Connect with us

Published

on

The government can’t “shrug its shoulders” and pretend the welfare system is “progressive”, Sir Keir Starmer has said, as he again defended his benefit cuts.

The prime minister told Sky News political correspondent Serena Barker-Singh he understands why some of his backbenchers are uncomfortable, noting his late mother had a disability and he recently lost his brother to cancer.

Politics live: Protesters get into House of Lords

However, he said it is “morally indefensible that a million young people are going essentially from education on to benefits”.

“All the evidence shows if young people are in that position and so early in their lives, they’re going to find it really difficult ever to get out of that,” the prime minister said.

He said it was indefensible to have a system that “makes it really difficult” for the unemployed to get into work.

“There aren’t many people who genuinely argue the status quo is working,” Sir Keir said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Benefits cuts explained

‘We can’t just shrug our shoulders’

Sir Keir said there were two million people on benefits because of sickness – a figure he said would double by 2030 without action from the government.

“We can’t just shrug our shoulders and pretend that it’s progressive to watch millions more people go on to disability benefits when they could and many of them want to be in work,” he added.

“That’s why it’s so vital that we carry out these reforms.”

The £5bn package of savings announced on Tuesday includes making it harder for people to claim a key disability benefit called personal independence payment (PIP).

The government is also delaying access to the universal credit health top-up until claimants are 22, using the cash to invest in training opportunities for young people.

This will go alongside a £1bn investment into “tailored” support to help the disabled and long-term sick get jobs, as well as several other reforms.

Read more:
What is PIP?
Key welfare changes explained

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Govt ‘rushed’ welfare reforms

Labour backlash

The timing of the announcement has attracted criticism given Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spring statement next Wednesday, when she is expected to announce more spending cuts.

At PMQs, veteran Labour left-winger Diane Abbott challenged ministers’ arguments of a “moral” need for change, saying: “This is about the Treasury’s wish to balance the country’s books on the back of the most vulnerable and poor people in this society.”

It echoes an argument the Tories are making, which is that while they broadly support reform, the cuts are only being made because of the damage they say Ms Reeves’ October budget has done.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What to expect from the spring statement

Ministers insist they would have changed things regardless of the fiscal situation, but that hasn’t quelled discontent, with Labour MP Chris Webb becoming the first of the 2024 cohort to break ranks.

It has led to questions about what the Starmer government stands for, following rows over cuts to the aid budget and the winter fuel payment, and the refusal to drop the two-child benefit cap.

Earlier on Thursday, defence minister Luke Pollard denied Labour was now a centre-right party.

It came after Health Secretary Wes Streeting rejected accusations Labour was “turning into the Tories”.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK will ‘keep all options on the table’ amid Trump’s trade wars, PM says

Published

on

By

UK will 'keep all options on the table' amid Trump's trade wars, PM says

Sir Keir Starmer has vowed to “keep all options on the table” after Donald Trump imposed a “very concerning” 25% tariff on all imported cars into the US.

The president signed an executive order on Wednesday for the tax to kick in on 2 April – what he has called “liberation day”.

The move ratchets up the global trade war that Mr Trump promised he would ignite upon entering the White House for a second term.

Speaking in Paris on Thursday, the prime minister described the tariffs as “very concerning” and said the UK “will keep all options on the table” and “put the national interest first”.

“I think we need to keep, as ever, pragmatic and clear eyed. We are engaged, as you know, in intense discussions with the US on economic arrangements, on a number of fronts, including to mitigate tariffs,” the prime minister said.

“We will continue in that way because I think that, rather than jumping into a trade war, it is better pragmatically to come to an agreed way forward on this if we can.”

Earlier, Chancellor Rachel Reeves told Wilfred Frost on Sky News Breakfast that the UK does not want to “escalate” Mr Trump’s trade wars.

Politics latest: Treasury minister under fire for ‘spicy’ briefing

Rachel Reeves
Image:
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said the UK does not want to escalate Donald Trump’s trade wars

She said: “We’re not at the moment in a position where we want to do anything to escalate these trade wars.

“Trade wars are no good for anyone. It will end up with higher prices for consumers pushing up inflation after we’ve worked so hard to get a grip of inflation, and at the same time, will make it harder for British companies to export.

“So look, we are looking to secure a better trading relationship with the United States. I recognise that the week ahead is important.

“There are further talks going on today, so let’s see where we get to in the next few days.”

The chancellor’s answer does leave the door open to the UK potentially responding to the US president’s actions, which risks a huge impact for the UK’s car industry including manufacturers such as Jaguar Land Rover, Aston Martin and Rolls-Royce.

