Ripple secures Dubai license to offer crypto payments in UAE
Blockchain payment provider Ripple received full regulatory approval from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) to offer cross-border crypto payment services in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The company announced on March 13 that it had secured its DFSA license, allowing it to operate in the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC), a UAE free-economic zone with its own tax policies and regulatory framework.
The announcement came almost six months after the company announced its receipt of an in-principle approval of the DFSA license. On Oct. 1, 2024, Ripple revealed that it was working to become licensed by the DFSA as it aimed to roll out its digital asset infrastructure in the UAE.
Enabling blockchain-based global payments for UAE businesses
With this license, Ripple can now provide its global blockchain-based payment solutions to businesses across the UAE. The company said this allows it to cater to financial institutions looking for partners to help them use digital assets in real-world applications.
In a news release sent to Cointelegraph, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the UAE is “well-placed” to benefit from tech and crypto innovation, thanks to its early leadership and supportive environment:
“We are entering an unprecedented period of growth for the crypto industry, driven by greater regulatory clarity around the world and increasing institutional adoption.”
Ripple also reported that it had seen increased demand across the Middle East for cross-border payments. The company said the demand was not limited to crypto-native firms but also came from traditional financial institutions.
Related: UAE to introduce legal framework for DAOs
Ripple becomes the first crypto payment provider in the DIFC
With DFSA approval, Ripple has become the first blockchain-enabled payments provider to operate within DIFC’s free zone, according to DIFC CEO Arif Amiri.
”We are thrilled that Ripple is deepening their commitment to Dubai by securing a DFSA license that makes them the first blockchain-enabled payments provider in DIFC,” he said.
The license allows Ripple to tap into opportunities in the UAE and the broader MENA region, he added.
Magazine: The Sandbox’s Sebastien Borget cringes at the word ‘influencer’: X Hall of Flame
South Korea is likely to end the year without a framework for locally issued stablecoins, amid ongoing disputes over the role of banks in stablecoin issuance.
The country’s central bank, the Bank of Korea (BOK), and other financial regulators have clashed over the extent of banks’ involvement in issuing Korean won-backed stablecoins, delaying a framework widely expected to arrive in late 2025, the Korea JoongAng Daily reported Tuesday.
According to the BOK, a consortium of banks should own at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking regulatory approval in South Korea, while regulators are more open to the involvement of diverse industry players.
“Banks, which are already under regulatory oversight and have extensive experience handling anti-money laundering protocols, are best positioned to serve as majority shareholders in stablecoin issuers,” a BOK official reportedly said.
Banks should play leading role to curb stablecoin risks, BOK says
The central bank said that giving banks a leading role in stablecoin issuance would help mitigate potential risks to financial and foreign exchange stability.
The BOK also warned that allowing non-bank companies to take the lead in issuing stablecoins could undermine existing regulations that bar industrial firms from owning financial institutions, as stablecoins effectively function like deposit-taking instruments by collecting funds from users.
“Allowing non-bank companies to issue stablecoins is essentially equivalent to permitting them to engage in narrow banking — simultaneously issuing currency and providing payment services,” the BOK reportedly wrote in a recent stablecoin study. It added that stablecoins issued by technology firms could also pose monopoly risks.
Three stablecoin bills under review
The Financial Services Commission (FSC) was expected to introduce a regulatory framework for won-backed stablecoins as part of a government bill in October.
According to a report by the local industry publication Bloomingbit, the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee is now reviewing three bills related to stablecoin issuance submitted by ruling and opposition party lawmakers on Monday.
The proposed legislation includes two bills put forward by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) and one from the opposition People Power Party (PPP).
While all three proposed bills stipulate a minimum capital of 5 billion won ($3.4 million) for issuers, some of the disputed areas include whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer interest on holdings.
“While Kim Eun-hye’s bill allows interest payments, Kim Hyun-jung’s bill and Ahn Do-geol’s bill seek to prohibit them,” the report states.
As South Korean lawmakers remain divided over a stablecoin framework, local tech giants such as Naver are accelerating stablecoin-related initiatives amid a potential merger with Dunamu, operator of the major exchange Upbit.
Related: Upbit operator Dunamu posts $165M in profit in Q3, up over 300% YoY
According to local reports, Naver Financial is set to launch a stablecoin wallet next month in collaboration with Hashed and the Busan Digital Exchange.
