Russia has been accused of making “hollow statements about peace” after launching a missile strike that wounded dozens of people, including children, as it held talks with the US on a proposed ceasefire at sea in the war in Ukraine.
Russian and US officials met in Saudi Arabia on Monday, with Ukrainian and American delegations due to gather in Riyadh on Tuesday.
Both Russia and Ukraine have accused the other of undermining efforts to reach a pause in the three-year-old war.
Image: The Ritz-Carlton hotel, where talks between Russia and the US are being held in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Pic: Reuters
There was no immediate word on whether an agreement had been hammered out or progress made in Monday’s talks with Russia.
A Russian source told the Reuters news agency that a draft joint statement on the talks’ outcome has been sent to Moscow and Washington for approval, with the parties aiming to release it on Tuesday,
A White House source said the talks have been going “extremely well” and a positive announcement is expected soon.
The talks were expected to cover energy infrastructure and a potential pause in attacks in the Black Sea to ensure the safety of commercial shipping.
In an exchange with reporters at the White House, Donald Trump said territorial lines and the potential for US ownership of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in southern Ukraine have been part of the talks.
As the Russia-US meeting was under way, a Russian missile strike damaged a school and a hospital in the northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumy, wounding at least 88 people, including 17 children, according to the local council.
“Moscow speaks of peace while carrying out brutal strikes on densely populated residential areas in major Ukrainian cities,” Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha said.
“Instead of making hollow statements about peace, Russia must stop bombing our cities and end its war on civilians.”
Sumy is about 18.6 miles from the Russian border and is subject to regular drone and missile strikes by Russia.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Meanwhile, Ukraine’s main intelligence agency claims Russia is recruiting unwitting Ukrainian teenagers to carry out terrorist attacks.
Russian intelligence agencies are promising children easy money on social media for delivering packages, which are remotely detonated, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said.
The SBU said the Russian Federal Security Service used a 15-year-old boy as an “assassin” in Kharkiv and killed a teenager in Ivano-Frankivsk, western Ukraine.
Sky News cannot independently verify these claims.
These are the main aspects of the deal set out by the US:
• The US and Russia have agreed to safe navigation in the Black Sea, which had been a key focus of talks this week • Additionally, they agreed to work together on measures banning strikes on energy infrastructure in Russia and Ukraine • Washington will also help to restore Russia’s access to global markets for agricultural and fertiliser exports, the White House said – although where this leaves Western sanctions against Russia is unclear at this stage.
The US also said it has agreed it will remain committed to returning forcibly transferred Ukrainian children.
Ukraine’s defence minister Rustem Umerov confirmed the agreement, but added that Kyiv maintains any movement by Russian military vessels outside of eastern part of the Black Sea will constitute violation of the spirit of this agreement.
“In this case Ukraine will have full right to exercise right to self-defence,” he said.
He added: “All parties agreed to develop measures for implementing the presidents’ agreement to ban strikes against energy facilities of Ukraine and Russia.”
The Kremlin has confirmed that it has agreed to the ceasefire but there has been a disagreement over the timing and conditions.
While Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he understood the ceasefire would start immediately after the US announcement, Moscow has countered, saying it will only come into force after Western sanctions are lifted against companies involved in food and fertiliser exports.
Datawrapper
This content is provided by Datawrapper, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Datawrapper cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Datawrapper cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Datawrapper cookies for this session only.
He says Russia will be quite happy dragging the US through peace talks without making any meaningful concessions.
The deal is one the US “can boast about” – without it changing much on the ground for Ukraine, he says.
“The Russians will be quite happy about that because they’ll just keep going down more and more rabbit holes and they’ll present little gains for the US,” he explains.
“But they won’t address the central issue,” he says.
No real deal can be agreed unless Donald Trump starts putting meaningful pressure on Vladimir Putin, he says.
Image: A Ukrainian patrol boat in the Black Sea in 2024. Pic: Reuters
“Unless the Americans are prepared to pressure Russia as opposed to just keeping offering them more advantages, the war will just go on.”
He also says Mr Trump will stay interested until it “gets difficult”, at which point he’ll “just go onto something else”.
“He’s a disrupter, but when disruption becomes hard to follow through, he goes on to the next topic, and I think that’s what will happen.”
Why is Russia willing to agree to a ceasefire at sea now?
Under the ceasefire at sea, Russia would once again be able to export farm produce and fertiliser through the Black Sea, getting relief from sanctions imposed by Western countries.
The US even referred to helping Russia access the world market again for agricultural products in its statement.