However, the UK government has sought to maintain a positive relationship with Mr Trump in a bid to avoid further punitive tariffs that he maintains are necessary to grow the US economy by boosting domestic manufacturing and protecting jobs.

The president has already imposed tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports to the US, which came into effect on 12 March.

The move has affected UK products worth hundreds of millions of pounds.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Spring statement 2025 key takeaways

While the European Union has announced it will impose retaliatory tariffs on the US, UK ministers have only said they are “disappointed” to see the tariffs on steel and aluminium and that “all options are on the table”.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds previously said there would be no immediate retaliation by the UK government as negotiations continue over a wider trade deal with the US.

A lucrative trade deal with the US is all the more pertinent for Ms Reeves after she admitted during her spring statement that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) had halved the UK growth forecast for 2025 from 2% to 1%.

However, the fiscal watchdog said that while growth had been downgraded for this year, it had been upgraded for every year after for the rest of this parliament – which is due to end in 2029.

Living standards, as measured by household disposable income, will fall after this year to almost no growth in 2027-28 before rising again due to firms rebuilding profit margins, wage growth slowing, taxes rising, and welfare measures taking effect.

Read more:
Spring statement 2025 key takeaways
How will Trump’s tariffs affect UK?

The chancellor said on Wednesday that she was “not satisfied with the numbers” for this year.

During the statement, Ms Reeves said she had restored the government’s £9.9bn fiscal “headroom” – the room she has to spend money before she breaks her fiscal rules.

However, the OBR has warned this could easily be jeopardised by global events.

“If global trade disputes escalate to include 20 percentage point rises in tariffs between the USA and the rest of the world, this could reduce UK GDP by a peak of 1% and reduce the current surplus in the target year to almost zero,” it warned.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, says CEO

Published

on

By

SEC has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, says CEO

SEC has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, says CEO

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has officially closed its investigation into Crypto.com, with no action taken against the crypto exchange, according to the firm’s CEO Kris Marszalek.

It comes around seven months after the SEC issued a Wells notice to the crypto platform in August 2024, signaling its intention to take legal action against the firm.

”They used every tool available to attempt to stifle us, restricting access to banking, auditors, investors, and beyond. It was a calculated attempt to put an end to the industry,” Marszalek said in a March 27 X post.

”The fact that we not only persevered but became stronger is a testament to our vision and the community supporting it. Onwards!”

Crypto.com filed a lawsuit against the SEC in October, accusing the Gary Gensler-led commission of overstepping its authority and taking a “misguided” approach to crypto regulation.

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.

Continue Reading

Politics

US DOJ says it seized Hamas crypto meant to finance terrorism

Published

on

By

US DOJ says it seized Hamas crypto meant to finance terrorism

US DOJ says it seized Hamas crypto meant to finance terrorism

The US Justice Department (DOJ) seized more than $200,000 in cryptocurrency intended to benefit the militant group Hamas it said in a statement on March 27.

The cryptocurrency with a total value of $201,400 was traced to fundraising addresses allegedly controlled by Hamas and used to launder more than $1.5 million in digital assets since October 2024.

The laundering occurred through a series of “virtual currency exchanges and transactions by leveraging suspected financiers and over-the-counter brokers,” the DOJ said. The funds are currently held in a combination of at least 17 wallets.

US DOJ says it seized Hamas crypto meant to finance terrorism

Affidavit to seize the Hamas-linked cryptocurrency. Source: US DOJ

In January 2024, the US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, along with corresponding organizations in the United Kingdom and Australia, announced sanctions against networks and facilitators of crypto transactions linked to Hamas. Those sanctions were built on US Treasury sanctions from October 2023.

In January 2024, three families of victims of the Hamas attack against Israel sued Binance and its former CEO Changpeng Zhao, alleging that the exchange had provided “substantial assistance” to terrorists. In oral arguments, a lawyer representing Binance claimed the exchange had “no special relationship [with] Hamas […].”

Binance has faced scrutiny from the US government over alleged shortcomings in its Anti-Money Laundering controls. The exchange settled with the DOJ for $4.3 billion in November 2023.

More regulation needed?

According to a December 2024 report by the Congressional Research Service, Hamas has allegedly sought cryptocurrency donations since at least 2019, although the “scale and effectiveness” of these efforts have been unclear.

Terrorist organizations using crypto for fundraising have increasingly drawn the attention of the US, with some officials questioning whether the industry needed more supervision or regulation to stop such behavior.

According to a 2023 Chainalysis report, terrorism financing accounts for a very small amount of crypto usage, with illegal groups sticking to using traditional, fiat-based methods to fund operations.

Magazine: Terrorism and the Israel-Gaza war have been weaponized to destroy crypto

Continue Reading

Trending