Connect with us

Published

on

Remember “securonomics”? It was the buzzword Rachel Reeves gave to her economic philosophy back before the election.

The idea was that in the late 2020s, the old ideas about the way we run the economy would or should give way to a new model.

For a long time, we ignored where something was made and by whom and just ordered it in from the cheapest source. For a long time, we ignored the security consequences of where we got our energy from. The upshot of these assumptions was that over time, we allowed our manufacturing base to become hollowed out, unable to compete with cheap imports from China. We allowed our energy system to become ever more dependent on cheap Russian gas.

Money blog: Supermarket puts buying limit on new Lindt version of viral chocolate

The whole point of securonomics was that it matters where something is made and who owns it. And not just that – that revitalising manufacturing and energy could help revitalise “left-behind” corners of the economy, places like the Midlands and the North East.

Back when she came up with the coinage, Joe Biden was in power and was pumping billions of dollars into the US economy via the Inflation Reduction Act – a scheme designed to encourage green tech investment. So securonomics looked a little like the British version of Bidenomics.

That’s the key point: the “security” part of “securonomics” was mostly about energy security and supply chain security rather than about defence.

More on Defence

But when Rachel Reeves became chancellor, it looked for a period as if securonomics was dead on arrival. Most glaringly, Labour dramatically trimmed back the ambition and scale of its green investment plans.

But roll on a year or so, and we all know what happened next.

A new era

The Democrats lost, Donald Trump won, came into office and swiftly triggered a chain reaction that panicked everyone in Europe into investing more in defence. Today, much of the focus among investors is not on net zero but on defence.

All of which is to say, securonomics might be about to resurface, but in a markedly different guise. In the spring statement, I expect the chancellor to bring back this buzzword, but this time, the emphasis will not be on green tech but on something else: the defence sector.

Expect to hear about weapons

This time around, the chancellor will say securonomics 2.0, which is to say government investment in the defence sector will also bring an economic windfall, as old naval ports like Plymouth and Portsmouth see regeneration. This time, the focus will not be on solar and wind but on submarines and weapons.

Whether this rendition of securonomics is any more successful than the last remains to be seen. For the chancellor hardly has an enormous amount of money left to invest. While this week’s event is billed as a mere forecast update, the reality, when you take a step back, is more serious.

Read more:
What do you need to know about the spring statement

The chancellor will have to acknowledge that, without remedial action, she would have broken her fiscal rules. She will have to confirm significant changes to policy to rebuild the “headroom” against these rules. These will stop short of tax rises. Instead, the spending envelope in future years will be trimmed (think 1.1% or so spending increases rather than 1.3% or 1.4%). Those welfare reforms announced last week will bring in a bit of extra cash. And thanks to an accounting quirk, the decision (announced a few weeks ago) to shift development spending into defence will also give her a bit more space against her rules.

The austerity question

But even these changes will raise further awkward questions: is this or is this not austerity? Certainly, for some departments, that spending cut will involve further significant sacrifices. Are those benefits gains really achievable, and at what cost? And, most ominously, what if the chancellor has to come back to parliament in another six months and admit she’s broken her rules all over again?

The return of securonomics might be the theme she wants to focus on in the coming months – but that, too, depends on having money to invest – and the UK’s fiscal position looks as tight as ever.

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk’s dad says Tesla protesters are ‘bums’

Published

on

By

Elon Musk's dad says Tesla protesters are 'bums'

Elon Musk’s father has told Sky News that protesters targeting his son’s cost-cutting work for the US government are “bums”.

Errol Musk was responding, in an interview with Business Live, to a growing backlash among US taxpayers and Tesla customers against his son’s role in the Trump administration-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

The electric car firm has increasingly become the subject of sales boycotts and protests – neither of which have been consigned to the US though dealerships there have seen vehicles vandalised and even set alight.

Money latest: Major car tax change on Tuesday – here’s what you need to know

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Elon Musk has got to go’

Musk Sr told presenter Darren McCaffrey: “To take notice of the bums that are trying to hurt Tesla by damaging cars, well that’s just plain silly. Nobody does that, you know, you use your brain… and (it) tells you these people are the problem, not the car.”

The anger directed at Elon Musk was “media hype”, he said as he also dismissed growing unease among Tesla investors that his son’s main business interest was suffering at a time when the challenges facing it are only rising.

Earlier this month one of Tesla’s earliest investors, Ross Gerber, told Sky News Mr Musk should step down as the electric carmaker’s chief executive unless he quit his work for the Trump administration.

More on Elon Musk

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I think Tesla needs a new CEO’

His worries included bad publicity and Mr Musk’s ability to devote enough time to Tesla.

It was revealed last week that Tesla sales had fallen 40% in Europe and were behind those of cheaper Chinese rival BYD on an annual basis.

