Connect with us

Published

on

Donald Trump has said he thinks the US will annex Greenland, days after the country’s incoming prime minister said: “We don’t want to be Americans.”

During an Oval Office meeting with NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, the US president was asked about his hopes to annex Greenland.

“I think that will happen,” he said. “I didn’t give it much thought before, but I’m sitting with a man who could be very instrumental.

“You know Mark, we need that for international security. We have a lot of our favourite players cruising around the coast and we have to be careful.”

Donald Trump and NATO secretary general Mark Rutte. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump and NATO secretary general Mark Rutte. Pic: Reuters

Mr Trump questioned Denmark’s claim to the autonomous territory, saying Denmark was “very far away” from Greenland despite being part of the country’s kingdom.

“A boat landed there 200 years ago or something. They say they have rights to it,” Mr Trump said. “I don’t know if that’s true. I don’t think it is, actually.”

He said the US already has a military presence in Greenland and added: “Maybe you’ll see more and more soldiers going there.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why Greenland’s election result is a blow to Trump

It comes after Greenland’s centre-right party won an election in a result seen as a rejection of Mr Trump’s interference in the island’s politics.

Greenland. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Greenland. Pic: Reuters

The Demokraatit party favours a slow move towards independence from Denmark – with its leader Jens-Frederik Nielsen telling Sky News on the eve of the election “we want to build our own country by ourselves”.

In his White House news briefing Mr Trump claimed the election result was very good for the US and said “the person who did the best is a very good person as far as we’re concerned”.

He previously promised “billions of dollars” in investment and told Greenlanders he would “make you rich”.

Mr Trump also reacted to Vladimir Putin’s remarks about Russia agreeing to an end in fighting in Ukraine, but adding “lots of questions” remain over proposals for a 30-day ceasefire.

The US president said his Russian counterpart’s statement was not complete and reiterated his willingness to talk to him, adding: “Hopefully Russia will do the right thing.”

Continue Reading

World

Russia sticks to red lines on 30-day Ukraine ceasefire plan – as Zelenskyy attacks ‘manipulative’ Putin

Published

on

By

Russia sticks to red lines on 30-day Ukraine ceasefire plan - as Zelenskyy attacks 'manipulative' Putin

Vladimir Putin has said Russia agrees to an end to fighting in Ukraine, but “lots of questions” remain over proposals for a 30-day ceasefire.

Casting doubt over whether a deal can be agreed, the Russian president said a ceasefire must lead to “long-term peace” which “would remove the initial reasons for the crisis”.

Russia has previously said it would not accept Ukraine joining NATO and European peacekeepers in Ukraine.

Moscow has reportedly also presented a “list of demands” to the US to end the war, which would include international recognition of Russia’s claim to Crimea and four Ukrainian provinces.

Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Mr Putin’s remarks were “very predictable” and “very manipulative”, adding that the Russian president was preparing to reject the ceasefire proposal he agreed with the US.

Mr Putin’s comments came as Donald Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff arrived in Moscow ahead of talks over Ukraine with the Russian president.

Vladimir Putin. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Vladimir Putin. Pic: Reuters

Ukraine war latest updates

Speaking on Thursday afternoon, Mr Putin described the situation in Russia’s Kursk region, where Ukrainian troops have pushed into Moscow’s territory, as “completely under our control”.

It appeared the US had persuaded Ukraine to accept the ceasefire, he said, but Ukraine is also interested because of the battlefield situation, with its forces in Kursk fully blocked in the coming days.

“In these conditions, I believe it would be good for the Ukrainian side to secure a ceasefire for at least 30 days,” he said.

He also said there would need to be a mechanism to control possible breaches of the truce.

Another issue he raised was whether Ukraine could use the 30-day ceasefire to continue to mobilise and rearm.

He said he would need to speak to Mr Trump over the terms of any ceasefire.

Moscow’s maximalist position hasn’t changed

Vladimir Putin was never going to flat out reject the US proposal for a ceasefire, but he also wasn’t going to fully endorse it either. Russia’s agreement, as expected, comes with several strings attached.

The Kremlin leader didn’t specify Moscow’s demands but he did allude to them by saying that any peace deal had to eliminate the “root causes” of the conflict.

It’s become a frequent refrain of his, and shows that Moscow’s maximalist position hasn’t changed.

By “root causes”, the Russian president is referring to NATO’s eastward expansion, which he blames as the catalyst for the war in Ukraine.

It’s a very clear indication his agreement to a ceasefire relies on getting some kind of security guarantees of his own, for example a promise Ukraine will never join NATO, or that there’ll never be any European peacekeeping forces from NATO members based in the country in the future.

He also articulated why Moscow is reluctant to agree to an immediate truce, talking at length about his forces’ advances in Kursk region. Ukraine’s incursion there has been humiliating for the Kremlin, but their expulsion is finally within reach.

