Connect with us

Published

on

The man who killed Conservative MP Sir David Amess was released from the Prevent anti-terror programme “too quickly”, a review has found.

Sir David was stabbed to death by Islamic State (ISIS) supporter Ali Harbi Ali during a constituency surgery at a church hall in Leigh-on-Sea in October 2021.

The killer, who was given a whole-life sentence, had become radicalised by ISIS propaganda and had been referred to the anti-terror programme Prevent before the attack.

Politics latest: PM and Badenoch in rare agreement over judge’s decision on Gazan refugees

His case had been closed five years before, after just one meeting for coffee at a McDonald’s to deal with his interpretation of “haram” (forbidden under Islamic law), as well as texts and calls with an “intervention provider”.

Despite Prevent policy and guidance at the time being “mostly followed”, his case was “exited too quickly”, security minister Dan Jarvis told the House of Commons on Wednesday.

Following the publication of a review into Prevent’s handling of Southport child killer Axel Rudakubana earlier this month, Mr Jarvis said a Prevent learning review into Sir David’s killing would be released this week in a commitment to transparency over the anti-terror programme.

Matt Juke, head of counter-terrorism policing, said it is clear the management and handling of Ali’s case by Prevent “should have been better” and it is “critical” the review is acted on “so that other families are spared the pain felt by the loved ones of Sir David”.

Undated handout file photo issued by the Metropolitan Police of Ali Harbi Ali who will be jailed for life at the Old Bailey on Wednesday when he is sentenced for the murder of Sir David Amess, the Conservative MP for Southend West during a constituency surgery in Leigh-on-Sea in Essex, on October 15, 2021 Issue date: Wednesday April 13, 2022.
Image:
Ali Harbi Ali was referred to Prevent twice before he stabbed Sir David to death. Pic: Met Police

The review found:

• Ali was referred to Prevent in 2014 by his school after teachers said his demeanour, appearance and behaviour changed from a previously “engaging student with a bright future” with aspirations to be a doctor to failing his A-levels and wanting to move to a “more Islamic state because he could no longer live among unbelievers”

• Prevent quickly took his case on and he was referred to Channel, part of the programme that aims to prevent involvement in extremism

• He was “exited from Prevent too quickly”, Mr Jarvis said, just five months later “after his terrorism risk was assessed as low”

• A review by police 12 months after he was released from Prevent “also found no terrorism concerns” and the case was closed. This was not uploaded for eight more months due to an “IT issue”

• People released from Prevent are meant to have a review at six and 12 months

• The assessment of Ali’s vulnerabilities “was problematic and outdated” as it did not follow the proper procedure, which led to “questionable decision-making and sub-optimal handling of the case”

• Ali’s symptoms were prioritised over addressing the underlying causes of his vulnerabilities – and support provided did not tackle those issues

• Record keeping of decisions, actions and rationale was “problematic, disjointed and lacked clarity”

• The rationale for certain decisions was “not explicit”

• Ali’s school was not involved in discussions to help determine risk and provide appropriate support – they were only called once to be told the “matter was being dealt with”

• A miscommunication led to only one intervention session being provided, instead of two.

Read more:
Sir David Amess’ daughter taking legal action

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is the Prevent programme fit for purpose?

The review found most of the failures in Ali’s case would not be repeated today as the guidance and requirements are much clearer.

It said referrers, in Ali’s case his school, are kept informed and engaged, and different departments and agencies – not just police – have clear roles.

Which records need to be kept is now clear and guidance for detecting underlying vulnerabilities has changed and would have made a difference, the review added.

It said a Prevent “intervention provider” met Ali at a McDonald’s to deal with his understanding of “haram” (forbidden under Islamic law).

No risk assessment was made but they suggested one more meeting, however a breakdown in communication between the police and the provider meant there were no more meetings.

Training for providers is “substantially different” now and the review says this would not be repeated today, with the provider in question saying the process is “a completely different one today”.

However, the review said there are still problems – not just in Ali’s case – with the Vulnerability Assessment Form, an “incredibly complex document that is vital to Channel” and the progression of a case.

