The chancellor has insisted that “we do need to get a grip” on the welfare budget, saying the “current system is not working for anyone”.
Rachel Reeves said the “bill for welfare is going up by billions of pounds in the next few years”, and argued the system should “get people into work so that more people can fulfil their potential”.
Her comments come ahead of an expected announcement next week of “radical” reforms to the welfare system, with many fearing drastic cuts to support for the most vulnerable.
Asked by broadcasters on Friday about those fears, the chancellor said: “Well, we’ll set out our plans for welfare reform. But it is absolutely clear that the current system is not working for anyone.
“It is not working for people who need support, it’s not working to get people into work so that more people can fulfil their potential, and it’s not working for the taxpayer when the bill for welfare is going up by billions of pounds in the next few years.
“So we do need to get a grip. We need to spend more on national defence, we need to reform our public services, and we need to reform our broken welfare system.”
More on Benefits
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:05
Welfare system ‘letting people down’
Ms Reeves’s comments come after the work and pensions secretary said the current system has locked “millions” out of work and called it “dysfunctional” as the system places a person in binary categories of either “fit for work” or “not fit for work”.
The government has promised to either reform or replace the Work Capability Assessment – which determines if a person is fit for work or not – as they say it currently drives people who want to work “to a life on benefits”.
Ministers have been priming MPs and the public for cuts to a ballooning welfare bill since the start of the year, with details expected next week ahead of an announcement in the chancellor’s spring statement on 26 March.
Image: Rachel Reeves during a visit Babcock in Rosyth. Pic: PA
The expected welfare cuts
Ms Reeves is expected to announce several billion pounds of spending cuts after losing her £9.9bn headroom since the October budget, with the welfare budget a key target for cuts.
Fiscal headroom is the amount by which government can increase spending or cut taxes without breaking its own fiscal rules.
The welfare cuts are expected to include £5bn in savings by making it harder to qualify for Personal Independent Payments (PIP), which help people with the additional costs of their disability.
PIP payments next year are also expected to be frozen and the basic rate for Universal Credit paid to those searching for work, or in work, is expected to be increased while the rate for those judged as unfit for work will be cut.
The department for work and pensions said new figures show 1.8 million people are now considered too sick to look for work due to a “broken work capability assessment” so are on Universal Credit but getting no support to find work.
It said the number has almost quadrupled since the start of the pandemic when 360,000 were considered too sick to look for work.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:52
‘Government’s plan to cut welfare is terrifying’
Labour MPs concerned about cuts
A growing number of Labour MPs are publicly raising concerns and, in an unusual move, all 404 Labour MPs were asked to attend “welfare roundtables” in Downing Street with the Number 10 policy unit on Wednesday and Thursday.
On Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer faced down Labour MPs unhappy over the rumoured welfare cuts – especially for disabled people.
Richard Burgon pleaded with him to make the “moral” choice, telling the Commons disabled people are “frightened” as he urged the PM to introduce a wealth tax instead of “making the poor and vulnerable pay”.
Sir Keir pledged to “protect those who need protecting”, but later added there is no “bottomless pit”.
He said the Tories “left a broken welfare system, which locks millions out of work, that is indefensible in my view, economically and morally”.
Image: Sir Keir Starmer was asked about the welfare cuts at PMQs
Another Labour MP, John Slinger, urged the PM to reassure the Commons he will “provide compassion to those who can’t work”.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome told the BBC the government should impose a wealth tax instead of “placing that burden on disabled people who have already borne the brunt of 14 years of austerity”.
She added that she “can’t look her mum in the eye and support this”.
Sir Keir Starmer is vowing to fight any challenge to his leadership rather than stand aside, amid claims of plotting by MPs being compared to TV’s The Traitors.
Number 10 is going on the attack ahead of a difficult budget this month, with fears it could prove so unpopular that Labour MPs may move against Sir Keir.
But Sky News political editor Beth Rigby reports the prime minister “has no intention of giving way”, with allies warning any challenge would lead to a “drawn-out leadership election, spook the markets, and create more chaos that further damages the Labour brand”.
One senior figure told Rigby any move against Sir Keir would be more likely to arrive after next May’s elections, rather than the budget.
They said many Labour MPs could probably get behind measures like tax rises for wealthier workers, pensioners and landlords, as well as scrapping the two-child benefit cap, if that’s what the chancellor announces on 26 November.
But there are a series of potentially damaging elections in May, including in London and for the Senedd in Wales, as Labour face a challenge from Reform UK on the right and parties like the Greens and Plaid Cymru on the left.
Rigby said there is a “settled view among some very senior figures in the party that Starmer lacks the charisma and communication skills to take on Nigel Farage and win over the public, particularly if or when he breaks a bunch of manifesto pledges”.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
The Number 10 operation to ward off a challenge comes after Sky News deputy political editor Sam Coates likened the febrile mood in the Labour high command to the TV hit The Traitors.
Speaking on the Politics At Sam And Anne’s podcast, he said: “A minister got in touch at the start of the weekend to say they believe that there’s some quite substantial plotting going on.
“They say there was at least one cabinet minister telling colleagues that Keir Starmer, and I quote, is finished.”
When Boris Johnson was facing mutiny from Conservative MPs, his allies launched “Operation Save Big Dog”.
When Margaret Thatcher was about to be ousted by her rebellious MPs in 1990, she declared: “I fight on, I fight to win.”
And Harold Wilson, constantly paranoid about plots, famously quipped in 1969: “I know what’s going on. I’m going on.”
Boris Johnson was ousted less than six months after “Operation Save Big Dog”, Margaret Thatcher resigned the following morning after saying “I fight on”, and Harold Wilson lost a general election to Edward Heath a year after vowing that he would go on.
