Connect with us

Published

on

Experienced astronauts Sunita “Suni” Williams and Commander Barry “Butch” Wilmore arrived at the International Space Station (ISS) in June 2024 thinking it was a routine eight-day stay.

Little did they know they would end up stranded in space for nine months, as the aircraft that brought them there – Boeing’s new Starliner – suffered several technical issues that made it too risky to make the return flight.

They are finally set to head home in the coming days, hitching a ride on a SpaceX aircraft that will land them in Florida.

But why have they been away for so long and what are the effects of such a lengthy stay in space?

How did they get stuck?

Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore blasted off on 5 June in Starliner’s first crewed mission.

The whole point of the mission was to test the spacecraft, which was tipped to be a critical alternative to Space X’s Crew Dragon spacecraft, which is currently the only shuttle for US, European, Canadian and Japanese astronauts to and from the ISS.

They arrived safely, but the space capsule had five helium leaks, five dead manoeuvring thrusters and a propellant valve that failed to close completely.

More on Nasa

In the following weeks, Boeing and NASA conducted a series of tests both in space and on the ground, using a Starliner replica, to try and fix the problems the aircraft faced.

Even as late as August, Boeing insisted it was confident the Starliner, which was developed on a reported $5bn NASA contract, could safely bring back the astronauts.

But both NASA and Boeing eventually deemed it too risky, so the Starliner returned to Earth unmanned last September, leaving Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore behind at the ISS.

They are not alone, as NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut Alexander Gorbunov joined them at the ISS in September.

How are they getting back – and why has it taken so long?

Mr Hague and Mr Gorbunov arrived in a SpaceX Dragon capsule with four seats, two for them and two extras to accommodate Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore on the journey home.

They are set to depart the ISS on an SpaceX craft and return to Earth, splashing down off Florida’s coast, where a recovery vessel will pick up the crew before they are helicoptered back to shore.

But they did not come just to grab the stranded pair and bring them home.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Astronauts show off Thanksgiving feast in November

Their trip was planned before Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore got stuck, as part of NASA’s SpaceX Crew 9 mission, aimed at carrying out science experiments and tech demonstrations aboard the ISS.

Crew 9, originally made up of four astronauts, was cut in half to make room for Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore on the return flight. But instead of bringing them home straight away, the pair agreed to join Crew 9’s six-month mission, taking them to February.

Then, in December, their scheduled February return was pushed back once more because of problems with the SpaceX rocket that was going to bring them back.

Now the four aboard the ISS are waiting for a new crew of four – NASA’s SpaceX Crew-10 – to come and take their places before leaving in a different SpaceX craft.

Crew 10 are now on their way and, if all goes to plan, there will be a brief handover period between the crews before Ms Williams, Mr Wilmore, Mr Hague and Mr Gorbunov head home.

Trump and Musk claim they have been ‘left’ there

Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore have missed an awful lot on Earth during their time away – including Donald Trump’s historic election win over Kamala Harris.

It means the pair left Joe Biden’s America and return amid Mr Trump’s second term.

That has prompted the president to claim his predecessor “left” the astronauts stranded in space, while his chief enforcer Elon Musk – who owns SpaceX – similarly said they were “left up there for political reasons”.

As stated previously, a rescue mission has never been sent for Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore; instead, they have joined another mission.

But Mr Musk has been challenged on this assertion, particularly by famed astronaut Andreas Mogensen, who accused him of lying.

Responding to the claims on social media, Mr Mogensen said to Mr Musk: “You know as well as I do, that Butch and Suni are returning with Crew-9, as has been the plan since last September.

“Even now, you are not sending up a rescue ship to bring them home. They are returning on the Dragon capsule that has been on ISS since last September.”

Mr Musk doubled down, writing: “SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago.

“I OFFERED THIS DIRECTLY to the Biden administration and they refused. Return WAS pushed back for political reasons. Idiot.”

In a news conference from space, Mr Wilmore, 62, responded to the comments by saying that politics did not play a part in his and Ms Williams’ return date.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Astronauts talk voting from space ahead of US election last year

What are the physical effects of space travel?

