A “shattering blow” has been dealt to farmers with the sudden pausing for new applications for environmental payments, according to the National Farmers’ Union.
The NFU says it was given just 30 minutes notice by the government that applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) were to close on Tuesday.
The post-Brexit scheme, launched in 2022, pays farmers and land managers to take up practices that improve productivity and protect the environment and climate.
Image: Protesters disrupted Defra Secretary Steve Reed’s speech at the NFU conference. Pic: PA
There were more than 100 options for farmers to choose from, including the management of hedgerows, organic farming development and providing habitat for wildlife.
The government says the budget for SFI has now been reached, adding that a “record” 50,000 farm businesses and more than half of all farmed land is now managed under the schemes.
Both Conservatives and Liberal Democrat politicians have criticised the move and the lack of any prior warning.
More on Farming
Related Topics:
But NFU president Tom Bradshaw said the decision showed “how little” the Department for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs (Defra) understood the industry.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:43
Fourth farmers’ protest through London
‘Growing disregard for agriculture within Defra’
“This is another shattering blow to English farms, delivered yet again with no warning, no understanding of the industry and a complete lack of compassion or care,” Mr Bradshaw said.
“Today’s terrible news was delivered with only 30 minutes warning to us before ministers briefed the press, leaving us unable to inform our members.
“There has been no consultation, no communication; there has been a total lack of the ‘partnership and co-design’ Defra loves to talk about. It is another example of the growing disregard for agriculture within the department.”
The government has said “every penny” in all existing SFI agreements will be paid to farmers, and outstanding eligible applications that have been submitted will also be taken forward.
It said details of a new SFI scheme will be announced following the Spending Review.
It was only last week that thousands of farmers were protesting outside Downing Street at the inheritance tax policy that’s angered so many in agriculture.
But one group representing farmers said on Tuesday the SFI decision is the “cruellest betrayal so far”.
The scheme was introduced under the Conservatives post-Brexit, to encourage sustainable farming.
It took years to develop – and was seen as world leading in a way of ensuring farming was both productive for the sector and protective of the environment.
Although a new scheme after the spending review is promised, many farmers will be left wondering whether it’ll be as comprehensive.
The National Farmers’ Union was preparing on Wednesday to release a report saying that farming confidence in England and Wales is at its lowest level ever.
It’s described Tuesday’s news as a “bleak irony”.
In a statement, minister for food security and rural affairs Daniel Zeichner said: “This government is proud to have set the biggest budget for sustainable food produce in history, to boost growth in rural communities and all across the UK, under our plan for change.
“More farmers are now in schemes and more money is being spent through them than ever before. That is true today and will remain true tomorrow.
“We have now successfully allocated the SFI24 budget as promised.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The government claims the last administration left the scheme uncapped – and they had to put a limit on to stop it running over budget.
‘Absolutely bonkers’
Olly Harrison, an arable farmer on Merseyside who organised the latest farming protest in London earlier this month, said the decision showed farmers were being “attacked from every single angle”.
“It’s just absolutely bonkers. The scheme worked. It was to replace what we had when we were in Europe [the EU] and a lot of farms embraced it, they were doing real good with it.”
“Why have we got people who don’t understand and don’t understand the environment in power?”
Edward Morello, the Liberal Democrat MP for West Dorset, told Sky News the decision will “alarm farmers across the UK” – and called for the government to “start listening and responding” to the agricultural community.
Tim Farron, the MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale, said the decision was made with “no warning”.
Conservative shadow farming minister Robbie Moore said the change was “absolutely scandalous”.
The energy regulator has confirmed plans for a massive upgrade to the UK’s energy grids, adding £108 to customer bills by 2031.
Ofgem said on Thursday that the £28bn investment over the next five years would bolster resilience in the transition to a renewable energy future and that much of the bill would be offset by increased efficiency.
It pointed to estimated savings for households of around £80 because of the planned investment in gas and power infrastructure, leaving a net additional contribution of £28.
Ofgem said the £28bn sum formed part of an estimated £90bn to be invested in the energy networks by 2031, with “adaptive” funding arrangements helping to shield customers from volatility in the market.
Most of the funding announced on Thursday will go towards maintaining gas networks, which will remain a key source of energy as green power capacity is built up further.
“Investing now to maintain world-class resilience and expand grid capacity is the most cost-effective way to harness clean power, support economic growth and protect the country from gas price shocks like the one seen in 2022”, Ofgem said.
More from Money
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:11
What’s driving energy prices higher?
Then, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Europe’s refusal to buy Russian gas in response, meant that energy bills hit unprecedented levels and gave birth to the wider cost-of-living crisis as higher energy costs were passed on across the economy.
Ofgem made its announcement as costs of government energy policy and other upgrades make the biggest upwards contributions to household bills. However, the budget moved to take away some costs from April next year.
Ofgem boss Jonathan Brearley said: “The funding announced today will keep Britain’s energy network among the safest, most secure and resilient in the world. The investment will support the transition to new forms of energy and support new industrial customers to help drive economic growth and insulate us from volatile gas prices.
“But this is not investment at any price. Every pound must deliver value for consumers. Ofgem will hold network companies accountable for delivering on time and on budget, and we make no apologies for the efficiency challenge we’re setting as the industry scales up investment.
“We’ve built strong consumer protections into these contracts, meaning funds will only be released when needed and clawed back if not used. Households and businesses must get value for money, and we will ensure they do.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:01
‘It’s either keep warm or eat’
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: “This government is taking action to bring down energy bills for families, with the budget taking an average £150 of costs off bills in April, and expanding our £150 Warm Home Discount to over six million families.
