Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer says he has full confidence in Rachel Reeves after questions were raised about inaccuracies in her CV and her use of expenses in a previous job.

The chancellor has been accused by former employees of being involved in an “expenses scandal” while working at Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) from 2006 to 2009, according to the BBC.

She has also been accused of saying she worked for the Bank of England for longer than she did.

Politics latest: PM ditches visit after tractors bypass gates

Downing Street said the PM believes he can trust the chancellor.

Ms Reeves’ spokesperson said she was “not aware of an investigation, nor was she interviewed”. Her lawyer has denied the allegations.

Jayne Wayper, former HR business partner for HBOS, said: “I do not recognise any of the accusations or claims that have been made against Rachel Reeves.”

One ex-colleague told the BBC she nearly got sacked after an investigation into three senior managers accused of “signing off each other’s expenses”.

This included spending hundreds of pounds on handbags, perfume, earrings and wine for colleagues, including one gift for her boss.

A whistleblower said there was also concern about her spending on taxis and on a Christmas party.

In a Facebook group of former HBOS employees seen by the BBC, several people referred to Ms Reeves being investigated over her expenses spending.

Rachel Reeves gestures, as she speaks about her plans for Britain's economy in Eynsham.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Sir Keir’s official spokesman said it was “correct” the prime minister has “no concerns whatsoever” about the chancellor’s conduct and has confidence in her.

He also said: “I can’t speak to her time prior to government.

“The PM works hand in hand and has full faith in the chancellor.”

Sir Keir later said she has “dealt with any issues that arise” from questions about her career before becoming an MP.

Ms Weyper, former HBOS’ HR, said there was an “extensive oversight” of all expense policies, receipts were signed off by line managers and in her role she “would have been made aware of any investigation which concluded”.

“I cannot speak for the motivations behind those who have been making these claims about Rachel Reeves. However, I do not recognise them and understand she left the bank on good terms,” she added.

Reeves was ‘not aware of an investigation’

A spokesperson for Ms Reeves said: “Rachel is proud of the work she did at HBOS and the teams that she led, it is 16 years since she left the bank and the first time she was made aware of these claims was when approached by journalists.

“She was not aware of an investigation nor was she interviewed, and she did not face any disciplinary action on this or any other matters. All expenses were submitted and signed off in the proper way.

“Several former colleagues from her time at the bank, including HBOS’ former HR business partner, have corroborated this account.

“Rachel left HBOS in 2009 on good terms.”

Ms Reeves’s lawyer while she was leaving HBOS said she left HBOS with a “standard-style agreement” after a “mutually agreed exit was made during the bank’s restructure”.

David Sorensen, a managing partner at Morrish Solicitors, added: “My clear understanding at the time was that my client, who was in a senior role, left on good terms when HBOS plc was acquired in 2009, as evidenced by the payments made to her, the retention of her company car and other benefits for a six-month period, and a favourable reference.

“Absolutely no allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct were mentioned by the HBOS HR team during this process.”

Read more:
Judge ‘wrong’ to let Gaza family settle in UK under Ukraine scheme, PM says

Treasury launches inquiry into leak of growth forecasts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I am not satisfied with the level of growth’

LinkedIn dates questioned

Questions have also been raised about Ms Reeves’ online CV, as her LinkedIn profile said she stayed at the Bank of England nine months longer than she actually did, the BBC has reported.

She has publicly said she spent a decade there, but her LinkedIn profile claimed she worked at the bank from September 2000 to December 2006.

However, she is understood to have left by March 2006, when she started working at HBOS.

That means she spent five and a half years at the bank, including nearly a year studying.

Ms Reeves’ spokesman, in a comment given to the BBC, said the dates on her LinkedIn were inaccurate and blamed an administrative error by her team.

They said the chancellor had not seen it before it was published.

The chancellor’s LinkedIn profile has now been updated to reflect she left the bank in March 2006.

Ms Reeves has repeatedly said she spent 10 years at the Bank of England, citing her time as an economist there as why she can be trusted with the UK’s finances.

Continue Reading

UK

British couple detained in Iran charged with espionage

Published

on

By

British couple detained in Iran charged with espionage

The British couple detained in Iran have been charged with espionage, according to the Iranian judiciary news agency.

The pair were named by their family on Monday as Craig and Lindsay Foreman.

Iranian state media said last week that the couple were in custody in Iran’s southeastern city of Kerman on security-related charges.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Lorries dumped waste on beach – as Sky News told gangs can ‘make millions’ from illegal tipping

Published

on

By

Lorries dumped waste on beach - as Sky News told gangs can 'make millions' from illegal tipping

On a bright but chilly February morning, around a dozen volunteers gather by the beachfront at Minster, on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent.