Human beings have been through millions of years of evolution to become perfectly adapted to life on Earth, so spending time in space – with no gravity, no sunlight and different levels of radiation – poses a real challenge physically.

These are the main hazards astronauts face in space:

Space radiation – Astronauts are exposed to high-energy radiation in space, unlike on Earth, where the atmosphere and planetary magnetic field provide a shield against it.

This can lead to DNA damage, increased cancer risk, neurodegenerative effects, cardiovascular issues and immune system dysregulation, experts say.

The good news for those aboard the ISS is Earth’s magnetosphere – the region of space dominated by the planetary magnetic field – provides some protection, as they are fairly nearby, being 250 miles away.

It’s when astronauts travel beyond that – such as on missions to the moon, which is roughly 238,855 miles away – where astronauts experience much higher radiation doses.

Effects of microgravity – Floating around the space station may look like a lot of fun, but gravity plays a critical role in regulating bodily functions, and its absence has negative impacts on human health, according to experts.

With their bodies not being engaged by the same forces they are used to on Earth, this can have two particularly concerning effects on astronauts.

Firstly, they are known to lose bone density, meaning bones get weaker and more brittle.

For every month in space, astronauts’ weight-bearing bones become roughly 1% less dense if precautions aren’t taken, according to NASA.

They also experience muscle atrophy, the wasting or thinning of muscle tissue, during their time in space.

Both bone density and muscle atrophy tend to occur on Earth from normal aging, an inactive lifestyle and illnesses, and they can cause serious injuries due to falls, osteoporosis, or lead to other medical problems.

The lack of gravity also makes bodily fluids shift upward, leading to facial swelling and increased intracranial pressure, which can affect vision.

Headaches are also widely reported for people in space. A study published last year found 22 out of 24 surveyed astronauts who travelled in space for up to 26 weeks experienced them frequently while away from Earth.

What are the psychological effects?

Living in confined and isolated spaces, with limited social interaction, is known to impact peoples’ mental health, and these are the conditions astronauts accept when they leave Earth.

It can lead astronauts to experience stress, sleep disturbance, cognitive performance declines and mood disorders, according to Afshin Beheshti, director of the Centre for Space Biomedicine at the University of Pittsburgh.

Being away from friends and family also inevitably impacts astronauts, especially given how far away they are from home.

Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams have regularly talked about missing their loved ones during news conferences on the ISS, saying they can’t wait to get back to them.

Are there long-term effects of space travel?

Data is hard to come by, because only around 700 people have ever been to space.

But studies so far suggest most astronauts who spend a while in space recover from most of its biological effects in proportion to how long they spend away.

If they were in space for five months, for example, it would take roughly the same amount of time to fully recover from most of space’s effects.

Some issues can persist, however.

Research published in 2022 documented bone loss in 17 ISS astronauts in missions averaging about five-and-a-half months.

It showed that a year after returning, the astronauts on average exhibited 2.1% reduced bone density of the tibia – one of the bones of the lower leg – and 1.3% reduced bone strength.

Some astronauts can have lasting impairment to their eyesight due to microgravity-induced fluid shifts and changes in intracranial pressure affecting the eyes, research suggests.

It’s often due to a condition known as Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS).

For those who only partake in short-term missions lasting a few days in low-Earth orbit, about 95% of all biological damage sustained appears to be reversed upon return.

NASA astronaut Frank Rubio, who came back from a 371-day space trip in 2023, shed some light on how astronauts reintegrate themselves after a long time away.

Similarly to Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore, Mr Rubio’s six-month mission ended up taking over a year after the capsule that was supposed to bring him home was damaged.

Nearly four months after getting back, the American told Time Magazine: “The first two or three months after your return is really focused on [recovery], just kind of reincorporating yourself into Earth, your family, and then also rehabilitating your body.

“You adapt incredibly quickly to being in space, but then unfortunately, the readaptation process back to earth can sometimes be a little bit longer and more difficult.

“And that’s just, I think, because the forces of gravity and the forces at play here on Earth tend to have a stronger effect on your body.”

What is being done about the negative effects?

