Octopus Energy Group is wading into the battle for the future of Britain’s biggest water company as part of a consortium which includes the French infrastructure giant Suez.
Sky News has learnt that Octopus Energy – which recently overtook British Gas as Britian’s biggest household gas and electricity supplier – has struck an agreement that would see its technology arm managing Thames Water‘s 16 million customers.
The deal with Kraken would provide Covalis Capital, the infrastructure investor spearheading the consortium, with critical technology expertise as it seeks to manage one of the UK’s most complex utilities – and one with a long-standing reputation for poor customer service.
Earlier reports said that Covalis would inject about £1bn into Thames Water, with £4bn more raised from asset sales, refinancing and a stock market listing.
Some industry sources have expressed doubts about the feasibility of such a plan.
The emergence of Octopus Energy’s involvement in the Thames Water crisis underlines the scale of Kraken’s ambitions as it further extends its reach beyond the energy sector.
More on Thames Water
Related Topics:
Earlier this week, TalkTalk became the first major broadband provider to join the Kraken platform.
Wholly owned by Octopus Energy, Kraken now manages more than 60 million customer accounts globally, of which roughly five million are water company customers.
Image: An Octopus wind turbine. Pic: Octopus
The consortium comprising Covalis, Suez and Octopus Energy was among fewer than a handful which tabled indicative offers to help Thames Water raise roughly £3bn in fresh equity ahead of a deadline on Monday.
CK Infrastructure Holding and Castle Water are also understood to have submitted proposals, while the private equity behemoth KKR remains interested but did not lodge an offer, according to insiders.
This week’s deadline was in any case regarded as arbitrary and meaningless because two other crucial determinants of Thames Water’s future have yet to become clear.
One is the outcome of a court battle between the water company’s class A and class B bondholders, both of which have said they want to lend a further £3bn to help Thames Water survive.
The company has backed the class A plan despite the fact that it will saddle Thames Water with higher interest payments at a time when its creaking balance sheet has left it on the brink of temporary nationalisation.
The second major uncertainty is whether Thames Water plans to appeal against an Ofwat ruling that it can increase customer bills by 35% over the next five-year regulatory period, rather than the 53% it had requested.
Thames Water must decide within days whether to formally appeal to the Competition and Markets Authority.
Prospective equity investors regard both those events as material to their investment case, with a preferred bidder not expected to be chosen by the company and its advisers at Rothschild until April.
Thames Water was plunged deeper into crisis last year when its existing shareholders – comprising a combination of sovereign wealth funds and pension funds – declared the company “uninvestible” and reneged on a commitment to provide billions of pounds in new funding.
The government has said it does not regard a special administration regime (SAR) as a desirable outcome, although an adverse outcome from the bondholders’ legal fight or inability to secure additional equity could render the company insolvent.
Laden with £19bn of debt, Thames Water has already warned that it will run out of money next month.
The only other major example of a SAR process was that involving Bulb Energy, which collapsed in 2021.
Its 1.5 million-strong customer base was bought by Octopus Energy, with their accounts transferred onto Kraken within six months.
Kraken, which works with UK water companies including Severn Trent and Portsmouth Water, says that it reduces water leakages, and reduces costs for both companies and customers.
A health and beauty retailer founded on a Lancashire market stall more than half a century ago is facing collapse amid a race to find a rescue deal.
Sky News has learnt that Bodycare, which employs about 1,500 people, could fall into administration as soon as next week unless a buyer is found.
City sources said that Interpath, the advisory firm which has been working with Bodycare and its owners for several months, was continuing to explore options for the business.
The company is owned by Baaj Capital, a family office run by Jas Singh.
Its other investments have included In The Style, which underwent a pre-pack administration earlier this year, and party products supplier Amscan International.
Baaj also attempted to take over The Original Factory Shop earlier this year before its offer was trumped by Modella Capital, another specialist retail investor.
More from Money
News of Bodycare’s travails comes just weeks after the retailer secured a £7m debt facility to buy it short-term breathing space.
The facility was secured against Bodycare’s retail inventory, according to a statement last month.
Bodycare was established by Graham and Margaret Blackledge in Skelmersdale in 1970, and sells branded products made by the likes of L’Oreal, Nivea and Elizabeth Arden.
The chain was profitable before the pandemic, but like many retailers lost millions of pounds in the financial years immediately after it hit.
Bodycare received financial support from the taxpayer in the form of a multimillion pound loan issued under one of the Treasury’s pandemic funding schemes.
The chain is run by retail veteran Tony Brown, who held senior roles at BHS and Beales, the now-defunct department store groups.
