Connect with us

Published

on

Teenagers are routinely seeing inappropriate violent or sexual content, “doom-scrolling” and being contacted by strangers online, according to an exclusive survey for Sky News.

More than 1,000 young people aged 14 to 17 in Darlington schools told us what they see and experience online when looking at apps commonly used by teenagers.

Their answers raise troubling questions about whether government and tech companies are doing enough to protect children online amid a growing debate among parents and campaigners about how far to restrict children’s access to smartphones and social media.

Of those surveyed, 40% spent at least six hours a day online – the equivalent of a school day. One in five said they spent upwards of eight hours a day on their phones.

Some of the findings in the under-16 group were striking, including that 75% had been contacted by strangers through social media and online gaming.

Over half (55%) of the Year 10 students, aged 14 to 15, had seen sexually explicit or violent content that was inappropriate for their age.

Concerningly, a large proportion of them (50%) said this always or usually came up on social media apps without them searching for it – suggesting it is driven by algorithms.

Doom-scrolling is the act of spending an excessive amount of time online consuming negative news or social media content, often without stopping.

The survey represents a snapshot of teenagers in one town in the UK, but resonates more widely.

The teenagers said they wanted their voices to be heard in the debate about online safety. While they did not favour a social media or smartphone ban, many wanted tougher controls on the content they see.

When asked if they were in favour of social media companies doing more to protect under 16s from seeing explicit or harmful content, 50% were in favour and 14% against.

‘It’s quite horrific’

Sky News was invited to film a focus group of under-16s from different schools discussing the results at St Aidan’s Academy in Darlington, hosted by Labour MP Lola McEvoy, whose office carried out the research.

Jacob, who is 15, said among the things he had seen on social media were “gore, animal abuse, car crashes, everything related to death, torture”.

He said: “It’s quite horrific. A lot of the things that I’ve seen that I shouldn’t have, have not been searched by me directly and have been shown to me without me wanting to.

“Most of this stuff pops up on social media, Instagram Reels, TikTok, sometimes on YouTube.

“It’s like a roulette, you can go online and see entertainment, because there’s always a risk of seeing racism, sexism and 18+ explicit content.”

Matthew, also 15, said he spends six to seven hours a day online, before school and late into the evening – and up to nine hours on weekends, gaming and messaging with friends.

“After school, the only time I take a break is when I’m eating or talking to someone. It can turn into addiction,” he said.

He also said inappropriate content was unprompted. “I’ve seen a varied spectrum of things – sexually explicit content, graphic videos, gory photos and just upsetting images,” he added.

“Mostly with the violence it’s on Instagram Reels, with sexually explicit content it’s more Snapchat and TikTok.”

Read more:
Boy’s mental health ‘severely impacted’ after pornography shared
Instagram unveils new feature to let users reset algorithms

‘It can be sexual stuff’

Summer, 14, said: “I see unwanted content about getting into a summer body and how you should starve yourself.

“It just pops up randomly without searching anything. I reported it, but it keeps coming up.”

Many of the group had been contacted by strangers. Summer said: “I have, and a lot of my friends have as well. They can just randomly come up on Snapchat and TikTok and you don’t know who they are, and it’s quite worrying, they’re probably like 40 years old.”

Olivia, 15, said: “I’ve been added to group chat with hundreds of people sending images like dead bodies, gore.

“I try to leave but there’s so many people, I don’t know who has added me, and I keep getting re-added. It can be sexual stuff or violent stuff. It can be quite triggering for people to see stuff like that quite damaging to your mental health.”

Asked what she disliked online, Briony, 14, said: “Involvement with older people, people who aren’t my friends and that I don’t know. It’s very humiliating when other people are commenting and being rude; and it’s quite horrible.”

Fewer than a third of those surveyed (31%) said they were always asked their age before viewing inappropriate content.

When asked about their age on social media, around a third said they usually pretended to be older. But in the focus group, teenagers were clear that they had seen upsetting and disturbing content when they used their real age.

Parents ‘can’t tackle this alone’

Ms McEvoy described the findings as “shocking” and said “the safety of our children online is one of the defining issues of our time”.