David Amess. Pic: Penelope Barritt/Shutterstock
Image:
David Amess. Pic: Penelope Barritt/Shutterstock


It also found a more recent decision by the College of Police to only hold Prevent case data for five years “may prove to be problematic” and if Ali’s case material had been deleted under that ruling “it would have been nigh on impossible to conduct this review”.

Sir David’s daughter, Katie Amess, 39, last week welcomed the announcement to publish a review into Ali’s case but said every victim failed by Prevent deserves an inquiry, not just the Southport victims.

“We potentially wouldn’t be in the same situation today with repeat failings of Prevent had somebody had just listened to me back when it [her father’s killing] happened and launched a full public inquiry,” she told LBC.

Ms Amess said she believes if the Southport attack had not happened, the review into Prevent’s handling of her father’s killer would never have been released into the public domain.

Continue Reading

UK

This woman won a case against her employer over her ADHD – and firms need to take note

Published

on

By

This woman won a case against her employer over her ADHD - and firms need to take note

For people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, also known as ADHD, the traditional workplace can be a challenging world to navigate. 

Yet, diagnosis rates of the condition are rocketing across all age groups and employment lawyers are now being flooded with enquiries from people who are concerned about how their condition has been handled at work.

Businesses are being forced to pay attention.

Bahar Khorram is one of those people. The IT executive was working at Capgemini, the global consultancy firm. While on her probation period, she started struggling with her tasks and asked for support.

Bahar Khorram
Image:
Bahar Khorram

“I was trying to avoid taking the legal route because I really liked the company. This was my dream job, I loved it, and I knew I could do it. So I was trying to manage it in my head and trying to do what they asked. But when I realised that I couldn’t, I was experiencing anxiety,” she said.

“I started losing a lot of weight, I went to the doctor, and I sat there, and I burst into tears, and he said, ‘you are depressed, and you have anxiety.'”

Not everyone’s experience is the same, but people with the condition might have difficulty concentrating on certain tasks or remembering instructions. They might struggle with organisation and restlessness.

Read more business news:
Government costs to push up energy price cap
Wagamama owner among suitors for Costa

Last month, an employment tribunal in London found Capgemini failed to provide the recommended neurodiversity awareness training, and this amounted to discrimination.

In a statement, the company said: “Capgemini is deeply committed to building a truly inclusive and diverse workplace, where everyone feels valued and respected.

“We continuously strengthen our culture of inclusion through employee networks, training, and open dialogue, ensuring that every voice is heard. We don’t comment on specific employees.”

An issue for businesses across the country

The Capgemini case is not remote or isolated. The decision has ramifications for businesses across the country, especially as rates of ADHD diagnosis are climbing.

Official data analysed by Sky News shows the number of people in work with disabilities or long-term health conditions has risen by 21% since the pandemic. That includes a 35% jump in workers with learning difficulties and mental conditions like ADHD.

ADHD can manifest itself in a struggle to concentrate. Pic: iStock
Image:
ADHD can manifest itself in a struggle to concentrate. Pic: iStock

Many of these people will already be in work and are being diagnosed as adults. This is a trend that is particularly pronounced among older women, with ADHD traditionally having been underdiagnosed in young girls.

However, it will also affect the future workforce. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility, the number of disabled children with ADHD as their main condition has more than doubled – from 38,000 in 2013 to 66,000 in 2023.

It means the profile of the workforce is changing, and businesses will have to think hard about how they can harness the potential and meet the needs of their workers to maximise their productivity.

A growing legal issue

Failure to do so could also have legal consequences. Although not every case of ADHD meets the definition of a disability, employment lawyers are increasingly receiving enquiries about possible discrimination related to neurodivergent conditions, especially since the pandemic.

Elizabeth McGlone, an employment lawyer at the law firm Didlaw, said every other enquiry she receives now relates to neurodiversity, up from one in every 10 or 20 before the pandemic.

“So the classic scenario is performance. They’re struggling at work in relation to time management, attendance, assimilating information, assimilating tasks, prioritising. And it’s not so much that they can’t do the job, they are just not having enough adjustments made to be able to do the job,” she said.

“I do think employers have greater responsibilities. I do also think it depends on the size and the resources of your business. So for a smaller business, it’s going to be much more difficult to make great changes. But some of the changes don’t have to be that significant.