The BOK’s support for giving banks a leading role in stablecoin issuance aligns with its earlier stance, after Deputy Governor Ryoo Sangdai called for banks to serve as the primary issuers of stablecoins in June 2025.
In July, eight major South Korean banks: KB Kookmin, Shinhan, Woori, Nonghyup, Corporate, Suhyup, Citi Korea and SC First Bank, reportedly teamed up to launch a won-pegged stablecoin in 2026.
Magazine: Bitcoin whale Metaplanet ‘underwater’ but eyeing more BTC: Asia Express
A former policy lawyer at crypto exchange Coinbase is running for attorney general of New York. His bid to represent the crypto industry’s interests runs against a strong Democratic bias and concerns over industry influence in policymaking.
Khurram Dara, who also worked as a regulatory and policy principal at Bain Capital Crypto, announced his campaign on Nov. 21. In a video accompanying his post on X, Dara said he wants to stop the supposed “lawfare” that current Attorney General (AG) Letitia James is waging against the crypto industry.
Dara said that the reportedly unfair treatment of the industry drives up costs for New Yorkers. New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani recently won his election with a focus on cost-of-living issues.
Dara’s campaign faces strong headwinds. James won her last two elections by a wide margin, and there are broader concerns over how much the crypto lobby is influencing policymaking.
Former Coinbase lawyer to oppose AG Letitia James
According to Dara, James’ policies hurt New York’s business climate and drive prices higher.
“When you play politics with the law, when you regulate by enforcement. When you use lawsuits to make policy that increases the cost of doing business, that increases legal and insurance costs; that increases prices, which hurts small businesses, new entrepreneurs and working-class New Yorkers the most,” Dara said in his announcement video.
As AG, Dara would curb the powers of the state’s Martin Act. The statute gives the AG’s office broad powers to investigate and prosecute securities and real estate fraud. Critically, it allows the AG to prosecute these activities “detrimental to the public without requiring proof of intentional or negligent conduct.”
Dara and other critics claim that James has used this act for her own political purposes, rather than as a neutral enforcement tool.
Under James, the AG’s office led enforcement actions against several crypto firms, including Bitfinex and Tether’s parent company, iFinex. The AG sued it for commingling client and corporate funds to cover up $850 million that went missing. Her office also secured $50 million for investors who were defrauded in Gemini’s Earn program.
Crucially for the cryptocurrency industry, Dara wants to reexamine the BitLicense, the state’s regulatory regime for companies involved in digital assets. BitLicense holds stricter standards for reporting, licensing and compliance than other states. Dara and other critics claim that these rules have driven crypto companies from the city. In his announcement video, Dara called the BitLicense “unlawful.”
But Dara faces an uphill battle. He’s running as a Republican in a state that hasn’t seen a Republican AG in nearly 30 years. Dennis Vacco, the last Republican to hold the office, lost to Eliot Spitzer in 1998.
In 2018, when James was first elected to the office, she defeated her opponent, Keith Wofford, by almost 20 percentage points. The gap narrowed in 2022, but she still won out over Republican Michael Henry 54.6% to 45.37%.
Historical tendencies aside, overall approval of Republicans has been dropping nationwide, and New York City, a crucial metropolitan area to secure for an AG candidate, just voted for a progressive Democratic mayor, Zohran Mamdani.
Recent: What Mamdani’s mayoral win means for crypto in New York
Dara’s challenge also comes at a time when the interests of the crypto lobby are increasingly represented in politics, with some of its most notable actors becoming overtly political.
Crypto gets more involved in politics
The crypto lobby played a big role in the 2024 federal elections, donating nearly $250 million to campaigns for offices around the country.
Since then, the industry’s interests have become well-represented in Washington. Landmark legislation like the GENIUS Act, which regulates stablecoins, has passed. The industry is also pushing hard for Congress to pass the CLARITY/Responsible Financial Innovation Act by year’s end.
Lobbies are ubiquitous in Washington; crypto is no exception. Crypto lobbying operates with breakneck speed, which has raised concerns over regulatory capture — i.e., when a regulatory body or agency serving the public interest is controlled by the industry that it is supposed to regulate.
