Connect with us

Published

on

Arizona’s strategic crypto reserve bills heads for full floor vote

Two strategic digital asset reserve bills in Arizona cleared Arizona’s House Rules Committee on March 24 and are now headed to the House floor for a full vote.

The bills together, if passed into law, would clear the way for Arizona to establish strategic digital assets reserves composed of existing assets confiscated through criminal proceedings in addition to newly invested public funds.

The Republicans hold a 33-27 majority in Arizona’s House of Representatives, giving both bills a decent chance of passing. 

Arizona’s strategic crypto reserve bills heads for full floor vote

Source: Bitcoin Laws

However, according to Bitcoin Laws, the final hurdle could be the state’s Democratic governor, Katie Hobbs. Hobbs has a history of vetoing bills before the House, having blocked 22% of bills in 2024 — the highest rate of any state governor.

Arizona’s two crypto bills explained

The two bills recently approved by Arizona’s House Rules Committee are the Strategic Digital Assets Reserve Bill (SB 1373) and the Arizona Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act (SB 1025). 

The Strategic Digital Assets Reserve Bill (SB 1373) focuses on establishing a strategic digital assets reserve made up of digital assets seized through criminal proceedings to be managed by the state’s treasurer. 

The treasurer would be limited to investing no more than 10% of the fund’s total value each fiscal year. However, they would also be able to loan the fund’s assets in order to increase returns, provided that doing so doesn’t increase financial risks.

The Arizona Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act (SB 1025) specifically deals with Bitcoin (BTC). The bill proposes allowing Arizona’s Treasury and state retirement system to invest up to 10% of its available funds into Bitcoin. 

Additionally, SB 1025 would also allow for the state’s Bitcoin reserve to be stored in a secure, segregated account inside a federal Bitcoin reserve, should one be established.

Related: US states lead in strategic Bitcoin reserve creation — Will Trump deliver on his BTC promise?

While Arizona is now considered to be leading the race to establish a state-based digital asset reserve, several other states are hot on its heels.

On March 6, the Texas Senate passed the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (SB-21) by a vote of 25-5. The Texan bill still needs to pass the House and get the governor’s signature to pass into law. Following this vote, a new bill was introduced by Democrat Representative Ron Reynolds to cap the size of the previously uncapped reserve to $250 million.

Utah also recently passed Bitcoin legislation, but all references to the establishment of a strategic reserve were removed at the last moment.

Meanwhile, the Oklahoma House passed its Bitcoin Reserve Bill HB1203, 77-15 on March 25. That bill will now head to the state’s senate.

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Published

on

By

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family’s crypto project, is planning to release a stablecoin, raising concern over the US president’s exposure to the digital asset industry.

The project released a memecoin immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the price of which skyrocketed and crashed soon after, causing many to accuse WLFI of a pump-and-dump scheme.

WLFI also made multimillion-dollar purchases of crypto tokens immediately prior to important crypto-related events the president has attended or announcements influencing the industry. WLFI purchased $20 million of various tokens ahead of the March 7 White House Crypto Summit. 

As World Liberty Financial’s portfolio grows and regulator oversight disappears from the crypto industry, observers and legal scholars are becoming increasingly concerned over conflicts of interest within the Trump administration. 

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Son Eric Trump pumps his father’s memecoin ahead of the inauguration. Source: Eric Trump

Trump’s stablecoin, USD1, riddled with liabilities 

WLFI announced on March 25 that it will launch the new stablecoin USD1, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents.”

WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff said in the announcement that the coin can be used for “seamless, secure cross-border transactions.” 

News of USD1’s forthcoming release came just days after WLFI secured more than $500 million through the sale of its own WLFI tokens. 

Observers have already begun to raise the alarm about the possible security risks posed by a stablecoin connected to the president. There are also concerns over the possibility of market manipulation and violations of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution — a section of the document that protects against undue influence over American leaders. 

As regards the latter, cyber and digital media attorney Andrew Rossow told Cointelegraph that the stablecoin is “a direct affront to constitutional safeguards meant to prevent conflicts of interest.”

“With Trump and his family controlling 60% of World Liberty’s equity interests, the USD1 stablecoin could facilitate indirect financial gains or undue foreign influence over US policy, particularly if foreign entities invest in or use the stablecoin.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

WLFI makes up a sizeable chunk of Trump’s estimated net worth. Source: Fortune

Corey Frayer, who worked on crypto policy at the Securities and Exchange Commission under former President Joe Biden, said that the project’s emphasis on cross-border payments was particularly worrisome and that foreign entities may invest as a way to gain favor with Trump.

“There’s a lot of opacity around this marketplace, and prior relationships with illicit finance,” Frayer told The New York Times. 

US policymakers have already noted the possibility for foreign influence following the launch of Trump’s eponymous memecoin in January.

At the time, Democratic Representative Maxine Waters — a top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee — wrote that “anyone globally, even individuals who have been sanctioned by the U.S. or banned from our capital markets, can now trade and profit off of $TRUMP through various unregulated platforms.”

Related: Congress repealed the IRS broker rule, but can it regulate DeFi?

In addition to potential foreign influence, observers are concerned that Trump’s crypto ventures could threaten market stability and integrity and open up global markets to manipulation. 

Referencing USD1, Heath Mayo, founder of the Trump-alternative conservative movement Principles First, said that a sitting president issuing an instrument backed by public debt should be illegal, adding that the project had “terrible incentives and corrupt use of US taxpayer credit.”

Rossow said that the president’s role in a stablecoin project while at the same time working to craft stablecoin legislation in the form of the GENIUS Act is “a constitutional violation that could destabilize regulatory integrity.”

Trump’s influence over the industry and ability to drop enforcement actions against crypto executives who support him create “an uneven playing field, disadvantaging competitors and violating principles of equal protection under the law.”

Options for Trump’s crypto conflicts of interest

Trump, who has long stated an affinity with former President Andrew Jackson, seems to be holding to the latter’s strategy of acknowledging judicial rulings — and then doing what he wants regardless. 

The presidential administration has already shown that it is willing to defy orders from federal judges when, earlier this month, it ignored a verbal order from a federal judge to turn around two planes full of alleged gang members bound for the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

Regarding crypto, Senator Elizabeth Warren has already called for an ethics probe into Trump’s crypto activities. She said that the president’s memecoin “massively enriched Trump personally, enabled a mechanism for the crypto industry to funnel cash to him, and created a volatile financial asset that allows anyone in the world to financially speculate on Trump’s political fortunes.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Warren, a longtime crypto critic, has taken aim at WLFI. Source: Senate Banking Committee

The probe, if it had a chance to begin with, doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere, and Congressional Republicans are busy working on the GENIUS Act, which even has the support of a handful of Democrats. 

What, if anything, can be done?

Rossow said that, despite changes in SEC leadership, other agencies like the Financial Crime Enforcement Network could still pursue investigations. 

He also noted that state-level action from local regulators and attorneys general is “not just possible but imperative, especially in states with robust consumer protection laws.”

He added that international regulatory bodies could exert pressure, stating that the “global nature” of crypto means that foreign governments could work for better oversight and more robust regulations. 

Related: Who’s running in Trump’s race to make US a ‘Bitcoin superpower?’

In any case, he said that the current situation demands multifaceted action, as there is currently a need to “safeguard the principles of fair governance and maintain the US’s credibility in the global financial system.”

Some in the crypto industry see no problem at all and believe the president’s involvement is just another sign of how the industry is reaching mainstream appeal. 

Chris Barrett, senior director of communications at Chainlink, congratulated the project, stating that “the global financial world runs on the U.S. dollar, and stablecoins are about to make that even harder to change.”

Arnoud Star Busmann, CEO of European stablecoin issuer Quantoz Payments, told Cointelegraph that USD1 is reflective of “increasing validation from world-leading brands that stablecoins are carving the path for the mainstream financial industry to access crypto assets and tokenized real-world assets.”

