Connect with us

Published

on

THORChain at crossroads: Decentralization clashes with illicit activity

THORChain has been called a money laundering protocol — a label no decentralized finance (DeFi) project wants unless it’s prepared to have regulators breathing down its neck.

Its supporters have fended off the criticism by championing decentralization, while its critics point to recent activities that showed some of the protocol’s centralized tendencies.

After exploiting Bybit for $1.4 billion, the North Korean state-backed hackers behind the attack, known as the Lazarus Group, flocked to THORChain, making it their top choice to convert stolen funds from Ether (ETH) to Bitcoin (BTC). Lazarus finished converting its Ether within just 10 days of the hack.

The controversy has triggered internal conflict, governance cracks and developer resignations, exposing a deeper issue and question: Can DeFi remain neutral when criminals exploit it at scale?

THORChain is not a mixer

THORChain is a decentralized swap protocol, so some say it’s unfair to call it a laundering machine, as the output is traceable. It’s not like a mixer, whose purpose is to conceal cryptocurrency fund trails — though the reasons for using mixers vary between users, with some simply wanting to preserve their privacy and others using them for illicit purposes.

Federico Paesano, investigations lead at Crystal Intelligence, argued in a LinkedIn post that it is misleading to state that the North Korean hackers “laundered” the Bybit hack proceeds.

“So far, there’s been no concealment, only conversion. The stolen ETH have been swapped for BTC using various providers, but every swap is fully traceable. This isn’t laundering; it’s just asset movement across blockchains.”

Decentralization, Cybercrime, North Korea, Cybersecurity, Money Laundering, THORChain, Features, Lazarus Group

Tracing funds swapped to Bitcoin is time-consuming, but not impossible. Source: Federico Paesano

Hackers also moved funds through Uniswap and OKX DEX, yet THORChain has become the focal point of scrutiny due to the sheer volume of funds that passed through it. In a March 4 X post, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said that 72% of the stolen funds (361,255 ETH) had flowed through THORChain, far surpassing activity on other DeFi services.

Decentralization, Cybercrime, North Korea, Cybersecurity, Money Laundering, THORChain, Features, Lazarus Group

Over $1 billion in Ether from the Bybit theft was traced to THORChain. Source: Coldfire/Dune Analytics

A truly decentralized platform’s strength lies in its neutrality and censorship-resistance, which are foundational to blockchain’s value proposition, according to Rachel Lin, CEO of decentralized exchange SynFutures.

“The line between decentralization and responsibility can evolve with technology,” Lin told Cointelegraph. “While human intervention contradicts decentralization’s ethos, protocol-level innovations could automate safeguards against illicit activity.”

Related: From Sony to Bybit: How Lazarus Group became crypto’s supervillain

THORChain collected at least $5 million in fees from these transactions, a windfall for a project already struggling with financial instability. This financial benefit has further fueled criticism, with some questioning whether THORChain’s reluctance to intervene was ideological or simply a matter of self-preservation.

Decentralization, Cybercrime, North Korea, Cybersecurity, Money Laundering, THORChain, Features, Lazarus Group

Source: Yogi (Screenshot cropped by Cointelegraph for visibility)

Governance cracks show when decentralization becomes a shield

The controversy sparked a dilemma on whether THORChain should act. In an attempt to block the hackers, three validators voted to halt ETH trading, effectively closing off their swapping route. However, four validators quickly voted to overturn the decision.

This exposed a contradiction in THORChain’s governance model. The protocol claims to be absolutely decentralized, yet it had previously intervened to pause its lending feature due to insolvency risks (swaps still remained operational). 

Some crypto community members called out THORChain’s actions as selective decentralization, where governance intervention only occurs when it serves the protocol’s own interests.

Decentralization, Cybercrime, North Korea, Cybersecurity, Money Laundering, THORChain, Features, Lazarus Group

Source: Dan Dadybayo

The backlash was immediate. Pluto, a key THORChain developer, resigned. Another developer, TCB, who identified themselves as one of the three validators who voted to halt Ether trades, hinted at leaving unless governance issues were addressed. 

Meanwhile, blockchain investigator ZachXBT called out Asgardex, a THORChain-based decentralized exchange, for not returning fees earned from hackers, while other protocols reportedly refunded ill-gotten gains.

THORChain founder John-Paul Thorbjornsen responded by claiming that centralized exchanges pocket millions from facilitating illicit transactions unless pressured by authorities.

“This pisses me off. Do we get ETH and BTC nodes to give back their transaction fees? What about GETH or BTCCore devs – who write the software, funded by grants/donations?” asked Thorbjornsen.

Decentralization, Cybercrime, North Korea, Cybersecurity, Money Laundering, THORChain, Features, Lazarus Group

Source: ZachXBT

THORChain’s growing regulatory risks, as previously demonstrated by privacy tools

For now, THORChain has avoided any direct enforcement actions from governments, but history suggests that DeFi protocols facilitating illicit finance may not escape scrutiny forever. Tornado Cash, a well-known crypto mixer, was sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2022 after being used to launder billions of dollars, though it was later overturned by a US court. Similarly, Railgun came under FBI scrutiny in 2023 after North Korean hackers used it to move $60 million in stolen Ether.

Related: Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev leaves prison custody

Railgun presents a unique case, as it’s marketed as a privacy protocol rather than a mixer or a DEX. But the distinction still draws comparisons to THORChain, given that privacy protocols frequently face criticism for potentially enabling illicit activities.

“Critics often claim that privacy-focused projects enable crime, but in reality, protecting financial privacy is a fundamental right and a cornerstone of decentralized innovation,” Chen Feng, head of research at Autonomys and associate professor and research chair in blockchain at the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan Campus, told Cointelegraph.

“Technologies like ZK-proofs and trusted execution environments can secure user data without obscuring illicit activity entirely. Through optional transparency measures and robust onchain forensics, suspicious patterns can still be detected. The goal is to strike a balance: empower users with privacy while ensuring the system has built-in safeguards to discourage and trace illicit use.”

Lin of SynFutures said continued illicit use of decentralized protocols would “absolutely” lead to drastic measures from authorities.

“Governments will likely escalate measures if they perceive decentralized protocols as systemic risks. This could include sanctioning protocol addresses, pressuring infrastructure providers, blacklisting entire networks or going after the builders,” she said.

Rising pressure against THORChain

THORChain supporters argue it is being unfairly singled out, as hackers have also used other DeFi protocols. But regulators tend to focus on the biggest enablers, and THORChain processed the vast majority of the stolen funds from the Bybit hack. This makes it an easy target for enforcement actions ranging from Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions to developer prosecutions.

“When the huge majority of your flows are stolen funds from north korea for the biggest money heist in human history, it will become a national security issue, this isn’t a game anymore,” TCB wrote on X.

“The threshold you want to be credibly decentralized you need a network of 1000+ unique validators. There is a reason why @Chainflip fixed this issue on the network level so quickly and all front end are applying censorship.”

If regulators decide to crack down, the consequences could be severe. Sanctions on THORChain’s validators, front-end service, and liquidity providers could cripple its ecosystem, while major exchanges might delist RUNE (RUNE), cutting off its access to liquidity. 

There is also the possibility of legal action against developers, as seen in the Tornado Cash case, or pressure to introduce compliance measures like sanctioned address filtering — something that would contradict THORChain’s decentralized ethos and alienate its core user base.

THORChain’s entanglement with North Korean hackers has put it at a crossroads. The protocol must decide whether to take action now or risk having regulators step in to make that decision for them.

For now, the protocol remains firm in its laissez-faire approach, but history suggests DeFi projects that ignore illicit activity don’t stay untouchable forever.

Magazine: THORChain founder and his plan to ‘vampire attack’ all of DeFi

Continue Reading

Politics

OKX CEO apologizes after ‘false positives’ lock users out of accounts

Published

on

By

OKX CEO apologizes after ‘false positives’ lock users out of accounts

OKX CEO apologizes after ‘false positives’ lock users out of accounts

The CEO of OKX says that “false positives” are among the biggest challenges the crypto exchange faces in ensuring global compliance.

Continue Reading

Politics

One year of Starmer: Nine charts that tell us whether Labour’s first year has been a success or failure

Published

on

By

One year of Starmer: Nine charts that tell us whether Labour's first year has been a success or failure

It might feel like it’s been even longer for the prime minister at the moment, but it’s been a whole year since Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party won a historic landslide, emphatically defeating Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives and securing a 174-seat majority.

Over that time, Sir Keir and his party have regularly reset or restated their list of milestones, missions, targets and pledges – things they say they will achieve while in power (so long as they can get all their policies past their own MPs).

We’ve had a look at the ones they have repeated most consistently, and how they are going so far.

Overall, it amounts to what appears to be some success on economic metrics, but limited progress at best towards many of their key policy objectives.

From healthcare to housebuilding, from crime to clean power, and from small boats to squeezed budgets, here are nine charts that show the country’s performance before and after Labour came to power, and how close the government are to achieving their goals.

Keir Starmer leaves 10 Downing Street.
Pic Reuters
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer has been in office for a year. Pic Reuters

Cost of living

On paper, the target that Labour have set themselves on improving living standards is by quite a distance the easiest to achieve of anything they have spoken about.

They have not set a specific number to aim for, and every previous parliament on record has overseen an increase in real terms disposable income.

The closest it got to not happening was the last parliament, though. From December 2019 to June 2024, disposable income per quarter rose by just £24, thanks in part to the energy crisis that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

By way of comparison, there was a rise of almost £600 per quarter during the five years following Thatcher’s final election victory in 1987, and over £500 between Blair’s 1997 victory and his 2001 re-election.

After the first six months of the latest government, it had risen by £144, the fastest start of any government going back to at least 1954. As of March, it had fallen to £81, but that still leaves them second at this stage, behind only Thatcher’s third term.

VERDICT: Going well, but should have been more ambitious with their target

Get inflation back to 2%

So, we have got more money to play with. But it might not always feel like that, as average prices are still rising at a historically high rate.

Inflation fell consistently during the last year and a half of Rishi Sunak’s premiership, dropping from a peak of 11.1% in October 2022 to exactly 2% – the Bank of England target – in June 2024.

It continued to fall in Labour’s first couple of months, but has steadily climbed back up since then and reached 3.4% in May.

When we include housing costs as well, prices are up by 4% in the last year. Average wages are currently rising by just over 5%, so that explains the overall improvement in living standards that we mentioned earlier.

But there are signs that the labour market is beginning to slow following the introduction of higher national insurance rates for employers in April.

If inflation remains high and wages begin to stagnate, we will see a quick reversal to the good start the government have made on disposable income.

VERDICT: Something to keep an eye on – there could be a bigger price to pay in years to come

‘Smash the gangs’

One of Starmer’s most memorable promises during the election campaign was that he would “smash the gangs”, and drastically reduce the number of people crossing the Channel to illegally enter the country.

More than 40,000 people have arrived in the UK in small boats in the 12 months since Labour came to power, a rise of over 12,000 (40%) compared with the previous year.

Labour have said that better weather in the first half of this year has contributed to more favourable conditions for smugglers, but our research shows crossings have also risen on days when the weather is not so good.

VERDICT: As it stands, it looks like “the gangs” are smashing the government

Reduce NHS waits

One of Labour’s more ambitious targets, and one in which they will be relying on big improvements in years to come to achieve.

Starmer says that no more than 8% of people will wait longer than 18 weeks for NHS treatment by the time of the next election.

When they took over, it was more than five times higher than that. And it still is now, falling very slightly from 41.1% to 40.3% over the 10 months that we have data for.

So not much movement yet. Independent modelling by the Health Foundation suggests that reaching the target is “still feasible”, though they say it will demand “focus, resource, productivity improvements and a bit of luck”.

VERDICT: Early days, but current treatment isn’t curing the ailment fast enough

Halve violent crime

It’s a similar story with policing. Labour aim to achieve their goal of halving serious violent crime within 10 years by recruiting an extra 13,000 officers, PCSOs and special constables.

Recruitment is still very much ongoing, but workforce numbers have only been published up until the end of September, so we can’t tell what progress has been made on that as yet.

We do have numbers, however, on the number of violent crimes recorded by the police in the first six months of Labour’s premiership. There were a total of 1.1m, down by 14,665 on the same period last year, a decrease of just over 1%.

That’s not nearly enough to reach a halving within the decade, but Labour will hope that the reduction will accelerate once their new officers are in place.

VERDICT: Not time for flashing lights just yet, but progress is more “foot patrol” than “high-speed chase” so far

Build 1.5m new homes

One of Labour’s most ambitious policies was the pledge that they would build a total of 1.5m new homes in England during this parliament.

There has not yet been any new official data published on new houses since Labour came to power, but we can use alternative figures to give us a sense of how it’s going so far.

