World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family’s crypto project, is planning to release a stablecoin, raising concern over the US president’s exposure to the digital asset industry.

The project released a memecoin immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the price of which skyrocketed and crashed soon after, causing many to accuse WLFI of a pump-and-dump scheme.

WLFI also made multimillion-dollar purchases of crypto tokens immediately prior to important crypto-related events the president has attended or announcements influencing the industry. WLFI purchased $20 million of various tokens ahead of the March 7 White House Crypto Summit. 

As World Liberty Financial’s portfolio grows and regulator oversight disappears from the crypto industry, observers and legal scholars are becoming increasingly concerned over conflicts of interest within the Trump administration. 

Trump’s stablecoin, USD1, riddled with liabilities 

WLFI announced on March 25 that it will launch the new stablecoin USD1, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents.”

WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff said in the announcement that the coin can be used for “seamless, secure cross-border transactions.” 

News of USD1’s forthcoming release came just days after WLFI secured more than $500 million through the sale of its own WLFI tokens. 

Observers have already begun to raise the alarm about the possible security risks posed by a stablecoin connected to the president. There are also concerns over the possibility of market manipulation and violations of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution — a section of the document that protects against undue influence over American leaders. 

As regards the latter, cyber and digital media attorney Andrew Rossow told Cointelegraph that the stablecoin is “a direct affront to constitutional safeguards meant to prevent conflicts of interest.”

“With Trump and his family controlling 60% of World Liberty’s equity interests, the USD1 stablecoin could facilitate indirect financial gains or undue foreign influence over US policy, particularly if foreign entities invest in or use the stablecoin.”

Corey Frayer, who worked on crypto policy at the Securities and Exchange Commission under former President Joe Biden, said that the project’s emphasis on cross-border payments was particularly worrisome and that foreign entities may invest as a way to gain favor with Trump.

“There’s a lot of opacity around this marketplace, and prior relationships with illicit finance,” Frayer told The New York Times. 

US policymakers have already noted the possibility for foreign influence following the launch of Trump’s eponymous memecoin in January.

At the time, Democratic Representative Maxine Waters — a top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee — wrote that “anyone globally, even individuals who have been sanctioned by the U.S. or banned from our capital markets, can now trade and profit off of $TRUMP through various unregulated platforms.”

Related: Congress repealed the IRS broker rule, but can it regulate DeFi?

In addition to potential foreign influence, observers are concerned that Trump’s crypto ventures could threaten market stability and integrity and open up global markets to manipulation. 

Referencing USD1, Heath Mayo, founder of the Trump-alternative conservative movement Principles First, said that a sitting president issuing an instrument backed by public debt should be illegal, adding that the project had “terrible incentives and corrupt use of US taxpayer credit.”

Rossow said that the president’s role in a stablecoin project while at the same time working to craft stablecoin legislation in the form of the GENIUS Act is “a constitutional violation that could destabilize regulatory integrity.”

Trump’s influence over the industry and ability to drop enforcement actions against crypto executives who support him create “an uneven playing field, disadvantaging competitors and violating principles of equal protection under the law.”

Options for Trump’s crypto conflicts of interest

Trump, who has long stated an affinity with former President Andrew Jackson, seems to be holding to the latter’s strategy of acknowledging judicial rulings — and then doing what he wants regardless. 

The presidential administration has already shown that it is willing to defy orders from federal judges when, earlier this month, it ignored a verbal order from a federal judge to turn around two planes full of alleged gang members bound for the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

Regarding crypto, Senator Elizabeth Warren has already called for an ethics probe into Trump’s crypto activities. She said that the president’s memecoin “massively enriched Trump personally, enabled a mechanism for the crypto industry to funnel cash to him, and created a volatile financial asset that allows anyone in the world to financially speculate on Trump’s political fortunes.”

The probe, if it had a chance to begin with, doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere, and Congressional Republicans are busy working on the GENIUS Act, which even has the support of a handful of Democrats. 

What, if anything, can be done?

Rossow said that, despite changes in SEC leadership, other agencies like the Financial Crime Enforcement Network could still pursue investigations. 

He also noted that state-level action from local regulators and attorneys general is “not just possible but imperative, especially in states with robust consumer protection laws.”

He added that international regulatory bodies could exert pressure, stating that the “global nature” of crypto means that foreign governments could work for better oversight and more robust regulations. 

Related: Who’s running in Trump’s race to make US a ‘Bitcoin superpower?’

In any case, he said that the current situation demands multifaceted action, as there is currently a need to “safeguard the principles of fair governance and maintain the US’s credibility in the global financial system.”

Some in the crypto industry see no problem at all and believe the president’s involvement is just another sign of how the industry is reaching mainstream appeal. 

Chris Barrett, senior director of communications at Chainlink, congratulated the project, stating that “the global financial world runs on the U.S. dollar, and stablecoins are about to make that even harder to change.”

Arnoud Star Busmann, CEO of European stablecoin issuer Quantoz Payments, told Cointelegraph that USD1 is reflective of “increasing validation from world-leading brands that stablecoins are carving the path for the mainstream financial industry to access crypto assets and tokenized real-world assets.”

The Blockchain Association — an industry lobby group — declined Cointelegraph’s request for comment. 

Magazine: Arbitrum co-founder skeptical of move to based and native rollups: Steven Goldfeder