Mr Putin doesn’t want that opportunity to slip away. By pausing Russia’s offensive, he fears they’ll lose the advantage and give the enemy time to regroup.

Mr Putin was, however, careful to thank Donald Trump for his efforts in trying to reach a peace agreement, perhaps wary of any backlash from the White House. But despite that, he still doesn’t appear to be showing any sign of compromise.

Mr Putin was speaking alongside Belarus’s President Alexander Lukashenko and the pair said in a joint statement that NATO’s actions regarding the war in Ukraine were fraught with the risk of nuclear conflict.

The two countries also criticised the European Union’s policy towards Russia, labelling it aggressive and confrontational.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will Russia go for ceasefire deal?

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 has left thousands of people dead and injured, millions displaced and towns and cities reduced to rubble.

Moscow’s forces have been advancing since the middle of last year and now control nearly a fifth of Ukraine’s territory.

In his speech Mr Putin said Russian forces were pushing forwards along the entire frontline.

Responding to the comments, Mr Zelenskyy said: “Putin, of course, is afraid to say directly to President Trump that he wants to continue this war, he wants to kill Ukrainians.”

He said Mr Putin’s words were “just another Russian manipulation”.

Donald Trump and NATO secretary general Mark Rutte. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Donald Trump and NATO secretary general Mark Rutte. Pic: Reuters

Mr Trump also responded to the remarks, saying Mr Putin’s statement was not complete and reiterated his willingness to talk to the Russian president, adding: “Hopefully Russia will do the right thing.”

In a news conference with NATO secretary general Mark Rutte, the US president shifted his tone on the alliance, saying it was “stepping up” and praising Mr Rutte for doing “some really good work”.

Mr Rutte said NATO members needed to produce more weapons, stating the alliance was not doing enough and was lagging behind Russia and China.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin visits Kursk in camo after Ukrainian attack

It comes after Mr Putin donned a camouflage uniform to visit a command post in the Kursk region on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

World

Israel accused of ‘genocidal acts’ against Palestinians during Gaza war in United Nations report

Published

on

By

Israel accused of 'genocidal acts' against Palestinians during Gaza war in United Nations report

Israel has been accused of carrying out “genocidal acts” against Palestinians during the Gaza conflict in a United Nations report.

It alleges a broad range of violations perpetrated against Palestinian women, men, girls and boys since 7 October 2023 – which Israel has denied and rejected.

“Israeli authorities have destroyed in part the reproductive capacity of the Palestinians in Gaza as a group,” said the report by the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel.

It alleges this was done by systematically destroying women’s healthcare facilities during the war in Gaza, and by “imposing measures intended to prevent births” – one of the categories of genocidal acts in the Rome Statute and the Genocide Convention.

In addition, a surge in maternity deaths due to restricted access to medical supplies amounted to the crime against humanity of extermination, it said.

The report said: “Hundreds of Palestinian men and boys have been photographed and filmed in humiliating and degrading circumstances while subjected to acts of a sexual nature, including forced public nudity and stripping, full or partial.”

“Male detainees were subjected to attacks targeting their sexual and reproductive organs, including violence to their genitals…,” it added.

The commission alleged these and other forms of “sexualised torture” are “committed with either explicit orders or an implicit encouragement by the top civilian and military leadership”.

“The evidence collected by the commission reveals a deplorable increase in sexual and gender-based violence,” said its chair Navi Pillay.

“There is no escape from the conclusion that Israel has employed sexual and gender-based violence against Palestinians to terrorise them and perpetuate a system of oppression that undermines their right to self-determination.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the report’s findings, saying they were biased and antisemitic.

“Instead of focusing on the crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation… the United Nations once again chooses to attack the state of Israel with false accusations,” he said in a statement.

Israel’s permanent mission to the UN in Geneva also refuted the allegations as unfounded, biased, and lacking credibility.

“The IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) has concrete directives… and policies which unequivocally prohibit such misconduct,” it said in a statement, adding its review processes are in line with international standards.

Read more:
Palestinian officials accuse Israel of killings during ceasefire
Trump envoy: Hamas has not been forthright in US talks
The competing plans for rebuilding Gaza after the war

A previous report by the commission in June last year accused Hamas and other Palestinian armed militant groups of serious rights violations in its 7 October 2023 multi-pronged surprise attack on southern Israel, including torture and degrading treatment.

Israel is party to the Genocide Convention and was ordered in January 2024 by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to take action to prevent acts of genocide during its war against Hamas.

South Africa has brought a genocide case against Israel’s actions in Gaza at the ICJ.

Read more from Sky News:
Russia’s ‘three demands for truce’
Impact of world’s biggest iceberg
Ex-cricketer guilty over drug deal

Israel is not party to the Rome Statute, which gives the International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction to rule on individual criminal cases involving genocide and crimes against humanity.