According to Prof Clarke, Russia is happy to continue fighting on land, where it is slowly making gains, while signing up to something that protects its ships at sea – where Ukraine has been growing in confidence and damaging Russian vessels.
And it helps with Russia’s goal of getting its equipment out of the Black Sea.
Today’s agreement has come in the midst of negotiations between Russia, the US and Ukraine in Riyadh in recent days centred on the Black Sea.
But the basis of the negotiations was a deal to secure shipping there that collapsed more than 18 months ago.
That UN-backed deal was negotiated in July 2022 between Turkey, the UN and Russia as a way of ensuring that Ukraine, one of the breadbaskets of the world, could keep exporting grain via its southern ports without being attacked.
It was known as the Black Sea grain initiative.
That deal benefited Russia, as it also allowed for greater Russian agricultural exports – but but Moscow pulled out of the initiative in July 2023 after accusing the West of reneging on this part of the agreement.
This meant Russia stopped granting safe passage to cargo ships going to and from Ukraine, and the country’s grain exports subsequently slumped.
But Russia is now said to be keen to revive parts of the grain deal.
What happened the last time Ukraine and Russia had a ceasefire agreement?
Last week, Mr Putin agreed to an immediate 30-day pause in strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure.
However, within 24 hours Ukraine and Russia accused the other of breaking the pledge.
World Athletics will introduce mandatory testing for anyone entering female competitions to verify their biological sex, insisting they are necessary to protect women’s sport.
Lord Coe said after a World Athletics Council meeting today that they could adopt non-invasive cheek swab tests or dry blood tests that only have to be carried out once on an athlete.
“This we feel is a really important way of providing confidence and maintaining that absolute focus on the integrity of competition,” he said.
The tests would seek to verify if someone has transitioned to a female after going through male puberty or if they had differences of sex development that provided testosterone advantages.
Testing providers are now being sought.
Lord Coe said: “The pre-clearance testing will be for athletes to be able to compete in the female category.
“The process is very straightforward frankly, very clear and it’s an important one and we will work on the timelines.
“Neither of these are invasive. They are necessary and they will be done to absolute medical standards.”
It follows US President Donald Trump, ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, saying there are only two sexes – male and female – while calling on sports to ban transgender women from women’s events.
The International Olympic Committee has previously called a return to sex testing a “bad idea”, but incoming IOC President Kirsty Coventry is not ruling it out, having also talked about protecting the female category.
“This is a conversation that’s happened and the international federations have taken a far greater lead in this conversation,” she told Sky News after her election last week.
“What I was proposing is to bring a group together with the international federations and really understand each sport is slightly different.
“We know in equestrian, sex is really not an issue, but in other sports it is.
“So what I’d like to do again is bring the international federations together and sit down and try and come up with a collective way forward for all of us to move.”
Reem Alsalem, the UN’s special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, last year called on the IOC to reintroduce sex testing or female athletes to protect them from injuries amid concerns about eligibility.
The IOC introduced “certificates of femininity” at the 1968 Mexico Games. But those chromosome-based tests were deemed unscientific and unethical and dropped ahead of Sydney 2000.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Former FIFA president Sepp Blatter and France football legend Michel Platini have been cleared of fraud for a second time.
The former FIFA president and former UEFA president were accused of fraud, forgery, mismanagement and misappropriation of more than $2m (£1.5m) of FIFAmoney in 2011.
The attorney general’s office in Switzerland had challenged a first acquittal in July 2022 and asked for sentences of 20 months, suspended for two years.
Blatter, 89, and Platini, 69, once among the most powerful figures in football, have consistently denied wrongdoing.
Image: Former UEFA President Michel Platini. Pic: Reuters
They were cleared of fraud at the Extraordinary Appeals Chamber of the Swiss Criminal Court in the town of Muttenz, near Basel.
Blatter approved FIFA paying 2m Swiss francs (now $2.21m) to France football great Platini in February 2011 for supplementary and non-contracted salary working as a presidential adviser from 1998 to 2002.
The Swiss federal investigation emerged in September 2015 as Platini was a strong favourite to succeed his one-time mentor in an upcoming election.
More on Fifa
Related Topics:
The probe kicked off events which would ultimately bring to an end the careers of Blatter and Platini.
Though federal court trials have twice cleared their names, Blatter’s reputation will likely always be tied to leading FIFA during corruption crises that took down a swath of senior football officials worldwide.
Platini, one of football’s greatest players and later Blatter’s protégé in football politics, never got the FIFA presidency he aspired to.