If Bodycare does fall into insolvency proceedings, it would be the latest high street chain to face collapse this year, amid intensifying complaints from the industry about tax increases announced in last autumn’s budget.
In recent weeks, River Island narrowly avoided administration after winning creditor approval for a restructuring involving store closures and job losses.
Later this week, the struggling discount giant Poundland will seek similar approval from the courts for a radical overhaul that will entail dozens of shop closures.
Bodycare could not be reached for comment on Tuesday, while Baaj has been contacted for comment and Interpath declined to comment.
President Trump says he is firing a governor of the US central bank, a move seen as intensifying his bid for control over the setting of interest rates.
He posted a letter on his Truth Social platform on Monday night declaring that Lisa Cook – the first black woman to be appointed a Federal Reserve governor – was to be removed from her post on alleged mortgage fraud grounds.
She has responded, insisting he has no authority over her job and vowed to continue in the role, threatening a legal battle that could potentially go all the way to the Supreme Court.
The president‘s threat is significant as he has consistently demanded that the central bank cut interest rates to help boost the US economy. Growth has sagged since he returned to office on the back of US trade war gloom and hiring has slowed sharply in more recent months.
Mr Trump has previously directed his ire over rates at Jay Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, blaming him for the economic jitters and has repeatedly called for him to be fired.
The Fed, as it is known, has long been considered an institution independent from politics and question marks over that independence has previously shaken financial markets.
More from Money
The dollar was hit overnight while US futures indicate a negative opening for stock markets.
Mr Powell’s term is due to end next spring and the president is expected to soon nominate his replacement.
Image: Fed chair Jay Powell is seen in discussion with board member Lisa Cook. Pic: AP
The Fed has 12 people with a right to vote on monetary policy, which includes the setting of interest rates and some regulatory powers.
Those 12 include the seven members of the Board of Governors, of which Ms Cook is one.
Replacing her would give Trump appointees a 4-3 majority on the board.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:18
July: Fed chair has ‘done a bad job’, says Trump
He has previously said he would only appoint Fed officials who support lower borrowing costs.
Ms Cook was appointed to the Fed’s board by then-president Joe Biden in 2022 and is the first black woman to serve as a governor.
Her nomination was opposed by most Senate Republicans at the time and was only approved, on a 50-50 vote, with the tie broken by then-vice president Kamala Harris.
It was alleged last week by a Trump appointed regulator that Ms Cook had claimed two primary residences in 2021 to get better mortgage terms.
Mortgage rates are often higher on second homes or those purchased to rent.
She responded to the president’s letter: “President Trump purported to fire me ‘for cause’ when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so,” she said in an emailed statement.
“I will not resign.”
Legal experts said it was for the White House to argue its case.
But Lev Menand, a law professor at Columbia law school, said of the situation: “This is a procedurally invalid removal under the statute.
“This is not someone convicted of a crime. This is not someone who is not carrying out their duties.”
The Fed was yet to comment.
It has held off from interest rate cuts this year, largely over fears that the president’s trade war will result in a surge of inflation due to higher import duties being passed on in the world’s largest economy.
However, Mr Powell hinted last week that a cut could now be justified due to risks of rising unemployment.
The owners of New Look, the high street fashion retailer, have picked bankers to oversee a strategic review which is expected to see the company change hands next year.
Sky News has learnt that Rothschild has been appointed in recent days to advise New Look and its shareholders on a potential exit.
The investment bank’s appointment follows a number of unsolicited approaches for the business from unidentified suitors.
New Look, which trades from almost 340 stores and employs about 10,000 people across the UK, is the country’s second-largest womenswear retailer in the 18-to-44 year-old age group.
It has been owned by its current shareholders – Alcentra and Brait – since October 2020.
In April, Sky News reported that the investors were injecting £30m of fresh equity into the business to aid its digital transformation.
Last year, the chain reported sales of £769m, with an improvement in gross margins and a statutory loss before tax of £21.7m – down from £88m the previous year.
More from Money
Like most high street retailers, it endured a torrid Covid-19 and engaged in a formal financial restructuring through a company voluntary arrangement.
In the autumn of 2023, it completed a £100m refinancing deal with Blazehill Capital and Wells Fargo.
A spokesperson for New Look declined to comment specifically on the appointment of Rothschild, but said: “Management are focused on running the business and executing the strategy for long-term growth.
“The company is performing well, with strong momentum driven by a successful summer trading period and notable online market share gains.”
Roughly 40% of New Look’s sales are now generated through digital channels, while recent data from the market intelligence firm Kantar showed it had moved into second place in the online 18-44 category, overtaking Shein and ASOS.