Arrest warrants for Mr Netanyahu, former defence secretary Yoav Gallant – and senior Hamas commander Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al Masri – were issued by the ICC in November over alleged war crimes.

Continue Reading

World

The waters once ran red with whale blood – now South Georgia is a conservation success story

Published

on

By

The waters once ran red with whale blood - now South Georgia is a conservation success story

Technically, the hundred-mile-long, 20 mile-wide British overseas territory of South Georgia is uninhabited.

Only a few visiting scientists and government fisheries inspectors occupy the island all year round.

But from a wildlife perspective, it’s anything but.

Its shores are home to the largest number of marine birds and mammals on the planet.

The impact of the world’s biggest iceberg

Lying 800 miles east off the Falkland Islands and a thousand miles north of Antarctica, it’s one of the few fragments of land between that vast frozen continent and the rest of the world.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How big is the world’s largest iceberg compared to London?

The part of the South Atlantic in which it sits is one of the most food-rich oceans in the world, fed by powerful circulating currents, and it’s full of shrimp-like Antarctic krill.

“Krill feeds the blue whales, humpback whales, fin whales. It also feeds the gentoo penguins, macaroni penguins, chinstrap penguins and the fur seals,” says Martin Collins, a scientist with the British Antarctic Survey, and former head of the South Georgia government, speaking to me from his office at King Edward Point on the island.

The island also has some of the largest and most significant populations of elephant seals, king penguins and several species of albatross and petrel – the hardiest of ocean-going seabirds.

The island has been in the headlines after the world’s largest iceberg, A23a, ran aground off its south-west coast.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky News to fly over world’s biggest iceberg

Concern over impact of iceberg on island’s wildlife

There’s a concern it could impact wildlife on the island – but the timing is fortuitous, says Mr Collins.

“It’s the end of the breeding season now, which means the impacts on penguins at that part of the island will be lessened.

“There may be a little bit of impact, particularly on gentoo penguins, which still forage around the island during the winter.”

From a wider conservation point of view, South Georgia is one of the world’s stand-out success stories.

Gentoo penguins. Picture submitted by Tom Clarke
Image:
Gentoo penguins are part of the island’s rich wildlife

Until the 1960s, it was a major hub for whaling. Thousands of whales were caught off its coasts and processed at a number of whaling stations – the scale of the slaughter such that the bays around the island were red with whale blood.

The whalers introduced reindeer for food that nibbled and trampled unique plant life that sustained many of the island’s endemic wildlife.

Stowaway rats plundered the eggs and chicks of penguins and other ground nesting birds (there are no trees).

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

World’s largest iceberg on collision course with South Georgia

Whales returning in large numbers

The South Georgia pipit, the world’s most southerly songbird, was driven to the brink of extinction.

But before the abandoned whaling stations have even rusted away, whales have begun returning to South Georgia in large numbers.

A campaign of air-dropping poisoned bait across the inaccessible island has eradicated the rats and the pipits are booming.

The seas around South Georgia were once heavily fished. The worst for wildlife were long-line vessels trying to hook high-value Chilean seabass.

EMBARGOED TO 0001 SATURDAY APRIL 25 Undated handout photo issued by the WWF of Macaroni penguins at Hercules Bay, South Georgia Sub-Antarctic. Scientists used tracking data from five types of penguin and 12 other species of predator to find the richest feeding grounds in the Southern Ocean.

MIME type:
image/jpeg
Width:
2490
Height:
3772
Copyright holder:
PA PICTURE DESK
Copyright notice:
PA Media
Usage terms:
PICTURE DESK USE ONLY. NO SALES
Picture by:
Image:
File pic: PA

Call for outright ban on fishing

Albatross and petrels would dive for the bait and be caught and drowned.

Since 2012, the government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands have policed a 500,000 square-mile marine-protected area around the islands where most fishing is now banned.

A few vessels are licensed to catch shrimp-like krill and seabass but only in winter when most predators are absent and under strict controls.

Some conservationists are calling for fishing to be banned outright.

However, the South Georgia government argues it’s the income from limited fishing licences that allows them to protect and monitor the exclusion zone.

Crucial at a time when funding from central government is scarce and unlikely to increase.

The key threat now is the rapidly changing climate around South Georgia.

“There’s evidence that the distribution of krill is moving a little further south gradually over time,” says Mr Collins.

“We need to be really mindful of that changing climate.”

But he’s optimistic too. Despite warmer oceans, numbers of some species are booming. Especially whales and fur seals.

“I’ve just had two king penguins walking past the windows as we were talking,” he says.

“When I first came here in the late 1990s, there were no fur seals in this area at all. And now they’re everywhere around us”.

Continue Reading

Trending