Connect with us

Published

on

Regulators have proposed sweeping changes for the baby formula industry, saying high prices and branding are leading to “poor outcomes” for parents.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) found many brands cost more than the weekly value of people’s benefits, leading some parents to forgo food to buy formula.

The report was released nearly two years after Sky News revealed how a black market for baby formula had evolved as desperate families struggled to feed their children.

Parents openly described having no choice but to steal products, no longer able to afford formula as prices soared above inflation.

Read more:
Desperate parents are stealing baby formula
Where to get help if you’re struggling to buy baby formula

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From May 2023: Parents stealing formula

In its final report on surging prices in recent years, the CMA said parents could be saving £300 annually by switching to lower-priced brands that offered the same nutritional benefits.

The CMA said the NHS could have its own non-brand baby formula, in a bid to help drive prices down.

But the watchdog stopped short of recommending a price cap, which it had said it was looking into last year.

Moment of vindication for struggling families


Tom Parmenter - News correspondent

Tom Parmenter

National correspondent

@TomSkyNews

This is a moment of vindication for every parent who has struggled to afford baby formula.

It’s the same for every charity that has picked up the pieces of a family in crisis because they can’t safely feed their baby. Their long-held suspicions that parents were getting a poor deal from the baby formula market were right.

The CMA has scrutinised the industry and recommended the biggest shake-up in decades. The changes they propose are far-reaching and could help end the stigma and shame that many families feel because of the difficulties of feeding their babies.

Better information, clearer labelling and greater efforts to empower parents are all long overdue.

Nobody should have to feel like their only option is to steal baby milk but that is exactly what Sky News found when our investigation started two years ago. It was described to us then as a “national scandal” that was putting the health and development of babies at risk.

Baby banks still report a never-ending demand from families needing help even though prices have started to come down and new budget formula milk brands are entering the market.

The measures recommended to ministers today represent a huge opportunity for change – it is down to governments and the industry itself to make it happen.

The CMA has previously reported a 25% increase in prices over the past two years, with just three companies – Nestle, Kendamil and Danone – controlling 90% of the market.

The watchdog had determined that the lack of manufacturers meant there was no incentive to compete on prices, which meant additional factory costs had been passed on “quickly” and in full to shoppers.

The CMA, which has no powers to bolster competition by increasing the number of formula producers, said its four main recommendations were aimed at delivering better outcomes for parents on both choice and price.

It said formula provided in hospitals should come in plain packaging to reduce brand influence while parents are in a “vulnerable” setting.

Formula sold in shops should display nutritional information and not carry any claims that cannot easily be checked by parents, it said.

It also recommended extending the ban on advertising to include follow-on formula, and allowing parents to use vouchers and loyalty points to buy infant formula.

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said many parents “pick a brand at a vulnerable moment, based on incomplete information, often believing that higher prices must mean better quality”.

“This is despite NHS advice stating that all brands will meet your baby’s nutritional needs, regardless of brand or price.”

Public health minister Ashley Dalton responded: “I welcome this report and would like to thank the Competition and Markets Authority for their thorough investigation.

“There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those families that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital that they can access formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies because of outdated regulation.

“As part of our Plan for Change, we’re determined to ensure every child has the best start to life. We will carefully consider these recommendations and respond fully in due course.”

Continue Reading

Business

Motor Fuel Group-owner plots sale of stake in £7bn petrol retail empire

Published

on

By

Motor Fuel Group-owner plots sale of stake in £7bn petrol retail empire

The private equity backer of Motor Fuel Group (MFG), one of Britain’s biggest petrol forecourt empires, is exploring the sale of a stake in a deal that could value it at about £7bn.

Sky News has learnt that Clayton Dubilier & Rice (CDR), which has built MFG from a mid-sized industry player over the course of more than a decade, is working with advisers to examine options for selling a large minority shareholding.

City sources said this weekend that CD&R was expected to run a process during the coming months, with a deal anticipated later this year.

A stake of roughly 25-30% is expected to change hands, although the final shape of any deal has yet to be determined.

A so-called continuation vehicle common in private equity transactions is understood to have been ruled out by CD&R.

MFG is now the largest independent forecourt operator in the UK, having grown from 360 sites at the point of CD&R’s acquisition of the company.

It trades under a number of brands, including Esso and Shell.

More from Money

Lazard, the investment bank, has been working with CD&R on the preparatory work for a minority sale.

CD&R, which also owns Morrisons, united MFG’s petrol forecourt businesses with that of the supermarket chain in a £2.5bn transaction which completed last year.

MFG now comprises roughly 1,200 sites across Britain, with pro forma earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of about £700m expected in this financial year.

A previous attempt by CD&R to sell the company in 2022 was derailed in part by Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and a deteriorating macroeconomic environment.

It is now focused on its role in the energy transition, with hundreds of electric vehicle charging points installed across its network, and growing its high-margin foodservice offering.

MFG has outlined plans to invest £400m in EV charging, and is now the second-largest Ultra Rapid player in the UK – which delivers 100 miles of range in 10 minutes – with close to 1,000 chargers.

It aims to grow that figure to 3,000 by 2030.

Insiders said that CD&R would retain a controlling stake in MFG after any stake sale, while Morrisons also holds a 20% interest in the company.

Bankers believe that a minority sale this year would be followed a couple of years later with an initial public offering on the London stock market.

CD&R invested in MFG in 2015, making its investment a long-term one by the standards of most private equity holding periods.