In bobble hats and walking boots, they carry blue plastic bags and litter pickers.

They wander slowly past the dog walkers and brightly painted beach huts, combing the pebbles for waste. But the rubbish they’re looking for isn’t normal litter; it’s builders’ rubble and shredded household waste.

It was dumped en masse by the lorry load, at an illegal dump site further up the coast by Eastchurch Gap, between 2020 and 2023.

“It’s lots of guttering that washes up, whole pipes, tiny rawlplugs, decorators’ caulk, bits of plastic and cable ties – it’s disgusting,” says Chris, as he pulls out items from his bin bag – filled in just 20 minutes.

Much of the rubbish is builders' waste
Image:
Much of the rubbish is builders’ waste

Waste litters the shore at Eastchurch Gap
Image:
Locals says the dumping should have been clamped down on far quicker

Belinda Lamb, who organises the clean-ups, describes seeing “shredded Christmas trees, bits of carpet, even the spongy material from playgrounds”.

“It’s really sad,” she says. “It’s having a huge impact on marine life – and probably our lives – because if fish are eating this plastic, then so are we.”

Belinda Lamb
Image:
Belinda Lamb says it’s ‘really sad’ and is affecting the sealife

They tell me that five years ago, lorries started turning up to tip waste over the cliffs at an illegal dump site a few miles away at Eastchurch Gap.

Day after day the vehicles arrived, leaving behind mounds of rotting rubbish and plastic that fills the shoreline, gets picked up by the sea and flung out by the waves further down the beach.

Locals are angry, and feel let down. Volunteers repeat their clean-up work monthly – but the sea keeps washing it in. They fear the area, a site of scientific special interest, will be like this for decades.

Eastchurch Gap was used as an illegal dumping group for several years
Image:
The area around Eastchurch Gap is a site of scientific special interest

“It should have been stopped immediately,” Elliott Jayes, the chair of Minster on Sea Parish Council, says.

“The Environment Agency should have been able to slap a stop notice on it, and it should then immediately stop and prosecutions start straight away.”

Investigations are ongoing at the site. In 2023, magistrates first granted the Environment Agency a six-month restriction order to close it down, which has since been extended.

The gate has been locked ever since, with concrete blocks installed to stop vehicles.

‘The new narcotics’

We don’t know who’s behind the Eastchurch Gap site, nor why they dumped the rubbish, but illegal tips are a huge problem across the country and one that’s increasingly being exploited by criminal gangs.

“What we’re seeing is actually more and more evidence of really serious organised criminal gangs operating in the waste sector, because it’s such a low risk, high reward activity,” explains Sam Corp from the Environmental Services Association.

Eastchurch Gap
Image:
Lorries chucked illegal waste over Eastchurch Gap for years

It’s something the previous head of the Environment Agency called “the new narcotics”, and Sam says waste criminals can be involved in multiple offences, from money laundering to human trafficking.

It’s thought one-fifth of all waste in England is being illegally managed. That’s around 34 million tonnes a year, enough to fill about four million skips.

It’s understood to cost the economy around a billion pounds a year, with a further £3bn thought to hit legitimate operators from missed business.

Forms of waste crime include fly-tipping to avoid paying tax or high processing costs, as well as illegal fires and exporting waste to other countries with looser regulations.

But criminal gangs are also a sizable part of the problem.

Stuart Hayward-Higham at a legal waste processing site
Image:
Gangs can get a waste licence for a few hundred pounds, says Mr Hayward-Higham

Chief innovation and technical development officer for Suez, Stuart Hayward-Higham, explains how the gangs operate.

“Imagine you’re a business, so I come along and I say, ‘I’ll pick up your waste and deal with it’.

“You pay me as though I’m going to treat it properly. So maybe £50 to collect it, manage it, and £100 to treat it. I pick it up and instead of spending the money to treat it, or recycle it, I just throw it on the ground somewhere.

“Then I keep all the profit.”

He says criminals can set themselves up with a licence to manage waste for as little as £154, making hundreds of thousands – even millions of pounds – in this manner.

‘Low fines not a deterrent’

Despite the scale of the issue, Sam Corp doesn’t believe the authorities have enough resources.

“A £1bn problem merits a lot more than the £10m that the Environment Agency gets to tackle this issue every year,” he says.

Old mattresses at a recycling centre
Image:
Illegal tippers see fines ‘as a legitimate business expense’

“We need regulations to be much tougher and stronger and more strongly enforced. And even if you do get caught, the penalties are far too low and they’re not enough of a deterrent.”

He says the criminals “see fines as a legitimate business expense”.

Of the 1,453 illegal dump sites recorded by the Environment Agency in the last decade, just 64 led to some form of enforcement.

Thirteen were prosecutions, 14 saw warning letters sent and 26 were logged as leading to “advice and guidance”.

Some 319 of the sites were thought to be linked to organised crime, 130 were hazardous waste, and 261 were in rivers.

Read more from Sky News:
Landlady describes moments before fatal pub shooting
Temperatures could hit 14C after ‘anticyclonic gloom’

In response, an Environment Agency spokesperson called waste crime “toxic”.

“It causes widespread and significant harm to people, places, the environment, and the economy,” they said.

“We are determined to make life harder for criminals by disrupting and stopping illegal activity through tough enforcement action and prosecutions.

“Last year we successfully shut down 462 illegal waste sites, bringing the total number in operation to the lowest on record.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘US security guarantee’ the only path to peace in Ukraine, Starmer says – ahead of Trump meeting next week

Published

on

By

'US security guarantee' the only path to peace in Ukraine, Starmer says - ahead of Trump meeting next week

A “US security guarantee” is the only path to peace in Ukraine, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

Speaking in Paris after an emergency summit with European leaders, the prime minister said a “US backstop” is the “only way to effectively deter Russia from attacking Ukraine again”.

And he said the future of Ukraine is not the only thing at stake.

European leaders at the security summit in Paris. Pic: Number 10/Flickr
Image:
European leaders at the security summit in Paris. Pic: Number 10/Flickr

“It is an existential question for Europe as a whole, and therefore vital for Britain’s national interests,” he added.

“This is a once in a generation moment for the collective security of our continent.”

It is a “new era”, he said, in which nations cannot “cling hopelessly to the comforts of the past”.

Any peace deal for Ukraine must “safeguard its sovereignty” and deter Russian leader Vladimir Putin from engaging in “further aggression in the future”, Sir Keir added.

Follow live: Russia gives more details ahead of peace talks with US

Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron in Paris: Pic: Number 10/Flickr
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron in Paris: Pic: Number 10/Flickr

The prime minister joined the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands, Denmark and the European Union at the Elysee Palace in Paris, alongside NATO secretary general Mark Rutte.

The meeting was called by French President Emmanuel Macron after Donald Trump shocked continental leaders by arranging bilateral talks between the US and Russia – excluding Europe and Ukraine.

The talks are set to begin in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday.

Sir Keir however insisted that “Europe must play its role”, adding: “I’m prepared to consider committing British forces on the ground alongside others if there is a lasting peace agreement.

“So I will go to Washington next week to meet President Trump and discuss what we see as the key elements of a lasting peace.”

It is “clear the US is not going to leave NATO”, Sir Keir said.

Analysis: Sombre Starmer confronts emerging new world order

He added: “But we Europeans will have to do more. The issue of burden sharing is not new, but it is now pressing and Europeans will have to step up, both in terms of spending and the capabilities that we provide.

“I spoke to President Zelenskyy on Friday. I will do so again in the coming days. And we envisage further [engagement] with European colleagues when I return from the US.”

Britain will “take a leading responsibility, as we always have”, the prime minister said, adding that “democracy must prevail”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer ‘prepared to send troops to Ukraine’

Read more from Sky News:
Pope stable in hospital and ‘asks for prayers’
Israel says it will receive bodies of four hostages

Mr Trump stunned Ukraine and Europe last week when he announced he had called Mr Putin to discuss ending the war, without consulting them.

Leaders have been left scrambling to confront a new future in which they have less US protection and support and must do more to ensure the security of their own continent.

Asked by Sky News’s Europe correspondent, Adam Parsons, whether the US has undermined the UK, Europe and Ukraine by unilaterally starting talks with Russia, Sir Keir said the US wanted “lasting peace”, as did Ukraine, before reiterating his point about a “US backstop” being necessary to support any security guarantees.

‘Completely premature’

However, despite three hours of emergency talks, European leaders left the meeting without a common view on possible peacekeeping troops in Ukraine.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz described the idea of deploying European peacekeepers as “completely premature” and said it was “completely the wrong time to have this discussion”.

He added that people were “talking over Ukraine’s head” and said he would be minded to support increased defence spending only if that was what European states wanted.

Similarly, Denmark’s Mette Frederiksen said their country was “open to discussing many things” but they stressed they were still very far off deploying their own soldiers to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Trending