The Blockchain Association — an industry lobby group — declined Cointelegraph’s request for comment. 

Magazine: Arbitrum co-founder skeptical of move to based and native rollups: Steven Goldfeder

Continue Reading

Politics

Binance exec shares details about his release from Nigerian detention

Published

on

By

Binance exec shares details about his release from Nigerian detention

Binance exec shares details about his release from Nigerian detention

Tigran Gambaryan, a Binance executive who was held in Nigeria for eight months in 2024 facing tax and money laundering charges, provided additional details about his experience and what led to his release.

Speaking at the DC Blockchain Summit on March 26, Gambaryan, the head of financial crime compliance at Binance, said the Nigerian government had held him hostage, suggesting the criminal charges were a pretext to “get something” from Binance. According to the Binance executive, he saw signs suggesting he could be released “around a month” before he was returned to the US.

“It was around the time of the [United Nations] General Assembly in 2024 happened is when that pressure really ramped up against the Nigerian government, and it realized that I was more of a liability,” said Gambaryan. “Before that, they kinda saw me as an asset they could use to get their billions out of Binance.”

Binance exec shares details about his release from Nigerian detention

Tigran Gambaryan speaking at the DC Blockchain Summit on March 26. Source: Rumble

Since his handover to US authorities in October, Gambaryan has made few public statements concerning his detention and release. The Binance executive’s family and reports from Nigeria suggested that his health deteriorated after he was initially placed into custody in February, including issues from pneumonia, malaria, and a herniated disc.

From arrest to release 

Gambaryan and Binance executive Nadeem Anjarwalla flew into Nigeria’s capital city of Abuja on Feb. 25 to discuss the crypto exchange’s activities. Nigerian authorities had reportedly been scrutinizing “suspicious flows” through Binance’s local arm and detained both men on Feb. 26.

While Gambaryan was being held, Binance announced it would discontinue services using the Nigerian naira, effectively exiting the country’s market. Nigeria’s Economic Financial Crime Commission later charged the two executives with money laundering, to which Gambaryan pleaded not guilty.

Related: Binance suspends staffer after internal investigation into insider trading

He was denied bail and sent to Kuje Prison, where his family reported he began suffering from health problems — a video released in September showed Gambaryan struggling to walk to court, prompting outrage from many supporters. After numerous calls from lawmakers and government officials for his release and delays in court, Gambaryan was returned to the United States on Oct. 23.

“Hopefully, those that did this will one day face justice,” said Gambaryan at the DC Blockchain Summit, referring to Nigerian authorities.

A March 13 statement that appeared to be from Nigeria’s Ministry of Information claimed Gambaryan’s description of his detention was “baseless” and “without merit.” Cointelegraph reached out to Nigerian officials for comment but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

Magazine: Meet lawyer Max Burwick — ‘The ambulance chaser of crypto’

Continue Reading

Politics

IRS crypto broker rules, explained: What you need to know in 2025

Published

on

By

IRS crypto broker rules, explained: What you need to know in 2025

IRS crypto broker rules, explained: What you need to know in 2025

How does the IRS define a crypto broker?

The definition of the term “broker” includes individuals or entities that regularly provide services to carry out digital asset transfers. This definition ensures that only those truly “in a position to know” transaction details are subject to Form 1099-DA reporting requirements.

These US Internal Revenue Service rules are built on prior rulemaking (T.D. 10000) from July 2024 and focus on extending broker reporting obligations to decentralized finance (DeFi), which involves digital asset transactions without a traditional intermediary. 

T.D. 10021 introduces the term “digital asset middleman,” which the IRS previously delayed due to its complexity and controversy.

The broker reporting mandate originates from the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It expanded existing broker reporting obligations under Sections 6045 and 6045A to include digital assets. The provision is projected to generate nearly $28 billion in revenue over a decade.