Researchers say more data is needed to fully understand the risks of space travel, and hope to be able to eventually map out personalised risk profiles and mitigation strategies for astronauts, considering their health backgrounds and the type of missions they are undertaking.

They say there are gaps in our knowledge of how spaceflight affects people long-term, and its impact – particularly when it comes to serious implications like lung function, cancer risk and cellular damage, is an area of active study.

Scientists also say they lack a comprehensive understanding of how all the aforementioned challenges space poses impact cognitive function, mental health and neuroplasticity – the brain’s ability to change and adapt – over long durations.

But NASA is conducting experiments and research centred around its astronauts all the time, much of it focusing on how to improve the space experience and prevent as many side effects as possible.

For example, it’s developing new radiation detectors to monitor how exposed crews are, and advanced materials to improve radiation shielding for future missions.

There is also unique exercise equipment on the ISS to help counter the effects of microgravity, and a lot of research focuses on determining the right combination of diet, exercise, and medication to keep astronauts healthy during missions and when they return to Earth.

NASA also studies people in isolated and confined environments to investigate how they can best protect astronauts from mental health challenges, and it regularly assesses staff.

All experiments and research regarding astronauts are aimed at countering potential health issues for current ISS staff, but they are also largely looking ahead to more taxing missions to the moon and eventually Mars, where all of space’s risks will be amplified.

How have the stranded astronauts fared?

Mr Wilmore and Ms Williams may have only expected a brief ISS visit, but in news conferences they have been adamant that they were fully prepared for a longer stay if the mission called for it.

The pair are space veterans, having both been up for two other flights, and have not reported any health concerns.

In November, NASA shared a photo of Ms Williams which sparked some concern over her health, with some members of the public suggesting she looked like she had lost a significant amount of weight.

The 59-year-old responded to the comments during a video interview with the New England Sports Network Clubhouse Kids Show, saying her supposed weight loss was just “rumours”.

She added any changes in her appearance would be down to “fluid shifts” caused by the lack of gravity.

She said she was healthy and that she had weighed herself using NASA’s spring-operated mass measuring device, and weighed the same as when she left Earth.

She added she had gained muscle due to all the exercises she was doing to keep in shape.

“My thighs are a little bit bigger, my butt is a little bit bigger,” she said. “We do a lot of squats.”

The pair have said throughout their stay they are feeling good mentally, insisting they “do not feel like castaways” and do not feel abandoned.

“Eventually we wanna go home,” Ms Williams said in January. “We left our families a little while ago.

“But we have a lot to do up here and we have to get that stuff done before we go.”

She then called the space station her “happy place”.

What have they been doing up there?

First and foremost, they have been living the typical space dweller life, aboard the 356ft-long ISS.

The space station has its own oxygen-generating systems, and about 50% of oxygen exhaled from carbon dioxide is recovered.

As for water, the station has a urine-into-drinking-water recycling system, and a part of that system also captures moisture released into the cabin air from the crew’s breath and sweat.

There’s always plenty of food reserves on board, but supplies have been sent up several times since they docked last year.

You can read more about their day-to-day lives on the ISS – including details like how they sleep and go to the toilet with no gravity – by reading this piece from last year.

But the pair have not spent all their time gazing out at Earth – they have been hard at work, like all astronauts on the space station.

They, along with the rest of Crew 9, have completed more than 900 hours of research between more than 150 “unique scientific experiments and technology demonstrations” during their stay, according to NASA.

Some of the crew’s most notable work has been done off the ISS, with Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore stepping out for a spacewalk together in January to help fix the NICER telescope, which studies neutron stars and other cosmic phenomena.

It was the first spacewalk by NASA astronauts since an aborted one last summer when water leaked into an airlock from the cooling loop in an astronaut’s suit.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Stuck astronauts take first spacewalk together

Here is a summary of some of the other work the crew has undertaken:

  • Helped grow arthrospiramicro-algae on the ISS – organisms that could be used to convert carbon dioxide exhaled by crew members into oxygen
  • Used a new exercise device to track how it can help astronauts counter bone and muscle loss and improve cardiovascular health while in space
  • Studying the spread of flames in microgravity could help improve safety on future missions
  • Part of their mission actually has involved Earth-gazing, as they have added to the collection of millions of photos taken by astronauts of our planet, to help keep a record of how it changes over time.

