After the detonation of global diplomacy we saw in the White House on Friday, all eyes are now on Downing Street.
Following his early exit from the Oval Office, Volodymyr Zelenskyy has left Washington and flown directly to the UK for an urgent meeting with Sir Keir Starmer ahead of Sunday’s summit with European leaders.
It’s an event which has been brought forward by a day, such is the anxiety about the unprecedented public breakdown in the relationship between the US and the Ukrainians.
After the verbal beating meted out by Donald Trump and JD Vance, walking into Number 10 for a tete-a-tete with one of his staunchest allies will surely be something of a relief for the Ukrainian president.
But the question is what they can do to try and salvage the situation.
Clearly bruised by the vice president’s unfounded claims about a lack of gratitude, he repeatedly thanked Mr Trump and the American people for their support.
But the fundamentals of his position – and the roots of that row with the Trump administration – remain unchanged. He reiterated his argument that Vladimir Putin has repeatedly broken ceasefires in the past and cannot be trusted not to do so in the future without strong US security guarantees.
“Once these guarantees are in place, we can talk with Russia, Europe and the US about diplomacy,” he said. “I want the US to stand more firmly on our side.”
Given his outright hostility to Mr Zelenskyy, it’s not a message Mr Trump seems in any mood to hear.
But it is effectively the position of the UK government too. Sir Keir has pledged his willingness to put British boots on the ground as part of a European peacekeeping force, in the event of a peace deal – but only if the US agrees to provide a security “backstop” to deter Mr Putin from attacking again.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:31
Ukrainians react to White House meeting
Sunday’s summit – hosted by Sir Keir and bringing together Mr Zelenskyy with a group of key European leaders – was meant to cap off a week of busy diplomacy. The British prime minister and French President Emmanuel Macron had clearly hoped to build on the success of their own visits to the White House and drum up further offers of support for their European peacekeeping plan.
Now that diplomatic momentum has been stopped in its tracks. Would the Europeans even consider going it alone, without the Americans? It was previously an unthinkable question, involving inconceivable increases in defence spending.
But the continent’s leaders have been relatively united in expressing their unshakeable backing for Mr Zelenskyy. Surely they will need to discuss how far they would be prepared to go if Mr Trump followed through with his threats to cancel American support completely.
Image: Sir Keir Starmer. Pic: PA
The prime minister only had a few hours to bask in the glow of his own unexpectedly successful trip to the White House on Thursday before Mr Zelenskyy’s visit blew up in such an extreme fashion.
Now his position as Mr Trump’s new best friend (with the “lovely accent”) will be tested much more quickly than anyone had predicted.
Will the prime minister be able to leverage their special relationship to stand up for Mr Zelenskyy and resurrect American support for Ukraine?
He’s regularly talked about acting as a bridge between Europe and the US. But it’s an increasingly impossible task when the two continents are pulling themselves apart.
Ten explosions have been heard near Srinagar International Airport in India-administered parts of Kashmir, officials have told Reuters news agency.
The blasts followed blackouts caused by multiple projectiles, which were seen in the sky above the city of Jammu earlier on Friday.
Explosions were also heard in the Sikh holy city of Amritsar, in the neighbouring Punjab state, according to Reuters.
An Indian military official told the agency that “drones have been sighted” and “they are being engaged”.
It comes as tensions between Indiaand Pakistanacross the line of control around the region of Kashmirhave boiled over this week, leading to fears of a wider conflict.
On Wednesday morning, Indiacarried out missile strikes in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered parts of the disputed region.
The government in India said it hit nine “terrorist infrastructure” sites, while Pakistan said it was not involved in the April attack and the sites were not militant bases.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:09
Explained: India-Pakistan conflict
Around 48 people have been killed since Wednesday, according to casualty estimates on both sides – which have not been independently verified.
India also suspended its top cricket tournament, the Indian Premier League, as a result of rising tensions, while the Pakistan Super League moved the remainder of its season to the United Arab Emirates.
Meanwhile, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a conference on Friday that the US is in constant contact with both India and Pakistan.