“Upgrading our gas and electricity networks after years of underinvestment is essential to keep the lights on and ensure energy security for our country. Without these plans, which were first set out under the previous government, costs would spiral and our security would be compromised.
“The only way to bring down bills for good and get off the fossil fuel rollercoaster is with this government’s mission to deliver clean homegrown that we control.”
The UK government is being urged to take even stronger action to tackle the ongoing crisis of families unable to afford baby formula milk.
The prime minister backed limited reforms to the market to help parents save money but will not yet support more radical changes.
Sir Keir Starmer confirmed support for better public health messaging to inform parents that cheaper brands are nutritionally equivalent when compared with the most expensive.
A ban on spending store loyalty points on baby formula will also be lifted.
They were among recommendations made by the Competition and Markets Authority which investigated the baby formula industry and described the price rises in recent years as unjustifiable.
Image: A newborn. File Pic: iStock
In the House of Commons the prime minister said: “For too long parents have been pushed into spending more on infant formula.
“They were told they’re paying for better quality and left hundreds of pounds out of pocket.
More from UK
“I can announce today that we’re changing that. We will take action to give parents and carers the confidence to access infant formula at more affordable prices, with clearer guidance for retailers on helping new parents use loyalty points and vouchers together.”
It comes two-and-a-half years after a Sky News investigation revealed the extreme measures families were taking to feed their babies.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Parents described how they had resorted to stealing to feed their infants, some were watering down formula milk or substituting it for condensed milk.
The British Pregnancy Advisory Service described the situation in 2023 as a “national scandal”.
Campaigners told Sky News the UK government needed to go further to address the crisis.
Co-founder of Feed UK Erin Williams told Sky News: “It is progress, they promised to look at this enormous nationwide problem and they have.
“At the moment women are still not routinely getting important information before giving birth – this should be given proactively to everybody and that will be a big win.
“The prime minister though needs to be tougher on the baby formula companies.
“Their marketing claims, their unjustified pricing – it’s stacked against families who just need to feed their babies safely.”
The UK government stopped short of accepting all of the recommendations made by the CMA.
More radical ideas such as a price cap on baby formula are not being considered.
Charities have also told Sky News the situations some families find themselves in have not eased.
Founder of the Hartlepool Baby Bank, Emilie De Bruijn, told Sky News the demand they see from desperate families is “constant and unmanageable”.
She said: “Parents are really feeling the pinch right now, and demands on baby banks are rising and it can feel quite relentless.
“We are pleased to see the extension of the National Breastfeeding Helpline alongside measures such as allowing parents to use points and vouchers.
“It is important that parents are supported to feed their children in whatever way they want and we hope that steps will continue to be taken to reduce the cost of formula and increase understanding that all brands are nutritionally the same.”
An engineer who took aerospace giant Leonardo UK to an employment tribunal for having to share women’s toilets with transgender colleagues has lost a discrimination claim.
Maria Kelly alleged harassment related to sex, direct sex discrimination and indirect sex discrimination.
Ms Kelly took action after lodging a formal grievance with the company.
The tribunal was heard in Edinburgh in October, but all of her claims have now been dismissed by employment judge Michelle Sutherland.
Ms Kelly said she believes the outcome “fundamentally misunderstands both the law and my case”, as she announced plans to appeal.
In a written judgment published on Wednesday, Ms Sutherland said Leonardo UK’s position was that “one out of 9,500 employees raised a concern about the impact of the policy despite multiple means to do so”.
She found there was no “disadvantage” due to the policy.
More on Scotland
Related Topics:
Ms Sutherland added: “Any fear or privacy impact could be addressed by affected female staff making recourse to the single occupancy facilities.
“Any effect on risk of assault arising from 0.5% of men using the women’s toilets instead of the men’s toilets would not have changed the overall risk profile across toilet facilities generally.
“In the circumstances of this case, the toilet access policy was in the alternative a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.”
The case followed the UK Supreme Court judgment in April which ruled the terms “woman” and “sex” in the 2010 Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
Ms Kelly, people and capability lead for the firm, had told the tribunal she began using a “secret” toilet at her workplace after encountering a transgender colleague in a female bathroom in March 2023.
She said she had first become aware of a transgender person using the female toilets in 2019 but did not raise the issue with the company at the time as she feared being labelled “transphobic” or being put on the “naughty list”.
Ms Kelly said: “I am of course disappointed by the judgment, which I believe fundamentally misunderstands both the law and my case.
“I intend to appeal, and I will ask the EAT (Employment Appeal Tribunal) to consider expediting my appeal as the decision risks further confounding the already widespread misunderstanding and defiance of the Supreme Court’s judgment in For Women Scotland.”
Maya Forstater, chief executive of charity Sex Matters, said: “This judgment interprets the law as transactivists would wish it to be, and is incompatible with the Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland in several places.
“It is incredible that even after the highest court in the land has ruled that the law recognises men and women in terms of biological sex, there are lower courts still trying to see the world in terms of gender identity.”
Leonardo UK acknowledged the tribunal’s judgment.
A spokesperson for the firm added: “We recognise that the process has been demanding for everyone involved and we appreciate the professionalism shown by colleagues who supported the proceedings.
“Our focus now is to ensure that workplace conduct remains respectful and that our facilities’ policies continue to meet legal standards.
“We will review the forthcoming Equality and Human Rights Commission guidance when it is published and will make any adjustments that are required.
“Leonardo remains a supportive and inclusive environment for all employees.”