For the first time since the Second World War, a far-right party is expected to come second in a federal election and the country is divided.
“I come from Jewish heritage so I’m really worried about the safety of my family,” says Shoshana.
“I don’t want to believe that 20% of Germany is extremist,” adds Christian.
Image: In Berlin, protesters march against the AfD
Shoshana and Christian are among hundreds of thousands of people who have taken part in demonstrations against the far-right in the run-up to the vote on 23 February.
But if polling is correct, around 20% of voters disagree – instead believing the Alternative for Germany Party or AfD offers Germans the best future.
Image: Anti-AfD protesters rally in Berlin
So in the run-up to what’s expected to be a historic result, I decided to go on a journey through the AfD heartland to find out why some German voters are turning to the far-right.
In Saxony, the tension is palpable
On a chilly February morning under a bright blue sky, we head towards Saxony, our first stop.
It’s a state around two hours’ drive from Berlin in east Germany.
The far-right AfD is holding a rally there and we want to speak to supporters to find out what’s attracting them to the party.
There are four main parties dominating the current polls.
In the lead at the moment, the conservative block is made up of the party of former chancellor Angela Merkel, the Christian Democrats (CDU), and their Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU) allies.
Their pick as the next chancellor, and the man widely expected to get the job, is Friedrich Merz.
The Social Democratic Party (SPD) is fielding Olaf Scholz for another term as chancellor.
Their coalition partners the Greens have nominated Robert Habeck.
But the AfD is the party coming in second in most polls.
Image: Posters of AfD co-chairperson Alice Weidel stood in the hall
A party dogged by allegations of racism, Islamophobia and right-wing extremism, all of which it denies, is currently on track to get its best-ever results.
Its chancellor candidate is the former banker Alice Weidel, who lives in Switzerland with her wife and kids.
Image: AfD co-leader Tino Chrupalla holds a rally in Saxony
It’s Weidel’s right-hand man, Tino Chrupalla, who’s holding the rally we are heading to, but when we arrive his opponents are ready and waiting.
Image: Anti-AfD protesters gather outside an AfD rally in Saxony
A loud and agitated group of anti-AfD protesters have surrounded the building where the rally will take place.
Many wave signs accusing the party of being Nazis or fascists.
Image: Anti-AfD protester and teacher Navina says she doesn’t want to live under a fascist regime
The AfD in Saxony has been officially designated as a far-right extremist group by the authorities but it’s still the state’s most popular party.
That terrifies some.
“I don’t want to have the AfD. I don’t want to live in a fascist regime,” says teacher Navina, who has joined the demonstration.
Germany’s Nazi history makes the discussion extremely sensitive.
The party rejects being called fascist, as well as opponents’ claims it will lead the country back towards a dark past.
It says it offers Germany a future.
Navina vehemently disagrees.
“They have no solutions. They just say if there’s less migration then everything will be fine,” she explains.
‘Society is so divided’
As the start of the AfD rally draws closer, the atmosphere becomes more tense.
A number of anti-AfD protesters have been hauled out of the crowd by the police and are being held by a fence.
Image: Anti-AfD protesters gather outside an AfD rally in Saxony
Officers have parked a line of vans between supporters and opponents to keep them apart while covered black plastic screens have been erected to stop the two sides from seeing each other.
Even in AfD strongholds like Saxony, the tension is palpable.
Opponents know it’s unlikely the AfD will get into government as it isn’t predicted to get a majority and a so-called “firewall” against the far-right means no other party has agreed to work with it, but the fact a far-right party is polling second in Germany angers many here.
One of the key flashpoints is the debate around migration.
The AfD wants much stricter controls which would include mass deportations.
At the party conference in January, Alice Weidel spoke of “large-scale repatriations” to a delighted crowd.
“And I have to be honest with you: if it’s going to be called remigration, then that’s what it’s going to be: remigration,” she said.
Remigration is a buzzword among Europe’s far-right.
Last year, around a million Germans demonstrated after it was revealed some AfD members attended a meeting where the Austrian leader of the far-right Identitarian movement, Martin Sellner, reportedly proposed a project of “remigration” which would see “unassimilated” immigrants forced to leave Germany even if they had citizenship.
While Weidel distanced herself from the meeting, and the party has previously said it has no plans to kick out people with German passports, critics say the idea has echoes of mass deportations of the Nazi era.
Image: Anti-AfD protester Richard in Saxony
Back at the protest, Richard tells me he thinks migrants are being scapegoated by the party. “It’s not a Syrian refugee’s fault that my wages are short or that crime is high,” he says.
Suddenly we are interrupted by Robert who is trying to get to the AfD rally.
It’s immediately clear just how divided voters are.
“I agree with the deportation thing because we definitely have too many foreigners and there’s too much violence,” Robert says.
He’s worried voters are so polarised that the country is heading towards “a situation of civil war”.
“Society is so divided into two parties there’s so much hate and so much violence, I have never seen a situation like this before,” he says.
Image: Robert says Germany has too many foreigners and ‘there’s too much violence’
‘We are being persecuted’
With that warning, we make our way into the hall where the AfD meeting is being held.
The foyer is filled with party flyers. Paper mugs bear their logo.
Upstairs, a crowd is enthusiastically listening to co-leader Tino Chrupalla’s speech.
Burly security guards keep an eye out for trouble, but aside from one heckler, the audience is adoring.
Image: The crowd gives AfD co-leader Tino Chrupalla a standing ovation
The standing ovation at the end suggests people agree with what they have heard but when we approach an audience member for an interview, he asks we keep his face hidden.
Peter tells us that he’s worried being identified as an AfD supporter could have repercussions.
“We are being persecuted by people like ANTIFA outside and they are not really democrats because they don’t accept different opinions,” he explains.
He says he is in favour of closing the borders and deporting criminals and believes Germany has become so unsafe that if nothing changes he will leave the country.
Image: AfD supporters gathered to listen to Tino Chrupalla in Saxony
Migration isn’t what triggered the election but it’s now dominating the debate.
Just over a week before the vote, the issue was reignited when a car was driven into trade union protesters in Munich, killing a mother and her two-year-old daughter, and injuring others. The suspect is a 24-year-old Afghan national. His asylum application was rejected, but he had not been forced to leave due to security concerns in Afghanistan and he was in Germany legally with a work permit.
This was the latest in a number of alleged attacks carried out by migrant suspects.
The next day, as the city mourned, around a thousand members of the far-right rallied.
“Asylum seekers out,” they shouted as they marched behind a banner saying “remigration”.
Saxony-Anhalt: ‘Germany has radically changed’
Magdeburg is the state capital of Saxony-Anhalt where around 31% of voters support the AfD.
As we arrive in the city, we meet Syrian-born Zaid.
He’s lived here for more than a decade but says since the Christmas market attack a division has opened up.
Image: People outside Magdeburg Cathedral following a memorial service for victims of the Christmas Market attack. File pic: AP
He runs through a list of assaults that he’s heard of in the last few weeks – including a migrant attacked at a bus stop or one of their children assaulted in a lift.
“People are very afraid,” he says.
Image: Zaid says divisions have opened up in Germany since a fatal attack on a Christmas market in December
The AfD held their own rally in Magdeburg after the Christmas market attack.
The rally’s organisers attempted to mobilise mourners behind an anti-migrant, anti-Muslim message while inaccurately claiming the suspect was an Islamic extremist.
Satish could hear the crowd from his restaurant.
He isn’t an AfD voter but on some points, he agrees with the party’s message. “Germany is well aware that you have to integrate, you have to bring skills here,” he says. “Immigrants should not be a threat to your country, there you have to draw a line.”
Image: Satish moved to Germany from India in 2008
Satish moved to Germany from India in 2008.
In 2015, in response to the migrant crisis, the then chancellor Angela Merkel opened the country’s doors to around a million mainly Syrian refugees.
By this point, the AfD – which had initially formed a few years earlier as a eurosceptic, anti-euro party – was increasingly using anti-migrant and anti-Islamic language as it moved further right.
Satish says Germany has radically changed in the decade since the so-called open door policy was announced.
“I won’t say it was a mistake, but it was ignorance. They were ignorant about how the people would respond,” he says.
A recent poll showed around 60% of Germans think the country should take fewer refugees.
The government reinstated temporary border checks last year and while all the main parties have hardened their stance on migration, the CDU wants to go further.
Its plans include making border checks permanent and potentially rejecting some asylum seekers on arrival.
Despite this, the AfD remains the loudest voice on stricter controls.
Like many other populist parties, the AfD is really effective at converting discontent into support.
Feeding on frustrations around migration, the economy or green policies has helped propel them up the polls.
In Thuringia, Elon Musk and Donald Trump get a special mention
No more so than in the state of Thuringia where last year the AfD was the first far-right party since the Second World War to claim victory in a state election.
The AfD is currently leading the current polls here with around 35% of the vote.
Image: A magazine cover shows Elon Musk dressed up as Superman carrying AfD co-leader Alice Weidel
The man who helped lead them to success is Bjoern Hoecke, a former history teacher, who is now arguably Germany’s most successful far-right politician.
He’s anti-immigration, Russia-friendly and eurosceptic.
A man who once called Berlin’s holocaust memorial a “moment of shame” and has twice been found guilty of using a Nazi slogan.
A poster boy for the far-right who opponents label “dangerous” but supporters adore.
Image: Former history teacher Bjoern Hoecke is now arguably Germany’s most successful far-right politician
“When you have no arguments, especially in Germany, then you say Nazis,” says Carolin Lichtenheld, a member of the party’s youth wing when I put this criticism to her.
Carolin has gathered with a few hundred others in a shopping centre conference hall on a freezing Tuesday night to watch Hoecke speak.
In the foyer, party merchandise has been carefully laid out.
One table is a tribute to American and German populist icons: there’s Elon Musk’s biography, a magazine showing Hoecke, next to a couple featuring Donald Trump. The most eye-catching is an edition showing Musk dressed up as Superman carrying Alice Weidel.
Image: An Elon Musk biography stands on the merchandise table of an AfD rally
The leaning towards the Trump administration is an interesting progression for a party whose supporters are often pro-Russia and anti-America.
Hoecke will later tell us that while he doesn’t know him personally, he “appreciates Donald Trump for his fight against wokeness… for his commitment to free speech”.
But before any of that, with every seat in the hall full, it’s time for the main event.
When Hoecke enters the room, cheers and applause erupt from the crowd.
For the next two hours, he and the local candidates lay out their vision for Germany.
Migration, Trump, Musk and Russia all get name-checked.
Image: Many supporters seemed slightly starstruck to meet Bjoern Hoecke
Hoecke, a man who once stood on the fringes of a fringe party, is now central to what’s likely to be the far-right’s most successful federal election since the Second World War.
After the speeches, fans queue up for selfies and autographs with Hoecke.
Many are young men and women who appear slightly starstruck.
This scene should serve as a wake-up call to anyone still questioning the power of populism.
When I put to Hoecke that his opponents call him a fascist and a racist who is a threat to democracy, he brushes it off.
He says the labels come from mainstream parties which he refers to as “a cartel”.
“They’ve merged into a cartel but now a competitor is emerging, a competitor who challenges their power,” he adds.
During his speech, he told the crowd that on the global stage, the political stars are now aligned in the AfD’s favour – with what he claims are administrations in America and Russia who support them.
It’s a new but potentially monumental message.
In the last 12 months, I’ve watched him at several rallies but in this hall, there’s a real feeling from him and his supporters that they’re on the brink of new power.
The extreme right in the ‘heart chamber of democracy’
Keeping an eye on the party’s rise is regional spy chief Stephan Kramer.
His branch of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has classified Thuringia’s AfD as right-wing extremists.
His team monitors a range of threats – from Islamic extremists to left-wing fundamentalists – but it’s the extreme right that he views as the severest threat to German democracy.
“What we see is that the extreme right has managed to get into what we call ‘the heart chamber of democracy’ and therefore is going after the roots of our democracy in our liberal society,” he says.
Image: Regional spy chief Stephan Kramer is watching the rise of the far-right
The AfD, at state and local level, deny they’re extreme or a threat but Stephan believes this election is the last moment for Germany “to change direction.”
“In the last ten years, the party has grown stronger and stronger. They are still growing, although we have put out the warning signs.
“I’m not saying the Federal Republic of Germany today is the same as the Weimar Republic of 1933, but you see similarities and that are very, very threatening,” Kramer says.
There’s no doubt Germany is divided, but on one point many agree: this election is a pivotal moment in German history.
Will the AfD gain power this time? That’s highly unlikely but they may get enough seats to cause serious disruption in parliament.
And if the next government fails, then the far right could easily seize victory in 2029.