What we know about the astronauts

Mr Wilmore is a veteran of two previous spaceflights and a former captain in the US Navy.

His first mission to space was in 2009, where he piloted a maintenance flight to the ISS, spending a total of 11 days in space.

Then, from September to November 2014, he served as flight engineer aboard the ISS for Expedition 41 and then as commander of Expedition 42 from November 2014 to March 2015, totalling 167 days in space.

When Mr Wilmore is on this planet, he resides in Tennessee with his wife Deanna and their two daughters, Daryn and Logan.

Ms Williams was made an astronaut by NASA in 1998, having served in the US Navy as a pilot.

Before heading to space, she lived underwater for nine days as part of NASA’s NEEMO mission, which sends groups of astronauts, engineers and scientists to live in Aquarius, the world’s only undersea research station.

Like her Boeing test partner Mr Wilmore, she has had two other ISS missions; one being from December 2006 to June 2007 as a flight engineer, and another from July to November 2012, spending 127 days in space.

NASA says she spends a lot of her time on Earth hiking and camping, and she’s got similar habits in space, too, having completed an impressive eight spacewalks during all her time at the ISS.

She and her husband Michael, who live in Massachusetts, also enjoy hanging out with their dogs, working out, and working on houses, cars and airplanes, according to NASA.

What is the longest anyone has spent in space?

Russian cosmonaut Valeri Polyakov set that record in the mid-1990s, spending 437 days off Earth.

He orbited the Earth more than 7,000 times before returning.

Polyakov had trained as a physician and wanted to demonstrate that the human body could endure extended periods in space.

When landing, Polyakov declined to be carried out of the Soyuz capsule, as is common practice to allow readjustment to the pull of gravity.

Instead, he was helped out of the capsule, and he walked to a nearby transport vehicle himself.

He died in 2022 aged 80. His cause of death was not disclosed.

Continue Reading

US

Meet the ‘moral migrants’ relocating from the West to Russia in search of sanctuary

Published

on

By

Meet the 'moral migrants' relocating from the West to Russia

Imagine moving to a country you’ve never been to before, with a culture you have no knowledge of and with a language you’re unable to speak. You’re with your whole family, including three children. And your new home, not your old one, is at war with its neighbour.

Well, that’s exactly what the Hare family did, who relocated to Russia from the United States two years ago because they felt “persecuted”.

“We were noticing a great upsurge in LGBT-type policies coming into the government, especially the school system,” Leo Hare says.

“This is where we drew a line in the sand,” his wife Chantelle adds. “This is a complete demonic attack against the conservative Christian families.”

The devout Christians, who have three sons aged 17, 15 and 12, describe themselves as “moral migrants”.

I’m chatting to them at their apartment in Ivanovo, a city 150 miles from Moscow. It’s a big change from Texas, where the family lived on a farm and had their own shooting range.

But in a country where so-called “LGBT propaganda” is banned, they say they feel safer than before.

More on Russia

Leo and Chantelle Hare
Image:
Leo and Chantelle Hare

“There are laws that say: ‘no you can’t just run wild and have gay pride parades and dance in front of all the children’. You can’t do this. I like this,” Leo tells me.

The family was granted asylum last year in a ceremony that was covered on state TV. But as unusual as their story may sound, the Hares aren’t the only ones who have turned to Russia in search of sanctuary.

According to the latest figures from Russia’s interior ministry, 2,275 Westerners have applied for a new shared values visa, which was introduced by Vladimir Putin last August.

It’s aimed at those who think the West has become too woke.

Citizens from countries Russia considers unfriendly (which includes Britain, the US and most of the EU) are offered a three-year residency permit without meeting any language requirements or skills criteria.

On the ninth floor of a skyscraper in Moscow’s financial district, a group of adults are holding pens in their mouths and making strange noises.

We’re observing a Russian language class that’s been put on by an expat club to help its members integrate into the local society.

