The chancellor has said she is “confident” 10,000 civil service jobs can be axed after numbers ballooned during the pandemic – as she seeks to cut more than £2bn from the budget.
Rachel Reeves has told Sky News she is certain the government can deliver those cuts to “back office jobs” to free up resources for “front line” services.
She is expected to unveil a raft of spending cuts during the spring statement on Wednesday – and has reportedly ruled out tax rises.
The FDA union has said the government needs to be honest about the move, first reported by The Telegraph, and the “impact it will have on public services”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:29
What to expect from the spring statement
Reeves concedes cuts won’t be pain-free
Appearing on Sky’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme, the chancellor was pushed repeatedly for a precise number of civil service jobs she wants to cut, and she eventually replied: “I’m confident that we can reduce civil service numbers by 10,000.
“And during COVID, there were big increases in the number of people that were working in the civil service.
More on Rachel Reeves
Related Topics:
“That was the right thing to do to respond to those challenges. But it’s not right that we just keep those numbers there forever.”
Ms Reeves said there are “a number” of civil service jobs that can be done by technology, while “efficiencies” can also be made by getting rid of quangos.
Asked what roles she expects to no longer need, she said: “It will be up for every department to set out those plans.
“But I would rather have people working on the front line in our schools and our hospitals and our police, rather than back office jobs.”
She said cuts will be made to things like travel budgets, spending on consultants, and also on communications.
She conceded that the cuts will not be pain free, but says she would rather spend money to “deliver better public services”.
Image: Chancellor Rachel Reeves will give the spring statement next week. Pic: PA
Civil service departments will first have to reduce administrative budgets by 10%, which is expected to save £1.5bn a year by 2028-29.
The following year, the reduction should be 15%, the Cabinet Office will say – a saving of £2.2bn a year.
The chancellor has also said she won’t be putting up taxes on Wednesday, telling The Sun On Sunday: “This is not a budget. We’re not going to be doing tax raising.”
Ms Reeves added: “We did have to put up some taxes on businesses and the wealthiest in the country in the budget [in the autumn].
“We will not be doing that in the spring statement next week.”
The chancellor has repeatedly insisted she won’t drop her fiscal rules which preclude borrowing to fund day-to-day spending.
Civil service departments will receive instructions from the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden in the coming week, The Telegraph reported.
“To deliver our Plan for Change we will reshape the state so it is fit for the future. We cannot stick to business as usual,” a Cabinet Office source said.
“By cutting administrative costs we can target resources at frontline services – with more teachers in classrooms, extra hospital appointments and police back on the beat.”
The move comes after the government last week revealed welfare cuts it believes will save £5bn a year by the end of the decade.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
FDA general secretary Dave Penman said the union welcomed a move away from “crude headcount targets” but that the distinction between the back office and frontline is “artificial”.
“Elected governments are free to decide the size of the civil service they want, but cuts of this scale and speed will inevitably have an impact on what the civil service will be able to deliver for ministers and the country…
“The budgets being cut will, for many departments, involve the majority of their staff and the £1.5bn savings mentioned equates to nearly 10% of the salary bill for the entire civil service.”
Ministers need to set out what areas of work they are prepared to stop as part of spending plans, he said.
“The idea that cuts of this scale can be delivered by cutting HR and comms teams is for the birds. This plan will require ministers to be honest with the public and their civil servants about the impact this will have on public services.”
Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect union, warned that “a cheaper civil service is not the same as a better civil service”.
“Prospect has consistently warned government against adopting arbitrary targets for civil service headcount cuts which are more about saving money than about genuine civil service reform.
“The government say they will not fall into this trap again. But this will require a proper assessment of what the civil service will and won’t do in future.”
Sir Keir Starmer has declared it his “moral mission” to “turn the tide on the lost decade of young kids left as collateral damage”.
The government launches its 10-year youth plan today, which has pledged £500m to reviving youth services.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has also warned that young people are now “the most isolated in generations” and face challenges that are “urgent and demand a major change in direction”.
But despite the strong language, the Conservatives have warned that “under Labour, the outlook for the next generation is increasingly bleak”.
