Connect with us

Published

on

A newly elected Labour MP has gone public with his objections to the government’s proposed farm tax, saying it would “penalise” small farms in rural communities.

Henry Tufnell, MP for South and Mid-Pembrokeshire, told Sky News he and other colleagues had informed ministers it’s not only wealthy landowners who would be affected by the decision to levy inheritance tax on farms worth more than £1m.

Politics latest: Farage says White House row a ‘blessing’

It comes as farmers gather in central London again today, although without their tractors, to protest the changes.

The controversial decision to remove Agricultural Property Relief was announced by Rachel Reeves at last year’s budget and is due to take effect in April 2026.

It has seen a growing backlash from farmers, as well as supermarkets Tesco, Aldi and Lidl, who have raised concerns about food security, and business group the CBI, which last week said it would hit growth.

Mr Tufnell is the third Labour MP to speak out, and it’s understood more could follow, as a vote on the change looms in the coming months.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer abandons visit after farmer protest

‘We have to stand up’

After making representations to Treasury ministers behind the scenes, Mr Tufnell is calling for the threshold for levying the tax to be raised.

He also wants an amnesty or transition period for older farmers who may not be able to pass farms on to their children in time to avoid it.

“Me and a number of other MPs who are part of this new, broader, coalition within the Labour Party have to stand up and inform government that this is affecting our constituents,” he said.

Farmers ‘critical’ to boost growth

“It’s affecting the fabric of the society within those rural communities and that’s why we were elected,” he added.

He said the tax relief for farmers had “encouraged them to die in their boots” – and farmers in their 70s and 80s had been put “in this incredibly difficult position” as they could not plan for the change.

“The policy needs to be improved,” he added, saying farmers are “critical” not just for the government’s growth agenda, but also hitting its environmental targets.

Read more:
What’s the beef with farmers’ inheritance tax?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why should farmers be taxed more?

A broken election promise?

Mr Tufnell, 32, narrowly won the seat from Conservative former cabinet minister Stephen Crabb, having told constituents during the election campaign that no changes to inheritance tax were planned.

His is one of 59 rural constituencies which are among the 100 most marginal wins for Labour.

The MP, who lives in Pembrokeshire, has faced questions after it was revealed last year that a portion of the land on the 2,200 acre Gloucestershire farm belonging to his parents Mark and Jane, worth a reported £20m, had been passed to his brother Albermarle just before the budget.

It means if Mark Tufnell lives for another seven years, no inheritance tax – which would be levied at a rate of 20% – would be paid on that part.

Mr Tufnell reiterated to Sky News he had no inkling of the change, which was not in Labour’s manifesto, saying it’s “completely preposterous” to suggest a backbencher would know in advance.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farmer explains how tax will hit him

‘Dyson and Clarkson should pay more’

Mr Tufnell couldn’t say where the threshold should be set, but said it’s something the government should discuss with farming unions.

The government says with tax reliefs that apply to farms owned by couples with children, the threshold could be up to £3m.

“I completely agree James Dyson and Jeremy Clarkson should pay more,” he said.

‘Huge concerns’

The MP acknowledged there have been “issues” with people “dodging tax” and around how the relief “artificially inflates the price of land”.

“But I’ve been engaging extensively with my constituents in Pembrokeshire, speaking to individual farmers in beef, dairy, poultry, on small-scale family farms, and they’ve got huge concerns,” he said.

“It’s not about me and my family. I appreciate that I come from a farming family. But fundamentally I’m standing up for my constituents on a constituency matter and that’s the issue here.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jeremy Clarkson tells govt to ‘back down’

‘The straw that broke the camel’s back’

A group of some 30 rural Labour MPs deeply concerned about the impact of the policy are understood to have held meetings with Treasury ministers in the past month.

Steve Witherden, MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr, and on the left of the party, said in January the proposed changes “feel like the straw that broke the camel’s back”.

Marcus Campbell-Savours, MP for the rural constituency of Penrith and Solway, said he planned to vote against the government’s plans in their current form and would seek “important amendments.”

The chancellor insisted at the October budget that the changes, which the government estimated would save £500m a year, would “ensure we continue to protect family farms”.

She said the top of 7% of claims currently account for 40% of the total tax relief, but the National Farmers Union claim the figures are “misleading” and tens of thousands of farms could be affected.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Published

on

By

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

Crypto’s path to legitimacy runs through the CARF regulation

The CARF regulation, which brings crypto under global tax reporting standards akin to traditional finance, marks a crucial turning point.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Published

on

By

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

Tokenized equity still in regulatory grey zone — Attorneys

The nascent real-world tokenized assets track prices but do not provide investors the same legal rights as holding the underlying instruments.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn

Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government’s controversial welfare bill.

Sir Keir Starmer’s Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion.

MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7.

Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole – close to breaching Ms Reeves’s fiscal rules set out last year.

Read more:
Yet another fiscal ‘black hole’? Here’s why this one matters

Success or failure: One year of Keir in nine charts

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were “costs” to watering down the welfare bill.

“I’m not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that,” Ms Reeves told the outlet.

More on Rachel Reeves

“We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement.

“So we’ll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.”

Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised.

The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more.

It comes after Ms Reeves said she was “totally” up to continuing as chancellor after appearing tearful at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why was the chancellor crying at PMQs?

Criticising Sir Keir for the U-turns on benefit reform during PMQs, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the chancellor looked “absolutely miserable”, and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election.

Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a “tough day” before adding: “People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday.

“Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

Sir Keir also told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby on Thursday that he “didn’t appreciate” that Ms Reeves was crying in the Commons.

“In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang,” he said. “That’s what it was yesterday.

“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”

Continue Reading

Trending