For an industry that measures contracts in decades, and a ministry with a reputation for bureaucracy, overspending and delays, the prospect of a rapid increase in defence spending presents a challenge as well as an opportunity.
Sir Keir Starmer’s commitment to spend 2.5% of GDP on defence by 2027 was a pragmatic response to the changing security reality. With Donald Trump back in the White House and retreating from European and NATO commitments, the UK is going to have to take more responsibility for its own security.
The chancellor took an expedient view too, spying an opportunity to tie the industry more closely to her growth agenda. Defence was already included in the industrial strategy being worked up in Whitehall, but if more taxpayer funds are directed to defence contracts it makes sense for as much as possible to be secured by British companies.
Last year the MoD spent £28bn, around half of its budget, on equipment, including almost £3bn on the nuclear deterrent and £5bn on maintenance contracts.
The new spending envelope will increase by almost £14bn in cash terms, £8bn of which will come from GDP growth, meaning only £6bn will be “new” money.
Much of that will be swallowed by the cost of new nuclear submarines, rebuilding stockpiles, commitments to Ukraine and pensions, a public service perennial.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:21
How will the UK scale up defence?
Most of what’s left will inevitably go to British defence “majors”, including BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce and Babcock, along with overseas multinationals with significant UK operations including Leonardo (Italian) and Thales (French).
More from Money
These companies say they are ready to step up, but identify a range of barriers, some in common with other engineering and manufacturing industries. Energy prices, rising employment taxes and workers’ rights reforms are all issues.
Specifically, they also want a clear plan of what the government wants to spend it on, scheduled to be set out in a defence spending review. Defence contracts are long-term and companies need certainty to invest.
For the small and medium-sized businesses the chancellor says she wants to participate, there are challenges of funding and access. In an industry where 5% of companies receive 95% of the money, breaking through is a challenge.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:19
A look at the Jackal
Everyone wants less red tape in MoD contracting, and there are calls for reform of single source contracting, where deals are struck without competition for reasons including national security or intellectual property, with regulated profit margins of less than 10%.
Perhaps the biggest culture change however concerns the shift to electronic warfare, and the importance of the digital frontline.
Clive Higgins, CEO of Leonardo UK and vice-president of industry group ADS said defence companies need to behave less like manufacturers and more like big tech, making six-monthly software upgrades as important as 20-year frigate contracts.
“The learning coming out loud and clear from Ukraine is that you’re having to operate more like a software company than an old-fashioned engineering,” he said.
“We need computer scientists, software engineers, data engineers, understanding all of that massive information coming through, allowing us to iterate quickly and put a solution in place correctly to defend against new threats coming in.
“We’re competing against the tech sector, with huge budgets and fintech in banking as well. So we need to ensure that we’ve got that capability with us in the UK to deliver.”
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Thousands of motorists who bought cars on finance before 2021 could be set for payouts as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has said it will consult on a compensation scheme.
In a statement released on Sunday, the FCA said its review of the past use of motor finance “has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers”.
“Where consumers have lost out, they should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way,” the statement continued.
The FCA said it estimates the cost of any scheme, including compensation and administrative costs, to be no lower than £9bn – adding that a total cost of £13.5bn is “more plausible”.
It is unclear how many people could be eligible for a pay-out. The authority estimates most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation.
The consultation will be published by early October and any scheme will be finalised in time for people to start receiving compensation next year.
What motorists should do next
The FCA says you may be affected if you bought a car under a finance scheme, including hire purchase agreements, before 28 January 2021.
Anyone who has already complained does not need to do anything.
The authority added: “Consumers concerned that they were not told about commission, and who think they may have paid too much for the finance, should complain now.”
Its website advises drivers to complain to their finance provider first.
If you’re unhappy with the response, you can then contact the Financial Ombudsman.
The FCA has said any compensation scheme will be easy to participate in, without drivers needing to use a claims management company or law firm.
It has warned motorists that doing so could end up costing you 30% of any compensation in fees.
The announcement comes after the Supreme Court ruled on a separate, but similar, case on Friday.
The court overturned a ruling that would have meant millions of motorists could have been due compensation over “secret” commission payments made to car dealers as part of finance arrangements.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:34
Car finance scandal explained
The FCA’s case concerns discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) – a practice banned in 2021.
Under these arrangements, brokers and dealers increased the amount of interest they earned without telling buyers and received more commission for it. This is said to have then incentivised sellers to maximise interest rates.
In light of the Supreme Court’s judgment, any compensation scheme could also cover non-discretionary commission arrangements, the FCA has said. These arrangements are ones where the buyer’s interest rate did not impact the dealer’s commission.
This is because part of the court’s ruling “makes clear that non-disclosure of other facts relating to the commission can make the relationship [between a salesperson and buyer] unfair,” it said.
It was previously estimated that about 40% of car finance deals included DCAs while 99% involved a commission payment to a broker.
Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: “It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It’s fair for their customers to be compensated.
“We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal.”
