Connect with us

Published

on

Labour was the party that created the welfare state. Now it is intent on cutting it back.

And in Liz Kendall, the government has found a Labour work and pensions secretary clearly entirely comfortable in going harder on benefit cuts than any of her Conservative predecessors since 2015, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies.

When I ask her about that, she is unrepentant and unfazed by colleagues’ criticisms.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I wouldn’t be able to survive’

“I am going to be a Labour work and pensions secretary who fixes a broken system,” she said, “who says to people who’ve been written off and denied chances and choices that we believe in them…

“I am cross, because I’ve seen in my own constituency people written off to a life that is not the life they hoped for themselves or their children or their families.

“I want to fix it. And that’s what I’m determined to do.”

This, then, is the moral case for reform that she and the prime minister have talked about in recent weeks.

More on Benefits

And on Tuesday, Ms Kendall outlined reforms designed to reduce those claiming the main disability, with hundreds of thousands of people expected to lose personal independence payments (PIP) if they suffer from milder mental health conditions and less severe physical difficulties.

Read more: Further benefit cuts not ruled out

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour announces benefit cuts

The target is to save £5bn from a disability benefits bill for working-age people set to balloon by over £20bn to £75bn by the end of the decade.

Ask some in Labour and they will privately acknowledge and argue this is but a drop in the ocean, with one insider telling me this week they didn’t think the reforms went far enough.

“I don’t think people have clocked the size of the numbers going on here,” they said. Look at the public finances and you can see why.

While the Labour Party clearly talked about welfare reform in its manifesto, it never signalled it would make these sorts of cuts to the benefits bill. But the environment has changed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I wouldn’t be able to survive’

Growth is sluggish, which many businesses – and the opposition – blame on tax rises in the October budget, while the cost of government borrowing is on the rise.

The chancellor now finds herself with a hole in the public finances to the tune of £9.9bn, which she has to fill if she is to fulfil her self-imposed fiscal rule that day-to-day government spending must be funded through tax receipts – not borrowing – by 2029/30.

She was crystal clear to me in our conversation for the Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast that she was not going to loosen her fiscal rules – although many MPs think she should.

She was also clear she wasn’t coming back with more tax rises. Instead it will be spending cuts, and welfare is the first wave, with a spending squeeze across Whitehall departments expected in the Spring Statement.

Read more:
Starmer says welfare bill is ‘indefensible’
The town where almost a third are out of work

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Benefits cuts explained

Sir Keir Starmer told me last week that his plans to reform the state, with thousands of job cuts already signalled in NHS England and benefit cuts, that there will be “no return to austerity”.

His hope is that reform – be it through technology or efficiency savings – can mean public services are maintained even if rates of spending growth are reduced.

It may not feel like that for those who are at the sharp end of the £5bn of benefit cuts coming down the track.

Liz Kendall would not rule out further cuts to the welfare bill further down the line in an interview with Sky News on Tuesday, which will make many in her party nervous with some MPs and ministers concerned about the motivations of the government in its overhaul of the benefits system.

“The intellectual question hasn’t been answered here: is this about principled reform or is it a cost-saving exercise?,” one cabinet source told me on Tuesday.

“There are some concerns this doesn’t fix the issues around welfare but rather is about finding quick savings.”

Read more from Sky News:
Why Starmer’s backbenchers are deeply uncomfortable
Netanyahu: Strikes that killed 400 across Gaza ‘just the beginning’

There will be unease among MPs, unions and charities as the Labour Party moves onto traditional Tory territory with welfare cuts as a strapped Labour government looks for savings. It is uncomfortable terrain.

“I have to say these are Conservative policies that Labour MPs will be voting for,” the former Tory work and pensions secretary Baroness Coffey told me on Tuesday.

“Overall, I think a lot of Labour MPs will be very unhappy about what they heard today [but] I think the Conservatives will support a considerable amount of that because, as I say, a lot of this was Conservative policy. We didn’t have time to do the legislation, unfortunately, towards the end of the parliament.”

Sir Keir Starmer has the majority to bring in these changes, but cutting the benefits of those living with disabilities will be controversial in the Labour movement even if the measures are more popular with the wider public.

As one veteran Labour MP put it to me: “This is one of these issues that come back to bite later.”

The devil will be in the detail, and for now, hundreds of thousands of benefits recipients don’t know if they will still be eligible for the main disability benefit – personal independence payments – in the coming months, with the government yet to outline where the £5bn of savings will be found.

It is an anxious time for those who rely on the welfare state. How long a shadow these reforms will cast over Sir Keir’s domestic agenda is hard to tell – but these reforms look set to become his hardest sell.

Continue Reading

UK

UK economy will be among hardest hit by global trade war, IMF warns

Published

on

By

UK economy will be among hardest hit by global trade war, IMF warns

Britain’s economy will be among the hardest hit by the global trade war and inflation is set to climb, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned – as it slashed its UK growth forecast by a third.

In a sobering set of projections, the Washington-based organisation said it was grappling with “extremely high levels of policy uncertainty” – and the global economy would slow even if countries manage to negotiate a permanent reduction in tariffs from the US.

