What happens when you put a boyhood fan in charge of their club?
They discover it’s not so simple to run after all. And the fans you sat with many years ago are as impatient as ever.
Anger reverberates exactly a year since Sir Jim Ratcliffe and his INEOS organisation gained day-to-day control of football operations at Manchester United.
Image: Sir Jim Ratcliffe at Old Trafford.
Pic: PA
Fans are furious about ticket price rises.
A charity helping former players has had funding slashed.
And rank-and-file staff – many loyal for years without Premier League salaries – have been swept out with 250 redundancies and warnings of more to come.
Sir Jim has taken the unpopular – but he would argue necessary – decisions to put the club on a healthier financial footing all while INEOS injected an additional £80m.
More on Football
Related Topics:
The Glazers
Being the face of cost-cutting and eradicating excesses can be reputationally damaging while the American family, still with the majority ownership, drift even deeper into the shadows.
The Glazers are blamed for the malaise and the debt burdened on a club that is one of the biggest money-makers in world football.
Image: Manchester United co-owner Avram Glazer.
Pic: AP/Craig Mercer/CSM
Image: Joel Glazer.
Pic: AP/Phelan M. Ebenhack
Just this week, United’s financial update to the New York Stock Exchange revealed they are set to make more than £650m this season.
But it also showed that the debt has climbed over £730m and has now cost more than £1bn to service in the last two decades.
Money has drained out of the club – to the Glazers – rather than, perhaps, being invested in Old Trafford upgrades or a new stadium as rivals have built glitzier, more lucrative venues.
Sky News US correspondent Mark Stone confronted executive co-chairman Avram Glazer over what has been a difficult year for the Red Devils.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Avram Glazer says he won’t sell Man Utd
When asked whether he would sell up the American businessman said: “No.”
He remained silent when asked if he was worried Sir Jim had made things worse, and also didn’t respond when asked if the Glazers should be facing more blame – as opposed to Sir Jim.
The British businessman bought a 27.7% stake in the club in February last year and took control of sporting operations. He later increased it to 29% but the Glazers remain majority owners of the club.
Floundering on and off the pitch
INEOS are now playing catch-up, trying to accelerate much-needed infrastructure upgrades, particularly at the training ground, which saw the women’s team temporarily pushed out.
But United have not been short of cash to spend on players, for the men’s team.
They have the highest net spend of any English club since Sir Alex Ferguson retired in 2013 at over £1.2bn – but without being able to add to the 13th Premier League titles he won.
In the summer and winter transfer windows, INEOS oversaw the arrival of £200m worth of new talent for the men’s team.
And yet the team is in its worst shape ever in the Premier League.
Image: Manchester United’s Diogo Dalot, left, and Joshua Zirkzee after, another, recent loss.
Pic: AP/Ian Walton
They’ve never been this low during a season – down in 15th place with 12 defeats in 25 matches.
This against the backdrop of decisions that can be viewed as bungled or quickly acknowledging mistakes.
Erik ten Hag was kept on as men’s team manager in the summer after aborting a firing plan following their FA Cup win.
But he went anyway in October – a change that cost £21m when you factor in Ruben Amorim’s release fee from Lisbon club Sporting.
It wasn’t the only hefty compensation bill.
Their pick for sporting director – Dan Ashworth – cost around £2m to prize away from Newcastle United.
But then he was ditched after just five months which, we discovered yesterday in new accounts, cost another £4m.
Fan fury
No wonder the supporters’ trust who protested against the Glazers are now aghast at “mismanagement” by the new leadership while still loading much blame on the Florida-based family.
And this while they are being asked to pay more to attend matches in fading facilities.
“Fans should not pay the price for a problem that starts with our crippling debt interest payments and is exacerbated by a decade or more of mismanagement,” the United Supporters’ Trust said.
“It’s time to freeze ticket prices and allow everyone – players, management, owners and fans – to get behind United and restore this club to where it belongs.”
INEOS – the petrochemicals giant that turned Sir Jim into a billionaire – has a lot of convincing to show they’re on the right path heading into year two at United.
And there could be the pain to come of seeing Liverpool match their record haul of 20 English titles.
Can INEOS rebuild a team and oversee the building of a new stadium without losing sight of the mission – to restore United’s greatness?
And the Glazers remain as tight-lipped as ever – but now flush with an extra £1.25bn from selling 29% to Sir Jim as he takes the heat.
Parents who are entitled to hours of free childcare should not have to pay mandatory extra charges to secure their nursery place, the government has said.
Updated guidance from the Department for Education states that while nurseries are entitled to ask parents to pay for extras – including meals, snacks, nappies or sun cream – these charges must be voluntary rather than mandatory.
The guidance, which comes amid concerns that parents have faced high additional charges on top of the funded hours, also states that local councils should intervene if a childcare provider seeks to make additional charges a condition for parents accessing their hours.
Since September last year, parents and carers with children aged nine months and older have been entitled to 15 hours of government-funded childcare a week, rising to 30 hours for three to four year-olds.
Under the new guidance, nurseries will be now obliged to clearly set out any additional costs parents will have to pay, including on their websites.
It says invoices should be itemised so parents can see a breakdown of the free entitlement hours, additional private paid hours and all the additional charges.
‘Fundamental financial challenges facing the sector’
Representatives of childcare providers welcomed the announcement but pointed out the financial stress that many nurseries were under.
Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Early Years Alliance, said: “While we fully agree that families should be able to access early entitlement hours without incurring additional costs, in reality, years of underfunding have made it impossible for the vast majority of settings to keep their doors open without relying on some form of additional fees or charges.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:32
Free childcare in England
“As such, while it is absolutely right that providers should be transparent with parents on any optional additional fees, today’s guidance does absolutely nothing to address – or even acknowledge – the fundamental financial challenges facing the sector.”
He added: “Given that from September, government will control the price of around 80% of early years provision, it has never been more important for that funding to genuinely reflect the true cost of delivering places.
“And yet we know in many areas, this year’s rate increases won’t come close to mitigating the impact April’s National Insurance and wage rises, meaning that costs for both providers and families are likely to spiral.”
In last year’s budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that the amount businesses will pay on their employees’ national insurance contributions will increase from 13.8% to 15% from April this year.
She also lowered the current £9,100 threshold employers start paying national insurance on employees’ earnings to £5,000, in what she called a “difficult choice” to make.
Last month a survey from the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA) found that cost increases from April will force nurseries to raise fees by an average of 10%.
Analysis by Anjum Peerbacos, education reporter
This could be welcome news for working parents as they approach the end of another half term break during which they will have incurred childcare costs.
But this money would not affect school age children.
It is dedicated to very young children, aged two or below and is targeting parents, predominantly mothers, that want to return to work.
Previously after doing the sums and factoring in childcare costs, many mums would have felt that it wasn’t worth it.
And so, if these funds are easily accessible on a local level it could make a real difference to those wanting to get back to work.
The survey, covering nurseries in England, revealed that staffing costs will increase by an average of 15%, with respondents saying that more than half of the increase was due to the national insurance decision in the budget.
Purnima Tanuku CBE, chief executive of the NDNA, said “taking away the flexibility for providers around charges could seriously threaten sustainability”.
“The funding government pays to providers has never been about paying for meals, snacks or consumables, it is to provide early education and care,” she said.
“Childcare places have historically been underfunded with the gap widening year on year.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:19
Parents ‘frustrated’ over rising childcare demand
“From April, the operating costs for the average nursery will go up by around £47,000 once statutory minimum wages and changes to national insurance contributions are implemented. NIC changes have not been factored into the latest funding rates, further widening the underfunding gap.”
The Department for Education said its offer to parents meant they could save up to £7,500 on average when using the full 30 hours a week of government-funded childcare support, compared to if they were paying for it themselves.
In December, the government also announced that a £75m expansion grant would be distributed to nurseries and childminders to help increase places ahead of the full rollout of funded childcare.
Local authority allocations for the expansion grant will be confirmed before the end of February. Some of the largest areas could be provided with funding of up to £2.1m.
Shops were given a surprisingly big boost in January as official figures showed retail sales rose by 1.7%.
Only a 0.3% rise had been forecast by economists polled by Reuters.
It’s the first growth since August and follows a fall of 0.6% in the key shopping month of December, according to Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures.
Not since May has there been a rise this large.
The December drop was even larger than first thought. Initially, only a 0.3% contraction was recorded by the ONS.
The large rise in January came as food shop sales rose 5.6% – the greatest amount since March 2020 when COVID-19 lockdowns began.
More on Retail
Related Topics:
Shops across the food and drink sector benefitted, the ONS said, as supermarkets, alcohol and tobacco stores plus specialist shops like butchers and bakers all reported strong trading.
Retail sales figures are significant as they measure household consumption, the largest expenditure across the UK economy.
Growing retail sales can mean economic growth, which the government has repeatedly said is its top priority.
Combined with other data released on Friday showing improved consumer sentiment the figures show a strengthening economy.
Wage rises and interest rate cuts helped to raise the longstanding consumer confidence measure by market research company GFK.
This increase had also not been expected by economists.
“The biggest improvement is in how consumers see their personal finances for the coming year with an increase of four points that takes this measure out of negative territory”, said Neil Bellamy the consumer insights director at NIQ GfK.
“The rate cut will have brightened the mood for some people, but the majority are still struggling with a cost-of-living crisis that is far from over.”
Nigel Farage has given up sole control of Reform UK, with the party’s members now being “handed over ownership” following a vote last year, according to its chairman.
The party, led by Mr Farage, was previously controlled by the Clacton MP as he held a majority of shares in the company.
According to the party’s new constitution, a board will instead be set up that will lead and direct the party, with members voting in an advisory manner on policies at the annual conference.
Members also have the power to call an “extraordinary general meeting”, and launch no-confidence motions in the party leader.
In a statement, Reform chairman Zia Yusuf said: “We are pleased to announce that, as promised, Nigel Farage has handed over ownership of Reform UK to its members.
“Reform UK is now a non-profit, with no shareholders, limited by guarantee.
“We are assembling the governing board, in line with the constitution.
“This was an important step in professionalising the party.
“We will soon have more exciting announcements about Reform UK as we prepare for government.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:47
Poll: Tories trail Reform UK
Documents filed with Companies House show that all shareholders in Reform UK Party Limited have given up their shares and control of the organisation.
Instead, a limited company called Reform 2025 Ltd is listed as being in control of the party.
Reform 2025 Ltd has two directors – Mr Farage and Mr Yusuf – but no shareholders or persons with significant control.
It is understood this is because the membership is said to be in control.
This appears to put it in a similar structure to the Labour Party, while the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats appear to have controlling leaders or chairs.
According to the party’s website, Reform UK have more than 211,000 members – close to double the Conservative membership.
Mr Farage says he wants to overtake Labour, which has around 309,000 members.
The party won five seats at the last general election off the back of 4.1 million votes. For comparison, the Liberal Democrats won 72 seats off the back of 3.5 million votes.
This discrepancy is largely down to seats votes are concentrated in.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Recent polling has shown that Reform are seen as stronger than Labour on a range of topics among voters, including trustworthiness, strength, and “clear sense of purpose”.
Earlier in February, the party also topped a voter intention poll for the first time.