Defence firms held back by UK ethical banking standards, industry says
British banks should abandon outdated ethical standards and increase lending to domestic defence manufacturers in a “patriotic” effort to ensure the UK can meet its security needs, defence suppliers have told Sky News.
The defence industry has long complained that environment, sustainability and governance (ESG) standards, intended to guide business impact on society, have prevented small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) raising finance.
With the government promising to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, and the chancellor keen that SMEs in the sector should contribute increased growth, the industry believes ESG rules could hold British companies back.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
What a British Army vehicle is like
Lizzie Jones of Supacat, which manufactures military vehicles used by special forces and infantry, told Sky News: “We have absolutely felt the disinterest from banks to invest in the defence industry, which has been really hard to deal with over the last few years.
“We’re hoping that the tide is beginning to change, and that actually some of the patriotic feelings that we need the defence industry, particularly right now, will help persuade the banks that investing in defence industries is good for UK growth.”
The call for support from the defence industry comes as European military chiefs meet in London to discuss operational aspects of a proposed peacekeeping force in Ukraine.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House, and his demand that European NATO partners scale up defence and lead any security guarantees for Ukraine, has forced a re-examination of defence priorities.
Rachel Reeves has sought to link increased spending to her growth agenda, and defence will form part of the industrial strategy due later this year.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Defence spending boost ‘not a one-off thing’
Earlier this month a group of Labour MPs, and members of the defence select committee, called on banks to end “anti-defence” ESG guidelines in light of the US retreat from European security, and the need to increase support for Ukraine.
Improved access to finance is one of several demands from defence suppliers large and small, as the industry prepares for increased demand.
Certainty of contracts, a reduction in Ministry of Defence red tape, and access to cheap energy, skilled workers and critical minerals are all also required if the UK is to enjoy “sovereign capability” – the ability to build and deploy its own equipment, weapons and systems.
The call for a re-examination of ethical standards was echoed by one of the largest defence suppliers, Leonardo UK, the British arm of an Italian-listed multinational that manufactures helicopters and electronic warfare technology.
Chief executive Clive Higgins told Sky News: “The ESG agenda was really impacting small to medium enterprises where no banking was effectively taking place, and individuals couldn’t go get a bank account because they were in the defence sector.
“We’ve seen a real, really proactive response from the government over the last 12 months. I think we’re starting to see a shift in the tragic events going on in Ukraine, which helps people recognise the importance of defence at home, because that ensures we can enjoy the freedoms that you and I take for granted each day.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
EU reveals ‘rearmament plan’
The UK Sustainable Finance Association, which represents a number of major investors and pension funds, rejected the argument that the defence industry is “underinvested”.
Chief executive James Alexander said: “The notion that defence firms’ low valuations and struggles for finance is because of ‘ESG’ criteria is nonsense.
Read more:
The rallying cry for defence requires big culture changes
Increased defence spending will mean cuts elsewhere
Defence spending decision ‘accelerated’ by Trump’s election win
“The UK’s ‘ESG’ (or sustainable finance) regulations at no point prohibit defence investments. While some values-based (or ‘ethical’) investors may opt against investing in defence companies, they represent a small proportion of the financial system.
“Many financial institutions, including mainstream, sustainable investors, do invest in defence. Most critical to defence companies’ prospects, though, is government spending, as highlighted by the rise in several defence stocks this year, as the UK and European allies have understandably announced increases in defence spending.”
The Financial Conduct Authority said last month that its ESG reporting rules contain nothing “that prevents investment or finance for defence companies”, implying that divesting from or avoiding defence is a choice for institutions and their customers.
Four people have been arrested by police investigating cyber attacks targeting M&S, Co-op and Harrods.
A 20-year-old woman and two males, both aged 19, and a male aged 17, were detained in London and the West Midlands this morning as part of a National Crime Agency (NCA) operation.
They were arrested at their homes on suspicion of Computer Misuse Act offences, blackmail, money laundering and participating in the activities of an organised crime group.
Money blog: Cost of renting over owning home is a lot
Electronic devices were seized from the suspects and are currently being analysed by forensic experts.
M&S halted online orders, and shelves were empty in shops after the cyber attack on the retailer earlier this year.
The initial hack into the retailer’s systems took place in April through “sophisticated impersonation” involving a third party.
Disruption is expected to continue at the retailer until the end of this month.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Mickey Carroll in May answered why M&S cyber attack was so bad.