“They can be as small as moving someone’s desk so they haven’t got as much surrounding noise, or making sure that they are taking regular rest breaks.”

Grey areas

However, not all cases are clear-cut. Neurodiversity sits on a spectrum, and a diagnosis can create grey areas for businesses, where it is difficult to determine how much of a role the condition is playing in an employee’s performance at work.

“You don’t want to be cynical,” said Ms McGlone.

“Obviously, you take everybody at face value, but I have had chronological circumstances where somebody has got performance issues, the employer isn’t aware of any diagnosis, then a diagnosis has been sought and confirmed… sometimes you do feel some element of it being contrived, but that’s very, very few and far between.”

Continue Reading

UK

British journalists demand action from PM over war in Gaza

Published

on

By

British journalists demand action from PM over war in Gaza

British journalists have called on Sir Keir Starmer to protect their Gazan counterparts and press Israel to allow international reporters into the war zone.

A vigil was held opposite Downing Street on Wednesday for the nearly 200 journalists killed in Gaza since the war began in October 2023.

Ahead of the gathering, the National Union of Journalists’ (NUJ) London freelance branch handed a letter to Number 10 calling on the prime minister to clarify what steps the government is taking to protect journalists in Gaza and to ensure they have safe access to food, water and necessary equipment.

They also asked what the government is doing to get international journalists into Gaza to report freely. Currently, Israel only allows them in under IDF supervision.

Journalists gathered outside Downing Street for a vigil. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Journalists gathered outside Downing Street for a vigil. Pic: Reuters

At least 189 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israeli forces in Gaza since October 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).

It is the deadliest period for journalists since the CPJ started gathering data in 1992.

Israel has repeatedly denied targeting reporters and accused some of those killed of being terrorists, including prominent Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, who was killed two weeks ago.

The latest attack happened on Monday, when five journalists were among 21 people killed at Nasser Hospital in a “double tap” strike. Benjamin Netanyahu described it as a “tragic mishap”.

Journalists at the vigil held up placards with the names of Gazan journalists, many of whom were freelance, who have been killed. They read their names out.

Read more:
Israel may say it is not targeting journalists – but it is certainly killing a lot of them

Journalists killed on Monday (L-R): Mohammed Salama, Moaz Abu Taha, Hussam al Masri, Ahmed Abu Aziz and Mariam Dagga
Image:
Journalists killed on Monday (L-R): Mohammed Salama, Moaz Abu Taha, Hussam al Masri, Ahmed Abu Aziz and Mariam Dagga

The will of Mariam Abu Daqqa, made days before her death on Monday, was read out, bringing tears to the eyes of seasoned reporters as it contained a message to her two children.

And a voice note from Al Jazeera’s Gaza bureau chief, Wael Dahdouh, whose son and grandchildren have been killed, was played out as he encouraged the government and British journalists to do everything possible to stop the war.

NUJ representatives handed the letter into Number 10
Image:
NUJ representatives handed the letter into Number 10

‘Starmer can do something’

Mariam Elsayeh, NUJ ethics council representative and freelance journalist, told Sky News the UK has the power to protect journalists in Gaza and ensure international journalists are allowed in.

“We can do anything, we’re a great country, and we have the law and a prime minister who graduated from law school and is known for decades for his humanitarian support,” she said.

“During the Iraq War, we all witnessed him defending activists, and he was defending the freedom of protest, and he was doing a lot, so we are recalling this from history, and we know he can do something.”

Mariam Elsayeh, from the NUJ, said Sir Keir Starmer needs to stand up for journalists
Image:
Mariam Elsayeh, from the NUJ, said Sir Keir Starmer needs to stand up for journalists

‘A generation has been erased’

She added that foreign journalists are needed “because a generation of journalists in Gaza have been erased”.

“I’m not just looking for foreign journalists to get into Gaza, I would hope to see the Pope asking to get into Gaza, I would hope to see ministers here asking to get into Gaza, I would hope politicians in the European parliament would get in,” she said.

“If you don’t want us to report, at least let people witness, allow politicians to enter.

“This is not insulting the Palestinian people, what the Israelis are doing is insulting the entire international community because they are not respecting anyone, so at least, respect international law.”

