Connect with us

Published

on

Labour MPs and officials briefing against work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall should “shut up”, Harriet Harman has said.

The Labour peer told Beth Rigby on Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast Labour needed to “pull together” rather than descend into infighting.

Ms Kendall said on Thursday she was “determined to fix the broken benefits system” ahead of announcing “radical welfare reforms” next week.

Ministers have been priming Labour MPs and the public for cuts to a ballooning welfare bill since the start of the year.

Image:
Baroness Harriet Harman said people criticising Liz Kendall should ‘shut up’

Asked what she thought of briefings against Ms Kendall as welfare cuts loom, Baroness Harman said: “I hate those sorts of briefings.

“I don’t think anybody should be briefing against Labour ministers who are trying to implement the manifesto.

“You know, she is incredibly competent and leads a really dedicated team. So I think they should just shut up and pull together.”

More on Benefits

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall. Pic: PA
Image:
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall. Pic: PA

More and more Labour MPs have publicly criticised the impending benefit cuts, with many concerned they will hit people with disabilities the most.

Downing Street has taken the unusual step of calling all 404 Labour MPs into Number 10 over Wednesday and Thursday for briefings on the changes ahead of the details being released next week.

Baroness Harman said she thinks Ms Kendall is a “rising star” and is “absolutely certain” the PM and chancellor will stand behind her.

Read more:
What welfare cuts could be announced?

Labour MPs criticise benefit cuts

The peer was social security secretary – the equivalent of Ms Kendall’s job now – at the start of Tony Blair’s first term after Labour’s 1997 landslide win.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Government’s plan to cut welfare is terrifying’

She was forced to defend benefit cuts just after they came to power and said there are “lots of parallels between what we were trying to do then, and what the government is trying to do now”.

However, she said the difference is, in 1997 she was making the argument for welfare cuts to help single parents into work by herself, but Ms Kendall is being backed by Rachel Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer.

Never miss an episode of Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts.

Continue Reading

Politics

What’s behind Starmer’s reset?

Published

on

By

What's behind Starmer's reset?

👉Listen to Politics At Sam And Anne’s on your podcast app👈       

As MPs return to Westminster for a packed autumn term, will the prime minister be back with a bang?

Sky News’ Sam Coates and Politico’s Anne McElvoy discuss Keir Starmer’s priorities as the so-called “reset week” begins.

There’s chatter around No 10 of a staffing restructure but could this impact the government’s message and delivery of its missions?

Back in the Commons, the home secretary will lay out the government’s plans to restrict family members from joining asylum seekers.

Continue Reading

Politics

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

Published

on

By

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

What to expect with US crypto policy as Congress comes back in session

According to some Republican lawmakers, the first crypto-related priority in the Senate will be to pass legislation for market structure.

Continue Reading

Politics

Sir Keir Starmer’s ‘Mr Fixit’ is likely to be a recipe for conflict

Published

on

By

Sir Keir Starmer's 'Mr Fixit' is likely to be a recipe for conflict

After a torrid time before the summer break, Sir Keir Starmer has reshuffled his inner circle again on the first day back. 

This has become something of a habit.

Politics latest: Cooper pledges to end use of asylum hotels ‘for good’

Although none of the Number 10 team are household names or public figures, the tally of those cycling through the top jobs is worth noting.

As of now, he’s had four chiefs of staff – the incumbent returning to the job, two cabinet secretaries with a third rumoured to be on the way and five directors of communications – a job that routinely fails to last a year these days.

The lesson this tells us is that when there’s blame to go around, Sir Keir is happy to apportion it to his closest aides.

In an interview today, the prime minister was clear that these changes are about moving to a new phase of government, more focused on delivery.

More on Keir Starmer

A delivery phase implies legislation completed and a focus on implementation. Bluntly, this is not the case or an accurate assessment of the job that now needs to be done.

The autumn term is not about implementation.

It’s about filling the £20bn to £40bn black hole we expect to emerge in the autumn budget, as well as continuing to deal with an uncertain world globally, and deciding on massively tricky domestic issues like reform of special educational needs and whether to revisit welfare reform.

We are still at the “big choices” section of this parliament, not the delivery phase.

The big choice in Sir Keir’s reset on Monday has been to bring in his own Mr Fixit into Downing Street.

He chose a mid-level cabinet minister, Darren Jones – until today the number two in the Treasury – and has parachuted him into his office to oversee policy.

This is an appointment, I’m told, that was pushed and encouraged by Rachel Reeves because of Mr Jones’ role in the spending review.

As chief secretary, Mr Jones is meant to have gone item by item through every department’s budget. He knows where the financial bodies are buried and will be a major alternate source of advice for Sir Keir to individual cabinet ministers.

Read more:
Angela Rayner a ‘great British success story’, says PM
Reform deputy hits back after Archbishop’s intervention

This is undoubtedly a recipe for conflict. There are already some around the cabinet table who found Mr Jones’ style a touch brusque. His fans say this is part of why he is effective: he is prepared to challenge what he’s told, is an independent thinker and unafraid to challenge big beasts.

He will now play this role permanently, on behalf of the prime minister, and structurally, this means he is bound to be disliked by several of these colleagues who will no doubt, in time, seek to undermine him, just as he will challenge them and have the last word with Sir Keir.

No matter that some might be surprised at the choice, as a fiscal and reforming hawk, since few would put him on the same ideological wing of the party as the prime minister. He is also a late joiner to the Starmer project, although joining in opposition spent years longer than some as chair of the business select committee rather than taking more junior roles.

This is now immaterial. He is responsible for making Sir Keir’s government work in practice. His colleagues could do worse than to sincerely wish him good luck and leave him to it, as there is a great deal to be done.

Continue Reading

Trending