Launching the 10-year strategy, Sir Keir said: “As a dad and as prime minister, I believe it is our generation’s greatest responsibility to turn the tide on the lost decade of young kids left as collateral damage. It is our moral mission.
“Today, my government sets out a clear, ambitious and deliverable plan – investing in the next generation so that every child has the chance to see their talents take them as far as their ability can.”
What’s in the government’s strategy?
Under the plans, the government will seek to give 500,000 more young people across England access to a trusted adult outside their homes – who are assigned through a formal programme – and online resources about staying safe.
The prime minister said the plans will also “ensure” that those who choose to do apprenticeships rather than go to university “will have the same respect and opportunity as everyone else”.
OTHER MEASURES INCLUDE
Creating 70 “young futures” hubs by March 2029, as part of a £70m programme to provide access to youth workers – the first eight of these will open by March next year;
Establishing a £60m Richer Young Lives fund to support organisations in “underserved” areas to deliver high-quality youth work and activities;
Improving wellbeing, personal development and life skills through a new £22.5m programme of support around the school day – which will operate in up to 400 schools;
Investing £15m to recruit and train youth workers, volunteers and “trusted adults”;
Improving youth services by putting £5m into local partnerships, information-sharing and digital tech.
The plan comes following a so-called “state of the nation” survey commissioned by Ms Nandy, which heard from more than 14,000 young people across England.
Launching the strategy, she said: “Young people have been crystal clear in speaking up in our consultation: they need support for their mental health, spaces to meet with people in their communities and real opportunities to thrive. We will give them what they want.”
Image: Lisa Nandy will speak about the plan on Sky News on Wednesday morning. Pic: PA
But the Conservatives have criticised the government for scrapping the National Citizen Service (NCS), which ended in March this year.
Shadow culture secretary Nigel Huddlestone said “any renewed investment in youth services is of course welcome”, but said Labour’s “economic mismanagement and tax hikes are forcing businesses to close, shrinking opportunities while inflation continues to climb”.
“The system is more than broken – it crossed that limit a long time ago,” says Palestinian asylum seeker Ibrahim Altaqatqa.
Ibrahim came to the UK two years ago on a tourist visa – then claimed asylum.
In the time he’s been waiting to have his claim processed, he’s met his partner Yvonne, who is English, and five weeks ago their baby daughter Alisha was born.
Image: Ibrahim with partner Yvonne and five-week-old daughter Alisha
But his asylum claim remains unresolved, and he says he can’t return to his home near Hebron in the West Bank because of his political activism.
“I can’t just be stuck like this,” he says. “I can’t just waste day after day of my life waiting for somebody to say ‘OK, we give you a decision’.”
He wants to move on with his life and be allowed to work, he says.
“I don’t think you need two years to process any asylum claim. I don’t think there’s any case that’s complicated to that level. I’m not single any more. I’ve got other responsibilities now.”
Image: Alisha was born in the UK five weeks ago
‘I’d be happy to join hotel protests’
Formerly a farmer in the Golan Heights, Ibrahim says he’s well aware of the shifting public mood over immigration and shares frustration over the money being spent on asylum seekers.
“I don’t think they are putting their anger toward the right group,” he says. “On many occasions, I spoke with a lot of them – the people who were protesting by the hotel.
“I said ‘if you are really angry and if you really want to save your country, I will be more than happy to come with you and let’s go together to protest’.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:32
Protests over plans to house asylum seekers in barracks
Ibrahim says he stayed in three Home Office-funded asylum hotels and claims at one point he got scabies.
He claims the food and conditions were so bad at one point, he left and slept on the streets.
Huge backlog of asylum claims
Meanwhile, the National Audit Office (NAO), the UK’s independent public spending watchdog, has published a study on the processing and costs of people claiming asylum, examining the causes of delays and inefficiencies.
It analysed a sample of 5,000 asylum claims lodged almost three years ago and found 35% of them have so far been granted, while 9% of the claimants have been removed from the UK.
But the claims of more than half – 56% – remain unresolved.
