Connect with us

Published

on

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — The NHL’s operations department pulled back the curtain on their process assessing how and why on-ice calls are overturned — or not — for the league’s general managers to kick off their annual meetings on Monday.

The 32 team executives gathered at Eau Palm Beach to hear from a panel of league hockey ops members who step into action when there’s a coach’s challenge for goalie interference or offside. The group reviewed several examples from this season and solicited manager feedback on whether they agreed with the original call or the extra layer of assessment.

Primarily, though, the goal was to provide clarity on what goes on between the refs — reviewing those infamous iPads in the penalty box — and the league figures connecting them with more information.

“When you get on the headset [in the Situation Room], the first thing you’re asking the referee when you give him the overhead [view], is, ‘is there anything you see here you didn’t see in real time,'” said Stephen Wolkom, the NHL’s senior vice president and director of officiating. “He’s going to [look] and be blunt. And that’s a tell right there on where we’re going to go [with our decision].”

Wolkom, along with Kris King, senior vice president of hockey operations and Colin Campbell, executive vice president and director of hockey operations, explained what their group is looking at when it comes to dissecting a potentially incorrect call. There’s a checklist of sorts they’ll go through on a goaltender interference question that serves, ideally, to be a consistent baseline if a goal is to be called back.

The league is looking at whether the contact from a player is deliberate or incidental, where it happened on the ice (in the goalie’s blue paint or out in white ice), if the goalie had a chance to reset, was able to do his job, and if the actions by the offensive or defensive player led to any part of the contact. And of course, there’s whether the referee sees anything differently on the provided replay that they missed in real time.

It’s often a fine line deciding which way the challenge goes. Perhaps that’s why the NHL has seen an uptick in coach’s challenges for goalie interference this season, rising to 105 already from 88 last year.

Campbell has one theory on that stat.

“There’s been maybe 10-15 really dumb challenges,” said Campbell. “We look at each other and go, ‘What are they doing? This is crazy by them.'”

Goal scoring is at a premium, though. And getting into a goaltender’s face while attempting to redirect pucks in front of the net is often the cost of netting one. So how can the NHL ensure goalies have a chance to stand tall without inhibiting a player’s right to try and beat him?

That’s at the forefront of the league’s decision-makers when they’re breaking down a challenge.

“We told the goalies we’d protect them in the blue,” said Rod Pasma, vice president of hockey operations. “How do we tell the position players when they’re trying to score and stay out of the blue, and they’re tipping a puck, and make a contact [with the goalie in white ice], [that they are] doing it wrong? That comes into it as well … and then, how much is the contact? Is it extreme? Is it relevant?”

All of that first falls on referees to answer. Those on the outside bemoan how long video review can take and the way challenges slow down a game’s flow. But communication between those eyes in the sky and the ones at ice level is key to getting a correct call. Usually once the refs have seen new angles, they’ll be able to tell King and company if the coach was right to question their verdict.

Nuance is everything, though.

“The goaltender has to be afforded the chance to make the save,” said goaltending supervisor Kay Whitmore. “But we have to be careful on saying whether the goalie can make the save or not. [Former NHL referee] Danny O’Halloran got an earful from Jonathan Quick one time saying, ‘how the [expletive] do you know I’m not going to make that save?'”

In addition to talking coach’s challenges, the league went over examples of unique offside reviews. They emphasized to the team execs that part of the process includes questioning where the puck entered the zone and whether they can clearly see where the puck is before issuing the offside challenge.

Missed game stoppages — for hand passes and tipping pucks into the net above “normal shoulder height” — were also on the agenda.

The league’s goal was to emphasize again the consistency of their approach in making one call or another — not that they want to be influencing the outcome of a game if they don’t have to.

“The call on the ice is [most] important in every one of these [situations],” said Campbell.

Continue Reading

Sports

Badgers AD backs team amid ‘Fire Fickell’ chants

Published

on

By

Badgers AD backs team amid 'Fire Fickell' chants

Wisconsin athletic director Chris McIntosh voiced his support for coach Luke Fickell and the program Saturday after Maryland handed the Badgers a 27-10 home loss, which featured several “Fire Fickell!” chants by the student section.

Speaking with the Wisconsin State Journal and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, McIntosh shared his “belief in the program and the people around our program, specifically Luke,” and reiterated his support for the players. Fickell fell to 15-15 in two-plus seasons as Wisconsin coach after consecutive losses to Alabama and Maryland. He is under contract through the 2031 season and is earning $7.7 million this fall.

The Badgers were booed as they headed to the locker room down 20-0 to Maryland at halftime and didn’t reach the end zone until 28 seconds remained in the fourth quarter.

“When you have kids that have given it all and are faced with, as a program, adversity like this, I think it’s a time for our people to come together,” McIntosh told the two outlets. “I think it’s a time for me to express my support.”

McIntosh, a former Wisconsin offensive lineman, fired coach Paul Chryst midway through the 2022 season and hired Fickell, who guided Cincinnati to the College Football Playoff in 2021. Although Fickell had no direct ties to Wisconsin — unlike Chryst and Jim Leonhard, the team’s interim coach in 2022 — Fickell’s hire was largely celebrated.

The Badgers have endured several quarterback injuries during Fickell’s tenure but could be in danger of missing bowl games in consecutive seasons for the first time since a stretch from 1985 to 1992. Fickell is 78-40 as an FBS coach.

McIntosh acknowledged the fans’ sentiment, saying, “Apathy is worst case, and so we’re far from that.” He also said he isn’t concerned about his job security. McIntosh is under contract through June 2029.

“I don’t think there’s anyone in the building that thinks that where we are at this moment in time right now, this is what Wisconsin football is,” he said Saturday. “… I’ll come back to what I said earlier: What’s left to be done about that? What’s left to be done about that is to learn from what happened on a day like today and grow.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Dabo: ‘Feel everybody’s pain’ in Tigers’ 1-3 start

Published

on

By

Dabo: 'Feel everybody's pain' in Tigers' 1-3 start

Clemson coach Dabo Swinney said he felt a “pain that’s hard to describe” following his team’s 34-21 home loss to Syracuse on Saturday, which dropped the Tigers to 1-3 and his worst start as the Tigers’ head coach.

“This is a bad, bad feeling. Terrible,” Swinney said. “This is what we do. This is our passion. We work incredibly hard to get results that we want to get, and when we don’t get them, it’s a pain that’s hard to describe, but it comes with the territory. So we gotta flush it. That’s all we can do. There’s no hope for a better yesterday.”

Clemson closed as a 17½-point favorite at ESPN BET but suffered its largest home loss against an unranked opponent since 2001 against North Carolina, when the Tigers lost by 35.

With losses to LSU, Georgia Tech and now Syracuse, the Tigers have lost three of their first four games for the first time under Swinney. It’s also the first time the program has started 1-3 since 2004.

Swinney conceded he was emotional on the field after the game during the school’s alma mater.

“Disappointed, painful, hurt,” he said. “I’m human. I’m not a cyborg. This is my life. I’ve been here 23 years. I love this place. I give this place the best I’ve got every single day. … I’ve invested my life here, and when I don’t get the job done, I’m responsible. I feel the pain. Not just my pain, I feel everybody’s pain. That comes with my job, and I don’t run from that.”

Clemson finished with 503 yards, its most in a loss since 2016. It’s a stunning start for Clemson, which returned the most production in the FBS (80%) this season. Quarterback Cade Klubnik has his top three receivers back from last year’s ACC championship team, and the defense was expected to be one of best fronts in the country.

“We just can’t seem to put it all together when we need it,” Swinney said.

The Tigers have a bye week before traveling to North Carolina on Oct. 4, and Swinney said it comes at a good time because the team is “beat up emotionally and physically.”

“There’s no quit in me and I didn’t see any quit in our team or our staff,” he said. “We’ll get back to work. We have to reset our goals and what we still can do. We can’t sit around and dwell on missed opportunities. … It’s basically an eight-game season for us at this point. We’ve just gotta fight our tails off to find a way to win a game, create some momentum.”

Continue Reading

Sports

TCU, Dykes prevail in 104th and final Iron Skillet

Published

on

By

TCU, Dykes prevail in 104th and final Iron Skillet

FORT WORTH, Texas — After 104 meetings, the TCUSMU Iron Skillet rivalry is over, with the Horned Frogs claiming the final edition 35-24 on Saturday.

TCU coach Sonny Dykes, who has been on both sides of the rivalry as head coach at SMU before moving west to Fort Worth, has been vocal that he doesn’t think the series should continue.

“It’s college football, it’s business and people have to make business decisions,” he said. “Sometimes nobody likes ’em.”

Last season, SMU won 66-42, and Dykes was ejected from the game after getting two consecutive unsportsmanlike conduct penalties for arguing with referees. He said he has heard from plenty of SMU fans about why he didn’t want to play the Mustangs anymore.

Dykes won his last two games at SMU against the Frogs and Gary Patterson, then beat SMU his first two years at TCU in 2022 and 2023 before last year’s loss.

“I think the idea is that Coach Dykes is scared of the Iron Skillet game. Five outta the last six is what we won,” he said before referencing a 1970s power ballad by Meat Loaf, “Two Out of Three Ain’t Bad.”

“I think that’s a Meat Loaf song, right? Five outta six ain’t bad?” he asked. “So yeah, I ain’t too scared.”

TCU was led by quarterback Josh Hoover, who was 22-of-40 for 379 yards, five touchdowns and an interception, along with a breakout performance from wide receiver Eric McAlister, a Boise State transfer from Azle High School in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. McAlister had eight catches for 254 yards and three touchdowns. He lost another when SMU defensive back Jaelyn Davis-Robinson wrestled the ball away from him in the end zone for an interception, and he also had a catch in the end zone that was ruled incomplete. The game wasn’t stopped for a review, but Dykes said afterward that the officials on the field said they were powerless to ask for a review because the booth had already reviewed it and ruled it incomplete.

“I saw the video,” McAlister said afterward. “That was two feet down. That’s good in the league.”

McAlister said it was important to claim this last win over the Mustangs.

“We see those guys out on the streets every day no matter where it’s at. It’s Dallas, so it’s not that far,” he said. “They might never sign this contract again. So at least we’ve got bragging rights.”

TCU discovered the Iron Skillet was broken while it was in its possession in 2018, and sources said it was hastily replaced with a Lodge Cast Iron skillet from a hardware store shortly before the game. On Saturday, Dykes was asked, given the skillet has had some issues in the past, what he would do with it now that it was in TCU’s possession indefinitely.

“Probably get a sledgehammer and break it,” he joked. “I don’t know. Our players have it right now and they’re excited about it. We took a picture. Now we’ll probably cook something in it.”

Continue Reading

Trending