Connect with us

Published

on

JD Vance is less liked among the UK public than Donald Trump, Sir Keir Starmer or any other major UK politician, a new poll shared with Sky News has found.

Just 14% of the British public have a favourable view of the US vice president, compared with 21% for Mr Trump and 29% for the prime minister and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage.

Ipsos questioned 1,132 adults aged 18 and over across Great Britain online between the 14 and 17 March – just weeks after the heated exchange between Mr Vance, Mr Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the White House over military assistance to Ukraine.

Politics latest: Farage brands protester ‘a saddo’

The poll was carried out before a conversation on the messaging app Signal – between US officials, including the vice president – was accidentally leaked to an American journalist, who was added to the encrypted chat in error.

In the conversation, Mr Vance and other officials – including National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – discussed plans to conduct airstrikes on Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis, which took place on 15 March.

During the discussion, Mr Vance questioned the rationale behind the military action, arguing that attacking the Houthis would largely serve European interests, with the continent benefiting from US protection of shipping lanes in the Red Sea that are a frequent target for attacks

More from Politics

US security breach latest: Trump dismisses war plan ‘glitch’

In a message addressed to Mr Hegseth, Mr Vance said: “If you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again.”

Mr Hegseth, who had made the case for military action against the Houthis, replied: “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. PATHETIC.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I know nothing’ about leak of military plans

Keiran Pedley, Ipsos director of politics, told Sky News: “It is clear from these numbers that Vance is unpopular with the British public.

“A majority hold an unfavourable view of the vice president, including clear majorities of Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem voters. Reform UK supporters are more split, with slightly more holding an unfavourable view than a favourable one.”

The leak of the messages to Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic’s editor in chief, has raised concerns about US national security and the Trump’s administration’s attitude towards Europe as it seeks to reach a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine to end the war.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Leaked security chat explained

President Trump has dismissed the significance of the accidental leaking of US military intelligence to Mr Goldberg, telling Garrett Haake, a reporter from Sky News’ US partner network NBC, that the journalist was “a sleazeball” and that his presence on the Signal chain had “no impact at all”.

Asked how he came to be added to the chat, Mr Trump said it was one of Mr Waltz’s staffers who “had his number on there”.

Asked if he still had confidence in Waltz, Trump said he did: “Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man.”

Read more:
Trump officials discussing war plans lambasted as ‘amateur hour’
DOGE staff getting daily death threats, says Elon Musk

The US president also expressed confidence in his team and supported comments by his defence secretary that the story was a non-issue, arguing it was “the only glitch in two months, and it turned out not to be a serious one”.

Downing Street has also insisted it is confident any UK intelligence shared with the US was being handled appropriately.

The prime minister’s official spokesman said: “The US is our closest ally when it comes to matters of defence, we have a long-standing relationship on intelligence and defence cooperation.

“We will continue to build on the very strong relationship we already have with the US on defence and security matters.”

Continue Reading

US

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

Published

on

By

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has been linked to a second group chat about sensitive military operations, which he reportedly shared with his wife, brother and personal lawyer.

The messages sent via the Signal messaging app are again understood to have contained details of an attack on Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis in March.

The second chat group, initially reported by The New York Times, included about a dozen people. It revealed details of the schedule of the airstrikes, according to the Reuters news agency.

Two sources with knowledge of the matter told Sky News’ US partner network NBC News there were 13 people in the second chat group, and Mr Hegseth divulged the information despite an aide warning him about using an unsecure communications system.

Mr Hegseth’s wife, Jennifer, a former Fox News producer, has attended sensitive meetings with foreign military counterparts, while his brother was hired at the Pentagon as a Department of Homeland Security liaison and senior adviser.

Military details from the first chat group were revealed by a journalist from The Atlantic magazine who was accidentally added to the Signal app by national security adviser Mike Waltz.

Mr Hegseth then shared sensitive information with cabinet officials about last month’s airstrike on targets in Yemen, which was later leaked.

Read more from Sky News:
What is Signal?
Who is Pete Hegseth?

Serious questions are being asked of Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (pictured in February). Pic: AP
Image:
Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (right) have used Signal to discuss sensitive government matters. Pic: AP

‘A non-story,’ says White House

But the White House has consistently defended Mr Hegseth.

Donald Trump dismissed the original leak as “something that can happen”.

Responding to the latest chat group, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said: “No matter how many times the legacy media tries to resurrect the same non-story, they can’t change the fact that no classified information was shared.

“Recently-fired ‘leakers’ are continuing to misrepresent the truth to soothe their shattered egos and undermine the President’s agenda, but the administration will continue to hold them accountable.”

The “leakers” referred to in the White House statement are four senior officials who were ousted from the Pentagon last week as part of an internal leak investigation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Leaked war plans: ‘Fairly serious’

‘Hegseth put lives at risk’

The New York Times reported that the second chat – named “Defence | Team Huddle” – was created on Mr Hegseth’s private phone.

It detailed the same warplane launch times as the first chat.

Several former and current officials have said sharing those operational details before a strike would have certainly been classified, and their release could have put pilots in danger.

Democratic politicians have repeatedly called for Mr Hegseth to step down.

“We keep learning how Pete Hegseth put lives at risk,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said in a post on X.

“But [Donald] Trump is still too weak to fire him. Pete Hegseth must be fired.”

The latest claims about Mr Hegseth emerged as Yemen’s Houthi rebels reported another wave of US airstrikes on Sunday, including on the capital Sanaa.

The Houthis said at least 12 people had been killed, with 30 more injured.

The US says its bombing campaign is in response to Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.

Continue Reading

US

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump’s deportation policy firm or cruel?

Published

on

By

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump's deportation policy firm or cruel?

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

The row over the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador from the US in error in March, continues to rock Washington DC.

US correspondent Martha Kelner speaks to Ron Vitiello, Donald Trump’s former acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, about the case and if the president’s border policies are working as he planned.

If you’ve got a question you’d like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.

Don’t forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

NB. This interview was recorded before Kilmar Abrego Garcia was moved from the CECOT prison – where terror suspects are held in severe conditions – to another detention centre in El Salvador.

Continue Reading

US

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

Published

on

By

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

DHL Express is suspending some shipments to the US as Donald Trump’s new tariff regime takes effect.

From 21 April, shipments worth more than $800 (£603) to US consumers from “any origin” will be temporarily suspended.

New rules that came into effect at the start of April made such shipments subject to increased customs checks.

“This change has caused a surge in formal customs clearances, which we are handling around the clock,” said the parcel delivery service.

Shipments going from business to business worth more than $800 aren’t affected by the suspension, but DHL warned they may also face delays.

Shipments under $800 to either businesses or consumers are not impacted, but one British cycle manufacturer suggested its US customers may need to split orders over $800 into “smaller shipments” to avoid the red tape.

Read more:
The art of doing a deal with Trump
Is there method to Trump’s madness?

More on Tariffs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Tariffs are making US ‘rich’

Trump targeting ‘deceptive’ practices

From May, shipments from China and Hong Kong that are worth less than $800 “will be subject to all applicable duties”, according to the White House.

“President Trump is targeting deceptive shipping practices by Chinese-based shippers, many of whom hide illicit substances, including synthetic opioids, in low-value packages,” it said in a statement.

Until now, deliveries worth less than $800 didn’t incur any duties, which allowed low-cost companies Chinese like Shein and Temu to make inroads in the US.

Both have warned their prices will now rise because of the rule changes, starting on 25 April.

Continue Reading

Trending