The Co-op and Harrods were also subsequently targeted by hackers.
Paul Foster, head of the NCA’s National cybercrime unit described the arrests as a “significant step” in their investigation, which remains “one of the Agency’s highest priorities”.
He added: “…our work continues, alongside partners in the UK and overseas, to ensure those responsible are identified and brought to justice.”
The National Crime Agency is keen to “signal” to “future victims” the “importance of seeking support and engaging with law enforcement”, stating that “the NCA and policing are here to help”.
The NCA has also thanked M&S, Co-op and Harrods for their support in their investigations.
The arrests, which took place early on Thursday morning, were supported by officers from the West Midlands Regional Organised Crime Unit and the East Midlands Special Operations Unit.
Earlier this week, the chairman of M&S told MPs that the hack had been “traumatic” and like an “out-of-body experience”.
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Archie Norman, however, refused to be drawn on whether the retailer had paid any ransom.
“We are not discussing any of the details of our interaction with the threat actor, including this subject, but that subject is fully shared with the NCA,” he said.
It is estimated that the cyber attack will cost M&S up to £300m this year.
Read more:
South West Water agrees to pay £24m for wastewater failures
Royal Mail to scrap second-class post on Saturdays and some weekdays
Days after M&S was attacked, the Co-op was targeted and forced to shut down some internal systems.
Harrods was then hacked, and also had to shut some systems despite its website and shops continuing to operate.
Of those arrested, a 17-year-old British male and a 19-year-old Latvian male were from the West Midlands.
A 19-year-old man was from London and a 20-year-old woman from Staffordshire.
Royal Mail is to be allowed to scrap Saturday second-class stamp deliveries, under a series of reforms proposed by the communications regulator.
From 28 July, Royal Mail will also be allowed to deliver second-class letters on alternate weekdays, Ofcom said.
The post will still be delivered within three working days of collection from Monday to Friday.
Money blog: Top chef reveals thing he hates about customers
The proposals had already been raised by Ofcom after a consultation was announced in 2024, and the scale back was proposed early this year.
Royal Mail had repeatedly failed to meet the so-called universal service obligation to deliver post within set periods of time.
Those delivery targets are now being revised downwards.
Rather than having to have 93% of first-class mail delivered the next day, 90% will be legally allowed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The sale of Royal Mail was approved in December
The target for second-class mail deliveries will be lowered from 98.5% to arrive within three working days to 95%.
A review of stamp prices has also been announced by Ofcom amid concerns over affordability, with a consultation set to be launched next year.
It’s good news for Royal Mail and its new owner, the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky. Ofcom estimates the changes will bring savings of between £250m and £425m.
A welcome change?
Unsurprisingly, the company welcomed the announcement.
“It is good news for customers across the UK as it supports the delivery of a reliable, efficient and financially sustainable universal service,” said Martin Seidenberg, the group chief executive of Royal Mail’s parent company, International Distribution Services.
“It follows extensive consultation with thousands of people and businesses to ensure that the postal service better reflects their needs and the realities of how customers send and receive mail today.”
Citizens Advice, however, doubted whether services would improve as a result of the changes.
“Today, Ofcom missed a major opportunity to bring about meaningful change,” said Tom MacInnes, the director of policy at Citizens Advice.
“Pushing ahead with plans to slash services and relax delivery targets in the name of savings won’t automatically make letter deliveries more reliable or improve standards.”
Acknowledging long delays “where letters have taken weeks to arrive”, Ofcom said it set Royal Mail new enforceable targets so 99% of mail has to be delivered no more than two days late.
Changing habits
Less than a third of letters are sent now than 20 years ago, and it is forecast to fall to about a fifth of the letters previously sent.
According to Ofcom research, people want reliability and affordability more than speedy delivery.
Royal Mail has been loss-making in recent years as revenues fell.
Read more from Sky News:
Greater risk to UK economy from Trump tariffs, BoE warns
What is a wealth tax and how would it work?
In response to Ofcom’s changes, a government spokesperson said: “The public expects a well-run postal service, with letters arriving on time across the country without it costing the earth. With the way people use postal services having changed, it’s right the regulator has looked at this.
“We now need Royal Mail to work with unions and posties to deliver a service that people expect, and this includes maintaining the principle of one price to send a letter anywhere in the UK”.
Ofcom said it has told Royal Mail to hold regular meetings with consumer bodies and industry groups to hear their experiences implementing the changes.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike