there was a second Labour MP in that toxic WhatsApp group, Oliver Ryan, it was surely only a matter of time before he faced his own retribution.
We’ve only seen a handful of the messages sent by the 29-year-old Burnley MP, as published in today’s Daily Mail.
He was a 23-year-old councillor when the group was set up – and while clearly highly inappropriate, his comments are not in the same league as those of his former boss, Andrew Gwynne. But it also seems clear he failed to challenge, let alone report, what was going on.
In his statement last night Mr Ryan said he fully condemns the “unacceptable” comments made in the group, that he regrets not speaking out at the time, recognises that failing to do so was wrong, and apologised for his own comments.
It was a much more heartfelt, detailed mea culpa than Mr Gwynne’s apology for “any offensive I’ve caused” and description of “badly misjudged comments”.
But the party leadership wants to make it abundantly clear that the offensive comments in the group, and the offensive attitudes fuelling them, are utterly condemned.
It’s hard to see how they could have avoided suspending Mr Ryan. It’s understood the decision had been taken as a result of the party’s internal investigation and before his meeting with the Chief Whip this afternoon – at which he was informed of the outcome.
The danger for Number 10 is if there is anything more to emerge both from the cache of messages, and whether substantial previous concerns had been raised about the individuals involved.
Sir Keir will be hoping his rapid response will have taken the heat out of the scandal, and limited the damage to the party’s reputation. But there’s no doubt the damage has been done.
He was expected to be deported, but instead of being handed over to immigration officials he was released from HMP Chelmsford on Friday.
He spent just under 48 hours at large before he was apprehended.
The accidental release sparked widespread alarm and questions over how a man whose crimes sparked protests in Epping over the use of asylum hotels was able to be freed.
Ms Mahmood said: “Last week’s blunder should never have happened – and I share the public’s anger that it did.”
Image: Anti-asylum demonstrators in Epping, Essex. Pic: PA
On Sunday, Justice Secretary David Lammy said an exclusive Sky News interview will be used as part of an independent inquiry into the mistaken release.
Speaking to Sky’s national correspondent Tom Parmenter, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu at HMP Chelmsford described him as being “confused” as he was being guided to the railway station by prison staff.
The migrant is said to have returned to the prison reception four or five times before leaving the area on a train heading to London.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:44
‘My family feels massively let down’
Mr Lammy, who put Kebatu’s release down to human error, said he ordered an “urgent review” into the checks that take place when an offender is released from prison, and new safeguards have been added that amount to the “strongest release checks that have ever been in place”.