Entities classified as brokers include:

  • Digital asset exchanges: Both custodial and non-custodial platforms that execute trades.
  • Hosted wallet providers: Those managing wallets and verifying user identities.
  • Digital asset kiosks: Bitcoin ATMs and other physical kiosks dealing in cryptocurrencies.
  • Crypto payment processors: Platforms that facilitate digital asset transactions while verifying buyers and sellers.
  • DeFi brokers: Only front-end service providers, such as token swap interfaces, are considered brokers. Activities like liquidity provision, staking and lending remain exempt from reporting requirements.

Providers of “unhosted” wallets, where users retain full control over their private keys, are generally exempt unless they function similarly to an exchange.

The definition of a digital asset broker has been highly debated after the enactment of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in November 2021.

How the IRS expands the definition of “broker” in digital asset transactions

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117-58), specifically Section 80603, broadened the definition of “broker” under Internal Revenue Code Section 6045 to include those facilitating digital asset transfers. 

Internal Revenue Service regulations broadly define brokers as entities engaged in digital asset sales or exchanges. Here is a timeline of the regulations:

Custodial brokers (June 2024 — Treasury Decision 10000)

Custodial brokers include operators of custodial digital asset trading platforms, such as centralized exchanges (CEXs) that hold customers’ private keys. It extends to hosted wallet providers, digital asset kiosks (e.g., Bitcoin ATMs) and certain processors of digital asset payments, such as crypto payment processors. These entities must report because they have custody, making it feasible to track transactions.

DeFi brokers (December 2024 — Treasury Decision 10021)

The IRS’s December 2024 regulations focus on trading front-end service providers in the DeFi ecosystem, such as interfaces that connect users to decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The Treasury and IRS use a three-part model (interface, application, settlement layers) to identify DeFi participants, focusing on those with sufficient control or influence, aligning with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidance.

However, as DeFi platforms lack centralized control, there were concerns about privacy and compliance. 

Efforts to repeal the IRS broker rule

In March 2025, discussions on repealing the DeFi broker rules intensified, with the Senate voting 70–27 on March 4 and the House voting 292–132 on March 11, to repeal the DeFi broker rules under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), as detailed in House Vote on Repeal. 

President Donald Trump has signaled support, with his crypto czar, David Sacks, affirming the administration’s backing to the repeal. If signed, this repeal would permanently bar the IRS from implementing similar regulations, significantly impacting DeFi reporting.

With bipartisan support, including 76 Democrats joining Republicans in the House vote, this reflects broader political shifts toward supporting crypto innovation, especially under President Trump’s pro-crypto stance, as seen in his executive order for a national crypto stockpile.

Did you know? Five draft Forms 1099-DA and three draft Final Instruction versions preceded the finalized IRS crypto broker rules. On Jan. 8, 2025, the IRS issued updated 2025 General Instructions for Certain Information Returns, which included instructions for Form 1099-DA.

What is Form 1099-DA? The new crypto tax form for 2025

Form 1099-DA, titled “Digital Asset Proceeds from Broker Transactions,” is a new tax form introduced by the IRS to standardize the reporting of digital asset transactions, such as those involving cryptocurrencies. It was released on Dec. 5, 2024.

It’s designed to help taxpayers accurately report their gains or losses from selling or exchanging digital assets and to ensure the IRS can track this income more effectively. Think of it as a specialized version of other 1099 forms — like the 1099-B used for stocks — but tailored for the unique world of crypto and other blockchain-based assets.

The form requires “brokers” (like crypto exchanges or platforms) to report specific details about your digital asset sales or exchanges to both you and the IRS. For transactions in 2025, brokers must report:

  • Customers’ name, address and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
  • The date and time of each transaction
  • The amount and type of digital asset sold (e.g., Bitcoin, Ether), including a unique nine-digit code from the Digital Token Identification Foundation (DTIF) to identify it
  • The gross proceeds (the total amount customers received in US dollars) from the sale.