A new Energy Performance Certificate is granted each time a new home is built – so tends to closely match the official house-building figures – and we have data up to March for those.

Those numbers suggest that there have actually been fewer new properties added recently than in any year since 2015-16.

Labour still have four years to deliver on this pledge, but each year they are behind means they need to up the rate more in future years.

If the 200,000 new EPCs in the year to March 2025 matches the number of new homes they have delivered in their first year, Labour will need to add an average of 325,000 per year for the rest of their time in power to achieve their goal.

VERDICT: Struggling to lay solid foundations

Clean power by 2030

Another of the more ambitious pledges, Labour’s aim is for the UK to produce 95% of its energy from renewable sources by 2030.

They started strong. The ban on new onshore wind turbines was lifted within their first few days of government, and they delivered support for 131 new renewable energy projects in the most recent funding round in September.

But – understandably – it takes time for those new wind farms, solar farms and tidal plants to be built and start contributing to the grid.

In the year leading up to Starmer’s election as leader, 54% of the energy on the UK grid had been produced by renewable sources in the UK.

That has risen very slightly in the year since then, to 55%, with a rise in solar and biomass offsetting a slight fall in wind generation.

The start of this year has been unusually lacking in wind, and this analysis does not take variations in weather into account. The government target will adjust for that, but they are yet to define exactly how.

VERDICT: Not all up in smoke, but consistent effort is required before it’s all sunshine and windmills

Fastest economic growth in the G7

Labour’s plan to pay for the improvements they want to make in all the public services we have talked about above can be summarised in one word: “growth”.

The aim is for the UK’s GDP – the financial value of all the goods and services produced in the country – to grow faster than any other in the G7 group of advanced economies.

Since Labour have been in power, the economy has grown faster than European rivals Italy, France and Germany, as well as Japan, but has lagged behind the US and Canada.

The UK did grow fastest in the most recent quarter we have data for, however, from the start of the year to the end of March.

VERDICT: Good to be ahead of other similar European economies, but still a way to go to overtake the North Americans

No tax rises

Without economic growth, it will be difficult to keep to one of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ biggest promises – that there will be no more tax rises or borrowing for the duration of her government’s term.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said last month that she is a “gnat’s whisker” away from being forced to do that at the autumn budget, looking at the state of the economy at the moment.

That whisker will have been shaved even closer by the cost implications of the government’s failure to get its full welfare reform bill through parliament earlier this week.

And income tax thresholds are currently frozen until April 2028, meaning there is already a “stealth” hike scheduled for all of us every year.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

One year of Keir: A review of Starmer’s first 12 months in office

But the news from the last financial year was slightly better than expected. Total tax receipts for the year ending March 2025 were 35% of GDP.

That’s lower than the previous four years, and what was projected after Jeremy Hunt’s final Conservative budget, but higher than any of the 50 years before that.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) still projects it to rise in future years though, to a higher level than the post-WWII peak of 37.2%.

The OBR – a non-departmental public body that provides independent analysis of the public finances – has also said in the past few days that it is re-examining its methodology, because it has been too optimistic with its forecasts in the past.

If the OBR’s review leads to a more negative view of where the economy is going, Rachel Reeves could be forced to break her promise to keep the budget deficit from spiralling out of control.

VERDICT: It’s going to be difficult for the Chancellor to keep to her promise

OVERALL VERDICT: Investment and attention towards things like violent crime, the NHS and clean energy are yet to start bearing fruit, with only minuscule shifts in the right direction for each, but the government is confident that what’s happened so far is part of its plans.

Labour always said that the house-building target would be achieved with a big surge towards the back end of their term, but they won’t be encouraged by the numbers actually dropping in their first few months.

Where they are failing most dramatically, however, appears to be in reducing the number of migrants making the dangerous Channel crossing on small boats.

The economic news, particularly that rise in disposable income, looks more healthy at the moment. But with inflation still high and growth lagging behind some of our G7 rivals, that could soon start to turn.


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

Politics

Sweden’s justice minister says to ‘turn up the pressure’ on crypto seizures

Published

on

By

Sweden’s justice minister says to ‘turn up the pressure’ on crypto seizures

Sweden’s justice minister says to ‘turn up the pressure’ on crypto seizures

Gunnar Strömmer reportedly said that Swedish authorities had confiscated more than $8.3 million worth of criminal profits since a law related to seizures was passed in 2024.

Continue Reading

Trending