Donald Trump has announced a 10% trade tariff on all imports from the UK – as he unleashed sweeping tariffs across the globe.
Speaking at a White House event entitled “Make America Wealthy Again”, the president held up a chart detailing the worst offenders – which also showed the new tariffs the US would be imposing.
“This is Liberation Day,” he told a cheering audience of supporters, while hitting out at foreign “cheaters”.
He claimed “trillions” of dollars from the “reciprocal” levies he was imposing on others’ trade barriers would provide relief for the US taxpayer and restore US jobs and factories.
Mr Trump said the US has been “looted, pillaged, raped, plundered” by other nations.
Image: Pic: AP
His first tariff announcement was a 25% duty on all car imports from midnight – 5am on Thursday, UK time.
Mr Trump confirmed the European Union would face a 20% reciprocal tariff on all other imports. China’s rate was set at 34%.
The UK’s rate of 10% was perhaps a shot across the bows over the country’s 20% VAT rate, though the president’s board suggested a 10% tariff imbalance between the two nations.
It was also confirmed that further US tariffs were planned on some individual sectors including semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical mineral imports.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:39
Trump’s tariffs explained
The ramping up of duties promises to be painful for the global economy. Tariffs on steel and aluminium are already in effect.
The UK government signalled there would be no immediate retaliation.
Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: “We will always act in the best interests of UK businesses and consumers. That’s why, throughout the last few weeks, the government has been fully focused on negotiating an economic deal with the United States that strengthens our existing fair and balanced trading relationship.
“The US is our closest ally, so our approach is to remain calm and committed to doing this deal, which we hope will mitigate the impact of what has been announced today.
“We have a range of tools at our disposal and we will not hesitate to act. We will continue to engage with UK businesses including on their assessment of the impact of any further steps we take.
“Nobody wants a trade war and our intention remains to secure a deal. But nothing is off the table and the government will do everything necessary to defend the UK’s national interest.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:43
Who showed up for Trump’s tariff address?
The EU has pledged to retaliate, which is a problem for Northern Ireland.
Should that scenario play out, the region faces the prospect of rising prices because all its imports are tied to EU rules under post-Brexit trading arrangements.
It means US goods shipped to Northern Ireland would be subject to the EU’s reprisals.
The impact of a trade war would be expected to be widely negative, with tit-for-tat tariffs risking job losses, a ramping up of prices and cooling of global trade.
Research for the Institute for Public Policy Research has suggested more than 25,000 direct jobs in the UK car manufacturing industry alone could be at risk from the tariffs on car exports to the US.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) had said the tariff costs could not be absorbed by manufacturers and may lead to a review of output.
The tariffs now on UK exports pose a big risk to growth and the so-called headroom Chancellor Rachel Reeves was forced to restore to the public finances at the spring statement, risking further spending cuts or tax rises ahead to meet her fiscal rules.
A member of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), David Miles, told MPs on Tuesday that US tariffs at 20% or 25% maintained on the UK for five years would “knock out all the headroom the government currently has”.
But he added that a “very limited tariff war” that the UK stays out of could be “mildly positive”.
He said: “There’s a bit of trade that will get diverted to the UK, and some of the exports from China, for example, that would have gone to the US, they’ll be looking for a home for them in the rest of the world.
“And stuff would be available in the UK a bit cheaper than otherwise would have been. So there is one, not central scenario at all, which is very, very mildly potentially positive to the UK. All the other ones which involve the UK facing tariffs are negative, and they’re negative to very different extents.”
Israel is beginning a major expansion of its military operation in Gaza and will seize large areas of the territory, the country’s defence minister said.
Israel Katz said in a statement that there would be a large scale evacuation of the Palestinian population from fighting areas.
In a post on X, he wrote: “I call on the residents of Gaza to act now to remove Hamas and return all the hostages. This is the only way to end the war.”
He said the offensive was “expanding to crush and clean the area of terrorists and terrorist infrastructure and capture large areas that will be added to the security zones of the State of Israel”.
The expansion of Israel’s military operation in Gaza deepens its renewed offensive.
The deal had seen the release of dozens of hostages and hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, but collapsed before it could move to phase two, which would have involved the release of all hostages and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:08
26 March: Anti-Hamas chants heard at protest in Gaza
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) had already issued evacuation warnings to Gazans living around the southern city of Rafah and towards the city of Khan Yunis, telling them to move to the al Mawasi area on the shore, which was previously designated a humanitarian zone.