Along with the crypto brokers, if you (i.e., a taxpayer resident in the US) sell or swap crypto through a broker, you’ll get a Form 1099-DA to use when filing your taxes. You’re still responsible for reporting all taxable crypto events, even if no form is issued (e.g., for trades on non-reporting platforms).

Key dates include:

  • Gross proceeds reporting: Begins for transactions on or after Jan. 1, 2025, with reports due in early 2026. This means you’ll receive your first Form 1099-DA for 2025 trades, due to you by Jan. 31, 2026, and to the IRS by Feb. 28 (or March 31 if filed electronically).
  • Basis reporting: Starts for transactions on or after Jan. 1, 2026, including cost basis and gain/loss character for certain brokers.

Why is this new form required?

Before Form 1099-DA, crypto tax reporting was a mess. Some exchanges issued Forms 1099-MISC or 1099-B, while others provided nothing, leaving taxpayers to manually track their trades. This inconsistency made it hard for people to report accurately and for the IRS to verify income. Thus, it’s part of a broader push to close the tax gap and bring crypto in line with traditional financial reporting.

Did you know? Unlike stock reporting, where Form 1099-B covers everything cleanly, crypto’s decentralized nature and lack of universal identifiers posed challenges. Form 1099-DA tackles this with the DTIF code and a focus on digital assets — defined as any blockchain-recorded value, like cryptocurrencies or non-fungible tokens (NFTs), but not cash.

How Form 1099-DA shifts crypto reporting

On Jan. 10, 2025, the IRS released the final version of Form 1099-DA, titled “Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions.” Brokers have been instructed to use this form to report specific digital asset transactions occurring from 2025 onward. 

Herein are the key highlights of the new Form 1099-DA and its implications:

Transition rule for tokenized securities

Digital assets previously reported under Form 1099-B, such as tokenized securities, must now shift to Form 1099-DA. For instance, sales of tokenized stocks or bonds should be reported on Form 1099-DA instead of Form 1099-B. 

However, a transitional rule for 2025 allows brokers to report cash sales of tokenized securities on either Form 1099-B or Form 1099-DA. This flexibility gives traditional brokers — who may not typically handle digital assets — extra time to update their systems for full compliance by 2026, as outlined in Treasury Decision 10000.

Form 1099-DA

Exception in tokenized securities rule

An exception to the general rule applies to tokenized securities settled or cleared on a Limited-Access Regulated Network (LARN). These transactions must be reported on Form 1099-B, not Form 1099-DA. 

If a LARN loses its regulated status, brokers can continue using Form 1099-B for affected transactions through the end of that calendar year, ensuring consistency during regulatory shifts.

Form 1099-B

Customer-provided acquisition information

Form 1099-DA includes a new checkbox (Box 8) that brokers must mark if they relied on customer-provided acquisition information to calculate the basis. 

This ties to final regulations allowing brokers to use such data for specific identification — pinpointing what units were sold or transferred — and requires them to disclose its use. This change, per Treasury Decision 10021, helps taxpayers align their records with broker reports.

Did you know? According to the 2025 General Instructions, Form 1099-DA electronic filing is required through the Information Reporting Intake System (IRIS), and Filing Information Returns Electronically System (FIRE) is not an option.

Noncovered status

Like Form 1099-B, Form 1099-DA requires brokers to indicate in Box 9 if a digital asset is a “noncovered security,” meaning its basis isn’t reported to the IRS. 

Unlike earlier drafts, the updated form no longer requires an explanation in Box 10 for this status — Box 10 is now reserved for future use. This simplifies reporting for assets acquired before basis tracking rules apply (e.g., pre-2026 purchases).

Number of decimal places

Brokers were earlier required to report the number of units of digital assets sold and transferred up to 10 decimal places. This requirement has been extended to 18 decimal places, reflecting the precision necessary in reporting digital asset transactions.​

Proceeds clarification

Total proceeds from the digital asset transaction should exclude gross proceeds from the initial sale of a specified non-fungible token (NFT) created or minted by the recipient. These amounts are instead reported separately in Box 11c, distinguishing creator earnings from secondary sales, per updated instructions.