A Russian language class
Image:
A Russian language class

Among those with the bit between their teeth is British national Philip Port from Burnley, Lancashire.

He runs a visa agency for those going in the opposite direction – Russians to the UK – and has been coming to Russia on and off for 20 years. He says he applied for the shared values visa for both practical and ideological reasons.

“I love Russia,” he tells me unapologetically, describing it as “safe as houses”.

“There’s no crime, the streets are clean, it’s well-developed,” he adds.

Philip Port from Burnley
Image:
Philip Port from Burnley

His view of the UK is nowhere near as complimentary.

“I’m all for gay rights, don’t get me wrong, but I think when they’re teaching them to children in school – I’ve got a seven-year-old son, I don’t want him being influenced in that way.”

It’s unclear how many British nationals have migrated to Russia under the shared values visa, but Philip Hutchinson, whose company Moscow Connect helps Westerners apply for the pathway, says he receives between 50 and 80 inquiries a week from the UK.

“There’s a huge amount of people that are frustrated by the way the country’s got in,” he tells me. “Taxes keep going up and up and up. And we’re giving all this money to Ukraine.”

Mr Hutchinson stood as a candidate for the Conservative Party in last year’s local elections in Britain.

He moved to Moscow earlier this year after his Russian wife was unable to obtain a UK visa, bucking a trend that saw most Western expats flee Russia after its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

I ask him if the war bothers him or his clients.

“It doesn’t,” he answers without hesitation. “As far as I’m concerned, I’m not getting involved in that. You know, I’m not here to deal with politics.”

Read more from Sky News:
How is Britain’s immigration system actually changing?
Everything we know about China’s new ‘super embassy’

But is politics at play here?

After arriving in Russia, many of the “ideological immigrants” post slick videos on social media about how wonderful their new life is.

The Hare family was granted asylum last year in a ceremony that was covered on state TV
Image:
The Hare family was granted asylum last year in a ceremony that was covered on state TV

One prominent American blogger called Derek Huffman, who moved to Russia with his family from Arizona, has even joined the Russian army to fight in Ukraine.

It’s the perfect PR for a country that markets itself as a beacon of conservative values, and as the antidote to moribund, Western liberalism. But Russia insists it’s not running a recruitment campaign.

“We don’t give any social security guarantee or any free housing,” says Maria Butina, the Russian lawmaker spearheading the shared values programme.

“People come on their own with their own money, own families, at their own expense.”

Not everyone’s had a positive experience, though. The Hares say they were scammed out of $50,000 (£38,200) by the family who initially put them up when they arrived in Russia.

And their two oldest sons have returned to America, because of problems finding a school. The family weren’t aware that children are required to speak Russian to be eligible for a state education.

So, do they regret moving here?

“Moving so fast? Probably,” Leo admits.

“At times though, your pathway in life takes you places you wouldn’t have willingly gone. But through God and providence, you’re meant to go through this.”

Continue Reading

US

Donald Trump says he would ‘love to see’ Marjorie Taylor Greene return to politics

Published

on

By

Donald Trump says he would 'love to see' Marjorie Taylor Greene return to politics

President Donald Trump says he would “love to see” one-time ally Marjorie Taylor Greene return to politics one day – as the fiery congresswoman reportedly considers a White House run in 2028.

The US leader said “it’s not going to be easy for her” to revive her political career in comments to Sky’s partner network NBC News.

But he added: “I’d love to see that.”

In the meantime, Mr Trump said “she’s got to take a little rest”.

Marjorie Taylor Greene wearing a MAGA cap last year. Pic: AP
Image:
Marjorie Taylor Greene wearing a MAGA cap last year. Pic: AP

Marjorie Taylor Greene – a one-time MAGA ally who has turned into a fierce critic of Mr Trump – unexpectedly announced on Saturday that she would be resigning from Congress.

In a video posted online, the Georgia representative said she did not want her congressional district “to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president we all fought for”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Marjorie Taylor Greene attacks Trump in resignation video

Ms Greene’s resignation followed a falling-out with Mr Trump in recent months, as the congresswoman criticised him for his stance on files related to Jeffrey Epstein, along with foreign policy and health care.