Mr Musk himself has since warned he expects a “significant” hit to Tesla from Mr Trump’s metal tariffs and looming duties on all US car imports and car parts.

He also hinted at the weekend, in an interview with Fox News, that he could soon have more time on his hands as the bulk of his work at DOGE should be completed by late May.

Errol Musk denied any suggestion that his son was overstretched, saying there were good people at Tesla to delegate day-to-day business while Elon completed “vital work” for US taxpayers, given the state of the country’s mounting debt pile.

“He’s got plenty of ability to do that. Don’t worry about it,” he said, while predicting that Tesla shares would recover to $600 per share by the year’s end. They are currently changing hands for $254.

“There’s no concern there whatsoever, not at all,” he said.

Continue Reading

Business

Post Office interim boss Brocklehurst lined up for permanent role

Published

on

By

Post Office interim boss Brocklehurst lined up for permanent role

The acting chief executive of the Post Office is being lined up to take the job on a permanent basis as the state-owned company continues talks with ministers over its long-term funding arrangements.

Sky News has learnt that Neil Brocklehurst, who was named interim chief last September, is close to being handed the role.

Whitehall sources said on Monday that an announcement about Mr Brocklehurst’s appointment was likely to be made in April.

Money latest: Major car tax change on Tuesday – here’s what you need to know

The decision, which requires the approval of business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, will bring a degree of stability to an organisation still grappling with the financial and reputational consequences of the Horizon IT scandal, which saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted of fraud and false accounting.

Reliant on the government for its funding, the Post Office has been in negotiations with ministers about delivering a previously pledged pay uplift this year.

Earlier this month, Sky News reported that Nigel Railton, the company’s chairman, had informed thousands of Post Office managers that he had yet to gain certainty from Whitehall about a £120m increase for this year.

More from Money

The sum was promised in November as part of a strategy to rebuild the Post Office in the wake of the Horizon scandal.

The Post Office has outlined plans for an ambitious transformation which includes franchising more than 100 directly managed branches.

Nick Read, chief executive of Post Office Ltd, arrives to give evidence to the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry at Aldwych House, central London. Picture date: Wednesday October 9, 2024.
Image:
It was announced last year that Nick Read would leave the Post Office in March

A substantial number of jobs are also being cut at the company’s head office as part of the restructuring.

Several tranches of those have already taken place.

Mr Brocklehurst replaced Nick Read at the Post Office’s helm following a turbulent period for the outgoing boss.

Mr Read was repeatedly accused of being obsessed with his pay arrangements and being at the centre of a series of rows with both board colleagues and his government employers.

Like Mr Railton, Mr Brocklehurst is a former executive at Camelot, the previous National Lottery operator.

A Post Office spokesman declined to comment, while the Department for Business and Trade has been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Primark boss Paul Marchant resigns and admits ‘error of judgement’ after allegation over his behaviour towards woman

Published

on

By

Primark boss Paul Marchant resigns and admits 'error of judgement' after allegation over his behaviour towards woman

The boss of Primark has resigned after admitting an “error of judgement” in his behaviour towards a woman in a social environment.

Paul Marchant stepped down as chief executive of the high-street fashion brand with immediate effect following an investigation.

Primark‘s parent firm, Associated British Foods (ABF), said he had co-operated with the investigation, and “acknowledged his error of judgment and accepts that his actions fell below the standards expected by ABF”.

“He has made an apology to the individual concerned, the ABF board and also to his Primark colleagues and others connected to the business,” the firm added.

The group’s overall chief executive George Weston said he is “immensely disappointed”.

“At ABF, we believe that high standards of integrity are essential,” he said in a statement.

“Acting responsibly is the only way to build and manage a business over the long term.

“Colleagues and others must be treated with respect and dignity.

“Our culture has to be, and is, bigger than any one individual.”

ABF’s finance director Eoin Tonge will take over as chief executive on an “interim basis” – and his role will be taken up by Joana Edwards, the group’s financial controller.

Read more from Sky News
WH Smith to disappear from High Street
Blackwall Tunnell charges to start
What it’s really like to be a bodyguard

A Primark store. Pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

The group’s statement added it “seeks to provide a safe, respectful, and inclusive work environment where all employees and third parties are treated with dignity and respect”.

“Primark is committed to doing business the right way at all levels of the company,” it said.

ABF promised to continue supporting the woman who made the complaint.

Primark results due soon

The group will still publish its interim results for the financial year as planned on 29 April, according to its statement.

In January, ABF reported an uncharacteristic decline in like-for-like sales at Primark across the UK and Ireland.

Sales at the store fell by 6% – with Primark saying it expects “low single-digit” sales growth for 2025 as a result – down from mid single-digit levels in November 2024.

Speaking at the time, Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said: “If Primark is struggling, you know the UK retail sector is in trouble.”

Continue Reading

Trending