Continue Reading

UK

Fertility rates continue to fall, but number of births rise

Published

on

By

Fertility rates continue to fall, but number of births rise

The fertility rate in England and Wales fell to its lowest level on record in 2024. It is the third consecutive year that record has been broken.

Other than a slight jump during the pandemic, birth rates have been falling consistently since 2010. On average, women now have 1.41 babies, compared with 1.42 in 2023 and 1.94 in 2010.

Rates in Scotland are even lower still, according to data released on Tuesday by National Records Scotland. Women there have an average of just 1.25 babies, falling from 1.77 in 2008.

To sustain the size of the global population, demographic experts say women need to have an average of 2.1 babies. This is what they call the “replacement rate”.

A similar rate is required to maintain the population of England and Wales, but it has been below that for more than 50 years. Despite that, the population has increased, largely as a result of immigration.

What’s happening in Britain reflects part of a global trend in declining fertility rates. In South Korea, the country with the lowest fertility rate in the world, women now have fewer than one baby on average – just 0.75.

Fertility remains high in many African countries, however. Somalia has the highest fertility rate in the world, with women there having more than six babies on average.

Despite the declining fertility rate, more babies were born in England and Wales in 2024 compared with 2023, although the 2023 figure was the lowest it had been since 1977.

This is because the population of England and Wales grew by more than 700,000 between 2023 and 2024, mainly due to immigration. So a lower fertility rate is offset by there being more women in the country.

Although fertility rates are falling across England and Wales as a whole, they have risen slightly in London and the West Midlands.

Birmingham was the local authority with the largest increase, rising from 1.61 babies per woman in 2023 to 1.75 in 2024. The largest fall was in Maldon, in Essex, where the number fell from 1.59 to 1.37 per woman.

Since 2014, there has been a fall in fertility in every one of the 303 local authorities for which we have continuous data.

Luton, the local authority with the highest overall fertility rate, where women have an average of exactly two babies, recorded the smallest fall – dropping just 6% in the last 10 years.

In places like Torbay, in Devon, Denbighshire, in north Wales, and the City of Bristol, fertility has fallen by more than a third in the past decade.

Data released last month reveals more information about the demographic make-up of mothers in the UK.

There has been a steady and sustained fall in the number of babies born to British-born mothers, but in 2024 that was offset by an increase in births among those born abroad.

The rise is particularly pronounced among mothers who were born in southern Asia.

In 2024, there were 20,000 more babies born in England and Wales to mothers from that region than there were in 2021 – a rise of almost 50% in just three years.

Births to African mothers have also risen sharply over that period, although there has been an equally rapid fall in babies born to mothers from EU countries, coinciding with Brexit coming into effect.

In 2024, just over a third of babies born in England and Wales had mothers who were born outside the UK, but in some areas foreign-born mothers made up a much higher proportion.

In Luton, for example, which we mentioned earlier, has the highest fertility rate in England and Wales, seven in 10 babies were born to foreign-born mothers in 2024.

As of the 2021 census, the total foreign-born population of Luton was 38%, but many of the foreign-born population will be younger, in age groups more likely to have children.

Birth rates by age

Fertility rates for both men and women are now falling among every age group, and the birth rate among under-30s is the lowest it has ever been.

The number of births to women in their 30s had been rising early this century, but has been steadily falling over the last decade.

In 2024, the average number of babies born to mothers aged between 30 and 34 was the lowest it’s been in more than 20 years.

The average age that mothers have their first child is now 29 years and five months in England and Wales, although there are significant variations in different parts of the country.

In the North East, mothers have their first child shortly after their 28th birthday, on average. In London, it’s three years later – just after turning 31.

The financial burden of low fertility

A combination of women having fewer babies and people living longer means that there is a higher economic burden on each person of working age to support those in retirement.

Demographics expert Dr Paul Morland told Sky News: “In terms of economic society politics, the fundamental problem is that you get more people who are of retirement age [compared with] the number of people working.

“The workers are the ones who are doing the work, paying the taxes, and people over a certain age consume a lot in healthcare – an 80-something consumes five or six times as much as a 20-something.

“The triple lock in the UK means very often that pensioners, even at the very bottom, are better looked after than poor workers. This puts more and more pressure on the state and more and more pressure on labour markets.”


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

Trending