Israeli forces have already set up a significant buffer zone within Gaza, having expanded an area around the edge of the territory that had existed before the war, as well as a large security area in the so-called Netzarim corridor through the middle of Gaza.
This latest conflict began when Hamas launched an attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking around 250 hostages.
The ensuing Israeli offensive has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
Bodies of aid workers found in Gaza
Aid group Doctors Without Borders warned on Wednesday that Israel’s month-long siege of Gaza means some critical medications are now short in supply and are running out, leaving Palestinians at risk of losing vital healthcare.
“The Israeli authorities’ have condemned the people of Gaza to unbearable suffering with their deadly siege,” said Myriam Laaroussi, the group’s emergency coordinator in Gaza.
“This deliberate infliction of harm on people is like a slow death; it must end immediately.”
“Liberation day” was due to be on 1 April. But Donald Trump decided to shift it by a day because he didn’t want anyone to think it was an April fool.
It is no joke for him and it is no joke for governments globally as they brace for his tariff announcements.
It is stunning how little we know about the plans to be announced in the Rose Garden of the White House later today.
It was telling that we didn’t see the President at all on Tuesday. He and all his advisers were huddled in the West Wing, away from the cameras, finalising the tariff plans.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is the so-called ‘measured voice’. A former hedge fund manager, he has argued for targeted not blanket tariffs.
Peter Navarro is Trump’s senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing. A long-time aide and confidante of the president, he is a true loyalist and a firm believer in the merits of tariffs.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
His economic views are well beyond mainstream economic thought – precisely why he appeals to Trump.
The third key character is Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary and the biggest proponent of the full-throttle liberation day tariff juggernaut.
The businessman, philanthropist, Trump fundraiser and billionaire (net worth ranging between $1bn and $2bn) has been among the closest to Trump over the past 73 days of this presidency – frequently in and out of the West Wing.
If anything goes wrong, observers here in Washington suspect Trump will make Lutnick the fall guy.
And what if it does all go wrong? What if Trump is actually the April fool?
“It’s going to work…” his press secretary said when asked if it could all be a disaster, driving up the cost of living for Americans and creating global economic chaos.
“The president has a brilliant team who have been studying these issues for decades and we are focussed on restoring the global age of America…” Karoline Leavitt said.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:52
‘Days of US being ripped off are over’
Dancing to the president’s tune
My sense is that we should see “liberation day” not as the moment it’s all over in terms of negotiations for countries globally as they try to carve out deals with the White House. Rather it should be seen as the start.
Trump, as always, wants to be seen as the one calling the shots, taking control, seizing the limelight. He wants the world to dance to his tune. Today is his moment.
But beyond today, alongside the inevitable tit-for-tat retaliation, expect to see efforts by nations to seek carve-outs and to throw bones to Trump; to identify areas where trade policies can be tweaked to placate the president.
Even small offerings which change little in a material sense could give Trump the chance to spin and present himself as the winning deal maker he craves to be.
One significant challenge for foreign governments and their diplomats in Washington has been engaging the president himself with proposals he might like.
Negotiations take place with a White House team who are themselves unsure where the president will ultimately land. It’s resulted in unsatisfactory speculative negotiations.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
6:03
Treasury minister: ‘We’ll do everything to secure a deal’
Too much faith placed in the ‘special relationship’?
The UK believes it’s in a better position than most other countries globally. It sits outside the EU giving it autonomy in its trade policy, its deficit with the US is small, and Trump loves Britain.
It’s true too that the UK government has managed to accelerate trade conversations with the White House on a tariff-free trade partnership. Trump’s threats have forced conversations that would normally sit in the long grass for months.
Yet, for now, the conversations have yielded nothing firm. That’s a worry for sure. Did Keir Starmer have too much faith in the ‘special relationship’?
Downing Street will have identified areas where they can tweak trade policy to placate Trump. Cars maybe? Currently US cars into the UK carry a 10% tariff. Digital services perhaps?
US food? Unlikely – there are non-tariff barriers on US food because the consensus seems to be that chlorinated chicken and the like isn’t something UK consumers want.
Easier access to UK financial services maybe? More visas for Americans?
For now though, everyone is waiting to see what Trump does before they either retaliate or relent and lower their own market barriers.