Coates said the cabinet minister “absolutely and totally denies they are up to anything nefarious whatsoever”.
“I actually do think that this is all in the style of The Traitors, because I’m not sure that there is hard and fast evidence of plotting – there might be some hints from some quarters,” he added.
“But what seems to be completely logical is that if you’re a bit worried in Number 10, you’re trying to pitch roll and ward off people who are maybe thinking about the need to position themselves by starting to get out rumours of plots and hoping that the political system turns against them for disloyalty.”
Image: Who is plotting to unseat the PM? Pic: PA
Cloak-and-dagger
Reports emerged on Tuesday night in The Times, The Guardian, and from the BBC of a “bunker mode” in Number 10, “regime change”, and “plotting” to replace Sir Keir.
Responding to the reports, Health Secretary Wes Streeting denied he was seeking to oust the prime minister.
A spokesperson for Mr Streeting told Sky News: “These claims are categorically untrue.
“Wes’s focus has entirely been on cutting waiting lists for the first time in 15 years, recruiting 2,500 more GPs and rebuilding the NHS that saved his life.”
Image: It’s not me, insists Wes Streeting. Pic: Reuters
However, there is clearly a co-coordinated campaign by allies of the increasingly unpopular Sir Keir to try to prevent a leadership challenge by a cabinet minister or stalking horse.
Sir Keir’s biographer Tom Baldwin questioned the logic of those briefing from within the corridors of power.
“I’m at a loss to understand why anyone would think this sort of briefing will help Keir Starmer, the government, or even their own cause,” he said on social media. “Some people just can’t resist, I guess, but it’s all a bit nuts.”
What next?
It comes ahead of Prime Minister’s Questions this lunchtime, handing Tory leader Kemi Badenoch the chance to make it an awkward afternoon for Sir Keir.
The health secretary will start his day on Sky News’ Morning With Ridge And Frost and will then speak at an NHS providers’ conference.
Watch and follow live coverage across Sky News – including in the Politics Hub.
Weaker stablecoin rules in the UK could risk financial stability and trigger a credit crunch, according to the Bank of England’s deputy governor, Sarah Breeden.
“We have a different set of risks to manage as we transition to bringing in this new form of money,” Breeden’s told Reuters on Tuesday. Last week, she said that the UK can keep pace with the US on stablecoin regulation.
Crypto industry leaders have criticized the BOE’s stablecoin consultation paper released on Monday, which proposed a relatively strict stance on stablecoin regulation in comparison to the US.
One of the biggest criticisms was the BOE’s decision to retain its controversial stablecoin proposal, which limits stablecoin holdings to 10,000 British pounds ($26,300) for individuals and 10 million British pounds ($13.1 million) for most companies.
Breeden said this would “halve the stress” on banks and credit creation caused by customers withdrawing bank deposits to buy stablecoins. She didn’t state when the measure could potentially be lifted.
Stablecoins have boomed into a $312 billion market in 2025, and nations around the world are looking to follow US President Donald Trump’s signing of the GENIUS Act earlier this year to craft similar legislation that balances industry innovation with consumer protection.
The UK built regulatory momentum from a meeting between UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in September, when the two countries agreed to strengthen their coordination on crypto and stablecoin activities.
The UK’s top bank also proposed measures on stablecoin issuers, requiring them to hold 40% of the assets backing their tokens with the BOE without earning interest.
Breeden said the proposal was grounded, pointing to Circle’s USDC (USDC) temporary depeg in March 2023 when around $3.3 billion of its reserves were held at the now-collapsed Silicon Valley Bank.
The BOE stated that it is open to further feedback and plans to finalize its regime next year.
It intends to regulate stablecoins used for daily payments, while the Financial Conduct Authority would regulate stablecoins used in crypto trading.
Meanwhile, Coinbase and one of the UK’s most prominent stablecoin companies, BVNK, agreed to part ways on a $2 billion deal on Tuesday, which could have boosted stablecoin adoption in the UK.
Michael Selig, currently serving as chief counsel for the crypto task force at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, will face questioning from senators next week in a hearing to consider his nomination as the chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
On Tuesday, the US Senate Agriculture Committee updated its calendar to include Selig’s nomination hearing on Nov. 19. The notice came about two weeks after the SEC official confirmed on social media that he was US President Donald Trump’s next pick to chair the agency following the removal of Brian Quintenz.
Hearings for Quintenz, whom Trump nominated in February, were put on hold in July amid reports that Gemini co-founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss were pushing another candidate. Quintenz later released private texts between him and the Winklevoss twins, signaling that the Gemini co-founders were seeking certain assurances regarding enforcement actions at the CFTC.
Since September, acting CFTC Chair Caroline Pham has been the sole commissioner at the financial agency, expected to have five members. Pham said earlier this year that she intends to depart the CFTC after the Senate votes on a new chair, suggesting that, if confirmed, Selig could be the lone leadership voice at one of the US’s most significant financial agencies.
US Senate committee releases draft market structure bill
Whether Selig is confirmed or not, the CFTC is expected to face significant regulatory changes regarding digital assets following the potential passage of a market structure bill.
In July, the US House of Representatives passed the CLARITY Act. The bill, expected to establish clear roles and responsibilities for the SEC and CFTC over cryptocurrencies, awaits consideration in the Senate Agriculture Committee and Senate Banking Committee before potentially going to a full floor vote.
On Monday, Senate Republicans on the agriculture committee released a discussion draft of the market structure bill, moving the legislation forward for the first time in weeks amid a government shutdown and congressional recess.
The agriculture committee oversees laws affecting commodities and the regulators responsible for them, such as the CFTC, while the banking committee has jurisdiction over securities and oversees the SEC.