Transfer date 

Box 12b records the date digital assets were transferred into a custodial account. The final instructions specify that this box should be left blank if the digital assets were transferred on various dates, accommodating scenarios where multiple transfers occur.​

Qualifying stablecoins and specified NFTs

Optional reporting for sales of qualifying stablecoins and specified NFTs comes with specific instructions. For specified NFTs, brokers enter code “999999999” in Box 1a and “Specified NFTs” in Box 1b. This ensures unique assets, like rare digital collectibles, are tracked distinctly from cryptocurrencies or stablecoins.

Applicable checkbox on Form 8949

Brokers must use new codes — G, H, J, K and Y — on Form 1099-DA to match the recipient’s Form 8949 (Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets) for the tax year. These codes help taxpayers correctly categorize gains or losses, linking broker reports to tax filings seamlessly.

Form 8949

Did you know? If asset sales remain unspecified, the IRS will apply first-in, first-out, which might lead to the taxpayer paying higher taxes.

How IRS crypto broker rules affect taxpayers

The IRS rolled out new cryptocurrency tax reporting rules effective Jan. 1, 2025, targeting brokers and investors with stricter record-keeping and reporting requirements. These changes aim to boost tax compliance and ensure digital asset transactions are reported accurately, bringing crypto in line with traditional financial assets. 

Here’s what’s new and what it means for you.

  • Cost basis tracking per account: Under the updated rules, crypto investors must now track their cost basis — the original purchase price — separately for each account or wallet, ditching the old universal tracking approach. For every transaction, you’ll need to record the purchase date, acquisition cost and specific details, like the wallet it’s tied to. Starting in 2025, brokers — like centralized exchanges — must report these transactions to the IRS using Form 1099-DA, mirroring how banks report stock trades. This shift, detailed in Treasury Decision 10000 (June 2024), closes loopholes by tying gains to specific accounts, making it harder to obscure taxable events.
  • Specific identification required for transactions: The new regulations require taxpayers to use specific identification for each digital asset sale, pinpointing the exact purchase date, amount and cost of the asset sold. If you don’t provide this, the IRS defaults to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method — selling your oldest coins first — which could inflate taxable gains if early purchases had lower costs. Previously, many investors averaged their cost basis across all holdings, a simpler but less precise method. This change, effective in 2025, demands detailed records to avoid unexpected tax bills.
  • Temporary safe harbor: To ease the switch, the IRS offers a temporary safe harbor under Revenue Procedure 2024-28. If you’ve been using a universal cost basis method, you have until Dec. 31, 2025, to reallocate your basis across accounts or wallets accurately. This one-time grace period lets you adjust records without penalty, but you’ll need to act fast — brokers won’t report basis until 2026 transactions, so 2025 is on you to get it right.
  • Penalties for noncompliance: Messing up these rules comes with a cost. The IRS has upped the stakes for 2025, increasing fines for underreporting crypto income, adding interest on unpaid taxes, and ramping up audits for mismatched gains and losses. Notice 2024-56 provides penalty relief for brokers making a good faith effort in 2025, but taxpayers don’t get the same leniency — noncompliance could trigger scrutiny, especially with Form 1099-DA giving the IRS clearer data to cross-check.

Notably, the IRS’s updated crypto broker rules also affect non-domiciled taxpayers — those living outside the US but subject to IRS reporting — by mandating detailed cost basis tracking for each account and specific identification of digital asset sales on Form 1099-DA, regardless of where they reside. 

For example, a US citizen in Europe or a foreign national with US-based crypto income must now maintain precise records of purchase dates and costs per wallet, facing increased compliance efforts and potential tax obligations on US-sourced gains.

From tracking cost basis per account to facing steeper penalties, these changes aim to align crypto with traditional finance, offering a brief safe harbor to adapt but signaling a clear shift: Compliance is no longer optional, and the tax net now stretches globally, leaving little room for oversight as the crypto landscape matures.

Continue Reading

Trending