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Conclaves are famously unpredictable affairs – and once again the election of Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost as the new pope caught many by surprise.
The newly elected Pope Leo XIV won the consensus of the 133 cardinal electors after only four ballots – a fast process for a diverse college of cardinals.
Though his name had circulated among some Vatican watchers, other cardinals had emerged as clear front-runners, including Pietro Parolin – the Vatican’s number two who would have been the first Italian in almost 50 years to become pontiff – or Luis Tagle, a Filipino cardinal looking to become the first Asian pope.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:58
What are the conclave’s secrecy measures?
Instead, it was the first North American to win the highly secretive process.
So, what went on behind the closed doors of the Sistine Chapel?
Until Thursday lunchtime, Cardinal Parolin was ahead, gathering between 45 and 55 votes, sources say.
A substantial number, but well short of the 89 votes he needed for a two-thirds majority.
At this point, Cardinal Prevost had between 34 and 44 votes.
But as the Italian struggled to grow his support during the first three rounds of voting, he stepped down from the race, endorsing Prevost instead, Sky News understands.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:14
Who is Pope Leo?
An internal battle between Luis Tagle and Pablo Virgilio David – both cardinals hailing from Asia – cancelled out both of their chances.
And a contender from Africa – the most conservative sector of the church – was never likely for a conclave where the overwhelming majority of cardinals had been appointed by Francis, a progressive pontiff, sources say.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:25
Moment new pope emerges on balcony
An American pope has long been seen as highly improbable, given the geopolitical power of the US.
But Cardinal Prevost was able to draw from across the groups making up the electors: moderate US cardinals, South American cardinals and many European cardinals all coalesced around him.
Italian newspaper La Repubblica said Prevost “certainly attracted cross-party preferences, both ideologically and geographically”.
“In the conclave he was the least American of Americans: Born in Chicago, he lived 20 years in Peru,” the newspaper said.
It added: “As a man used to teamwork, Prevost appeared to many as the right man to make the papacy evolve into a more collegial form.”
Standing on Red Square, this was an intimidating sight, which felt much more like a celebration of war rather than peace.
I could feel the ground shake as the tanks rolled past, their caterpillar tracks on the ancient cobbles providing a deafening clatter.
The hairs on the back of my neck stood up in fear as the phalanxes of troops roared “Hurrah” in response to their commander in chief.
And the sight of combat drones being paraded on their launchers was actually quite sickening. Weapons that have been at the forefront of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine were paraded in a show of pomp and patriotism.
Image: Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin watch the procession. Pic: Reuters
For the rest of Europe, the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War has been a celebration of peace, but this felt much more like a celebration of war.
And it wasn’t just military hardware on display here, but the very identity of modern Russia.
Image: Pic: Reuters
For this is a country that is now defined by its military and its memory. The glory and sacrifice of 1945 have been weaponised to give credence to Russia’s current course and to make people believe that victory is their right.
For Russians, it served as a rallying cry and there was applause when the troops who have fought against Ukraine marched past.
But for those watching in Kyiv and other European capitals, it was an overt warning that Moscow has no intention of backing down.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:49
Putin hails sacrifice of Russian troops
The parade was considerably larger in scale than in recent years, when units and hardware have been needed on the battlefield. I think it was a deliberate attempt to project an image of confidence, and so was Vladimir Putin‘s positioning of his guests.
China’s Xi Jinping was given a prime position on the Kremlin leader’s right-hand side. It was no surprise given the economic lifeline Beijing has provided, but it felt like a particularly pointed gesture to the West – that they were looking at a new world order.
Despite that appearance of confidence, there were signs of Moscow’s unease that the parade could be disrupted.
There were snipers on every rooftop. Security was extremely tight. And the mobile internet signal across the city centre was completely shut down for fear of Ukrainian drone attacks, meaning none of the international media that had gathered could broadcast any live transmissions.
After the parade finished, Putin saluted the crowds as they spontaneously erupted into rhythmic shouts of “Rus-si-ya” at the sight of him.
Another PR coup complete without interruption, he will have departed as a very happy man.