The sale of a 25% stake at a £7bn enterprise valuation would deliver a meaningful amount of liquidity to the US-based buyout firm.

CD&R and its investors have already been paid hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from MFG, having seen its earnings grow 14-fold since the original purchase.

Morrisons’ rival, Asda, has undertaken a similar transaction, with EG Group acquiring the Leeds-based grocer’s forecourt network.

EG Group, which along with Asda is controlled by private equity firm TDR Capital, is now being prepared for a listing in the US.

CD&R declined to comment on Saturday.

Continue Reading

Business

First-time buyers up by a fifth – and older than they were 10 years ago, Halifax says

Published

on

By

First-time buyers up by a fifth - and older than they were 10 years ago, Halifax says

The number of first-time buyers rose by almost a fifth last year, according to data from Halifax.

The bank said 2024 saw 341,068 people buy their first properties, up by 19% from 2023.

While the figures are a rebound from 2023’s 22% drop, they are not as high as they were in 2022.

That year saw 367,870 first-time buyers recorded.

Amanda Bryden, head of mortgages at the bank, said the rise “likely reflects an improvement in mortgage affordability as interest rates eased and stabilised, providing more certainty for those stepping on to the ladder”.

Earlier this month, the Bank of England cut interest rates to 4.5% – a drop of another quarter percentage point for the third period in a row.

Halifax said that on average, first-time buyers are 33 years old – two years older than they were a decade ago – and that the average deposit paid was £61,090 for a home typically valued at £311,034.

More on Housing

The bank also said that people stepping on to the property ladder accounted for more than half of all home purchases made with a mortgage last year, at 54%.

Ms Bryden added that “many are still teaming up to make the numbers work, with most buying homes jointly”, which “makes sense” given the average deposit and house price.

She said these prices “can be a stretch for those with a single income”, and that: “It’s not surprising the average first-time buyer is now 33 years old, the oldest in the last two decades.”

However, while Halifax expects “modest house price growth” this year, Ms Bryden said: “Upcoming stamp duty threshold reductions won’t make things any easier in the short term for first-time buyers.”

Read more from Sky News:
Stake to leave UK gambling market as advert investigated
Merlin Entertainments weighs up aquarium asset sale

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her budget last year that the “nil rate” stamp duty band for first-time buyers will reduce from £425,000 to £300,000 from 1 April.

Halifax’s research was based on data from its own housing statistics database, as well as figures from trade association UK Finance and official earnings data.

Continue Reading

Business

The Bank of England gold rush that’s pushing up the price

Published

on

By

The Bank of England gold rush that's pushing up the price

Deep under the Bank of England, in a network of vaults into which cameras are rarely admitted, sits the world’s second biggest known trove of gold.

Once upon a time the Bank’s vaults stored bullion owned by the Crown but these days they serve mostly as a repository for other central banks and private banks that want to hold on to this critical asset.

But in recent weeks fears have been raised that the vaults are slowly being emptied – leading to other fears, that the Bank is struggling to keep up with the outflow. All of which raises a somewhat ominous question: is the Bank of England running out of gold?

Well, now the governor has told Sky News that there is no shortage of gold left inside the central bank’s vaults, though he acknowledged that billions of pounds of bullion had left and been flown across the Atlantic in recent months.

The movements are a symptom of a deeper financial issue. Traders are fretting about the possibility of Donald Trump imposing tariffs on movements of precious metals into the US. The pre-emptive trades have seen a sudden sharp rise in the amount of gold held in New York, not just from London but also from elsewhere around the world.

However, repatriating gold is no simple matter. Moving it in and out of vaults takes time, not to mention security, and the gold rush has led to a shortage of logistics options. Adding to the complexity is the fact that the Bank’s vaults are not really designed to cater for large-scale inflows and outflows – so simply getting bars isn’t easy.

Last week, deputy governor Dave Ramsden said: “Gold is a physical asset. So there are real logistical constraints and security constraints. It takes time and the stuff is also quite heavy, as you know.”

More on Bank Of England

The upshot is there is a multi-week wait for anyone wanting to remove gold from the Bank, which in turn has pushed up the price of gold in London.

Talking to Sky News last week, Andrew Bailey said: “London is a very important gold market. We have seen a movement in the relative price of gold in London and New York in recent times. And that is causing some gold to be moved to New York. Not vast: it’s under 2% of our stock.

“Obviously you have to have a lot of security and a lot of insurance around moving gold. So you can’t just put it all on the back of a lorry and take it away. So it has to be planned.

“So there are constraints, because of physical constraints. But we’ve got slots for all the gold people want to move in and out.”

Asked where there was still plenty of gold left in the Bank of England, the governor said: “There’s still plenty of gold.”

Gold bars
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Adrian Ash, director of research at precious metals marketplace BullionVault, said: “There is a shortage in London’s bullion market, but it’s a shortage of manpower and trucks. New York, in contrast, now has a glut of gold.

“This is a financial market phenomenon. It’s helped juice prices higher, but it hasn’t had any real impact on the availability of metal. And it will, most likely in due course, all come back out again.

“London remains the centre of the world’s gold trading and storage network. Short-term bottlenecks are nothing new, and they just to serve to highlight the underlying physical reality of the global gold market.

“Longer-term however, the Bank of England’s role as a custody for foreign central banks wanting to tap the London market may be dented. It’s already seen stockpiles edge lower in recent years, even amid a surge of emerging-market central bank buying, as reserves managers worry over sanctions and other political risks vis-à-vis the West versus the Rest.”

Continue Reading

Trending