“Parents and teachers are doing their best, but they can’t tackle this alone,” she added.

“We need enforceable age verification, better content controls, and more age-appropriate functions to ensure children can go online without fear.”

The Online Safety Act, which was passed by MPs in October 2023, is intended to protect users – particularly children – from illegal and harmful content.

It is being implemented this year, with tough fines for platforms which do not prevent children from accessing harmful and age-inappropriate content coming in this summer.

A private members’ bill debated by MPs earlier this month proposed that the internet “age of consent” for giving data to social media companies be raised from 13 to 16, but it was watered down after the government made clear it would not support the move.

Snapchat, Instagram and TikTok were contacted for comment, but did not provide an on-the-record statement on the comments by the teenagers.

The companies insist they take issues of safety and age-appropriate content seriously.

Instagram is rolling out Teen Accounts, which it says will limit who can contact teenagers and the content they can see.

Snapchat and TikTok say on their websites that accounts for under-16s are set to private.

Continue Reading

Politics

Bitcoin may recover to $90k amid easing inflation concerns after FOMC meeting

Published

on

By

Bitcoin may recover to k amid easing inflation concerns after FOMC meeting

Bitcoin may recover to k amid easing inflation concerns after FOMC meeting

Bitcoin may stage a recovery above the key $90,000 psychological mark amid easing monetary inflation concerns in the world’s largest economy.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) over two-month downtrend has raised numerous alarms that the current Bitcoin bull cycle may be over, defying the theory of the four-year market cycle.

Despite widespread investor concerns, Bitcoin may be on track to a recovery above $90,000 due to easing inflation concerns in the United States, according to Markus Thielen, the CEO of 10x Research.

“We can see some counter-trend rally as prices are oversold, and there is a good chance that the Fed is mildly dovish,” Thielen told Cointelegraph, adding:

“This is not a major bullish development, rather some fine-tuning from the policymakers. We think BTC will be in a broader consolidation range but we could trade back towards $90,000.”

Bitcoin may recover to $90k amid easing inflation concerns after FOMC meeting

Bitcoin daily RSI indicator. Source: 10x Research

Investor confidence may also be improved by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s comments indicating that the Fed will “remain on hold amid rising uncertainty among households and businesses,” wrote 10x Research in a March 17 X post, adding:

“Powell also expressed doubts about the sustained inflationary impact of Trump’s tariffs, referencing the 2019 scenario where tariff-related inflation was temporary, and the Fed eventually cut rates three times.”

Meanwhile, investors are eagerly awaiting today’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, for cues on the Fed’s monetary policy for the rest of 2025, a development that may impact investor appetite for risk assets such as Bitcoin.

Related: Crypto market’s biggest risks in 2025: US recession, circular crypto economy

FOMC meeting will be crucial for Bitcoin’s trajectory: analyst

Traders and investors will be watching for any hints about the ending of the Fed’s quantitative easing (QT) program, “a move that could boost liquidity and risk assets,” according to Iliya Kalchev, dispatch analyst at Nexo digital asset investment platform.

The upcoming Fed decision could be a major catalyst for further movements,” the analyst told Cointelegraph, adding:

“If Chair Powell spreads his dovish wings, Bitcoin could take flight on renewed bullish momentum.”

“However, persistent inflation concerns or a reaffirmation of tight financial conditions, such as elevated interest rates or continued liquidity tightening, could limit upside potential,” added the analyst.

Related: Rising $219B stablecoin supply signals mid-bull cycle, not market top

Bitcoin may recover to $90k amid easing inflation concerns after FOMC meeting

Fed target interest rate probabilities. Source: CME Group’s FedWatch tool

Markets are currently pricing in a 99% chance that the Fed will keep interest rates steady, according to the latest estimates of the CME Group’s FedWatch tool.

Still, investors have slashed their exposure to  US equities by the most on record by 40-percentage-points between February and March, according to Bank of America’s latest survey — raising concerns that recession fears may hurt Bitcoin’s price action.