US President Donald Trump started his term at the beginning of the year, nominating people with strong ties to the crypto industry to important posts and crucial regulatory agencies. He has also pardoned high-profile crypto executives like former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, as well as four BitMEX executives, including Arthur Hayes.
Related: Trump’s crypto pardons raise ethics and corruption concerns
Fundraising has also increased apace. Gemini founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss have shelled out tens of millions of dollars this year alone. Their funding has become partisan, with millions going to organizations fighting to keep the Republicans’ slim majority in Congress.
This tendency has some in the industry concerned that, when the partisan pendulum eventually swings back in the Democratic direction, a Republican-aligned crypto industry could find itself in a precarious political situation.
Crypto-friendly Democratic Representative Sam Liccardo told Politico in early October, “I don’t think anybody in this town would recommend that an industry put their eggs in one party’s basket.”
How the crypto connection, complete with its growing political connections, will affect Dara’s campaign remains to be seen. His campaign is still in its early days; it doesn’t appear to have a website, just a donation link with a campaign logo, which resembles the logo Mamdani used in his mayoral race.
Mamdani’s lack of position on crypto didn’t appear to affect his popularity with voters. Nor did ex-Governor Andrew Cuomo’s last-minute crypto Hail Mary help him secure the lead. There’s a good chance New Yorkers’ choice will boil down to other pressing issues.
Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies: What the hell is PeerDAS?
Banking giant JPMorgan Chase’s decision to cut ties with the CEO of Bitcoin payments company Strike is reigniting concerns about a renewed wave of US “debanking,” an issue that haunted the crypto industry during the 2023 banking turmoil.
Jack Mallers, CEO of the Bitcoin (BTC) Lightning Network payments company Strike, said Sunday on X that JPMorgan closed his personal accounts without explanation.
“Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase threw me out of the bank,” Mallers wrote. “Every time I asked them why, they said the same thing: We aren’t allowed to tell you.”
Cointelegraph has contacted JPMorgan Chase for comment.
The decision has stirred fears of Operation Chokepoint 2.0, a term critics use to describe alleged government pressure on banks to sever relationships with crypto companies.
“Operation Chokepoint 2.0 regrettably lives on,” said US Senator Cynthia Lummis in a Monday X post. Actions like JP Morgan’s “undermine the confidence in traditional banking” while sending the digital asset industry overseas, she said, adding:
“It’s past time we put Operation Chokepoint 2.0 to rest to make America the digital asset capital of the world.”
Other crypto founders, including Caitlin Long of Custodia Bank, said the debanking efforts targeting crypto may persist until January 2026, pending the appointment of a new Federal Reserve governor.
Related: Fed mulls ‘skinny’ payment accounts to open rails for fintech, crypto companies
“Trump won’t have the ability to appoint a new Fed governor until January. So, therefore, you can see the breadcrumbs leading up to a potentially big fight,” Long said during Cointelegraph’s Chainreaction daily X show on March 21.
Long’s Custodia Bank was repeatedly targeted by US debanking efforts, which cost the company months of work and “a couple of million dollars,” she said.
The collapse of crypto-friendly banks in early 2023 sparked the first allegations of Operation Chokepoint 2.0, during which at least 30 technology and cryptocurrency founders were reportedly denied access to banking services under the administration of former President Joe Biden.
In August 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order related to debanking, aiming to prevent banks from cutting off services to politically unfavorable industries, including the cryptocurrency sector.
Related: $1.9B exodus and flicker of hope hits crypto investment funds: CoinShares
Lummis accuses FDIC of destroying records
Debanking concerns took another turn in January, when Lummis’s office was contacted by an anonymous whistleblower, alleging that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was “destroying material” related to Operation Chokepoint 2.0.
“The FDIC’s alleged efforts to destroy and conceal materials from the U.S. Senate related to Operation Chokepoint 2.0 is not only unacceptable, it is illegal,” said Lummis in a letter published on Jan. 16, threatening “swift criminal referrals” if the wrongdoing was uncovered.
Traditional financial institutions have long criticized crypto firms for enabling illicit finance. But US banks have themselves paid more than $200 billion in fines over the past two decades for compliance failures, according to data compiled by Better Markets and the Financial Times.
Bank of America reportedly accounted for about $82.9 billion of those penalties, while JPMorgan Chase paid more than $40 billion.
Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment3 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024