Ruth Kelly, NAO chief analyst, says ministers have tended to take “short-term reactive interventions to fix problems, but then these have led to other pressures forming elsewhere in the system and new backlogs forming”.
“That’s led to wasted funds, poor outcomes for asylum seekers, and harm to the government’s ability to meet its obligations to citizens.”
The NAO estimates in the last year the Home Office and Ministry of Justice spent nearly £5bn on asylum – more than £2bn of that on asylum hotels.
It says there is a lack of a “whole system” approach within the Home Office; no shared objectives and there needs to be more robust shared data.
The NAO said it found the Home Office’s effectiveness and value for money are being undermined because of fundamental barriers that mean people seeking asylum spend extended periods waiting in the system.
The government has announced a raft of new measures to overhaul the asylum system but the watchdog points out they will take time and parliamentary approval to introduce.
In November, the home secretary acknowledged some people who are coming to the UK are economic migrants seeking to abuse the system, with even genuine refugees passing through other safe countries searching for the most attractive place to seek refuge.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:40
Beth Rigby: The two big problems with Labour’s asylum plan
Government vows to ‘restore order’
With asylum claims falling across Europe but rising in the UK, the government says it wants to reduce illegal migrant arrivals and increase the removal of people with no right to be in the UK.
A Home Office spokesperson said the home secretary “recently announced the most sweeping changes to the asylum system in a generation to deal with the problems outlined in this report.
“We are already making progress – with nearly 50,000 people with no right to be here removed, a 63% rise in illegal working arrests and over 21,000 small boat crossing attempts prevented so far this year.
“Our new reforms will restore order and control, remove the incentives which draw people to come to the UK illegally and increase removals of those with no right to be here.”
The first serving member of the British armed forces has been killed in Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale war.
He died on Tuesday following a “tragic accident” while watching the Ukrainian military test a new weapon away from the frontline, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said.
Hostile fire is not thought to have been involved.
Image: The frontline town of Kostiantynivka in Donetsk region in Ukraine. Pic: Reuters
The Sun reported the serviceman was in the Special Forces. An MoD spokesperson would neither confirm nor deny the claim and the individual’s rank and service have not yet been revealed.
“My deepest sympathy and condolences to the family of the member of our Armed Forces who sadly lost their life today,” Sir Keir said.
“Their service and sacrifice will never be forgotten.
More on Russia
Related Topics:
Mr Healey said he was “devastated by the death of a UK service person in Ukraine.
“My thoughts are with their family, friends and colleagues as they grieve for a loved one. Our hearts go out to them.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
5:12
Trump ‘desperate’ for a peace deal
What role do Britons have in Ukraine?
The UK has previously acknowledged the presence of a small number of service personnel in Ukraine who are helping the Ukrainian military, as well as providing security for the British ambassador and other diplomats at the embassy in Kyiv.
There are also British troops who have been giving medical training.
Dozens of former British troops, as well as foreign fighters from many other countries, have travelled to Ukraine to fight for the Ukrainian armed forces ever since Russia launched its full-scale war almost four years ago.
A number of them have been killed in battle.
But this is the first time a serving member of the military has died.
Image: The aftermath of a Russian drone attack on Dnipro. Pic: AP
“It is with deep regret that we must announce that a member of the UK Armed Forces died in Ukraine this morning, Tuesday 9 December,” the MoD said in a statement.
“He was injured in a tragic accident whilst observing Ukrainian forces test a new defensive capability, away from the front lines.”
It was not immediately clear whether the accident happened on the same day that he died. The location where it occurred has also not been confirmed.
The serviceman’s family has been notified.
Image: Russian troops launched a drone attack on Dnipro on Monday. Pic: AP
Kremlin will likely seek to exploit death
The death shines a rare light on the little-discussed work of the UK military inside the country.
Very little is said about the mission amid concerns that Russia could exploit the discrete UK presence to falsely claim that serving British soldiers are actively fighting against Russian troops.
The first confirmed death of a serving member of the British armed forces confirms the significant risks they are taking.
But the Kremlin will also likely seize on the tragedy to amplify bogus claims about NATO forces already being deployed in Ukraine, fighting directly against Russia.