Magazine: ETH may bottom at $1.6K, SEC delays multiple crypto ETFs, and more: Hodler’s Digest, March 9 – 15

Continue Reading

Politics

Minister denies misleading voters over benefits cuts – as he’s shown awkward old tweet

Published

on

By

Minister denies misleading voters over benefits cuts - as he's shown awkward old tweet

A minister has denied misleading Labour voters with a £5bn package of benefit cuts that was not in the party’s manifesto.

Stephen Timms told Sky News Breakfast with Wilfred Frost that Labour pledged to “fix the broken system” during the election campaign and said it would reform or replace the work capability assessment (WCA).

Politics live: PM defends welfare cuts

Scrapping the WCA was one of a series of measures announced on Tuesday, along with narrowing the criteria to qualify for some health and disability benefits.

Labour’s manifesto said: “We believe the work capability assessment is not working and needs to be reformed or replaced, alongside a proper plan to support disabled people to work.”

However, it did not explicitly mention cuts.

Asked if Labour had misled people, social security minister Mr Timms said: “No.”

Stephen Timms on Sky News breakfast
Image:
Stephen Timms on Sky News Breakfast

There’s always a tweet…

It was put to him that his boss Liz Kendall previously tweeted against benefit cuts being considered by former Tory chancellor George Osborne under his austerity programme.

In 2016, the now work and pensions secretary retweeted a colleague who accused Mr Osborne of introducing the cuts “to give handouts to the rich”, alongside a petition campaigning against the measure.

Mr Timms said the Tories “made lots of changes which did a great deal of damage”, including reforms to universal credit which put more people on the higher rate and meant they were “no longer supported into work”.

“We opposed damaging changes the previous government made,” he said.

“We’re bringing forward a package which we think will do the job that’s needed, support people back into work and make the system sustainable financially.”

Read more:
All Labour’s welfare reforms explained

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Benefits cuts Q&A | What do they mean for you?

What measures have been announced?

The most significant measure announced yesterday was making it harder to qualify for personal independence payments (PIP), which is money for people who have extra care or mobility needs as a result of a disability.

The new PIP test will go on to replace the WCA, which currently decides whether people are fit to work or not. There will also be a consultation on delaying access to the health top-up on universal credit until someone is 22.

The announcement was met with criticism from Labour backbenchers, unions and charities, who called for the cuts to be reversed and warned it would push more sick and disabled people into poverty.

However, it is unclear how many people could lose benefits as a result as the impact assessment will not be released until the spring statement next week.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What to expect from the spring statement

Reforms ‘rushed through’

The spring statement will see Chancellor Rachel Reeves make further spending cuts to account for the loss of around £9bn in fiscal headroom due to a poor economy and global instability.

The government has denied this is the reason for the welfare package, with Ms Kendall telling Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby she would have announced these measures regardless – as she refused to rule out further cuts.

But Tory shadow chancellor Mel Stride told Sky News the reforms were “rushed” through because Ms Reeves “killed the economy” with her October budget.

“That doesn’t make for good policy, particularly in the area of welfare where you do need to take your time and to be thoughtful about it,” he added.

Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride claims the economy is "flatlining" under Labour
Image:
Mel Stride on Sky News Breakfast

PM: Benefits bill ‘devastating’

Sir Keir Starmer has defended the measures, writing in The Times that the 2.8 million working age people out of work due to long-term sickness is a “damning indictment of the Conservative record” on welfare.

He added: “The result is devastating for the public finances. By 2030 we are projected to spend £70bn a year on working-age incapacity and disability benefits alone.”

Continue Reading

Politics

The Trump-Putin friendship goes on ice

Published

on

By

The Trump-Putin friendship goes on ice

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

Sky News’ Sam Coates and Politico’s Anne McElvoy present their guide to the day ahead in British politics.

Sir Keir Starmer’s team spent the day trying to work out how the Trump-Putin phone call really went down. Could the UK end up sending more military support to Ukraine before any pause in fighting?

The idea of an ice hockey game apparently came up on the call – Anne has an important history lesson on that.

Around Westminster, it’s PMQs but the Labour charm offensive to convince its backbenchers of its welfare reforms goes on.

Continue Reading

Trending