The London-listed investment group ICG is closing in on a £200m deal to buy three of Britain’s biggest regional airports.
Sky News has learnt that ICG is expected to sign a formal agreement to buy Bournemouth, Exeter and Norwich airports later this month.
The trio of sites collectively serve just over 2 million passengers annually.
ICG is buying the airports from Rigby Group, a privately owned conglomerate which has interests in the hotels, software and technology sectors.
Exeter acted as the hub for Flybe, the regional carrier which collapsed in the aftermath of the pandemic.
The deal will come amid a frenzy of activity involving Britain’s major airports as infrastructure investors seek to exploit a recovery in their valuations.
AviAlliance, which is owned by the Canadian pension fund PSP Investments, agreed to buy the parent company of Aberdeen, Glasgow and Southampton airports for £1.55bn last year.
More from Money
London City Airport’s shareholder base has just been shaken up with a deal which saw Australia’s Macquarie take a large stake.
French investor Ardian has increased its investment in Heathrow Airport as the UK’s biggest aviation hub proposes an expansion that will cost tens of billions of pounds.
Some of the world’s leading tech companies are betting big on very small innovations.
Last week, Samsung released its Galaxy Z Fold 7 which – when open – has a thickness of just 4.2mm, one of the slimmest folding phones ever to hit the market.
And Honor, a spin-off from Chinese smartphone company Huawei, will soon ship its latest foldable – the slimmest in the world. Its new Honor Magic V5 model is only 8.8mm thick when folded, and a mere 4.1mm when open.
Apple is also expected to release a foldable in the second half of next year, according to a note by analysts at JPMorgan published this week.
The race to miniaturise technology is speeding up, the ultimate prize being the next evolution in consumer devices.
Whether it be wearable devices, such as smartglasses, watches, rings or foldables – there is enormous market potential for any manufacturer that can make its products small enough.
Despite being thinner than its predecessor, Honor claims its Magic V5 also offers significant improvements to battery life, processing power, and camera capabilities.
More from Money
Hope Cao, a product expert at Honor told Sky News the progress was “due largely to our silicon carbon battery technology”. These batteries are a next-generation breakthrough that offers higher energy density compared to traditional lithium-ion batteries, and are becoming more common in consumer devices.
Image: The Magic V5. Pic: Honor
Honor also told Sky News it had used its own AI model “to precisely test and find the optimum design, which was both the slimmest, as well as, the most durable.”
However, research and development into miniaturisation goes well beyond just folding phones.
A company that’s been at the forefront of developing augmented reality (AR) glasses, Xreal, was one of the first to release a viable pair to the consumer market.
Xreal’s Ralph Jodice told Sky News “one of our biggest engineering challenges is shrinking powerful augmented reality technology into a form factor that looks and feels like everyday sunglasses”.
Xreal’s specs can display images on the lenses like something out of a sci-fi movie – allowing the wearer to connect most USB-C compatible devices such as phones, laptops and handheld consoles to an IMAX-sized screen anywhere they go.
Image: Pic: Xreal
Experts at The Metaverse Society suggest prices of these wearable devices could be lowered by shifting the burden of computing from the headset to a mobile phone or computer, whose battery and processor would power the glasses via a cable.
However, despite the daunting challenge, companies are doubling down on research and making leaps in the area.
Social media giant Meta is also vying for dominance in the miniature market.
Image: Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses are shown off at the annual British Educational Training and Technology conference. Pic: PA
Meta’s Ray-Ban sunglasses (to which they recently added an Oakley range), cannot project images on the lenses like the pair from Xreal – instead they can capture photos, footage and sound. When connected to a smartphone they can even use your phone’s 5G connection to ask Meta’s AI what you’re looking at, and ask how to save a particular type of houseplant for example.
Gareth Sutcliffe, a tech and media analyst at Enders Analysis, tells Sky News wearables “are a green field opportunity for Meta and Google” to capture a market of “hundreds of millions of users if these devices sell at similar rates to mobile phones”.
Li-Chen Miller, Meta’s vice president of product and wearables, recently said: “You’d be hard-pressed to find a more interesting engineering problem in the company than the one that’s at the intersection of these two dynamics, building glasses [with onboard technology] that people are comfortable wearing on their faces for extended periods of time … and willing to wear them around friends, family, and others nearby.”
Mr Sutcliffe points out that “Meta’s R&D spend on wearables looks extraordinary in the context of limited sales now, but should the category explode in popularity, it will be seen as a great strategic bet.”
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s long-term aim is to combine the abilities of both Xreal and the Ray-Bans into a fully functioning pair of smartglasses, capable of capturing content, as well as display graphics onscreen.
However, despite recently showcasing a prototype model, the company was at pains to point out that it was still far from ready for the consumer market.
This race is a marathon not a sprint – or as Sutcliffe tells Sky News “a decade-long slog” – but 17 years after the release of the first iPhone, people are beginning to wonder what will replace it – and it could well be a pair of glasses.