Connect with us

Published

on

European nationals will soon have to get an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) if they want to visit the UK.

The ETA scheme was introduced in 2023 for non-European nationals – including those from the USA, Canada and Australia.

The UK government, which says the scheme strengthens the immigration system’s security, is now rolling it out for eligible Europeans, who will need an ETA to travel to the UK from 2 April.

Here’s what you need to know about who needs one and how much it costs to apply

What is an ETA and who needs one?

An ETA is a digital permission to travel to the UK. It is not a visa and does not permit entry into the UK – it authorises a person to travel.

Upon being approved, it is attached digitally to the traveller’s passport.

All travellers who do not require a visa to enter the UK for a short stay, or who don’t already have a UK immigration status, are required to have one.

You also do not need an ETA if:

  • you have a visa
  • you have permission to live, work or study in the UK (including settled or pre-settled status or right of abode)
  • you are transiting through a UK airport and you will not pass through border control – check with your airline if you are not sure
  • you are a British or Irish citizen
  • you are travelling with a British overseas territories citizen passport
  • you are travelling with a British National (Overseas) passport
  • you live in Ireland and you are travelling from Ireland, Guernsey, Jersey or the Isle of Man
  • you are a child travelling on the France-UK school trip travel information form
  • you are exempt from immigration control
The new King Charles III UK passport, at the Home Office, central London. Picture date: Tuesday July 18, 2023.
Image:
Pic: PA

What if you are a dual citizen?

If you are a dual citizen with British or Irish citizenship, you do not need an ETA.

You can prove you are allowed to travel using a valid British or Irish passport or another valid passport containing a certificate of entitlement.

How much does it cost?

The ETA costs £10 – however, the government has said it intends to raise that to £16 from April.

How to apply for an ETA and how long it takes

The best way to obtain an ETA is through the UK ETA app, but you can also apply through the government’s website.

It usually takes minutes to receive a decision on an application when sent through the app.

However, people are advised to leave at least three working days for a decision as a “small number” of cases need further review.

The application involves paying the fee, providing contact and passport details, providing a valid photo and answering a set of questions.

Visitors must then ensure the passport they use to travel is the same one used to complete the ETA application.

What if my ETA isn’t approved before travel?

As long as you apply before travelling, you can travel to the UK while waiting for a decision on your ETA.

What happens if my application is rejected?

If an application is rejected, the individual will be told the reason and they can apply again.

If it is refused, they cannot appeal – and instead would need to apply for a visa if they still wish to travel to the UK.

Do I need an ETA for transit?

An ETA won’t be needed if you don’t pass through border control while transiting through a UK airport.

The government recommends checking with your airline if you are uncertain.

Read more from Sky News:
What would peace in Ukraine look like?
Gisele Pelicot’s son relives moment he discovered his father was a monster

How long will the ETA last?

An ETA lasts two years. It allows for multiple journeys and for stays of up to six months at a time over two years or until the holder’s passport expires – whichever is sooner.

How does it help UK border security?

The Home Office has said that those applying for an ETA will have to provide their biographic, biometric and contact details, and answer a short set of questions on suitability and criminality.

The aim is that this information will increase knowledge about those seeking to come to the UK and prevent the arrival of those who present a threat.

Continue Reading

UK

Major incident declared in Birmingham as ‘17,000 tonnes’ of rubbish piles up

Published

on

By

Major incident declared in Birmingham as '17,000 tonnes' of rubbish piles up

A major incident has been declared in Birmingham over an ongoing bin strike, which has left around 17,000 tonnes of waste on the streets of the city.

Birmingham City Council said the “regrettable” step was taken in response to public health concerns, with picket lines blocking depots and preventing waste vehicles from collecting rubbish.

Members of Unite have been on all-out strike since 11 March in a row over pay, which the union claims will leave some members of staff £8,000 worse off. A series of walkouts have also impacted refuse collections since January.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

By declaring a major incident, the council will be able to increase the availability of street cleansing and fly-tip removal with an additional 35 vehicles and crews around the city.

This action will also allow the council to explore what further support is available from neighbouring authorities and the government to assist in the management of the situation.

Council leader John Cotton said it was a “regrettable” step, but the situation was “causing harm and distress” to local people.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Birmingham suffers bin crisis

“I respect the right to strike and protest, however actions on the picket line must be lawful and sadly the behaviour of some now means we are seeing a significant impact on residents and the city’s environment,” he said.

Jim McMahon, the minister for local government, said the all-out strike by Unite members is causing “misery and disruption” to residents, as well as posing a “public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived”.

He said the government “stands ready” to respond to any request for extra resources, but insisted that any deal to end the bin strike must “maintain value for money”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘They can’t hold the city to ransom’

Mr McMahon told the Commons: “This is causing a public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived residents. As a result, I am aware that Birmingham has today declared a major incident to give them the mechanisms to better manage the impact on local residents.

“I support that decision, and I will back local leaders.”

The minister added that the government will “not hesitate to give support in any way that Birmingham leaders need”.

He said: “If local leaders on the ground in Birmingham feel that tackling these issues goes beyond the resources available to them and they request national support, then of course we stand ready to respond to any such request.”

Members of the Unite union met with Birmingham City Council last Thursday, but talks have so far failed.

Unite says the dispute will not end unless the “hugely damaging” cuts to bin collectors’ wages are reversed.

But Birmingham City Council says the aim of the restructuring is to create a “modern, sustainable and consistently reliable waste collection service”.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Extensive search’ under way for 11-year-old girl who fell into River Thames

Published

on

By

'Extensive search' under way for 11-year-old girl who fell into River Thames

An “extensive search” is under way to find an 11-year-old girl after she fell into the River Thames in east London.

The Metropolitan Police said it was called at around 1.15pm on Monday to reports the girl had entered the river near Barge House Causeway, near London City Airport.

All emergency services are forming a “large-scale response” to the incident.

The girl’s next of kin have been made aware and are being supported by officers.

The London Ambulance Service was also called at a similar time, after receiving a report of a person in the water at Lowestoft Mews, which is close to the airport.

“We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an advanced paramedic, an incident response officer and members of our hazardous area response team,” a spokesperson said.

“Our crews assisted our emergency services partners at the scene but were later stood down.”

London Fire Brigade Deputy Assistant Commissioner Joseph Kenny added that “firefighters responded to reports of a person in the River Thames near Lowestoft Mews, Newham”.

He said crews from East Ham, Barking, Ilford and Bexley fire stations were sent to the scene alongside other emergency services.

“The brigade also deployed its drone team and fire boat as part of its response, with crews carrying out a systematic search of the area,” he added.

“The brigade was first called about the incident at 1.23pm. Search operations for firefighters were concluded at 3.49pm when responsibility for the incident was left with the police.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Sentencing guidelines for ethnic minority suspects delayed after backlash

Published

on

By

Sentencing guidelines for ethnic minority suspects delayed after backlash

Controversial sentencing guidelines that were due to come into force on Tuesday have been delayed after a political backlash.

The Sentencing Council, the independent body that sets out sentencing guidance to courts in England and Wales, was due to bring in new rules around how judges should determine punishment for people from ethnic minority backgrounds.

The new guidance states that a pre-sentence report – the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence – will “usually be necessary” before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, had said the proposed guidance was “unacceptable” and amounted to “differential treatment before the law” as she urged the council to reverse it.

When the Sentencing Council initially refused her request, Ms Mahmood threatened to legislate to overturn the guidance if necessary.

She confirmed this evening that she would introduce legislation on Tuesday to block these guidelines coming into effect.

More on Ministry Of Justice

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Robert Jenrick has hit out at what he says is

The Sentencing Council has now delayed the “in force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect”.

It said in a statement that the council “remains of the view that its guideline, imposition of community and custodial sentences, as drafted is necessary and appropriate”.

However, in a meeting between the chairman Lord Justice Davis and Ms Mahmood on Monday, the minister “indicated her intention to introduce legislation imminently that would have the effect of rendering the section on ‘cohorts’ in the guideline unlawful”.

The council said it is unable to introduce a guideline when there is a draft bill due for introduction that would make it unlawful.

Ms Mahmood said: “This differential treatment is unacceptable – equality before the law is the backbone of public confidence in our justice system. I will change the law to ensure fairness for all in our courts.”

The Sentencing Council also attracted criticism from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who said its updated guidance was an example of “two-tier justice” that would lead to “blatant bias” against Christians and straight white men.

He also argued that it would make “a custodial sentence less likely for those from an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community” – something the council denied.

The council previously rejected calls from the government to abandon the guidelines, which ask judges to consider offenders’ racial, cultural and religious background when deciding a sentence.

Lord Davis denied that pre-sentence reports reduced the prospect of a jail sentence.

However, he said the council would provide “some clarification of the language” to avoid confusion.

Continue Reading

Trending