More on Donald Trump

Mr Trump branded her a “traitor” and “lunatic” and said he would endorse a challenger against her when she ran for re-election next year.

She said her last day would be 5 January 2026.

Meanwhile, Time magazine reports that Ms Greene has told allies that she is considering running for president in 2028.

Continue Reading

US

Haunted by Trump deja vu, Ukraine and its allies are in a perilous moment

Published

on

By

Haunted by Trump deja vu, Ukraine and its allies are in a perilous moment

There is a profound sense of deja vu surrounding the Ukraine crisis right now.

It was only a few months ago that European leaders rushed to Washington after Donald Trump appeared to align with Vladimir Putin at their Alaska Summit.

The Europeans gathered in Washington in August and appeared convinced that they had pulled Trump back around to their mindset: that unity and strength, not capitulation, is the answer for Ukraine.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Mark Stone on how Ukraine peace plan came about

Well, this week it is possible (some sources say probable) that European leaders will again head to Washington for another attempt to pull Trump back.

Ukraine live: Trump suggests peace plan ‘not final offer’

Ukraine and its allies head to Geneva

The meeting in Geneva on Sunday is absolutely pivotal.

It was billed initially as a meeting between the Americans and the Ukrainians.

But it has since morphed into a wider meeting with a number of European countries sending senior officials.

The core meeting is still expected to be between US envoy Steve Witkoff and the Ukrainians, but sideline talks will now take place with a much wider group of nations.

Many European leaders have spoken to President Trump on Friday and Saturday and plan to do so again.

I am told Keir Starmer’s conversation with him was “good, short but productive.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: ‘More to do’ on peace plan

Britain’s national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, will be in Geneva.

Over the last nine months, he has emerged as an important British influence on the Trump administration. He is close to Witkoff – who co-wrote or at least signed off on the 28-point plan.

However, the Powell-Witkoff relationship is clearly not close enough to have afforded the UK a heads-up on this latest peace plan.

Kirill Dmitriev and Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Saint Petersburg, Russia, in April. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Kirill Dmitriev and Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Saint Petersburg, Russia, in April. Pic: Reuters

‘Sudden injection’

One source told me that the “sudden injection” by the Americans had “been surprising.”

The American decision to put a rocket under the quest for peace in Ukraine appeared to have vice president JD Vance’s fingerprints on it.

The territorial elements of the peace plan are almost identical to a proposal put forward by Vance in the summer of 2024 before Trump won the election.

Read more:
Trump’s 28-point Ukraine peace plan in full
Battle for frontline towns where Ukraine’s soldiers are surrounded
Starmer reveals Trump peace plan ‘concern’ at G20

Vance’s stance on Ukraine has always leant towards questioning the point of it all. He led the attacks of Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Oval Office in February.

The US secretary of the army, Dan Driscoll, who has taken a lead in the conversions with Ukrainian officials, is a friend and ally of Vance – the two were at Yale together.

Vance has also been leading calls for his own administration to spend more time on “the home front”.

This sudden momentum on Ukraine could be an attempt to draw a line under it quickly in order to focus attention domestically.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: ‘I’d like to get to peace’ in Ukraine

The week ahead

So – things to look out for now: first, the Geneva meeting on Sunday – this is pivotal and will set the tone and the agenda for the days ahead. It is day-by-day at the moment.

Out of the Geneva meeting, a meeting of the European “coalition of the willing” countries will convene.

And following that, a contingent of European leaders heading to Washington seems likely – perhaps on Tuesday.

By Wednesday, America begins to wind down for the biggest holiday of the year – Thanksgiving.

Trump’s deadline for an agreement by Thanksgiving still feels improbable, but it’s not impossible that some sort of memorandum of understanding could be signed by then.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

This would ensure momentum remains in the process and Trump is kept encouraged on progress.

He has suggested that the deadline is movable, and that the deal proposed in the 28-point plan is not the final one.

Notwithstanding all this, there is no question that this moment, for Ukraine and for Europe, is perilous and ominous.

Continue Reading

Trending