Echoing earlier warnings about the risks to the global financial system, the IMF said stock markets could fall even more sharply than they did in the aftermath of Donald Trump‘s “Liberation Day” tariffs announcement, when US and UK indices recorded some of their largest one-day falls since the pandemic.

It comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to meet her US counterpart Scott Bessent at the IMF’s spring gathering in Washington this week.

She is hoping to negotiate a reduction to the 10% baseline tariff the US president has applied to all UK goods. Steel, aluminium and car exports face an additional 25% tariff.

Money latest: Trump’s ‘major loser’ attack on Fed chair sparks market alarm

HARD TO SEE A WIN FOR REEVES AHEAD


Photo of Gurpreet Narwan

Gurpreet Narwan

Business and economics correspondent

@gurpreetnarwan

As long as the world’s two largest economies are at war with each other, there will be considerable spillovers. The US and China account for 43% of the global economy.

If demand in either nation slows, that has ripple effects across the world. Tariff or no tariff, exporters to those markets will be hurt.

If China redirects its goods elsewhere, that could hurt domestic industries – jobs could be at stake.
US and Chinese investors might hit pause on global projects and stock market devaluations could hurt consumer confidence. Things could unravel quickly.

Against that backdrop, it is difficult to say with any certainty what would happen to the UK but, even if we find a way to sweet talk our way out of tariffs, the dark clouds of the global economy are moving in every direction.

Britain is an open and highly trade-sensitive economy (we have a trade-to-GDP ratio of around 65%) and global spillovers will rain on us.

Then there are the spillovers from the financial markets. The IMF warned that rising government borrowing costs were weighing on economic growth.
While rising UK bond yields are, in part, a reflection of investor unease over the UK’s growth and inflation outlook, they also reflect anxiety over the US trajectory.

It’s worth bearing all of this in mind if Chancellor Rachel Reeves emerges from her trip to Washington with a deal.

The Treasury would no doubt celebrate the achievement. After all, a reduction in tariffs could make a big difference to some industries, especially our car manufacturers who are currently grappling with a 25% levy on goods to their largest export market. However, it would not solve our problems.

In fact, it would barely make a difference to our overall GDP. Back in 2020, the government estimated that a free trade deal with the US would boost the UK economy by just 0.16% over the next 15 years.

And overall GDP does matter. The chancellor desperately needs economic growth to support the country’s ailing public finances (when the economy grows, so do government tax receipts).

She will know better than most that the prize the US has to offer is comparatively small, so she should weigh up the costs of any deal carefully.

The IMF presented a range of forecasts in its latest World Economic Outlook. Its main case looked at the period up to 4 April, after Mr Trump announced sweeping tariffs on countries across the world, ratcheting up US protectionism to its highest level in a century.

If the president were to revert to this policy framework, global growth would fall from 3.3% last year to 2.8% this year, before recovering to 3% in 2026.

In January, the IMF was predicting a rate of 3.3% for both years.

IMF

Nearly all countries were hit with downgrades, with the US expected to grow by just 1.8% this year, a downgrade of 0.9 percentage points.

Mexico was downgraded by 1.7 percentage points, while China and Canada are forecast to slow by 0.6 percentage points and Japan by 0.5 percentage points.

The UK economy is expected to grow by just 1.1% this year, down 0.5 percentage points from the 1.6% the IMF was predicting in January. Growth picks up to 1.4% next year, still 0.1 percentage points lower than the January forecast.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will tariffs hit UK growth?


Along with recent tariff announcements, the IMF blamed the UK’s poor performance on a rise in government borrowing costs, which has in part been triggered by growing unease among investors over the fate of the US economy.

When borrowing costs rise, the chancellor has to rein in public spending or raise taxes to meet her fiscal rules. That can weigh on economic growth.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Tariffs are making US ‘rich’

It also pointed to problems in the domestic economy, mainly “weaker private consumption amid higher inflation as a result of regulated prices and energy costs”.

In a blow to the chancellor, the IMF warned that the UK would experience one of the largest upticks in inflation because of utility bill increases that took effect in April.

It upgraded its inflation forecast by 0.7 percentage points to 3.1% for 2025, taking it even higher above the Bank of England’s 2% target and deepening the dilemma for central bankers who are also grappling with weak growth.

Read more:
Can Reeves come up trumps in Washington?
Trump’s tariffs to have major global impact

Meanwhile, inflation in the US is likely to jump one percentage point higher than previously forecast to 3% in 2025 on the back of higher tariffs.

The IMF forecast period ended on 4 April. That was before the US president paused his reciprocal tariffs on countries across the world while ratcheting up levies on China.

In a worrying sign for finance ministers across the world, as they attempt to negotiate a deal with the US administration, the IMF said the global economy would slow just the same if Mr Trump were to make his temporary pause on reciprocal tariffs permanent.

That is because higher tariffs between the US and China, which together account for 43% of the global economy, would have spillover effects on the rest of the world that offset the benefits to individual countries.

“The gains from lower effective tariff rates for those countries that were previously subject to higher tariffs would now be offset by poorer growth outcomes in China and the United States – due to the escalating tariff rates – that would propagate through global supply chains,” the IMF said.

In response, Chancellor Rachel Reeves said:

“This forecast shows that the UK is still the fastest-growing European G7 country. The IMF have recognised that this government is delivering reform which will drive up long-term growth in the UK, through our plan for change.

“The report also clearly shows that the world has changed, which is why I will be in Washington this week defending British interests and making the case for free and fair trade.”

Continue Reading

UK

100% chance that Bank of England will cut interest rates next month, markets predict

Published

on

By

100% chance that Bank of England will cut interest rates next month, markets predict

Financial markets have priced in a 100% chance of a Bank of England interest rate cut next month, as the effects of Donald Trump’s evolving trade war continue to play out in the global economy.

LSEG data early on Tuesday had shown an 82% likelihood of a reduction from 4.5% to 4.25% on 8 May.

But the doubt disappeared shortly after remarks on inflation by a member of the rate-setting committee.

Money latest: Trump’s ‘major loser’ attack on Fed chair sparks market alarm

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Tariffs are making US ‘rich’

Megan Greene, who voted with the majority for a hold at the last meeting in March, told Bloomberg that US trade tariffs are more likely to push down on UK inflation than raise the pace of price increases.

Her argument is essentially that the UK’s decision not to respond to Trump’s import duties through reciprocal tariffs could make the UK a destination for cheaper goods from Asia and Europe.

“The tariffs represent more of a disinflationary risk than an inflationary risk,” she said, adding: “There’s a ton of uncertainty around this, but there are both inflationary and disinflationary forces.”

More on Bank Of England

Ms Greene also said that a recent surge in the value of the pound against the US dollar could also help ease inflation but cautioned that it was early days to determine the likely currency path.

The Bank is expecting inflation to rise this year despite a greater than expected dip witnessed in March largely due to the impact of rising energy prices but also the effects of tax rises on businesses from April.

Read more:
UK will be among ‘hardest hit’ in trade war

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The impact of inflation falling

The trade war is widely tipped to weigh on economic activity globally.

It poses a problem for the Bank as rising inflation curbs policymakers’ ability to help boost growth through interest rate cuts.

The LSEG data further showed that financial markets are expecting three Bank of England rate cuts by the year’s end.

The Bank’s counterpart for the euro area has been cutting rates at a faster pace as inflation has allowed, due to the dire performance of its collective economy.

Like in the UK, the US central bank has also been taking a cautious approach to rate cuts recently due to the spectre of domestic inflation arising from the Trump trade war.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

US trade deal may take ‘some time’

A perceived failure of the Federal Reserve to address an anticipated growth slowdown, largely arising from the imposition of tariffs, has angered the president.

Mr Trump declared last week that the bank’s chair, Jay Powell, should be fired and demanded a rate cut “NOW” in a social media post.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is in Washington this week for a series of meetings but is expected to hold discussions with her US counterpart on a trade agreement to nullify the need for US/UK tariffs.

Any rate cut by the Bank of England would be a welcome boost in her push for economic growth in troubled times for the world trade order.

Continue Reading

UK

Woman who claimed to be Madeleine McCann pleads not guilty to stalking missing girl’s parents

Published

on

By

Woman who claimed to be Madeleine McCann pleads not guilty to stalking missing girl's parents

A woman who claimed to be Madeleine McCann has pleaded not guilty to stalking the missing girl’s parents.

Julia Wandel, 23, is accused of making calls, leaving voicemails, and sending a letter and WhatsApp messages to Kate and Gerry McCann.

Wandel, from southwest Poland, is also accused of turning up at their family home on two occasions last year and sending Instagram messages to Sean and Amelie McCann, Madeleine’s brother and sister.

It is alleged she caused serious alarm or distress to the family between June 2022 and February this year when she was arrested at Bristol Airport.

She claimed to be Madeleine on Instagram in 2023, but a DNA test showed she was Polish.

Karen Spragg, 60, who is alleged to have made calls, sent letters and attended the home address of Mr and Mrs McCann, also denied a charge of stalking at Leicester Magistrates’ Court.

Wandel was remanded back into custody while Spragg, from Caerau in Cardiff, was granted conditional bail.

Both women are due to appear at Leicester Crown Court for trial on 2 October.

Karen Spragg arriving at Leicester Magistrates' Court on Tuesday. Pic: PA
Image:
Karen Spragg arriving at Leicester Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday. Pic: PA

Madeleine’s disappearance has become one of the world’s most mysterious missing child cases.

She was last seen in Portugal’s Algarve in 2007 while on holiday with her family.

Her parents had left her in bed with her twin siblings while they had dinner with friends at a nearby restaurant in Praia da Luz when the then three-year-old disappeared on 3 May.

A man suspected of kidnapping Madeleine will not face any charges in the foreseeable future, a prosecutor told Sky News earlier this year.

Continue Reading

Trending